Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (5-HT3 receptor)
 2,290 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We estimate the influence of five 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT3) antagonists on the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPDase), the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-fluorouracil (5FU) metabolism. The activity of DPDase from the rat liver was compared in the cytosol mixture of 5FU incubated with or without each of five 5-HT3 antagonists. DPDase activity was not altered in the presence of any 5-HT3 antagonist studied here. It may be inferred from these results that the any 5-HT3 receptor antagonist examined in this study has little or no effect on fluorouracil catabolism.
Cancer Lett 1996 Nov 12
PMID:The activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase from rat liver was not affected by any of five 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists. 895 Feb 2

Major breakthroughs in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis have come through the use of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in combination with corticosteroids. This combination can be considered standard for most but not all commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. Delayed-onset emesis remains a problem, particularly for patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. There is debate over the value of using selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists beyond the first 24 h. Clinical trials have not settled this uncertainty, although it seems likely that they add only modestly to the effect of corticosteroids. For both the acute and delayed phases, dopamine receptor antagonists may add to the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy. This article outlines a strategy for initial antiemetic therapy and the rationale for the recommendations.
Support Care Cancer 1997 Jan
PMID:Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. 901 Sep 81

A series of 2-piperazinylbenzimidazole derivatives were prepared and evaluated as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Their 5-HT3 receptor affinities were evaluated by radioligand binding assays, and their abilities to inhibit the 5-HT-induced Bezold-Jarisch reflex in anesthetized rats were determined. Compound 7e (lerisetron, pKi = 9.2) exhibited higher affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor than did tropisetron and granisetron, while compound 7q (pKi = 7.5) had very low affinity for this receptor, showing that substitution on the N1 atom of the benzimidazole ring is essential for affinity and activity. The effect of substitution on the aromatic ring of benzimidazole by several substituents in different positions is also discussed. A strong correlation between the 5-HT3 antagonistic activity of the studied compounds and the position of substitution on the aromatic ring was established. Thus, while the 4-methoxy derivative 7m showed weak affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor (pKi = 6.7), the 7-methoxy derivative 7n exhibited the highest affinity (pKi = 9.4). Compounds 7e and 7n are now under further investigation as drugs for the treatment of nausea and emesis evoked by cancer chemotherapy and radiation.
 ...
PMID:New 2-piperazinylbenzimidazole derivatives as 5-HT3 antagonists. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation. 904 49

Ten years after it was demonstrated in the ferret that cisplatin-induced emesis could be blocked by the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist MDL 72222, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have become routine anti-emetic agents for chemotherapy-induced emesis. However, although in association with highly emetogenic, mainly cisplatin-containing regimens, the use of these agents is well justified, the net benefit of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in association with moderately emetogenic regimens has not been that well clarified. Here, we present an overview of 30 randomised studies comparing 5-HT3 antagonists with the conventional anti-emetics in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy. A meta-analysis showed that 5-HT3 antagonists reduce the risk of acute vomiting in comparison to conventional anti-emetics both with cisplatin treatments (15 trials; odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.70) and with moderately emetogenic treatments (11 trials; odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.58). The risk of acute vomiting seems to be further reduced when 5-HT3 antagonists are combined with dexamethasone.
Eur J Cancer 1997 Jan
PMID:An overview of randomised studies comparing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to conventional anti-emetics in the prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting. 907 2

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, two of the most distressing side-effects of cancer chemotherapy, have been the subject of a number of fundamental and clinical investigations. These have led to the development of a novel class of antiemetic agents, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The pathophysiology of the emetic reflex and the clinical management of emesis are very complicated. Two experimental preclinical animal models are available (ferret and dog) and are particularly used to assess monochemotherapy as a single dose. Results are fairly good for acute nausea and vomiting. However, no optional animal model is available for the assessment of delayed and anticipated emesis. The clinical settings are so complex and variable that they preclude the development of an adequate model in all cases. It is also impossible to carry out clinical studies to assess each issue. Management of nausea and vomiting depends on the analysis by the physician of individual and drug-related parameters and on his own expertise. Scores can be assigned to each parameter and a decision tree can be elaborated to help the decision and improve the management of patients. The first goal is to obtain an optimal control of emesis from the very first cycle of chemotherapy in order to ensure good control during subsequent cycles.
Bull Cancer 1996 Dec
PMID:[Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: from experimentation to experience]. 911 65

Chemotherapy-induced emesis has a major adverse impact on patients undergoing therapy for various malignancies, and this has led to considerable research in this field. Most investigative efforts have concentrated on the acute phase of emesis that occurs within the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, and significant strides forward have been made with this problem. Better control of acute emesis with newer agents such as the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists has focused increasing attention on a second phase of nausea and vomiting, known as delayed emesis, which occurs more than 24 hours after chemotherapy. This delayed phase is often not as well controlled with the antiemetics that have proven effective in acute emesis, and contributes to the distress associated with emetogenic chemotherapy. Most of the available data on delayed emesis are based on studies with cisplatin-based regimens, with much less understanding of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, it is evident that the patterns of delayed emesis associated with cisplatin and non-cisplatin chemotherapy have distinct differences. The control of delayed emesis, especially following cisplatin, remains a therapeutic challenge. Contributing to the lack of progress has been the absence of an experimental model to help in elucidating the pathophysiology of delayed emesis and in the evaluation of new therapeutic approaches. The combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone, although superior to placebo in randomised trials, provides only moderate control of delayed emesis following high-dose cisplatin. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists that are effective in the prevention of acute emesis with cisplatin have failed to make a major impact on the delayed phase. When combined with dexamethasone, these agents provide no additional benefit to that achieved using dexamethasone alone or dexamethasone combined with metoclopramide. With non-cisplatin chemotherapy, corticosteroids and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are the most useful agents. Efforts are ongoing to identify more effective treatments for delayed emesis. One novel approach involves the blockade of substance P binding to neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors. This article reviews what is currently known about chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis, with a focus on treatment strategies.
 ...
PMID:Drug treatment of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis. 911 14

