Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (5-HT3 receptor)
 2,290 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An open, two-armed, multicentre trial was conducted in 231 patients with malignant disease who had previously failed to respond to conventional antiemetic treatment for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Patients were randomized to receive either tropisetron (5 mg/day; n = 115) or a standard antiemetic therapy, which was considered optimal for each individual but did not include a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (n = 116). Acute vomiting on Day 1 was controlled in 60 (52%) tropisetron patients, compared with only 29 (25%) patients receiving optimal standard therapy (p < 0.001). Acute nausea was completely inhibited in 37 (32%) tropisetron patients, compared with 22 (19%) patients on optimal standard therapy (p < 0.05). On Day 1, delayed vomiting was also significantly better prevented by tropisetron (p < 0.001). Side effects from tropisetron (headache and constipation) were mild, and no extrapyramidal symptoms were observed in any tropisetron patients, in contrast, to 14 (13%) patients in the 'optimal standard' group. In conclusion, in cases of acute nausea and vomiting it is more effective to switch refractory patients to tropisetron rather than attempt to optimize the dose of standard antiemetic therapy. For delayed nausea and vomiting, combination antiemetic therapy, with differing types of receptor antagonism and corticosteroids may provide the best way forward. Such studies are in progress.
 ...
PMID:Tropisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients responding poorly to previous conventional antiemetic therapy. 836 95

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was performed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of two 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, in Chinese patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Twenty patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either granisetron on day 1 and ondansetron on day 8 of the first cycle followed by the reverse order in the second cycle, or vice versa. The number of vomiting episodes and the severity of nausea in the first 24 h (acute vomiting/nausea) and the following 7 days (delayed vomiting/nausea) were studied. Acute vomiting was completely prevented in 29 (72.5%) cycles with granisetron and 27 (67.5%) cycles with ondansetron, and treatment failure (>5 vomiting episodes) occurred in two (5%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). Acute nausea was completely controlled in 15 (37.5%) cycles with granisetron and 14 (35%) cycles with ondansetron, whereas severe acute nausea occurred in four (10%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). However, complete response for delayed vomiting was observed in only 21 (52.5%) cycles with granisetron and 22 (55%) cycles with ondansetron (P = NS), and delayed nausea was completely controlled in only 11 (27.5%) and ten (25%) cycles respectively (P = NS). In conclusion, both granisetron and ondansetron are effective in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in Chinese patients, with equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Control of delayed nausea and vomiting is less satisfactory.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron and ondansetron in Oriental patients: a randomized crossover study. 963 49