Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (
5-HT3 receptor
)
2,290
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The selective "5-HT1-like" receptor agonist 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT, 0.2-1.6 micrograms/kg bolus i.v.), serotonin (5-HT, 3-10 micrograms/kg), and phenylbiguanide (10-40 micrograms/kg) all elicited the "Bezold-Jarisch-like" bradycardia reflex in conscious rabbits. This reflex was antagonised by the
5-HT3 receptor
antagonist, MDL 72222. After autonomic blockade (mecamylamine), 5-CT and 5-HT infusion (i.v.) caused renal artery spasm (Doppler flowmeter) that was antagonised by ketanserin, a 5-HT2-receptor antagonist. Both 5-CT and 5-HT caused 5-HT1-like receptor mediated increases in hindquarter conductance that were unaltered by ketanserin (0.5 mg/kg). The anomalous 5-HT3 and 5-HT2 receptor actions of 5-CT were completely prevented by 16 h pretreatment with reserpine (5 mg/kg) that lowered total serum serotonin to less than 3% of normal but did not reduce the cardiovascular actions of 5-HT.
Fluoxetine
(1 mg/kg i.v.), an inhibitor of 5-HT uptake into platelets, significantly attenuated the Bezold-Jarisch-like reflex evoked by 5-CT but not by 5-HT. These studies suggest that 5-CT is carried into platelets where it releases 5-HT. This illustrates how apparent receptor selectivity asserted in in vitro assays can be destroyed in vivo.
...
PMID:5-carboxamidotryptamine elicits 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor-mediated cardiovascular responses in the conscious rabbit: evidence for 5-HT release from platelets. 247 Sep 92
The effect of the selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, on the inward current mediated by 5-HT3 receptors was investigated with the whole-cell patch-clamp technique.
Fluoxetine
inhibited the peak 5-HT current with an IC50 value of 1.2 microM. During continuous application of fluoxetine at concentrations of < or = 1 microM, there was a transient decrease in the fluoxetine-induced inhibition of 5-HT current. It is suggested that fluoxetine may have a short-lived action on 5-HT current and that the
5-HT3 receptor
is a possible acting site for the therapeutic use of fluoxetine.
...
PMID:Inhibition of a 5-HT3 receptor-mediated current by the selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine. 752 98
1. A combined study of receptor binding in central neuronal cell membranes and functional responses in isolated segments of guinea-pig small intestine allowed characterization of the interaction of four antidepressant drugs with central and peripheral 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors. 2. Clomipramine, paroxetine and fluoxetine inhibited [3H]-DAU 6215 binding to 5-HT3 recognition sites in NG 108-15 cells with IC50 values in the range 1.3-4 microM. Litoxetine had an IC50 of 0.3 microM. The specific binding of [3H]-GR 113808 to 5-HT4 recognition sites in pig striatal membranes was inhibited by all four antidepressants with negligible potency (IC50 values > or = 20 microM). 3. In whole ileal segments, concentration-response curves to 5-HT were biphasic, with the high- and low-potency phases involving 5-HT4 and 5-HT3 receptors, respectively. Curves to 2-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (2-methyl-5-HT: a
5-HT3 receptor
agonist) and 5-methoxytryptamine (5-MeOT: a 5-HT4 receptor agonist) were monophasic. All antidepressants were used at concentrations lacking anticholinoceptor properties, as demonstrated in both electrically stimulated longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus preparations (LMMPs) and in unstimulated LMMPs following addition of acetylcholine (100 nM). 4.
Fluoxetine
(0.1-1 microM) and litoxetine (0.3-3 microM) antagonized both the high- and low-potency phases of the 5-HT curve. Schild analysis for the low-potency phase yielded pA2 estimates of 6.6 +/- 0.3 (Schild slope of 1.1) and of 6.6 +/- 0.1 (Schild slope of 1.1), respectively. At higher concentrations (3 microM), fluoxetine markedly inhibited the 5-HT response maximum. Clomipramine (10-300 nM) inhibited, by a mechanism independent of concentration, both phases of the 5-HT curve with a reduction of the maximum response. Paroxetine (1 microM) was ineffective on the high-potency phase, but caused a rightward shift of the low-potency phase (pKB: 6.1 +/- 0.01). 5. Responses to 2-methyl-5-HT were inhibited by 1 microM fluoxetine (pKB: 5.4 +/- 0.02). Like clomipramine(30 and 100 nM), litoxetine (1 and 3 microM) produced rightward displacements of 2-methyl-5-HT-induced contractions, which were virtually independent of antidepressant concentration (pKB values: 6.0 +/- 0.02 and 5.5 +/- 0.01, respectively). At higher concentrations, fluoxetine (3 microM) and clomipramine (300 nM)markedly reduced the 2-methyl-5-HT response maximum. Paroxetine (1 micro M) was ineffective.6. Responses to 5-MeOT were shifted to the right by fluoxetine (0.1-1 micro M) and litoxetine (1 and 3 microM)in a concentration-dependent manner. At higher concentrations, fluoxetine (3 microM) markedly reduced the 5-MeOT response maximum, an effect also observed with 100 and 300 nM clomipramine. Paroxetine(1 microM) was ineffective.7. In unstimulated LMMPs, the excitatory effects evoked by 5-HT, 2-methyl-5-HT and 5-MeOT and the antagonism produced by 300 nM clomipramine were comparable to those obtained in whole ileal segments. This suggests that 5-HT contained in the mucosa of whole preparations does not interfere with agonist-induced contractile responses and with the inhibitory effect of antidepressant drugs.8. In conclusion, our results show that clomipramine, fluoxetine, paroxetine and litoxetine possess low to moderate potency/affinity at both central and peripheral (enteric) 5-HT3 receptors. In contrast, all four antidepressants are virtually ineffective at central 5-HT4 receptors. Inhibition of 5-HT4 receptor mediated ileal contractions by fluoxetine, litoxetine and clomipramine may result from allostericant agonism or, more likely, from post-receptor blockade of second messenger generation. The interaction of antidepressants with central and peripheral 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors may be relevant for both potential therapeutic action and adverse effects at gastrointestinal level.
