Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:Q86TM3 (cage)
 29,987 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

BAK-C is a new autostabilizing interbody cage which is implanted during an anterior cervical procedure to provide stability to the motion segment and allow fusion to occur. Special instrumentation is provided with a bone collecting reamer. The system utilizes surgical site bone graft as the osteo-inductive material within the implant. Biomechanical testing indicates improved stability and animal studies show good fusion. The basic principle is distraction-compression using the tension forces of the annulus fibrosus. Operative material concerns a two years experience with 80 patients (101 levels), 72 with cervical radiculopathy, 8 with myelopathy. Clinical evaluation is assessed on a ten point analogue pain scale for neck and arm/shoulder pain, with neurological examination. Radiological evaluation includes dynamic X-rays, myelo-CT and MRI. Patients are re-evaluated at 1, 6, 12 months postoperatively. Results for neck and radicular pain is excellent, but neurological recovery for radiculopathy and myelopathy is quite different. Radiological results are also good with (except one case) no instability, no cage migration, no kyphosis, no pseudarthrosis. Bone fusion is assessed at 6 and 12 months. Complications are few with proper technique, mainly correct distraction, symmetrical endplate drilling and lateral X-ray control. Only one patient needed an early re-operation with additional miniplate fixation. Immediate stability with good clinical response and no graft morbidity are the advantages of this implant compared to conventional cervical interbody grafting techniques.
 ...
PMID:Anterior interbody fusion with the BAK-cage in cervical spondylosis. 952

Surgical treatment for internal disc disruption remains controversial in terms of efficacy of spinal fusion and optimal fusion method. The present study was carried out in 56 consecutive patients, with the diagnosis confirmed by computed tomographic (CT) discography, who were operated with one of four different lumbar fusion procedures. Outcomes were determined by postoperative pain questionnaires, independent clinical assessment, and radiographic evaluation. Simultaneous anterior interbody fusion using BAK cage and posterior facet fusion provided the highest rate of fusion (88%) and clinical satisfaction (63%). Pain scores were also significantly lower than facet screw augmented posterolateral fusion, and anterior interbody fusion with fibula allograft, but not significantly different from pedicle screw instrumented posterolateral fusion. Patients who achieved successful lumbar fusion had better clinical outcomes and a better chance of work resumption.
 ...
PMID:Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion techniques. 981 Oct 96

The immediate stabilization provided by anterior interbody cage fixation is often questioned. Therefore, the role of supplementary posterior fixation, particularly minimally invasive techniques such as translaminar screws, is relevant. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to determine the immediate three-dimensional flexibility of the lumbar spine, using six human cadaveric functional spinal units, in four different conditions: (1) intact, (2) fixed with translaminar screws (TLS), (3) instrumented with anterior interbody cage insertion with the BAK system and (4) instrumented with BAK cage with additional TLS fixation. Flexibility was determined in each testing condition by measuring the vertebral motions under applied pure moments (i.e. flexion-extension, bilateral axial rotation, bilateral lateral bending) in an unconstrained manner. Anterior fixation with the BAK alone provided significant stability in flexion and lateral bending. Additional posterior TLS significantly reduced the motion in extension and axial rotation. TLS fixation alone resulted in smaller rotations than BAK fixation in all loading directions. Based on these results, it seems that interbody cage fixation with the BAK system stabilizes the spine in some, but not all, loading directions. The problematic loading directions of extension and axial rotation can be substantially stabilized by using translaminar screw fixation. However, one should emphasize that the degree of stability needed to achieve solid fusion is not known.
 ...
PMID:The role of supplemental translaminar screws in anterior lumbar interbody fixation: a biomechanical study. 984 Apr 74

The coincidental development of minimal intervention techniques for carrying out anterior lumbar spinal fusion and the introduction of cages to provide mechanical support of introduced bone graft led to the development of a type of cage suitable for both minimal intervention use (laparoscopic) and for the standard open procedure (the BAK cage). Reported results concentrated in the main on feasibility, safety and fusion rate achieved, rather than clinical outcome. Laparoscopic insertion at the lumbosacral level was as safe as if the procedure was an open one, although there was a slighter higher incidence of retrograde ejaculation. Immediate post-operative morbidity was less with the laparoscopic procedure and discharge home and return to work was earlier. There was no long-term benefit from the laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic insertion at the L4/5 level was attended by a greater incidence of complications, and had a longer learning curve.
 ...
PMID:Cages: outcome and complications. 1076 66

