Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P61278 (somatostatin)
22,083 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Chromaffin granules, the secretory organelles of the neuron-like adrenal medullary chromaffin cells, have previously been shown to store and liberate neurotrophic activities that support in vitro survival of several neuron populations including those innervating the adrenal medulla. Molecules resembling fibroblast growth factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor have been identified among these activities. Since chromaffin granules store a variety of neuropeptides and many neuropeptides can have pleiotropic effects on neuronal growth and maintenance we have tested 24 different neuropeptides for their capacities to promote survival of embryonic chick ciliary, dorsal root and sympathetic ganglionic neurons. Peptides tested included several derivatives of proenkephalin (Leu- and met-enkephalin, fragments BAM 22, B, F and E), somatostatin, substance P, neuropeptide Y, neurotensin, VIP, bombesin, secretin, pancreastatin, dynorphin B, dynorphin 1-13, beta-endorphin, alpha-, beta-, and gamma-MSH. Control cultures received saturating concentrations of ciliary neurotrophic or nerve growth factor (CNTF; NGF), or no trophic supplements. At 1 x 10(-5) M leu- and met-enkephalin as well as somatostatin supported sympathetic neurons to the same extent as NGF. At the same concentrations, leu-enkephalin, the proenkephalin fragments BAM 22 and E, and somatostatin maintained about half of the dorsal root ganglionic neurons supported by NGF, but were not effective on ciliary neurons. VIP promoted the survival of approximately 50% of the ciliary and embryonic day 10 dorsal root ganglionic neurons as compared to saturating amounts of CNTF, but required the presence of non-neuronal cells in the cultures to be effective. Neurotensin (1 x 10(-5) M had a small effect on ciliary neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Screening of adrenal medullary neuropeptides for putative neurotrophic effects. 163 76

We investigated the production, binding to cell membranes, and influence on cell proliferation of peptides and growth factors in 4 classic, 5 transitional, and 5 variant SCLC cell lines. Glucagon, neurotensin, and TGF-alpha were present in all cell lines. Bombesin was predominantly found in classic cell lines and insulin in variant cell lines. Neurokinin A, calcitonin, CGRP, GHRF, somatostatin, and CNTF were detectable in some cell lines without prevalence for a particular cell type. We could not detect AVP, growth hormone, neuropeptide Y, substance P, VIP, and NGF. Insulin binding sites were present on 11/14 cell lines, and some cell lines specifically bound bombesin, calcitonin, and EGF. Growth effects were detectable for insulin, GRP-related peptides, tachykinins, and VIP. Using serum-free conditions, insulin and VIP had a growth stimulating effect in liquid culture at nanomolar concentrations. Bombesin and neuromedin B stimulated the clonal growth at a concentration of 3-30 nM. The tachykinins neurokinin A, neurokinin B, physalaemin, and eledoisin inhibited the clonal and mass culture growth with a peak effect in the range of 0.1 to 10 pM. Peptide-induced stimulating and inhibiting effects were within a magnitude of 2-fold. All other peptides and growth factors tested, including ACTH, AVP, calcitonin, glucagon, neurotensin, somatostatin, EGF, CNTF, and NGF did not affect the growth of SCLC. We conclude that the growth of SCLC is partly controlled by such peptides in an autocrine/paracrine fashion.
...
PMID:Peptides and growth factors in small cell lung cancer: production, binding sites, and growth effects. 283 87

