Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (5-HT3 receptor)
 2,290 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. The ability of several 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (MDL 72,222EF, the methyl quaternary ammonium salt of MDL 72,222, dolasetron, tropisetron, granisetron and ondansetron) to inhibit writhing induced in the mouse by either 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), acetylcholine or acetic acid was examined. 2. All of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were able to inhibit writhing induced by acetylcholine. MDL 72,222EF and tropisetron were also able to inhibit writhing induced by 5-HT and acetic acid but higher doses were required to have the same effect as against acetylcholine. Dolasetron inhibited writhes induced by 5-HT but failed to significantly affect writhes induced by acetic acid. 3. MDL 72,222EF and its quaternary salt were more potent and had a more rapid onset of action after i.p. than after s.c. administration. 4. 2-Methyl-5-HT did not induce writhing at doses up to 4 mg/kg i.p., whereas 5-HT dose-dependently induced writhing over the range 0.5-2 mg/kg. 5. These results show that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists can inhibit writhes induced by a variety of compounds and this appears to be a local action. However, the inability of 2-methyl-5-HT to induce writhing and the high doses of antagonist required indicate that further studies are required to establish a role for 5-HT3 receptors in this effect.
 ...
PMID:The effect of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on the writhing response in mice. 759 Jan 23

Dolasetron mesilate [(2 alpha, 6 alpha, 8 alpha, 9a beta)-octahydro-3-oxo-2,6-methano-2H-quinolizin-8-yl-1H-indole-3-c arboxylate monomethane-sulfonate], is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which is in development for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. The compound is rapidly reduced by carbonyl reductase to form its major pharmacologically active metabolite reduced dolasetron (red-dolasetron), which us further metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Studies were conducted, using human liver microsomes, to characterize the CYP450 enzymes responsible for the in vitro metabolism of red-dolasetron. Red-dolasetron underwent oxidation of the indole aromatic ring at positions 5, 6, and 7, and also N-oxidation. Enzyme-selective inhibition and correlation studies showed that hydroxylation of red-dolasetron was CYP2D6-dependent, and N-oxidation was conducted by CYP3A4. The rate of formation of 6-hydroxy red-dolasetron was significantly correlated with that of 5-hydroxy red-dolasetron, which further suggested that these metabolites were formed by the same CYP450 enzyme(s). Inhibition studies also demonstrated that 6-hydroxylation was, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4-dependent. This was confirmed by correlation experiments, wherein formation of this metabolite was significantly correlated with that of N-oxide formation, in quinidine-inhibited microsomes. Results were compared with those obtained with two other indole-containing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists: tropisetron and ondansetron. Tropisetron hydroxylation was CYP2D6-dependent, whereas that of ondansetron was both CYP2D6- and CYP2E1-dependent. Results were further confirmed, when compounds were incubated with microsomes containing recombinant human liver CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2E1. Red-dolasetron was a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6, with an IC50 value of 70 microM, which is 2 orders of magnitude above maximum plasma concentrations found in humans. The implications of these in vitro results to the in vivo metabolism of these compounds in humans and their potential pharmacokinetic consequences is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Characterization of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the in vitro metabolism of dolasetron. Comparison with other indole-containing 5-HT3 antagonists. 872 43

Dolasetron mesilate (Anzemet) ((2 alpha, 6 alpha, 8 alpha, 9a beta)-octahydro-3-oxo-2,6-methano-2H-quinolizin-8-yl-1 H-indole-3-carboxylate monomethane-sulfonate) is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which is in development for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. The ketone moiety of dolasetron is rapidly reduced by carbonyl reductase to form an alcohol, reduced dolasetron (red-dolasetron), which is the major pharmacologically active metabolite in humans. The pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and red-dolasetron were compared in dog, after single intravenous (i.v.) (2 mg/kg) and oral (p.o.) (5 mg/kg) administration of [14C]dolasetron or [14C]red-dolasetron. Pharmacokinetic parameters of dolasetron showed a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of 0.1 h, total body plasma clearance (Cltot) of around 109 mL/min/kg, apparent volume of distribution (aVd beta) of 0.83 L/kg, and bioavailability (F) of 7%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of red-dolasetron, calculated after dolasetron or red-dolasetron administration, were very similar. The t1/2 was around 4.0 h, Cltot 25 mL/min/kg, aVd beta 8.5 L/kg, and F around 100%. The apparent first-order formation rate constant (ki) of red-dolasetron was 7 h-1, which was similar to the first-order elimination rate constant (kel) of dolasetron. Cmax of red-dolasetron was similar, after po administration of either compound, but the median Tmax was 0.33 h after dolasetron, compared with 1.5 h after red-dolasetron. The first-order absorption rate constants (ka) of dolasetron and red-dolasetron were 14 h-1 and 2 h-1, respectively. Dolasetron transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers was also higher than that of red-dolasetron. Thus dolasetron was more quickly absorbed than red-dolasetron, and its administration led to the more rapid appearance of red-dolasetron in plasma. There appears to be no advantage in the direct administration of the metabolite, especially as in humans oral administration of dolasetron, 30 min before chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective in preventing emesis.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its major active metabolite, reduced dolasetron, in dog. 881 90

