Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P51532 (
transcriptional activator
)
6,546
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
GATA4 is a
transcriptional activator
of cardiac-restricted promoters and is required for normal cardiac morphogenesis. Friend of GATA-2 (FOG-2) is a multizinc finger protein that associates with GATA4 and represses GATA4-dependent transcription. To better understand the
transcriptional repressor
activity of FOG-2 we performed a functional analysis of the FOG-2 protein. The results demonstrated that 1) zinc fingers 1 and 6 of FOG-2 are each capable of interacting with evolutionarily conserved motifs within the N-terminal zinc finger of mammalian GATA proteins, 2) a nuclear localization signal (RKRRK) (amino acids 736-740) is required to program nuclear targeting of FOG-2, and 3) FOG-2 can interact with the transcriptional co-repressor, C-terminal-binding protein-2 via a conserved sequence motif in FOG-2 (PIDLS). Surprisingly, however, this interaction with C-terminal-binding protein-2 is not required for FOG-2-mediated repression of GATA4-dependent transcription. Instead, we have identified a novel N-terminal domain of FOG-2 (amino acids 1-247) that is both necessary and sufficient to repress GATA4-dependent transcription. This N-terminal repressor domain is functionally conserved in the related protein, Friend of GATA1. Taken together, these results define a set of evolutionarily conserved mechanisms by which FOG proteins repress GATA-dependent transcription and thereby form the foundation for genetic studies designed to elucidate the role of FOG-2 in cardiac development.
...
PMID:A functionally conserved N-terminal domain of the friend of GATA-2 (FOG-2) protein represses GATA4-dependent transcription. 1080 15
The zinc finger protein early growth response 1 (Egr-1) is a
transcriptional activator
involved in the regulation of growth and differentiation. Egr-1 has a large activating domain and three zinc finger motifs that function as a DNA binding region. We show here that a third functional domain of the Egr-1 protein, localized between the extended activation domain and the zinc finger DNA binding region, acts as a
transcriptional repressor
domain when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain (DBD). Through protein-protein interaction this inhibitory domain of Egr-1 brings the transcriptional corepressor NAB1 in close proximity to the transcription unit. NAB1 is expressed ubiquitously in human cell lines as shown by RNase protection mapping. Overexpression studies revealed that NAB1 is able to completely block transcription mediated by Egr-1. In addition, the transcriptional repression activity of a fusion protein containing the inhibitory domain of Egr-1 and the DBD of the yeast transcription factor GAL4 was increased by overexpression of NAB1. A fusion protein consisting of the DBD of GAL4 and the coding region of human NAB1 repressed transcription from model promoters with engineered upstream GAL4 binding sites. The GAL4-NAB1 fusion protein functioned from proximal and distal positions indicating that NAB1 displays
transcriptional repressor
activity at any position within the transcription unit. Thus, the biological function of the inhibitory domain of Egr-1 is solely to provide a docking site for NAB1 via protein-protein interaction.
...
PMID:The human transcriptional repressor protein NAB1: expression and biological activity. 1101 54
Octamer transcription factor-1 (Oct-1) is a member of the POU (Pit-1, Oct-1, unc-86) family of transcription factors and is involved in the transcriptional regulation of a variety of gene expressions related to cell cycle regulation, development, and hormonal signals. It has been shown that Oct-1 acts not only as a
transcriptional activator
but also as a
transcriptional repressor
for certain genes. The mechanism of the repressive function of Oct-1 has not been well understood. Here we demonstrate by using the glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays and coimmunoprecipitation assays that the POU domain of Oct-1 directly interacts with a silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT). The interaction surfaces are located in the C-terminal region of SMRT, which are different from previously described silencing domains I and II or receptor interacting domains I and II. In transient transfection assays in COS1 cells, overexpression of SMRT attenuated the augmentation of Oct-1 transcriptional activity by OBF-1/OCA-B, activator for Oct-1. In pull-down assays, increasing amounts of SMRT could compete the binding of OCA-B to Oct-1 POU domain. The activity of Oct-1 could be determined by a regulated balance between SMRT and OCA-B. Furthermore, cotransfected unliganded thyroid hormone receptor enhanced the transactivation by Oct-1, and addition of 3,3',5-tri-iodo-l-thyronine obliterated the stimulatory effects. Consequently, in the presence of cotransfected thyroid hormone receptor, the octamer response element acts as an element negatively regulated by 3,3',5-tri-iodo-l-thyronine. The results suggest that the transcriptional activity of Oct-1 can be modulated by interaction through its POU domain by a silencing mediator SMRT resulting in the cross-talk between Oct-1 and nuclear receptors.
