Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P46098 (5-HT3 receptor)
 2,290 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An open, noncomparative, Nordic multicenter study was carried out during 1991-1992 to evaluate the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron (Navoban) as an antiemetic agent for various types of cancer chemotherapy. A total of 630 patients were recruited from 15 centers in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Gynecological cancers (60%), breast cancer (15%), and lung cancer (10%) were the main diagnoses. Prior experience of chemotherapy was documented in 338 patients (54%). In 260 patients (41%), cisplatin was part of the cytostatic regimen. Carboplatin (23%), doxorubicin (27%), and epidoxorubicin (24%) were also frequently included. In all, 23 cytostatic agents were used in various combinations. The mean number of courses studied was 4.6 (range 1-19). Altogether, 394 of 619 evaluable patients (64%) were completely protected from acute nausea and vomiting during the first course of chemotherapy. Delayed nausea and vomiting were completely prevented in 45%-73% (days 2-6) in the complete series. Treatment efficacy remained stable (60%-79%) during ten consecutive courses of chemotherapy. With noncisplatin regimens, complete protection from acute nausea and vomiting was achieved in 72% compared with 52% for cisplatin regimens (P < 0.0001). Patients without prior experience of chemotherapy had higher control rates of acute nausea and vomiting (72%) compared to patients treated before (57%) during the first course, but not later on. There were no differences in delayed nausea and vomiting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Tropisetron (Navoban) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting--the Nordic experience. 785 34

An open, non-comparative, Nordic multicenter study was performed during 1991-1992 to evaluate the new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron, as an antiemetic agent in various types of cancer chemotherapy. More than 600 patients were recruited from 16 cancer centers in Sweden, Finland and Denmark. In this report an interim analysis on 231 patients is presented. Gynecological cancers (61%), lung cancer (14%) and breast cancer (7%), were the main diagnoses. In 118 of 231 patients (51%) prior experience of chemotherapy was documented. In 91 patients (39%) cisplatin was part of the cytostatic regimen. Carboplatin (27%), doxorubicin (32%), epidoxorubicin (18%) were also frequently included. In all, 18 cytostatic agents were studied. The median number of courses studied was 3.3 (range 1-15). Overall 153 of 231 patients (67%) were completely protected from acute nausea and vomiting during the first course of chemotherapy. Delayed nausea and vomiting (Days 2-6) were completely controlled in 45%-72%. Treatment efficacy remained stable (57%-89%) over 10 consecutive courses of chemotherapy. For non-cisplatin regimens complete protection was achieved in 78% compared with 51% for cisplatin-regimens (p < 0.0001). Patients with no prior experience of chemotherapy had greater control of acute nausea and vomiting (73%) than patients treated before (61%) in the first course, but not in subsequent courses. There were no such differences in control of delayed nausea and vomiting between chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients. Sex and age were significant prognostic factors with regard to antiemetic response. Adverse events were recorded in 19%-36% of the cases during long-term follow-up. Headache (16%) and constipation (5%) were most frequent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Tropisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the Nordic experience. 836 99

Cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy is often given to patients for the treatment of breast cancer. This chemotherapy can induce severe nausea and vomiting in these patients, which can adversely affect their quality of life, especially as these regimens are often given on an outpatient basis over several courses. This paper reviews 5 randomised, double-blind, multicenter comparative studies which have been carried out in breast cancer patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the potent and highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron. These studies have shown that ondansetron is superior to placebo in the control of emesis induced by a 14-day CMF schedule and that it is superior to conventional anti-emetics (metoclopramide and alizapride) in the control of acute and delayed emesis induced by regimens containing high-dose cyclophosphamide. Ondansetron was well tolerated in these studies and did not induced any extrapyramidal reactions. The efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron was reflected in a better quality of life for patients given this anti-emetic which was formally assessed in 2 of the studies using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist or the Functional Living Index-Emesis. In conclusion, ondansetron is an effective and well-tolerated anti-emetic for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Ondansetron provides significant benefits for patients' quality of life compared with conventional anti-emetics particularly as these patients are often treated on an outpatient basis and can be treated with oral ondansetron at home.
 ...
PMID:Improved control of emesis and quality of life with ondansetron in breast cancer. 845 89

