Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P52742 (pT3)
 1,034 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans play important biological roles in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, and are closely associated with growth factor actions. Loss of syndecan-1, a cell surface-bound heparan sulfate proteoglycan, has been reported for advanced head and neck carcinomas, and expression of endoglycosidic heparanase, which cleaves heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (HS-GAGs), is associated with invasion and metastatic potential of malignant tumors. Paraffin sections of 103 primary esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were immunohistochemically examined for the expression of syndecan-1 core protein, HS-GAGs and heparanase protein, and the results were compared with various clinicopathological parameters, such as invasion depth. For 16 cases, fresh tumor samples were quantitatively analyzed for heparanase and syndecan-1 mRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR in addition to the immunohistochemical studies. Syndecan-1 core protein and HS-GAGs expression was significantly decreased in pT2 and pT3 cases compared with their pTis and pT1 counterparts. Decreased expression of core protein and HS-GAGs was correlated with the incidence of lymphatic invasion, and venous involvement. Furthermore, decreased expression of HS-GAGs was correlated positively with the incidence of nodal metastasis and distant organ metastasis, and negatively with the grade of tumor cell differentiation. The percentage of cytoplasmic heparanase protein-positive cases increased significantly in pT2 and pT3 cases compared to that in pTis and pT1 cases, and this was associated with lymphatic invasion, and venous and lymph nodal involvement. The level of heparanase mRNA was inversely correlated with the degree of HS-GAGs expression rather than core protein. In conclusion, loss of syndecan-1 and heparanase overexpression in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas are closely associated with malignant potential. Regarding the mechanism of loss of HS-GAGs, heparanase upregulation appears to play an important role.
 ...
PMID:Loss of syndecan-1 and increased expression of heparanase in invasive esophageal carcinomas. 1167 57

Seeking insight into the possible role of estrogens in prostate cancer (PCa) evolution, we assayed serum E2, estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) in 349 PCa and 100 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, and in 208 control subjects in the same age range (50-74 years). E1 (pmol/L+/-S.D.) and E1S (nmol/L+/-S.D.) in the PCa and BPH patients (respectively 126.1+/-66.1 and 2.82+/-1.78, and 127.8+/-56.4 and 2.78+/-2.12) were significantly higher than in the controls (113.8+/-47.6 and 2.11+/-0.96). E2 was not significantly different among the PCa, BPH, and control groups. These assays were also carried out in PCa patients after partition by prognosis (PSA, Gleason score (GS), histological stage, and surgical margins (SM)). Significantly higher E1S levels were found in PCa with: PSA>10 ng/L (3.05+/-1.92) versus PSA<or=10 ng/mL (2.60+/-1.55), stage pT3-T4 (2.99+/-1.80) versus pT2 (2.58+/-1.58), and positive (3.26+/-1.95) versus negative margins (2.52+/-1.48). E1 was higher in poor- than in better-prognosis PCa. E2 was significantly higher in PCa with GS>or=4+3 (109.5+/-43.8) versus GS<or=3+4 (100.6+/-36.5) and increased significantly when GS increased from 3+3 to 4+4. Estrogens, especially E1S appeared to be possible markers of PCa progression. Attempting to identify potential sources of E2 in PCa according to prognosis, as well as in BPH, we found a significant correlation coefficient between E1S and E2 (0.266-0.347) in poor-prognosis PCa and no correlation in BPH (0.026) and better-prognosis PCa (0.013-0.104). It is as though during progression of PCa from good to poor prognosis there were a shift in the E1 to E2 metabolic pathway from predominantly oxidative to predominantly reductive.
 ...
PMID:Estrone sulfate (E1S), a prognosis marker for tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer (PCa). 1833 90