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF, Anzemet; Hoechst Marion Roussel, Laval, Canada) is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist undergoing clinical evaluation for use as an antiemetic agent. The pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its reduced metabolite (MDL 74,156) were studied after administration of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate 2.4 mg/kg in 18 healthy elderly subjects. Expressed as the dolasetron base, this dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Dolasetron was rapidly metabolized to the reduced metabolite, which appeared in plasma within 10 minutes after intravenous or oral administration. The mean half-life (t1/2) of dolasetron was 0.24 hours after intravenous administration and 0.50 hours after oral administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the reduced metabolite were similar after intravenous and oral administration. The apparent absolute bioavailability of the reduced metabolite was 89%, and it had an elimination t1/2 of approximately 7 hours and an apparent volume of distribution (Vd beta) of 4.69 L/kg. Dolasetron was not detected in urine. Metabolites were excreted in urine almost completely within 24 hours of administration. The primary metabolite detected in urine was the (+)-enantiomer of the reduced metabolite, which accounted for 25.35% (+/- 7.79%) and 18.88% (+/- 7.65%) of the intravenous and oral doses, respectively. Hydroxylated metabolites accounted for 5% or less of the total dose via either route. The pharmacokinetics of the reduced metabolite after single intravenous or oral doses in elderly volunteers were consistent with pharmacokinetics observed in both young healthy men and cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Dosage adjustments of dolasetron mesylate on the basis of age do not appear to be necessary.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in healthy elderly volunteers. 893 Jul 77

1. Dolasetron (Anzemet) is a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist which is rapidly and extensively reduced to yield its major pharmacologically active metabolite, reduced dolasetron (RD). RD is further metabolized by CYP450 enzymes as well as undergoing renal excretion. As both in vitro and in vivo data on RD were available from animals and man, two approaches to predict the human pharmacokinetic parameters of RD were assessed. 2. First, in vitro studies, using liver microsomes from animal species and man, were undertaken to measure Vmax and K(m) and to assess the intrinsic clearance (CLint). With appropriate liver weight and liver blood flow scaling factors the predicted in vivo metabolic clearance (CLm-pred) was calculated. Human CLm-pred was underestimated by a factor of 5 when it was calculated using the above scaling factors. As, in a prospective study, the observed human in vivo metabolic clearance (CLm-obs) is unknown, CLm-pred was substituted into the least-squares correlation equation obtained from a plot of CLm-pred against CLm-obs' using animal data. The estimate of human CLm-obs was improved as it was only underestimated by a factor of 1.5. 3. Second, allometric scaling of in vivo animal pharmacokinetic data, using body weight, was performed to predict pharmacokinetic parameters in man. Good predictions of human pharmacokinetic parameters of RD were obtained for plasma clearance (1.7 l/min predicted versus 1.61/min observed), half-life (6.0 h predicted versus 5.6 h observed), and volume of distribution (860.91 predicted versus 770.41 observed). 4. The integration of in vitro metabolic data from microsomes gave similar results to conventional allometric scaling, whereas the normalization of clearance by brain weight resulted in an approximately three-fold underestimation of human clearance. 5. For RD, a drug that is eliminated by both renal and metabolic clearance, retrospective conventional allometric scaling allowed accurate prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters in man, whereas in vitro-in vivo scaling resulted in an underestimation of in vivo CLm. Although these results are somewhat at variance, ideally both scaling methods should be applied to improve the prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters.
 ...
PMID:Prediction of the pharmacokinetic parameters of reduced-dolasetron in man using in vitro-in vivo and interspecies allometric scaling. 905 32