This paper describes the only published study to date which prospectively evaluates the efficacy of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist over repeated courses of cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone was significantly superior to metoclopramide and dexamethasone over 6 courses of chemotherapy given for the treatment of breast cancer. Importantly, patients given ondansetron benefited from a superior quality of life over the six courses of treatment. A Markov chain statistical model has been applied to these data. This model assumes that the results over subsequent courses is dependent on the efficacy of the anti-emetic therapy and the results obtained during the previous course of chemotherapy. This model successfully predicts the actual results obtained in the clinical study. Using this model it is possible to hypothesise on the results obtained following different treatment strategies. These data emphasise that it is important to give optimal anti-emetic therapy from the first course of chemotherapy as this will facilitate good control during subsequent courses.
 ...
PMID:Management of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis over repeat courses. 869 49

While the use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists is clearly justified in patients receiving cisplatin, their role with less emetic drugs is still not defined. The aim of our randomized study was to verify the efficacy of the single standard dose of three 5-HT3-receptor-antagonists in moderately emetic chemotherapies. Sixty chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients of 30 to 71 years in age, P.S. = 0-1, receiving 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC 75) q 21 days or cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) or 120 mg/m2 epirubicin or high dose mitomycin-methotrexate-mitoxantrone (MMM) q 14 days (+ G-CSF) or 100 mg/m2 epirubicin (+ G-CSF) were randomized to receive, 15 min before chemotherapy, 8 mg i.v. bolus of ondansetron or 3 mg i.v. granisetron or 5 mg i.v. tropisetron and no further antiemetic therapy in the following days. 180 cycles were evaluable. Complete protection, (the absence of vomiting episodes,) was respectively 75%, 70% and 70% in the acute and 70%, 82%, 72% in the delayed phases, and an absence of nausea was 56%, 37% and 20% in the acute phase and 50%, 35% and 27% in the delayed, respectively. Complete response, (absence of vomiting and absence or mild nausea,) was 74%, 58.6% and 50.8% in the acute and 64%, 63.7%, 47.3% in the delayed phases, respectively. At the statistical analysis no significant differences between the three drugs were found regarding acute vomiting while ondansetron was superior to granisetron and tropisetron in acute (p = 0.018; p < 0.05) and delayed nausea (P = 0.104; p < 0.01). This activity is practically the same as that we reported (Ann Oncol 1994; 6, suppl 8: 204) with a loading dose on day 1 and maintenance for the following 2-5 days, but with a significantly favorable cost-benefit ratio.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of delayed emesis by a single intravenous bolus dose of 5-HT3-receptor-antagonist in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. 880 24

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was performed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of two 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, in Chinese patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Twenty patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either granisetron on day 1 and ondansetron on day 8 of the first cycle followed by the reverse order in the second cycle, or vice versa. The number of vomiting episodes and the severity of nausea in the first 24 h (acute vomiting/nausea) and the following 7 days (delayed vomiting/nausea) were studied. Acute vomiting was completely prevented in 29 (72.5%) cycles with granisetron and 27 (67.5%) cycles with ondansetron, and treatment failure (>5 vomiting episodes) occurred in two (5%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). Acute nausea was completely controlled in 15 (37.5%) cycles with granisetron and 14 (35%) cycles with ondansetron, whereas severe acute nausea occurred in four (10%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). However, complete response for delayed vomiting was observed in only 21 (52.5%) cycles with granisetron and 22 (55%) cycles with ondansetron (P = NS), and delayed nausea was completely controlled in only 11 (27.5%) and ten (25%) cycles respectively (P = NS). In conclusion, both granisetron and ondansetron are effective in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in Chinese patients, with equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Control of delayed nausea and vomiting is less satisfactory.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron and ondansetron in Oriental patients: a randomized crossover study. 963 49

The inhibitory effect of ramosetron hydrochloride (Ram), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on nausea and vomiting occurring in CMF or CEF therapy as a pre- or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy for recurrent cancer was evaluated in 34 patients with breast cancer. On days 1 and 8, the patients received Ram (0.3 mg) concomitantly with these agents intravenously and were observed for nausea and vomiting to evaluate the inhibitory effect. Food intake was observed at the same time. On day 1, there was moderate to severe nausea in one patient and vomiting in two patients, while results for 32 of 34 patients (94.1%) were classified as "excellent". On day 8, no moderate or severe nausea was seen, but vomiting occurred in one patient; the results of 33 patients (97.1%) were classified as "excellent". Even when considering only 12 patients who had experienced nausea or vomiting on chemotherapy, 11 showed an "excellent" response on day 1. Moreover, no patient received any additional dose of an anti-emetic drug within 24 hours of Ram administration. Food intake decreased to less than 50% of the baseline in three patients on day 1 and four patients on day 8. Administration of Ram to breast cancer patients on CMF or CEF therapy is thus concluded to be useful in the inhibition of nausea and vomiting.
 ...
PMID:[Usefulness of ramosetron hydrochloride on nausea and vomiting in CMF or CEF therapy for breast cancer]. 1043 83