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages are expected to reduce segmental mobility. Current ALIF cages have different designs, suggesting differences in initial stability. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of different stand-alone ALIF cage constructs and cage-related features on initial segmental stability. Human multisegmental specimens were tested intact and with an instrumented L3/4 disc level. Five different ALIF cages (I/F, BAK, TIS, SynCage, and ScrewCage) were tested non-destructively in axial rotation, flexion/extension and lateral bending. A cage 'pull-out' concluded testing. Changes in neutral zone (NZ) and range of motion (ROM) were analyzed. Cage-related measurements normalized to vertebral dimensions were used to predict NZ and ROM. No cage construct managed to reduce NZ. The BAK and TIS cages had the largest NZ increase in flexion/extension and lateral bending, respectively. Cages did reduce ROM in all loading directions. The TIS cage was the least effective in reducing the ROM in lateral bending. Cages with sharp teeth had higher 'pull-out' forces. Antero-posterior and mediolateral cage dimensions, cage height and wedge angle were found to influence initial stability. The performance of stand-alone ALIF cage constructs generally increased the NZ in any loading direction, suggesting potential directions of initial segmental instability that may lead to permanent deformity. Differences between cages in flexion/extension and lateral bending NZ are attributed to the severity of geometrical cage-endplate surface mismatch. Stand-alone cage constructs reduced ROM effectively, but the residual ROM present indicates the presence of micromotion at the cage-endplate interface.
 ...
PMID:Biomechanical stability of five stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion constructs. 1076 72

Two cases of cervical discopathy operated on with anterior interbody fusion with the BAK-cage are described. The authors stress the advantages of this kind of stabilization: shorter time of the operation, no bone graft complication, immediate stabilization without collar. The technical procedures of BAK-cage implantation, indications and exclusion criteria are discussed.
 ...
PMID:[Anterior interbody fusion of cervical spine with BAK-C: case reports]. 1096 29

Interbody fusion cages are small hollow implants that are inserted into the intervertebral space to restore physiological disc height and to allow bony fusion. They sometimes cause clinical complications due to instability, subsidence or dislocation. These are basic biomechanical parameters, which influence strongly the quality of a fusion device; however, only few data about these parameters are available. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the primary stabilizing effect of four different cervical fusion devices in in vitro flexibility tests. Twenty-four human cervical spine segments were used in this study. After anterior discectomy, fusion was performed either with a WING cage (Medinorm AG, Germany), a BAK/C cage (Sulzer SpineTech, USA), an AcroMed cervical I/F cage (DePuy AcroMed International, UK) or bone cement (Sulzer, Switzerland). All specimens were tested in a spine tester in the intact condition and after implantation of one of the four devices. Alternating sequences of pure lateral bending, flexion-extension and axial rotation moments (+/- 2.5 Nm) were applied continuously and the motions in each segment were measured simultaneously. In general, all tested implants had a stabilizing effect. This was most obvious in lateral bending, where the range of motion was between 0.29 (AcroMed cage) and 0.62 (BAK/C cage) with respect to the intact specimen (= 1.00). In lateral bending, flexion and axial rotation, the AcroMed cervical I/F cages had the highest stabilizing effect, followed by bone cement, WING cages and BAK/C cages. In extension, specimens fused with bone cement were most stable. With respect to the primary stabilizing effect, cages, especially the AcroMed I/F cage but also the WING cage and to a minor extent the BAK/C cage, seem to be a good alternative to bone cement in cervical interbody fusion. Other characteristics, such as the effect of implant design on subsidence tendency and the promotion of bone ingrowth, have to be determined in further studies.
 ...
PMID:Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. 1105 35