Dolasetron (dolasetron mesilate) is a pseudopelletierine-derived 5-HT3 antagonist which has recently become available for clinical use. It is rapidly converted in vivo to its active major metabolite, hydrodolasetron, which appears to be largely responsible for its pharmacological activity. In clinical trials, single intravenous or oral doses of dolasetron were effective in preventing acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Intravenous doses of 1.8 mg/kg achieved complete suppression of vomiting in approximately 50% of patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and in approximately 60 to 80% of patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. In the latter setting, oral doses of 200 mg achieved similar response rates. In comparative studies, intravenous dolasetron 1.8 mg/kg was as effective as intravenous granisetron 3 mg or ondansetron 32 mg after highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and oral dolasetron 200 mg was equivalent to multiple oral doses of ondansetron (3 or 4 doses of 8 mg) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Dolasetron 1.8 mg/kg was superior to metoclopramide in preventing emesis induced by high dose cisplatin or by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in high risk subgroups. Dolasetron has also shown efficacy in preventing radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) in preliminary studies. Single intravenous or oral dolasetron doses ranging from 12.5 to 100 mg and 25 to 200 mg, respectively, were significantly more effective than placebo in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in female surgical patients. A 50 mg intravenous dose was as effective in preventing PONV as ondansetron 4 mg in a mixed-gender group. Intravenously administered dolasetron was also effective in treating established PONV, although complete suppression of vomiting was achieved in < 40% of patients. Dolasetron has a tolerability profile characteristic of this class of compounds, with headache, dizziness and diarrhoea being the most commonly occurring adverse events in clinical trials. Diarrhoea is not thought to be related to dolasetron administration, being experienced mostly by patients receiving chemotherapy. Dolasetron and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been associated with minor changes in ECG intervals, but these generally do not appear to be clinically important. Thus, available evidence suggests that dolasetron will provide an alternative to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the management of CINV and PONV. Further studies are required to determine whether it offers any advantages over other agents in these settings and to determine the optimum dosage for preventing RINV.
 ...
PMID:Dolasetron. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. 925 83

Insight into the pathophysiology of antineoplastic therapy-induced nausea and vomiting led to the development of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as the most potent class of antiemetic agents. Among those which have been investigated are ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron and dolasetron. A risk-benefit analysis of these drugs must not only account for the modest clinical differences in efficacy and tolerability, but also should include such issues as ease of use, route of administration, dosage considerations and patient preference. Pharmacokinetic and preclinical studies reveal distinctions among these antiemetics, but, overall, these distinctions do not translate in to clinically significant differences. In clinical trials, the most widely studied members of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are granisetron and ondansetron, which have been found to possess equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Dolasetron and tropisetron are also available, and some randomised trials have also documented their similar antiemetic activity, depending on the doses and schedules used. The equivalent efficacy of oral granisetron 2 mg versus intravenous ondansetron 32 mg has recently been demonstrated in prospective randomised clinical trials in patients receiving either highly emetogenic or moderately emetogenic antineoplastic therapy. The utilisation and efficacy of oral ondansetron and dolasetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic antineoplastic therapy has also been documented. This review offers a brief overview of the pharmacokinetic and preclinical research on the 5-HT3 antagonists, a review of the comparative clinical trials of the major members of this class and a summary risk-benefit assessment that considers clinical applicability and cost, as well as efficacy and safety.
 ...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis. 946 87