...
PMID:Silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors interacts with octamer transcription factor-1 and acts as a transcriptional repressor. 1113 19
The Wilms tumor gene WT1 encodes a zinc finger transcription factor that is required for normal kidney development. WT1 was identified as a
transcriptional repressor
, based on its suppression of promoter reporters, but analysis of native transcripts using high density microarrays has uncovered transcriptional activation, rather than repression, of potential target genes. We report here that WT1 binds to the transcriptional coactivator CBP, leading to synergistic activation of a physiologically relevant promoter. The physical interaction between WT1 and CBP is evident in vitro and in vivo, and the two proteins are co-immunoprecipitated from embryonic rat kidney cells. The WT1-CBP association requires the first two zinc fingers of WT1 and the adenovirus 5 E1A-binding domain of CBP. Overexpression of this domain of CBP is sufficient to inhibit WT1-mediated transcriptional activation of a promoter reporter, as is co-transfection of E1A. Retrovirally driven expression of either the CBP fragment or of E1A in human hematopoietic cells suppresses the induction by WT1 of its endogenous target gene, p21(Cip1). These observations support a model of WT1 as a
transcriptional activator
of genes required for cellular differentiation.
...
PMID:A functional interaction with CBP contributes to transcriptional activation by the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1. 1127 47
Transcriptional control is generally thought to operate as a binary switch, a behavior that might explain observations such as monoallelic gene expression, stochastic phenotypic changes and bimodal gene activation kinetics. By measuring the activity of the single-copy GAL1 promoter in single cells, we found that changes in the activities of either the
transcriptional activator
, Gal4 (by simple recruitment with synthetic ligands), or the
transcriptional repressor
, Mig1, generated graded (non-binary) changes in gene expression that were proportional to signal intensity. However, in the context of the endogenous glucose-responsive signaling pathway, these transcription factors formed part of a binary transcriptional response. Genetic studies demonstrated that this binary response resulted from regulation of a second repressor, Gal80, whereas regulation of Mig1 by a distinct signaling pathway generated graded changes in GAL1 promoter activity. Surprisingly, isogenetic cells can respond to glucose with either binary or graded changes in gene expression, depending on growth conditions. Our studies demonstrate that a given promoter can adapt either binary or graded behavior, and identify the Mig1 and Gal80 genes as necessary for binary versus graded behavior of the Gal1 promoter.
...
PMID:Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses. 1140 93
Significant progress has been made in the past year in understanding the mechanism of systemic acquired resistance. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades have been implicated as negative regulators of salicyclic acid accumulation and the induction of resistance. The salicylic acid signal is transduced through NPR1, a nuclear-localized protein that interacts with transcription factors that are involved in regulating salicylic-acid-mediated gene expression. Both promoter analyses and genetic studies have shown that gene expression in systemic acquired resistance requires not only the activation of a
transcriptional activator
(s) but also inhibition of a
transcriptional repressor
(s). Microarray experiments have been performed to search for those genes whose expression is transcriptionally regulated during systemic acquired resistance and to identify common promoter elements that control these genes.
...
PMID:Genetic dissection of systemic acquired resistance. 1141 40
Different cyclins mediate different cell-cycle transitions. Some cyclins, such as cyclin A and cyclin E, form stable complexes with proteins that bind directly or indirectly to DNA and thus might be recruited to certain regions of the genome at specific times in the cell cycle. Furthermore, cyclins contain structural motifs that are also present in known transcriptional modulators. We found that cyclin A is a potent
transcriptional repressor
and cyclin E is a potent
transcriptional activator
when bound to DNA via a heterologous DNA binding domain. The former activity was linked to the integrity of the cyclin A cyclin fold, whereas the latter activity related to the ability of cyclin E to activate cdk2 and recognize substrates. Furthermore, we found that cyclin E, but not cyclin A, activated transcription in a cell-cycle-dependent manner when present in physiological concentrations as an unfused protein. These results suggest that cyclin A and cyclin E intrinsically differ with respect to their ability to modulate transcription when tethered to DNA.