Activin as a neurodifferentiation factor. Our studies of neurotransmitter expression have focused on the expression of neuropeptide transmitters in the avian ciliary ganglion (CG) and have examined the influence of choroidal vascular smooth muscle cells in regulating the differential expression of somatostatin in the CG. In these activities we have identified activin A as a potential target-derived neurodifferentiation factor that can stimulate somatostatin expression in cultured CG neurons. In cultured CG neurons, activin can stimulate the expression of somatostatin in choroid neurons, the pattern of neurotransmitter expression found in vivo, and in the ciliary neurons that would normally not express somatostatin. In vivo, mRNA transcripts of the cActR-IIA appear to be expressed by both choroid and ciliary CG neurons. This suggests that activin might serve as an instructive factor in controlling neuropeptide phenotype. For activin to serve as an instructive factor requires that activin be produced by choroid smooth-muscle target cells. Indeed, activin mRNA and activin-like immunoreactivity are found in choroid cells, in vitro. However, the lack of somatostatin expression by ciliary neurons suggests that activin is not produced by their targets, the iris and ciliary body. This simple view is countered by the observation that activin A mRNA is also present in the iris and activin-like immunoreactivity is detectable in the iris and ciliary body. Instead, the production of the specific activin inhibitor follistatin in the iris and ciliary body is likely to limit the availability of activin to only those neurites innervating the choroid layer, thus accounting for the differential expression of somatostatin in only the choroid CG neurons. This somewhat more complicated arrangement is similar to the mechanism thought to be employed for primary induction during frog embryogenesis. The observations reviewed here are all consistent with the hypothesized role for activin as a molecule whose availability to neurites in the target regulates neurotransmitter expression. Additional in vivo perturbation experiments are needed to further examine this hypothesis; nevertheless, activin appears as a strong candidate for a target-derived neurotransmitter differentiation factor. Activin's potential roles in differentiation: A wide variety of biological effects have been ascribed to activin. Initially identified and purified as a gonadal hormone stimulating the production and release of FSH from the pituitary, activin is also implicated in the stimulation of erythroid differentiation, as a modulator of follicular granulosa cell differentiation, as a mesodermalizing factor in both amphibian and avian early development, and as a component in establishing left-right axial patterning in the chicken embryo. Activin has also been found to be a survival factor for several neuronal cell lines and for rat embryonic neural retina cells in culture. However, activin is not a survival factor for chicken CG neurons in culture. Our observation that activin may play a function in target-derived control of neuropeptide expression adds yet another aspect to the list of its potential biological functions. In addition, activin shares regions of amino acid sequence identity with members of the TGF-beta superfamily, which includes the TGF-betas, Mullerian inhibitory substance, Drosophila decapentaplegic gene product, dorsalin, bone morphogenetic proteins, inhibin, and glial-derived neurotrophic factor. Interestingly, these are all factors that have effects upon cellular differentiation. Effects of activin on other neurons. Activin A--as well as two other TGF-beta superfamily members, BMP-2 and BMP-6--has been shown to induce expression of mRNAs for several neuropeptides in cultured rat sympathetic neurons. In addition, activin A induces ChAT mRNA in cultured sympathetic neurons. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
...
PMID:Target tissue influence on somatostatin expression in the avian ciliary ganglion. 916 Sep 73

The local microenvironment at the sites of cancer metastases protects tumour cells from anticancer drug-induced apoptosis via mechanisms, such as soluble growth factors and cytokines. The concept of antisurvival factor (ASF) therapy as a component of anticancer treatments aims at neutralising the protective effect conferred upon cancer cells by the survival factor(s) derived by the local microenvironment, in order to enhance the sensitivity and/or reverse the resistance of tumour cells to other anticancer therapeutic strategies. Herein, we review the translation of this concept from ex vivo studies to clinical applications in the setting of prostate cancer refractory to androgen ablation (stage D3). At this stage, which predominantly involves bone metastases, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) production (either growth hormone (GH)-dependent or GH-independent) can protect tumour cells from apoptosis, despite the significant suppression of androgens. The application of the ASF therapeutic concept involves the combination of dexamethasone (which suppresses GH-independent IGF-1) and somatostatin analogue (which suppresses endocrine, GH-dependent IGF-1) with the pro-apoptotic effect of the testicular androgen suppression by sustained use of LHRH analogues. In stage D3, patients who had failed anti-androgen withdrawal, chemotherapy and also had several other adverse prognostic features, the ASF-based combination achieved durable objective responses and major symptomatic improvement, paving the way for future applications of this approach. The ASF-based combination therapy illustrates a novel paradigm in cancer treatment: anti-tumour treatment strategies may not only aim at directly inducing cancer cell apoptosis, but can also target the tumour microenvironment and neutralise the protection it confers on metastatic cancer cells. The favourable toxicity profile of this therapeutic approach calls for its testing in a randomised controlled setting in metastatic prostate cancer and, conceivably, in other IGF-1-responsive malignancies.
...
PMID:Combination of dexamethasone and a somatostatin analogue in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. 1182 17