Purpose of the present investigation is to determine the biomechanical behaviour of different cages for monosegmental fusion of the cervical spine. Three commercially available cages (BAK, NOVUS, WING) representing the different principles of intercorporal implants and a combination of intercorporal bone graft together with anterior plating were tested for their resistance and sintering patterns under axial compression conditions. Therefore, FSU (functional spine-units) of 5-months old calfs were used. After preparation, the anterior fusion was performed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Specimen were mounted in a testing machine Zwick 1425 and axial load from 100 N up to 2000 N was applied. The compressed distance was measured and put into relation to the applied load. After that, the device was unloaded and the test was repeated another 2 times to determine the plastic deformation of implant and specimen. There was no significant difference to all of the constructs in the first compression. After repeated compression, the WING-cage, the NOVUS-cage and the plate-construct showed a constant compression pattern as expression of resting stable on the vertebral endplates, whereas the cylindrical BAK-cage had a decrease in compression distance, but increase in sintering into the vertebral body. Intercorporal implants that require the destruction of the vertebral endplates as described in the Cloward dowel-technique may have a higher risk of sintering into the vertebral body and therefore of developing progressive kyphosis. By attaching lateral supporting areas this risk can be reduced and the advantage of sponges contact for fusion is preserved.
 ...
PMID:[Initial instability of different cages for fusion of the cervical spine]. 1139 86

Beginning in January 1994, a prospective, clinical study was done comparing the effectiveness of complete anterior (Group 1) versus partial reamed channel discectomies (Group 2) in 100 consecutive patients who had anterior BAK instrumentation and fusion using autogenous iliac crest bone graft. At 2 or more years of followup, all patients in Group 1 who had complete operative disc removal achieved solid arthrodesis. There were no revision surgeries. However, in Group 2, there were seven patients who had a pseudarthrosis and an additional patient with early postoperative cage displacement, which resulted in eight patients in Group 2 requiring revision surgery. The differences in operative preparation of the disc space for BAK instrumentation surgery resulting in complications proved to be significant. The use of interbody titanium cages dramatically increases the biomechanical efficacy of anterior fusions. Original proponents of cages advocated removing a cylindrical channel of disc material using a drill. A prospective review of 100 patients who had complete versus partial discectomy revealed 14% of patients in Group 2 eventually had a pseudarthrosis develop.
 ...
PMID:Anterior BAK instrumentation and fusion: complete versus partial discectomy. 1179 52

Important requirement for spinal fusion devices for segment are that they provide sufficient stability and guarantee a low subsidence risk. An important requirement for spinal fusion devices for segments are that they provide sufficient stability and guarantee a low subsidence risk. Therefore, in the following in vitro study, the stabilizing effect and subsidence tendency of cervical fusion cages and bone cement were investigated during cyclic loading. The WING cages (Medinorm AG) and BAK cages (Spinetec) made of titanium, the carbon fiber reinforced PEEK cage from Acromed (DePuy Acromed), and bone cement (PMMA, Sulzer) were tested. Twenty-four human cervical spine specimens were first tested intact with a standardized flexibility test (+/- 2.5 Nm). Then the implants were inserted and the primary stability determined. For the simulation of the postoperative loading of the cervical spine a cyclic loading protocol with 700 loading cycles was performed. In this test pure moments +/- 2.0 Nm in 9 different loading directions in randomized order were applied together with a 50 N preload to simulate the weight of the head. The subsidence and "long term stability" was measured after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 cycles. All implants had a stabilizing effect in all directions most obviously in lateral bending. Here the range of motion was between 20.9% (AcroMed Cage), and 62% (BAK Cage) with respect to the intact specimen (100%). In laterial bending, flexion, and axial rotation the AcroMed cage stabilized the most followed by the bone cement, WING and BAK Cage. In extension the specimens treated with bone cement were the most stable. After 700 loading cycles the specimens with the BAK cage lost 1.6 mm in height, with the WING Cage 0.8 mm, with the Acromed 0.7 mm, and with the bone cement 0.5 mm. Two Acromed Cages dislocated during the long term testing. Cages have the potential to stabilize as effectively as bone cement. A smaller contact area, however, causes a higher subsidence risk compared to bone cement but increases the fusion area, thus increasing the chance of obtaining bony fusion.
 ...
PMID:[Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments]. 1208 97


1 2 Next >>