Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P51532 (transcriptional activator)
 6,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The X. laevis tRNA((Ser)Sec) gene is different from the other tRNA genes in that its promoter contains two external elements, a PSE and a TATA box functionally equivalent to those of the U6 snRNA gene. Of the two internal promoters governing classical tRNA gene transcription, only subsists the internal B box. In this report, we show that the tRNA((Ser)Sec) contains in addition an activator element (AE) which we have mapped by extensive mutagenesis. Activation is only dependent on a 15 bp fragment residing between -209 and -195 and containing an SPH motif. In vitro, this element forms a complex with a nuclear protein which is different from the TEF-1 transcriptional activator that binds the SV40 Sph motifs. This AE is versatile since it shows capacity of activating a variety of genes in vivo, including U1 and U6 snRNAs and HSV thymidine kinase. Unexpectedly for an snRNA-related gene, the tRNA((Ser)Sec) is deprived of octamer or octamer-like motifs. The X.laevis tRNA((Ser)Sec) gene represents the first example of a Pol III snRNA-type gene whose activation of transcription is completely octamer-independent.
 ...
PMID:Optimal tRNA((Ser)Sec) gene activity requires an upstream SPH motif. 131 Oct 68

RNA polymerase III transcription of genes with external promoters only (e.g. U6 snRNA) or containing in addition an internal B box (selenocysteine tRNA(Sec)) is stimulated by upstream elements; a distal sequence element (DSE) for U6 or an activator element in the tRNA(Sec) gene. In contrast to the composite structure of the DSE which requires an octamer motif, the Xenopus tRNA(Sec) activator element contains an SPH motif only. In vivo transcription is optimally stimulated by SPH in an absolute octamer-independent manner since adding octamer does not induce superstimulation. Experiments performed in the work presented here led to the following observations. Co-operation between SPH and octamer motifs can be detected in two distinct cases: first when these motifs are placed in front of B box-less tRNA(Sec) or U6 external promoters and second, if either element of the external promoter (proximal sequence element or TATA element), or the SPH motif itself, are altered. Altogether, our data provide evidence that an SPH motif can function alone in an optimized promoter only. In contrast, an octamer becomes indispensable when the basal promoter is weak or disabled. It follows that module composition of Pol III transcriptional activator elements is dependent on the structure and strength of the promoter. This reveals the existence of cross-talk between activator and promoter elements, mediated by the bound transcription factors, which are thus able to compensate for each other in order to allow successful assembly of the transcription complex.
 ...
PMID:Promoter strength and structure dictate module composition in RNA polymerase III transcriptional activator elements. 769 50

Drosophila heat shock factor (HSF) binds to specific sequence elements of heat shock genes and can activate their transcription 200-fold. Though HSF has an acidic activation domain, the mechanistic details of heat shock gene activation remain undefined. Here we report that HSF interacts directly with the general transcription factor TBP (TATA-box binding protein), and these two factors bind cooperatively to heat shock promoters. A third factor that binds heat shock promoters, GAGA factor, also interacts with HSF and further stabilizes HSF binding to heat shock elements (HSEs). The interaction of HSF and TBP is explored in some detail here and is shown to be mediated by residues in both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal portions of HSF. This HSF/TBP interaction can be specifically disrupted by competition with the potent acidic transcriptional activator VP16. We further show that the acidic domain of the largest subunit of Drosophila RNA polymerase II (Pol II) associates with TBP in vitro and is specifically displaced from TBP upon addition of HSF. The region of TBP that mediates both HSF and Pol II acidic domain binding maps to the conserved carboxyl-terminal repeats and depends on at least one of the TBP residues known to be contacted by VP16 and to be critical for transcription activation. We discuss these findings in the context of a model in which HSF triggers hsp70 transcription by freeing the hsp70 promoter-paused Pol II from the constraints on elongation caused by the affinity of Pol II for general transcription factors.
 ...
PMID:Cooperative and competitive protein interactions at the hsp70 promoter. 940 12