Selective inhibition of the "false" proliferative signals via targeting tyrosine kinases resulting in the induction of apoptosis by depletion of the "survival factors" is one of the most studied and widely accepted concepts of modern chemotherapy. We have synthesized a series of potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors and tested these compounds for apoptosis induction. Some of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors caused either apoptotic or cytoplasmic vacuolar cell death in various tumor cell cultures. The somatostatin analogue oligopeptide TT-232, which indirectly inhibits tyrosine kinases, exerted a dose-dependent apoptosis-inducing effect. The tumor growth-inhibitory effect of TT-232 and some tyrosine kinase inhibitors has also been proven by in vivo experiments, using human tumor xenografts. On the other hand, a dose-dependent pro- or anti-apoptotic activity of (-)-deprenyl has been shown in melanoma cell cultures, the lower doses inhibiting and the higher doses inducing apoptosis. Various metabolites of (-)-deprenyl are responsible for these actions. The effect of (-)-deprenyl is connected with depolarization of mitochondrial membranes. The kinase inhibitors act on the growth factor receptor signaling pathways (survival factor pathways) and initiate the caspase cascade. The key enzyme for the action of both pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic compounds is caspase 3.
...
PMID:Pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic molecules affecting pathways of signal transduction. 1503 4

The development of resistance to anticancer therapies is a major hurdle in preventing long-lasting clinical responses to conventional therapies in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Herein, the molecular evidence documenting that bone metastasis microenvironment survival factors (mainly the paracrine growth hormone-independent, urokinase-type plasminogen activator-mediated increase of IGF-1 and the endocrine production of growth hormone-dependent IGF-1, mainly liver-derived IGF-1 production) produce an epigenetic form of prostate cancer cells that are resistant to proapoptotic therapies is reviewed. Consequently, the authors present the conceptual framework of a novel antibone microenvironment survival factor, mainly an anti-IGF-1 hormonal manipulation for androgen ablation refractory prostate cancer (a combination of conventional androgen ablation therapy [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist-A or orchiectomy]) with dexamethasone plus somatostatin analogue, which yielded durable objective responses and major improvement of bone pain and performance status in stage D3 prostate cancer patients.
...
PMID:Combination therapy using LHRH and somatostatin analogues plus dexamethasone in androgen ablation refractory prostate cancer patients with bone involvement: a bench to bedside approach. 1678 42

Somatostatin agonists (SM-As) are capable of achieving durable symptomatic relief and significant clinical responses in certain tumours. Herein, we review the diverse direct and indirect mechanisms of antineoplastic activity elicited by SM-As as well as the hurdles that complicate their use as monotherapies in a broader range of malignancies. Emphasis is placed on recent clinical attempts to neutralise the IGF-mediated survival factor effects in the bone metastasis microenvironment in advanced prostate cancer. The first clinical trials of this 'anti-survival factor manipulation' strategy utilised the ability of SM-As to suppress the growth hormone-dependent liver-derived IGF-I bioavailability in combination with other drugs, such as dexamethasone, zolendronate and oestrogens, acting systemically and at the bone metastasis microenvironment. These regimens restored androgen ablation responsiveness in stage D3 prostate cancer patients and successfully produced objective clinical responses while only mild toxicities were observed. Furthermore, we focus on the preclinical experimental data of a targeted SM-A coupled to the super-potent doxorubicin derivative AN-201. The resulting conjugate (AN-238) has shown increased antitumour potency with a favourable toxicity profile. The potential use of novel SM-As as anticancer drugs is discussed in relation to data suggesting other direct and indirect treatment approaches pertaining to the somatostatin system.
...
PMID:Somatostatin and somatostatin receptors: implications for neoplastic growth and cancer biology. 1967 99