The use of ondansetron, a selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, is well established in patients with nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, radiotherapy or anaesthesia and surgery. The wide distribution of 5-HT3 receptors in the body and the role of these receptors in disease have provided the rationale for investigation of ondansetron in novel applications. Preliminary data have shown ondansetron to have clinical benefit in patients with nausea and vomiting associated with drug overdosage or poisoning, anti-infective or antidepressant therapies, uraemia or neurological trauma, and in patients with pruritus. Patients with gastrointestinal motility disorders (e.g. carcinoid syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhoea associated with cryptosporidiosis or diabetes, and chronic refractory diarrhoea) have also shown some improvement when treated with ondansetron, as have patients with certain pain or CNS-related disorders [e.g. alcohol (ethanol) dependence, opiate withdrawal, vertigo, cerebellar tremor and Parkinson's disease treatment-related psychosis]. In contrast to conventional antiemetics, ondansetron is generally well tolerated with a lower incidence of sedation and only isolated case reports of extrapyramidal reactions. Furthermore, unlike dopamine receptor-blocking neuroleptics, ondansetron does not appear to worsen the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Thus, in addition to its established indications, preliminary results suggest that ondansetron may be beneficial in a number of novel applications. This drug may represent a treatment alternative in patients with refractory disease, or an effective treatment of conditions for which current therapies are either poorly tolerated or not available. Further investigation of ondansetron in a range of potential new applications appears to be warranted.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron. A review of its pharmacology and preliminary clinical findings in novel applications. 911 22

During the 1995 Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Congress, a consensus conference was planned by the Subcommittee for Antiemetics. To define the topics to be discussed, a questionnaire containing both clinical and methodological issues was sent to 118 experts in 31 countries. The questionnaire contained 33 items on clinical and 19 items on methodological issues, and each response was rated on a 4-level categorical scale. The clinical issues were evaluated for interest, that is clinical importance, and feasibility, that is availability of sufficient data to make them suitable topics for the consensus conference. About 60% of questionnaires were returned, with a small number of missing responses. The responses to the items of clinical interest showed that about two-thirds of the issues identified by the Subcommittee were found by the experts to be of at least high interest, but often the availability of data was found to be insufficient for their discussion. Prevention of acute emesis induced by cisplatin and by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and the optimal intravenous dose and schedule of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were the items with the highest interest and feasibility. The issues in the methodological section were also mostly found to be of at least high interest. The distinction between acute and delayed emesis, the evaluation of the persistence of antiemetic efficacy in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy and the statistical analysis of delayed emesis were the methodological issues in which the highest interest was recorded. Data collected will be used to define the main topics to be discussed during the planned consensus conference.
Support Care Cancer 1997 Jul
PMID:Clinical and methodological issues in antiemetic therapy: a worldwide survey of experts' opinions. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 925 22

Differences among 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been reported in pharmacological studies with regard to selectivity of receptor binding, potency, duration of action and dose-response curves. However, whether these pharmacological differences can affect clinical efficacy and safety remains to be determined. A careful analysis of the literature revealed 22 comparative studies among the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists available for review. Unfortunately, several of these trials have some important shortcomings especially in the study design, the size of population studied and the type of anti-emetic treatment selected, making their conclusions often difficult to interpret. However, among these studies, seven large, double-blind clinical trials have clearly shown that the antiemetic activity and tolerability of ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron and dolasetron is almost identical at least in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Therefore, from the efficacy and safety point of view, there is no reason to prefer one with respect to the other compound. From the economic perspective, instead, differences may exist and they are strictly related to the dose and schedule of administration chosen for each compound. The information available on the use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prevention of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is at best scant. Contrasting results have been reported and only one well-conducted study has been published in full. Therefore, the possible differences among the various compounds are difficult to evaluate. More studies should be carried out in this group of patients.
Eur J Cancer 1997 Aug
PMID:5-HT3 receptor antagonists: differences and similarities. 933 75

In 1983, Coates conducted a survey that ranked the side-effects perceived by patients receiving chemotherapy in the order of their severity. Vomiting and nausea were found to be the two most distressing side-effects. They have an impact on quality of life and compliance with treatment. The development of 5HT3 antagonists has been a major step forward in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Presently, these antiemetics are routinely used as concomitant therapy in emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of 5HT3 antagonists on patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy. Coates' survey was replicated in patients who received 5HT3 antagonists for acute nausea and vomiting resulting from emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received the survey to identify those physical and non-physical side-effects that they attributed to chemotherapy and were asked to rank the five most distressing side-effects. Of the 197 patients who consented to take part in the study, 181 were evaluable. Nausea, hair loss and vomiting were described as the three most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy. Eighty per cent of all the patients actually experienced nausea and 57% experienced vomiting. Hair loss appeared to be more distressing to women (P < 0.001) but, in other aspects, gender, age and marital status did not influence the ranking of the three most distressing side-effects. Constipation was ranked as 6th and was not identified as a distressing side-effect in 1983. Nausea and vomiting remain to be the first and third most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy, even though the incidence and severity of acute nausea and vomiting are now significantly reduced.
Br J Cancer 1997
PMID:Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. 937 66


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10