Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P43146 (tumour suppressor)
 5,935 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Solid tumours in man are characterized by acquired genetic rearrangements that, in most cases, can be detected by cytogenetic methods as clonal chromosomal abnormalities. Whereas primary abnormalities contribute to the establishment of the tumour and often are seen as solitary changes, secondary aberrations accrue during clonal evolution. Both abnormalities are nonrandom in distribution. Some primary abnormalities are so characteristic as to be virtually pathognomonic for particular types of solid tumours, eg, t (11;22)(q24;q12) in Ewing's sarcoma, t (9,22)(q22;q12) in extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, t (X;18)(p11;q11) in synovial sarcoma, and t (12;16)(q13;p11) in myxoid liposarcoma. To these purely cytogenetic data implicating specific genetic changes in carcinogenesis may now be added a growing evidence of molecular specificity emerging from recombinant DNA-studies. It appears that both currently known classes of directly cancer-relevant genes, the dominant oncogenes and the recessive tumour suppressor genes, are located at precisely those genomic sites that are visibly involved in neoplasia-associated chromosomal rearrangements. The importance of cytogenetic characterization of solid tumors is thus twofold. First, the recurrent aberrations provide insight into the pathogenetic mechanisms that are operative. They pinpoint areas of the human genome that carry genes or regulatory sequences whose function is disrupted in neoplastic cells. Second, even before the long-term goal of a more fundamental understanding of the neoplastic process is reached, the cytogenetic aberrations have direct clinical importance. The finding of an acquired clonal chromosomal abnormality identifies the presence of a neoplastic disease, and the specific type of aberration may reveal the true nature of the tumor and thus improve the diagnostic precision.
 ...
PMID:[Significance of chromosomal abnormalities in solid tumors of humans]. 817 15

Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of soft tissue tumours has yielded a wealth of new information over the past 10-15 years. Many soft tissue neoplasms show specific karyotypic aberrations which have proved to be diagnostically valuable, and have also assisted in the understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms and rationalisation of classification systems (e.g. lipomatous tumours and Ewing's sarcoma/PNET). In certain clinical subsets, especially round cell sarcomas and fatty neoplasms, determination of karyotype (whether by conventional analysis, FISH or RT-PCR) has proved often to be useful in the diagnostic setting. Additionally the recognition of clonal abnormalities in both benign neoplasms as well as lesions formerly thought to be non-neoplastic (e.g. inflammatory "pseudotumour") has prompted reassessment of biologic concepts with regard to growth control. Inherited molecular genetic defects which predispose to soft tissue neoplasia (e.g. NF-1, Li-Fraumeni syndrome) have been characterised, leading to a greater understanding of tumour suppressor genes. Mesenchymal differentiation genes, the modes of action of which may help to expunge concepts of histogenesis, are being characterised. It is becoming clear that there exist growth control genes (such as the HMGI family) which, irrespective of differentiation, play an important role in a wide range of different mesenchymal tumours. Additionally it is evident that different histologic types of sarcoma (e.g. variants of liposarcoma) show quite different abnormalities of cell cycle control (notably at the G1-S checkpoint) and it seems increasingly likely that certain genetic aberrations, identifiable either at the chromosomal or individual gene level, may prove to be of prognostic relevance in sarcomas and may also open novel therapeutic avenues. While the validity of all molecular genetic data depends totally on skilled histological diagnosis and grading, there has never been a better time for close collaboration between pathologists and basic scientists in the study of soft tissue neoplasia.
 ...
PMID:Soft tissue tumours: the impact of cytogenetics and molecular genetics. 947 86