We have isolated and characterized a cDNA encoding a transcription activating factor for the mouse selenocysteine tRNA (tRNAsec) gene from mouse mammary gland. The full-length cDNA, designated m-Staf, has a 1878-base pair open reading frame encoding 626 amino acids. The predicted amino acid sequence of m-Staf is highly homologous to that of Staf, another selenocysteine tRNA gene transcription activating factor of Xenopus laevis. Like Staf, m-Staf contains seven tandemly repeated zinc fingers and four repeated motifs. Gel shift assays indicated that the recombinant m-Staf specifically bound to the activator element region in the mouse tRNAsec gene. Transient co-transfection experiments in Drosophila Schneider cells, which lack endogenous Staf-like binding activity, showed that m-Staf increased the mouse tRNAsec gene transcription about 15-fold, whereas it stimulated Pol II-dependent thymidine kinase promoter only 2-fold. Northern blot analysis detected the presence of a 3.4-kilobase pair m-Staf transcript, which was widely but differentially expressed in various murine tissues. The binding activity of m-Staf in mouse mammary gland was undetectable during virgin and postlactating periods but increased markedly in parallel with the increase of tRNAsec transcript during the periods of pregnancy and lactation, when the gland undergoes growth and development. These results indicate that m-Staf is a transcriptional activator of the mouse tRNAsec gene and that its binding activity in the mammary gland undergoes developmental alterations.
 ...
PMID:Molecular cloning and characterization of the murine staf cDNA encoding a transcription activating factor for the selenocysteine tRNA gene in mouse mammary gland. 953 33

Staf is a transcriptional activator of prime importance for enhanced transcription of small nuclear (snRNA) and snRNA-type genes transcribed by RNA polymerases II and III (Pol II and III). In addition to this activity, it also possesses the capacity to stimulate expression from an RNA polymerase II mRNA promoter. This promiscuous activator thus provides a useful model system for studying the mechanism by which one single transcription factor can activate a large variety of promoters. Here, we report the use of in vivo assays to identify the Staf activation domains involved in promoter selectivity. Analysis of Staf mutants reveals the existence of two physically and functionally distinct regions, outside of the DNA binding domain, responsible for mediating selective transcriptional activation. While a 93-amino-acid domain, with the striking presence of four repeated units, is specialized for transcriptional activation of an mRNA promoter, a segment of only 18 amino acids, with a critical Leu-213 residue, acts specifically on Pol II and Pol III snRNA and snRNA-type promoters. In addition, this study disclosed the fundamental importance of invariant leucine and aspartic acid residues located in each repeat unit of the mRNA activation domain. Staf is therefore the first transcriptional activator described so far to harbor two physically and functionally distinct activator domains. This finding suggests that the same activator can contact different, specialized transcription complexes formed on different types of basal promoters through promoter-specific transactivation pathways.
 ...
PMID:Two distinct domains in Staf to selectively activate small nuclear RNA-type and mRNA promoters. 956 84

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators may function, at least in part, to facilitate the assembly of the RNA polymerase II (pol II) preinitiation complex at the core promoter region through their interaction with a subset of components of the basal transcription machinery. Previous studies have shown that artificial tethering of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter region is sufficient to stimulate pol II transcription in yeast. To test whether this phenomenon is a general one in eukaryotic pol II transcription, the DNA-binding domain of yeast GAL4 was fused to either Xenopus laevis TBP or TFIIB in order to enable these factors to be efficiently positioned near the transcription start site in a GAL4-binding site-dependent manner. We found that GAL4-xTBP as well as GAL4-xTFIIB directed an increased level of transcription without involvement of the transcriptional activator, suggesting that incorporation of these basal factors into a preinitiation complex (PIC) is a major rate-limiting step accelerated by activator proteins in metazoans. These results show that transcription activation by artificial recruitment of basal transcription machinery can be observed in general among eukaryotic transcription both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, failure of recovery of transcription by adding GAL4-xTFIIB after depletion of endogenous TBP with TATA oligo competitor suggests that recruitment of TBP cannot be bypassed for Pol II transcription.
 ...
PMID:Recruitment of TBP or TFIIB to a promoter proximal position leads to stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription without activator proteins both in vivo and in vitro. 1006 20

SWI/SNF is a chromatin remodeling complex that facilitates expression of a number of yeast genes. Here we demonstrate that SWI/SNF can be recruited from yeast nuclear extracts by a transcriptional activator. Recruitment is dependent on an activation domain but not on promoter sequences, TBP, or RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. We also show that acidic activation domains can target SWI/SNF remodeling activity. These results demonstrate that SWI/SNF activity can be targeted by gene-specific activators and that this recruitment can occur independently of Pol II holoenzyme.
 ...
PMID:Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by transcriptional activators. 1050 94