Antiemetic treatment should be considered for breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Although the extent of chemotherapy-induced emesis is largely dependent on the emetogenic potential of the specific agents employed, patient characteristics such as age and sex also contribute. Recent clinical studies show that treatment with the currently available 5-HT3 antagonists effectively reduces the incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and improves quality of life in a substantial number of these patients. A Medline search from 1994 through February 1998 identified clinical trials that included previously untreated breast cancer patients using antiemetic therapy such as granisetron, ondansetron, dolasetron, and metoclopramide. The studies reviewed here indicate that the antiemetic efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists is equivalent in previously untreated patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for breast cancer, depending on the doses and schedules utilized. In particular, two comparative studies of granisetron and ondansetron with specific data for breast cancer patients showed that both agents eliminate nausea in approximately 50%, and vomiting in 60-70% of these patients, with the higher values observed when steroids were added to the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist regimen. Although the chemotherapy regimens employed for breast cancer are considered only moderately emetogenic, these regimens account for 60-90% of patients experiencing nausea and vomiting. The most recent clinical studies demonstrate that 5-HT3 antagonists can significantly reduce the incidence of nausea in breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and should be employed in this setting.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999 Sep
PMID:5-HT3 antiemetic therapy for patients with breast cancer. 1059 48

The objective of this double blind parallel-group multicentre study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination ondansetron + methylprednisolone + lorazepam (O + M + L) in the prevention of emesis induced by chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide or adriamycin . This tritherapy was compared to a bitherapy O + M. Patients included were suffering from severe haemopathy or breast cancer. They had to have an incomplete response to a previous antiemetic association of 5HT3 serotoninergic receptor antagonist and corticoid. One hundred and thirty-five adult patients were included and were randomised to receive : O + M + L or O + M for 3 days. The emesis control during the 3 days of treatment (no emetic episode during the complete course) was significantly superior in the group O + M + L than in the group O + M (69% versus 46%, p = 0. 042); nausea control on the worst day of the cure was significantly superior in the group O + M + L than in the group O + M (p = 0.04) with 76% of patients in the group O + M + L having complete or major nausea control compared to 51% in the group O + M. The stability of quality of life during the days following chemotherapy measured by one questionnaire, including two scales, one cancer specific (FLIC) and one emesis specific (FLIE), appeared significantly better in group O + M + L (p = 0.04 and p = 0.019). Safety of both antiemetic regimens was good and similar between the two treatment groups. This trial shows that the adjunction of lorazepam to ondansetron and corticoid in combination increases the antiemetic control for patients with an incomplete response to a previous regimen containing a 5HT3 serotoninergic receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.
 ...
PMID:[Improvement in the control of chemotherapy induced emesis with ondansetron, methylprednisolone and lorazepam combination in patients treated by a moderate emetic treatment and uncontrolled by a previous antiemetic combination]. 1090 90

This descriptive study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic protection of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in a sample of 33 Chinese breast cancer patients who were receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The antiemetic protection effect was not satisfactory. The results showed that the worst nausea and vomiting was experienced on the third day, with 87.9% of patients reporting nausea and 63.6% experiencing vomiting on that day. In almost one-third of the sample antiemetic medication failed to protect against either acute vomiting or delayed vomiting (i.e. patients continued to experience more than five emetic episodes). Complete protection from acute vomiting was seen in 36.4% of patients, whereas complete protection from delayed vomiting was seen in only one-third of the patients. There was an association between acute nausea/vomiting and delayed nausea/vomiting. Different types of antiemetics need to be offered to Chinese patients receiving chemotherapy (i.e. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists or a combination of antiemetics), but more research should be directed to this area.
 ...
PMID:An analysis of the antiemetic protection of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in Chinese patients receiving moderately high emetogenic chemotherapy. 1209 46


1 2 Next >>