Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:Q99581 (FEV)
 3,296 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study compared the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP [QVAR]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 0. 8-1.2 m) versus cholorofluorocarbon-11/12 BDP (CFC-BDP [Beclovent]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 3.5-4.0 m) in 31 steroid naive patients with mild to moderate asthma (PC(20,) 4 mg/mL). Functional high-resolution computed tomography was used to assess the relative efficacy of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on regional air trapping, as an indirect measure of small airways function and on regional hyperreactivity. Pretreatment functional computed tomography was performed at residual volume before and after methacholine challenge. After 4 weeks of treatment, functional imaging was repeated before and after the same concentration of methacholine that was administered before the treatment (n = 19 patients). Quantitative assessment of changes in distribution of lung attenuation was performed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the HFA-BDP group showed significantly more improvement in air trapping overall (a shift in the lung attenuation curve at residual volume toward more attenuation) on the posttreatment computed tomography scan (P <.05; Fisher's Exact Test). After an equal constrictor stimulus (methacholine concentration), subjects treated with HFA-BDP (n = 10 patients) showed less increase in air trapping overall than subjects treated with CFC-BDP (n = 9 patients) on the posttreatment scans compared with the pretreatment scans (P <.001; Fisher's Exact Test). No significant difference was demonstrated between the 2 treatment groups with respect to improvement in symptoms, spirometry, or methacholine responsiveness assessed by FEV(1), except for a greater reduction in breathlessness in the HFA-BDP group (P <.05). We conclude that HFA-BDP may have greater efficacy in the peripheral airways and that this effect is better assessed with functional imaging computed tomography techniques than with conventional physiologic tests.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. 1058 87

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of BDP 200 microg bid via metered dose inhaler, using HFA-134a (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) versus CFC (Becotide, Allen & Hanburys, U.K.) as a propellant. 172 adult patients (86 in each group) with stable mild persistent asthma who completed a 7-day run-in period were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment in a double-blind, double dummy, parallel-group design; 164 patients completed the study. Morning and evening PEFR, use of rescue salbutamol, number of day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of night-time awakenings and clinical symptoms were recorded daily on a diary card. Pulmonary function tests (FEV(1), FVC, PEFR, and MEF(50)) were measured at the clinic before and after the 1-week run-in period, and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. A challenge test with inhaled methacholine was completed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period to assess potential bronchial hyper-reactivity in a subgroup of subjects (n = 65; 34 HFA, 31 CFC). In accordance with asthma of mild severity (FEV(1) predicted over 90% in both groups), a small improvement in lung function compared to baseline was seen for both treatments, significantly for FEV(1) in BDP HFA and MEF(50) in both groups. The two formulations of BDP had similar efficacy for the primary outcome variable morning PEFR (ITT population mean difference 5.8 L/min; C.I. -4.9 to +16.5) as well as for the secondary outcomes of evening PEFR and clinic FEV(1). There were small improvements in methacholine PD(20) and PC20 in both groups, with no significant difference between treatments. A total of 22 and 19 drug-related adverse events were reported in the BDP HFA and CFC groups, respectively; most events were of seasonal nature or were local effects due to the use of inhaled corticosteroids. It can be concluded that the newly developed formulation of BDP given via HFA-134a seems to provide similar asthma control, compared with the same low daily dose of the active drug delivered via CFC. Further studies are needed using higher doses in moderate to severe asthma to confirm these preliminary findings.
 ...
PMID:Effects on lung function, symptoms, and bronchial hyperreactivity of low-dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate given with HFA-134a or CFC propellant. 1258 7