Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:Q06643 (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma)
 11,307 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Three hundred thirty-two eligible patients with advanced (Ann Arbor stage III or IV) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of aggressive histologic subtype (Rappaport classification diffuse histiocytic [DH], diffuse poorly differentiated lymphocytic [DPDL], diffuse mixed [DM], or diffuse undifferentiated [DU]) were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with one of three intensive regimens in a clinical trial conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between 1978 and 1983. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) (COPA) administered in 3-week cycles; cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin plus prednisone beginning day 1, with vincristine plus bleomycin day 15 of each 3-week cycle (COPA + Bleo); or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin plus procarbazine beginning day 1, and bleomycin plus vincristine plus prednisone beginning day 15 of each 4-week cycle (CAP-BOP). The median patient follow-up from study entry for patients still alive is 5 years. The three regimens were not significantly different with respect to complete response (CR) rates (43% to 46%), time to progression of malignant disease (median, 1.0 to 1.7 years), or survival (5-year survival, 34% to 45%), although duration of complete remission appeared to be shorter in patients receiving COPA (P = .03). COPA + Bleo and CAP-BOP were significantly more toxic than the COPA regimen. This study did not demonstrate any substantial therapeutic advantage associated with the addition of a fifth or sixth chemotherapy drug, or with treatment administered on a more frequent administration schedule, compared with the COPA regimen in this population of patients with advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The relatively small proportion of long-term disease-free survivors treated with COPA underscores the need for prospective clinical trials of new and more effective treatments for patients with these potentially curable tumors.
 ...
PMID:Prospectively randomized clinical trial of three intensive chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced unfavorable histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. 244 22

Fludarabine is an antineoplastic agent which has been studied in patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative malignancies. Clinical evidence from comparative studies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggests that fludarabine is at least as effective as CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) in previously treated or chemotherapy-naive patients and significantly more effective than chlorambucil in terms of response rate and duration and survival in chemotherapy-naive patients. Promising results have also been reported with fludarabine-based combination therapy in the treatment of patients with CLL. In addition, sequential therapy with fludarabine and cytarabine has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of acute leukaemias, as has fludarabine monotherapy and combination therapy in low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A favourable cytoreductive response has been reported in patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma and in a smaller number of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, CLL of T cell origin or prolymphocytic leukaemia. Recent data also support the use of fludarabine, either as a component of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen or in the attainment of minimal residual disease, in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. The tolerability profile of fludarabine is similar to that of CAP, with the most common adverse events being granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and infection. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting appear to be less frequent with fludarabine therapy than with CAP although the development of immune cytopenias is more frequent with fludarabine. Severe neurotoxicity has been reported with fludarabine but this is mostly confined to the use of high doses. Clinical experience therefore indicates that fludarabine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antineoplastic agent for the second-line treatment of advanced CLL. Recent data from comparative studies also support the earlier use of fludarabine in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with CLL. Furthermore, results of available studies are increasingly highlighting an important future role for fludarabine in the treatment of acute leukaemias and low grade NHL and possibly other lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly when used as a component of combination chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies. 917 29