Although it is well known that oncogenesis is a multistep process involving the activation of normal cellular genes to become oncogenes and/or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, this process has seldom been investigated in soft tissue tumours. We screened a group of 36 liposarcomas for genetic abnormalities in the p53 tumour suppressor gene and c-myc oncogene. Altered c-myc gene expression was examined by differential RT-PCR assay. p53 Gene mutations in exons 4-8 were analysed by using PCR-SSCP analysis and direct sequencing. Elevated c-myc expression was found in 6 of 31 liposarcomas (19.4%). p53 Gene mutations were observed in 5 of 36 liposarcomas (13.9%). Both genetic alterations were associated with the histological subtype of liposarcomas. Whereas c-myc gene expression was a characteristic of myxoid/round cell liposarcomas, p53 gene mutations were found more frequently in pleomorphic variants. Liposarcomas of the well-differentiated subtype showed neither p53 gene mutations nor altered c-myc gene expression. Our results indicate that the c-myc oncogene and the p53 tumor suppressor gene do not seem to cooperate in the oncogenesis of liposarcomas.
 ...
PMID:No correlation of c-myc overexpression and p53 mutations in liposarcomas. 980 33

Sarcomas represent a complex group of malignant neoplasms of mesenchymal origin and their heterogeneity poses a serious diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. There is therefore a need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of the more than 70 distinguishable sarcoma subtypes. The transcription factor TBX3, a critical developmental regulator, is overexpressed in several cancers of epithelial origin where it contributes to tumorigenesis by different molecular mechanisms. However, the status and role of TBX3 in sarcomas have not been reported. Here we show that a diverse subset of soft tissue and bone sarcoma cell lines and patient-derived sarcoma tissues express high levels of TBX3. We further explore the significance of this overexpression using a small interferring RNA approach and demonstrate that TBX3 promotes the migratory ability of chondrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and liposarcoma cells but inhibits fibrosarcoma cell migration. This suggested that TBX3 may play a key role in the development of different sarcoma subtypes by functioning as either an oncoprotein or as a brake to prevent tumour progression. To further explore this, TBX3 knockdown and overexpression cell culture models were established using chondrosarcoma and fibrosarcoma cells as representatives of each scenario, and the resulting cells were characterized with regard to key features of tumorigenesis. Results from in vitro and in vivo assays reveal that, while TBX3 promotes substrate-dependent and -independent cell proliferation, migration and tumour formation in chondrosarcoma cells, it discourages fibrosarcoma formation. Our findings provide novel evidence linking TBX3 to cancers of mesenchymal origin. Furthermore, we show that TBX3 may be a biomarker for the diagnosis of histologically dynamic sarcoma subtypes and that it impacts directly on their oncogenic phenotype. Indeed, we reveal that TBX3 may exhibit oncogene or tumour suppressor activity in sarcomas, which suggests that its role in cancer progression may rely on cellular context.
...
PMID:The T-box transcription factor 3 is a promising biomarker and a key regulator of the oncogenic phenotype of a diverse range of sarcoma subtypes. 2690 Sep 51

The p16 gene belongs to INK4 family of genes and is made up of four members: p16 INK4A , p15 INK4B , p18 INK4C and p19 INK4D , all of which share biological properties, namely, inhibition of cell growth and tumour suppression. After p53, p16 is the second most common tumour suppressor gene. It has been regarded as the familial melanoma gene. Immunohistochemistry for p16 has a well-defined role in distinct pathological scenarios. It is used to distinguish desmoplastic melanoma from reactive fibrous proliferation, with former showing strong nuclear positivity. In other types of melanoma, p16 protein expression is lost. Spitz nevi show retention of nuclear staining for p16. Benign mesothelial proliferations tend to retain nuclear p16 immunoreactivity, while malignant mesotheliomas lose expression. However, p16 fluorescent in-situ hybridisation analysis is recommended in the workup of malignant mesothelioma. Another common application of p16 immunohistochemistry is as an indicator for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and p16 protein is overexpressed in HPV-associated tumours. In this context, p16 immunopositivity should be strong, diffuse, nuclear or nuclear and cytoplasmic in location. Another use for p16 is demonstration of p16 immunopositivity in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma.
 ...
PMID:p16. 3007 91