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is frequently inactivated in tumors. It functions as a transcriptional activator as well as a repressor for a number of viral and cellular promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and by RNA Pol III. Moreover, it appears that p53 also suppresses RNA Pol I transcription. In this study, we examined the molecular mechanism of Pol I transcriptional inhibition by p53. We show that wild-type, but not mutant, p53 can repress Pol I transcription from a human rRNA gene promoter in cotransfection assays. Furthermore, we show that recombinant p53 inhibits rRNA transcription in a cell-free transcription system. In agreement with these results, p53-null epithelial cells display an increased Pol I transcriptional activity compared to that of epithelial cells that express p53. However, both cell lines display comparable Pol I factor protein levels. Our biochemical analysis shows that p53 prevents the interaction between SL1 and UBF. Protein-protein interaction assays indicate that p53 binds to SL1, and this interaction is mostly mediated by direct contacts with TATA-binding protein and TAF(I)110. Moreover, template commitment assays show that while the formation of a UBF-SL1 complex can partially relieve the inhibition of transcription, only the assembly of a UBF-SL1-Pol I initiation complex on the rDNA promoter confers substantial protection against p53 inhibition. In summary, our results suggest that p53 represses RNA Pol I transcription by directly interfering with the assembly of a productive transcriptional machinery on the rRNA promoter.
 ...
PMID:Repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by the tumor suppressor p53. 1091 76

BC1 RNA is a neuronal cell-specific RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcript. The BC1 RNA gene has plural types of Pol III promoters, in addition to which an E-box sequence (E2 site) acts as a transcriptional activator, which is recognized by a brain-specific protein(s). Using an in vitro transcription system, we found that the upstream region of the BC1 RNA gene contained a sequence that interfered with the activity of the E-box element in a distance-independent manner. A tandem repeat within this sequence, which was weakly homologous with the neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) found in the Pol II system, was recognized by a brain nuclear protein. Consistently, the transcriptional activity increased by deleting the tandem repeat sequence. We called this BC1 RNA-repressing element BCRE. The DNA-binding specificities of BCRE-binding protein differed from that of NRSE-binding protein (NRSF). A similar protein with an ability to bind to BCRE was also found in liver and kidney. Furthermore, the glutamate analog kainic acid increased the DNA-binding of both E2 site-binding protein and BCRE-binding protein, and then the levels of BC1 RNA also increased transiently. Our results suggested that both positive and negative regulatory elements contribute to neuronal BC1 RNA expression.
 ...
PMID:Identification of a negative regulatory DNA element for neuronal BC1 RNA expression by RNA polymerase III. 1097 16

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a transcriptional activator that functions as a master regulator of cellular and systemic oxygen homeostasis. It consists of two constitutively produced subunits: HIF-1alpha and HIF-1beta. Under normoxic conditions HIF-1alpha undergoes hydroxylation at specific prolyl residues which leads to an immediate ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of the alpha subunit. Additionally, hydroxylation of an asparaginyl residue blocks the transcriptional activity of HIF-1 due to inhibition of its interaction with co-activators. In contrast, under hypoxic conditions, abolition of prolyl hydroxylation results in HIF-1alpha stabilization, whereas the lack of asparaginyl hydroxylation allows the transcriptional activity. Additionally, the transcriptional activity may be modulated by phosphorylation or redox modification of HIF-1. Despite its name, HIF-1 is induced not only in response to reduced oxygen availability but also by other stimulants, such as nitric oxide, various growth factors, or direct inhibitors of prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylases. Therefore, it seems to be a crucial transcription factor elicited by a wide range of stresses such as impaired oxygenation, inflammation, energy deprivation, or intensive proliferation. However, the mechanisms of normoxic activation, as well as of oxygen sensing, are not yet fully known. Further understanding of the processes that control HIF-1 activity will be crucial for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Acta Biochim Pol 2004
PMID:HIF-1: the knowns and unknowns of hypoxia sensing. 1544 22


1 2 3 Next >>