Dolasetron mesilate is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that prevents chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. For the majority of patients in intravenous dolasetron trials for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, dosing has been based on body weight (mg/kg). The approved weight-based dose is 1.8 mg/kg based on results of controlled clinical trials. However, trials of dolasetron evaluating oral doses for prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis, and intravenous doses for prevention and treatment of postoperative emesis have used a fixed milligram dose. To identify an appropriate intravenous fixed milligram dose for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, this analysis was performed to derive efficacy results for fixed milligram doses from pooled results obtained with dosing based on body weight. Intravenous dolasetron doses for 1,598 patients treated on a mg/kg basis (0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) in 14 clinical trials were converted to fixed milligram doses based on weight. Fixed-dose groups were established at doses of 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, and 200 mg. Doses less than or equal to the midpoint between two dose groups were included in the lower dose group. Pooled results showed that the 100 mg intravenous dolasetron dose group (who received actual doses of 88-112 mg) produced the highest rate (53%) of complete response (0 emetic episodes and no rescue medication in the 24-h period following initiation of chemotherapy).
 ...
PMID:Rationale for the use of a single fixed intravenous dolasetron dose for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Pooled analysis of 14 clinical trials. 977 66

In this first part of a two-part investigation, the intravenous dose proportionality of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and the absolute bioavailability of oral dolasetron mesylate were investigated. In an open-label, randomized, four-way crossover design, 24 healthy men between the ages of 19 and 45 years received the following doses: 50, 100, or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate administered by 10-min intravenous infusion or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate solution administered orally. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 h after dosing. Following intravenous administration, dolasetron was rapidly eliminated from plasma, with a mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of less than 10 min. Dolasetron was rarely detected in plasma after oral administration of the 200 mg dose. Hydrodolasetron, the active primary metabolite of dolasetron, appeared rapidly in plasma following both oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate, with a mean time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of less than 1 h. The mean t1/2 of hydrodolasetron ranged from 6.6-8.8 h. The plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity)) for both dolasetron and hydrodolasetron increased proportionally with dose over the intravenous dose range of 50-200 mg dolasetron mesylate. Approximately 29-33%) and 22% of the dose was excreted in urine as hydrodolasetron following intravenous and oral administration of dolasetron, respectively. For dolasetron as well as hydrodolasetron, mean systemic clearance (C1), volume of distribution (Vd), and t1/2 were similar at each dolasetron dose. The mean 'apparent' bioavailability of dolasetron calculated using plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron was 76%. The R(+) enantiomer of hydrodolasetron represented the majority of drug in plasma (> 75%) and urine (> 86%). Dolasetron was well tolerated following both oral and intravenous administration.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous pharmacokinetics and absolute oral bioavailability of dolasetron in healthy volunteers: part 1. 1008 35

Fractionated cisplatin-containing regimens are routinely used for chemotherapy in certain types of cancer. Dolasetron has been shown to be effective in preventing acute emesis related to high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy over 24 h; its effectiveness has not been evaluated in fractionated cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy of dolasetron alone or dolasetron plus dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. The patients were 210 cancer in-patients, who were randomised to receive 100 mg dolasetron i.v. or 100 mg dolasetron i.v. plus 20 mg dexamethasone before chemotherapy primarily with cisplatin (15-50 mg/m2) infused over < or =4 h for at least 2 but not more than 5 consecutive days. Dolasetron was administered to all patients 30 min before cisplatin. Dexamethasone was administered in double-blind fashion 5 min before cisplatin. Efficacy was measured at hour 24 of each study day using complete response (no vomiting and no rescue medication) and maximum severity of nausea, self-assessed by patients using a 100mm visual analogue scale. Most (198) of the patients completed the study and were evaluable. Overall complete response rates were significantly higher in the dolasetron plus dexamethasone group than in the dolasetron only group (72.9% vs. 40.8%, respectively; P<0.0001). Complete response rates on each study day were also significantly higher with dolasetron plus dexamethasone than with dolasetron alone (P<0.029), with an attenuated efficacy in the delayed phase in both groups. Chi-square test and logistic regression applied to daily response rates indicated a significant influence of treatment (day 1: P = 0.0002, day 2: P<0.0001, day 3: P = 0.0007, day 4: P = 0.0007, day 5: P = 0.029). Treatment and duration of chemotherapy exerted the only statistically significant subgroup effects on complete response (P<0.0001). Both treatments were administered safely. As seen with other 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetics, the addition of dexamethasone to dolasetron significantly increases effectiveness in preventing nausea and vomiting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. Both dolasetron and dolasetron plus dexamethasone were well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, randomised, parallel study comparing intravenous dolasetron plus dexamethasone and intravenous dolasetron alone for the management of fractionated cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting. 1065 Aug 98


1 2 Next >>