Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:Q02556 (DNA-binding domain)
 6,431 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We and others previously reported that up-regulation of retinoic acid receptor-alpha (RAR alpha) RNA and protein levels is elicited by estrogen in human breast cancer cells. We set out to determine the mechanism by which estrogen up-regulates RAR alpha. Cloning of 500 bp of the human (h) RAR alpha 1 promoter has been reported previously; we obtained this 500-bp DNA sequence by PCR techniques from human genomic DNA and tested its activity in the context of a luciferase-containing reporter vector in Hep G2 cell contransactivation assays. Estradiol elicited a 6- to 8-fold increase in luciferase activity from the reporter vector driven by hRAR alpha promoter sequence between -491 and +36 bp that was dependent on the presence of contransfected estrogen receptor (ER). Analysis of various truncated versions of this promoter sequence indicated that two regions of the sequence are sensitive to estrogen stimulation. The first resides in the region -49 to -79 bp upstream from the transcription start site and conferred approximately 2-fold activation by estrogen. This region does not contain a consensus estrogen response element, and ER binding to this DNA sequence was not observed. The second responsive sequence lies at -455 to -491 bp and conferred in additional 4- to 6-fold activation by estrogen. This upstream sequence contains two A/TGGTCA half-sites; however, direct binding of ER to this sequence was not observed. Additionally, ER DNA-binding domain mutants that are not capable of binding to DNA were just as effective as wild type ER in their ability to confer estrogen responsiveness to the RAR alpha promoter, implying that ER DNA-binding ability is not required for the estrogen-induced increase in transcriptional activity. Mutation of either half-site or of an additional immediate downstream sequence in the context of the -491 to +36 bp construct reduced the luciferase activity induction by estrogen from 6-fold to 1.5- to 2-fold. Placement of the region between -455 to -491 bp upstream of an SV40 promoter-driven luciferase vector conferred approximately 20- to 30-fold stimulation of luciferase activity by estrogen in an ER-dependent manner. The ER antagonists, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, keoxifene, and ICI 164384, each acted as weak agonist via the hRAR alpha promoter in contransactivation assays, exhibiting 20-30% of the efficacy that was demonstrated by estradiol. Interestingly, upon treatment of MCF7 cells with estradiol or the ER antagonists, increased levels of RAR alpha RNA and protein were observed with the antagonists as well as with estrogen.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen and estrogen receptor antagonists stimulate transcription from the human retinoic acid receptor-alpha 1 promoter via a novel sequence. 873 79

Estrogen (E) inhibits the growth of both non-tumorigenic, immortal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) and breast cancer cells which stably express exogenous estrogen receptors (ER). The anti-estrogenic compounds 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (HT) and ICI 164384 (ICI) have different effects on the growth of the ER-transfectants. HT is a potent growth inhibitor, while ICI has no effect by itself but is able to block the anti-proliferative effects of E and HT. In order to elucidate the mechanism by which E or HT-bound ER inhibit cell growth, we have evaluated the effects of these compounds on the growth of HMEC stably expressing ER with mutations or deletions in the N-terminal A/B domain, the DNA-binding domain (DBD), and the C-terminal ligand-binding domain. These studies revealed that E and HT require different structural domains of the ER for their anti-proliferative activities. The N-terminal A/B domain is required for HT-, but not E-dependent growth inhibition. The DNA-binding domain of the ER is not essential for HT-mediated anti-proliferative effects, but is important for E-dependent activity. The effect of ER mutations on the ligand-inducible expression of the endogenous progesterone receptor (PR) and pS2 genes was also evaluated. Neither gene was induced in the cells containing the ER mutated in the DBD, even though cell growth was inhibited. These results suggest that E and HT use different pathways to elicit their anti-proliferative effects and that this occurs via modulation of genes that are controlled by mechanisms different from those important for activation of the PR and pS2 genes.
 ...
PMID:Different estrogen receptor structural domains are required for estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent anti-proliferative activity in human mammary epithelial cells expressing an exogenous estrogen receptor. 944 40