Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (5-HT3 receptor)
 2,290 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Histamine H1-receptors are involved in the development of the symptoms and signs of motion sickness, including emesis. On provocative motion stimulus, a signal for sensory conflict activates the histaminergic neuron system, and the histaminergic descending impulse stimulates H1-receptors in the emetic center of the brain stem. The histaminergic input to the emetic center through H1-receptors is independent of dopamine D2-receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone and serotonin 5HT3-receptors in the visceral afferent, which are also involved in the emetic reflex. Antihistamines block emetic H1-receptors to prevent motion sickness. Acetylcholine muscarinic receptors are involved in the generation of signals for sensory conflict. Anti-cholinergic drugs prevent motion sickness by modifying the neural store to facilitate the acquisition of habituation to provocative motion.
 ...
PMID:Neuropharmacology of motion sickness and emesis. A review. 844 18

1. In the present study we evaluated the receptor selectivity of the potent histamine H3 receptor antagonist, iodophenpropit (IPP) in comparison with the prototype antagonist, thioperamide. 2. IPP proved to be a potent competitive H3 receptor antagonist as measured against (R)-alpha-methylhistamine-induced inhibition of electrically-evoked contractions of the guinea-pig jejunum (pA2 = 9.12 +/- 0.06, Schild slope: 1.0 +/- 0.1, n = 8). In the same assay, thioperamide was slightly less potent (pA2 = 8.9 +/- 0.2). 3. In radioligand binding studies, IPP showed a high affinity for the H3 receptor. Displacement of [125I]-IPP binding to rat cortex membranes by unlabelled IPP resulted in a Ki value of 0.97 +/- 0.06 nM (n = 3). In contrast, IPP showed only a weak affinity for the histamine H1- and H2 receptor. Displacement of [3H]-mepyramine and [125I]-iodoaminopotentidine binding to respectively guinea-pig H1- and human H2 receptors by IPP resulted in Ki values of 1.71 +/- 0.32 microM (n = 3) and 2.28 +/- 0.81 microM (n = 3). For thioperamide the affinities for the H1-, H2- and H3 receptor were respectively > 10 microM, > 10 microM and 4.3 +/- 1.6 nM (n = 7). 4. Testing IPP and thioperamide in 39 different receptor binding assays revealed that IPP showed relatively high affinity for the 5-hydroxytryptamine 5-HT3 receptor (Ki = 11 +/- 1 nM, n = 3), the alpha 2-adrenoceptor (Ki = 120 +/- 5 nM, n = 3) and the sigma receptor (Ki = 170 +/- 70 nM, n = 3). Thioperamide showed relatively high affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor (Ki = 120 +/- 30 nM, n = 3) and the sigma receptor (Ki = 180 +/- 90 nM, n = 3). 5. Due to the low density of histamine H3 receptors in the brain, the interaction of IPP with the 5-HT3-, the alpha 2- and the sigma receptor might interfere with [125I]-IPP binding to rat cortex membranes. Yet, in this preparation [125I]-IPP binding was not influenced by ondansetron, yohimbine or haloperidol. The interaction with the 5-HT3 receptor was not restricted to IPP or thioperamide, but was alsofound with other H3 receptor antagonists. The potent H3 receptor agonist imetit, a compound belongingto the same chemical class of IPP, also interacted with the 5-HT3 receptor (Ki = 240 +/- 40 nM). In contrast,histamine or the H3 receptor agonist, (R)-a-methylhistamine showed no affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor.7 In the guinea-pig isolated ileum, imetit evoked concentration-dependent contractions, resulting in apD2 value of 4.72 +/- 0.03 (n = 9). The contractions were antagonized by ondansetron, yielding a pA2 valueof 7.1 +/- 0.1 (n = 9). Similarly ondansetron antagonized the contractions evoked by the 5-HT3 receptoragonist, 2-methyl-5-HT with a pA2 value of 7.3 +/- 0.1 (n = 4). IPP and thioperamide did not mimic 2-methyl-5-HT but non-competitively inhibited the 2-methyl-5-HT-induced contractions of thispreparation.8 In an in vivo model for 5-HT3 activity, the Von Bezold Jarisch reflex, thioperamide showedantagonism in low dosages, which correlated well with the affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor site. Yet, athigher dosages no further 5-HT3 receptor antagonism was observed. For IPP no 5-HT3 receptor activitycould be observed in vivo.9 In the present study we showed that many H3 receptor compounds, that are regarded as highlyselective (including the prototype drug, thioperamide), also interact with the 5-HT3 receptor, albeit athigher drug concentrations.Keywords.: Histamine H3-receptor; iodophenpropit; thioperamide; receptor selectivity; 5-hydroxytryptamine 5-HT3 receptor;guinea-pig intestine; rat brain; Von Bezold Jarisch reflex
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the receptor selectivity of the H3 receptor antagonists, iodophenpropit and thioperamide: an interaction with the 5-HT3 receptor revealed. 856 66

Three kinds of neurotransmitters: histamine, acetylcholine and noradrenaline, play important roles in the neural processes of motion sickness, because antihistamines, scopolamine and amphetamine are effective in preventing motion sickness. Histamine H1-receptors are involved in the development of the symptoms and signs of motion sickness, including emesis. On provocative motion stimuli, a neural mismatch signal activates the histaminergic neuron system in the hypothalamus, and the histaminergic descending impulse stimulates H1-receptors in the emetic center of the brainstem. The histaminergic input to the emetic center through H1-receptors is independent of dopamine D2-receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone in the area postrema and serotonin 5HT3-receptors in the visceral afferent, which are also involved in the emetic reflex. Antihistamines block emetic H1-receptors to prevent motion sickness. Scopolamine prevents motion sickness by modifying the neural store to reduce the neural mismatch signal and by facilitating the adaptation/habituation processes. The noradrenergic neuron system in the locus coeruleus is suppressed by the neural mismatch signal. Amphetamine antagonizes mismatch-induced suppression of noradrenergic neural transmission, resulting in preventing motion sickness.
 ...
PMID:Neural mechanisms of motion sickness. 1128 16

Nausea and vomiting are rather stereotyped symptoms. The challenge is that nausea and vomiting have many different causes and, in some patients, management may be rather complex. The clue is to determine the causal factor early. It helps to separate acute vomiting (<48 hours onset) from chronic vomiting. In acute vomiting, the causal factor or factors are most often evident. Symptomatic treatment with parenteral central-type antiemetics is the preferred treatment. Histamine-1 receptor antagonists, phenothiazines, butyrophenones, and corticosteroids are suitable drugs. For specific types of acute vomiting, for example, chemotherapy-related vomiting, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are costlier but effective drugs with minimal side effects. Sometimes, oral and parenteral administration of the above-mentioned drugs may be combined. The origin of chronic vomiting is often obscure, requires specialized investigation, and the causative factor may be uncorrectable. Symptomatic treatment requires a value judgement. If delayed gastric emptying is a contributing factor, prokinetic agents (metoclopramide, erythromycin, cisapride in special cases, if authorized) may prove useful. Otherwise, symptomatic treatment with central antiemetics is the only recourse. Some patients with unexplained vomiting present with psychological disturbances that act as magnifying or contributing factors and may be helped by psychotherapeutics.
 ...
PMID:Nausea and Vomiting. 1209 71