...
PMID:Differential control of transcription by DNA-bound cyclins. 1145 14
Hedgehog (Hh) activates a signal transduction pathway regulating Cubitus interruptus (Ci). In the absence of Hh, full-length Ci (Ci-155) is bound in a complex that includes Costal2 (Cos2) and Fused (Fu). Ci-155 is phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA), inducing proteolysis to Ci-75, a
transcriptional repressor
. Hh signaling blocks proteolysis and produces an activated Ci-155
transcriptional activator
. The relationship between PKA and the Ci/Cos2/Fu complex is unclear. Here we examine Hh target gene expression caused by mutant forms of PKA regulatory (PKAr) and catalytic (PKAc) subunits and by the PKAc inhibitor PKI(1-31). The mutant PKAr*, defective in binding cAMP, is shown to activate Hh target genes solely through its ability to bind and inhibit endogenous PKAc. Surprisingly, PKAcA75, a catalytically impaired mutant, also activates Hh target genes. To account for this observation, we propose that PKAc phosphorylation targeting Ci-155 for proteolysis is regulated within a complex that includes PKAc and Ci-155 and excludes PKI(1-31). This complex may permit processive phosphorylation of Ci-155 molecules, facilitating their processing to Ci-75.
...
PMID:Genetic evidence for a protein kinase A/cubitus interruptus complex that facilitates processing of cubitus interruptus in Drosophila. 1145 64
The Maf oncoprotein is a basic leucine zipper (bZip)-bearing
transcriptional activator
that recognizes the Maf recognition element (MARE) DNA sequence. In this study, we investigated the role of Maf's transactivation function in cell transformation. Replacement of the conserved amino terminus transactivator domain of Maf by a heterologous and stronger transactivator domain (the acidic transactivator domain of VP16) resulted in enhanced transformation of chicken embryo fibroblast cells. In contrast, the fusing of a
transcriptional repressor
domain (Sin3 interaction domain of Mxi1) with the whole Maf protein masked the transactivator function of Maf, which in turn inhibited its transforming activity. Furthermore, the leucine zipper domain of Maf, which defines its dimer-forming specificity, was exchangeable with that of GCN4 yeast protein in terms of its transactivating and cell transforming activities. Thus, heterodimer formation with other bZip factors is not required for Maf's ability to transform. These results together suggest that transactivation through MARE is necessary for Maf-induced transformation and that there exist downstream target gene(s) for transformation. Since the MARE sequence overlaps with the recognition element of another bZip oncoprotein Jun, we assessed whether Jun and Maf induce cell transformation through activating the same genes. We thus constructed a mutated version of Jun that has a GCN4 leucine zipper and lacks the transactivator domain. This mutant repressed the cell transformation not only by Jun but also by Maf. Thus, Maf and Jun share downstream target gene(s) that are involved in cell transformation.
...
PMID:Maf and Jun nuclear oncoproteins share downstream target genes for inducing cell transformation. 1146 1
The yeast Mediator is composed of two subcomplexes, Rgr1 and Srb4, known to be required for diverse aspects of transcriptional regulation; however, their structural and functional organizations have not yet been deciphered in detail. Biochemical analyses designed to determine the subunit composition of the Rgr1 subcomplex revealed that the regulator-interacting subcomplex has a modular structure and is composed of the Gal11, Med9/Cse2, and Med10/Nut2 modules. Genome-wide gene expression and Northern analyses performed in the presence or absence of the various Mediator modules revealed a distinct requirement for the Gal11, Med9/Cse2, and Med10/Nut2 modules in transcriptional repression as well as activation. GST pull-down analysis revealed that the
transcriptional repressor
Tup1 binds to distinct but overlapping regions of the Gal11 module that were shown previously to be
transcriptional activator
binding sites. These data suggest that competition between transcriptional activators and repressors for a common binding site in the Mediator and distinct conformational changes in the Mediator induced by repressor binding may underlie the mechanism of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes.
...
PMID:Med9/Cse2 and Gal11 modules are required for transcriptional repression of distinct group of genes. 1147 Jul 94
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>