...
PMID:The interaction of antidepressant drugs with central and peripheral (enteric) 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors. 778 Jun 35
The selective 5HT uptake inhibitor, litoxetine (SL 81.0385), currently under development as an antidepressant was shown to have antiemetic properties in the ferret. Litoxetine (at 1 and 10 mg/kg i.v.) dose dependently reduced the number of retches and vomiting as well as the number of emetic episodes induced by cisplatin (10 mg/kg i.v.) and delayed the onset of emesis.
Fluoxetine
(at 1 or 10 mg/kg i.v.) failed to inhibit cisplatin-induced emetic responses and, in contrast, significantly increased the number of retches and vomiting and accelerated the onset of emesis. The possibility that the antiemetic effects of litoxetine may be mediated through an interaction with
5HT3
receptors was studied using [3H]quipazine or [3H]BRL 43694 to label the
5HT3
receptor. Litoxetine has moderate affinity for cerebral
5HT3
receptors (Ki = 85 nM), while fluoxetine, similar to other 5HT uptake inhibitors, has only negligible affinity for this receptor (Ki = 6.5 microM). It is proposed that litoxetine inhibits cisplatin-induced emetic responses due to its moderate
5HT3
antagonist properties. The clinical use of the majority of serotonergic antidepressants (e.g. fluoxetine, fluvoxamine etc.) is associated with gastrointestinal discomfort (particularly nausea and vomiting) as a major side-effect. If nausea and vomiting associated with the use of 5 HT uptake inhibitors are due to stimulation of
5HT3
receptors, the concomitant
5HT3
antagonism of litoxetine may limit the gastrointestinal side-effects of this novel antidepressant and thus offer an important advantage.
...
PMID:Litoxetine: a selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor with concomitant 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and antiemetic properties. 838 15
Lotronex (alosetron hydrochloride) is a
5-HT3 receptor
antagonist indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in females whose predominant bowel habit is diarrhea. Alosetron is extensively metabolized by multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, including CYP2C9 and CYP3A4.
Fluoxetine
is an antidepressant that is administered as a racemic mixture of equipotent R- and S-enantiomers.
Fluoxetine
metabolism involves CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 in the formation of its major metabolite, norfluoxetine. This metabolite is also present as two enantiomers, of which only the S-enantiomer exhibits comparable antidepressant activity. This study was conducted to assess the potential for an effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine. This was an open-label, two-period, nonrandomized, crossover study in 12 healthy female and male volunteers. The pharmacokinetics for both enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were examined following single oral doses of 20 mg fluoxetine, given alone and in combination with alosetron 1 mg twice daily for 15 days. The results showed small delays in peak concentration but no clinically significant effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of S- and R-fluoxetine or S- and R-norfluoxetine. Coadministration of alosetron and fluoxetine was well tolerated by all subjects.
...
PMID:Effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine. 1130 3
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may produce digestive side effects such as nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea and decreased appetite. These side effects are determined by the increase in serotonin availability at 5-HT3 receptors. Granisetron, a
serotonin 5-HT3 receptor
antagonist, is expected to antagonize the digestive adverse effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but the question is to what extent granisetron influences the antidepressant effect of these substances. The aim of this study was to determine the dose of fluoxetine that has an antidepressant effect in the Porsolt test, and the interaction between fluoxetine and granisetron with respect to the antidepressant effect in this test. In experiment 1, fluoxetine was antidepressant only at 20 mg/kg body weight (bw). In experiment 2, granisetron 1 mg/kg bw had a statistically significant antidepressant effect vs. control.
Fluoxetine
20 mg/kg bw associated with a small dose of granisetron (0.1 mg/kg bw) produced a significant antidepressant effect vs. control. This shows that low doses of granisetron associated to fluoxetine might produce a significant antidepressant effect, suggesting a potentiation between these two drugs used in sub-effective antidepressant doses. In conclusion, in our experimental conditions, we can assume that granisetron in low doses could be used to combat intestinal transit disorders produced by SSRI antidepressants. These low doses are preferred, because they increase the antidepressant effect of these SSRIs.
...
PMID:Antidepressant effect of the interaction of fluoxetine with granisetron. 3181 74