Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P41181 (collecting duct)
5,183 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

KIT expression has not been studied substantially in renal tumors. We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression for KIT in 256 conventional renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 29 chromophobe RCCs, 25 papillary RCCs, 6 collecting duct RCCs, 6 unclassified RCCs, 7 renal oncocytomas, 20 urothelial carcinomas, 7 nephroblastomas, and 23 angiomyolipomas. We found that 24 chromophobe RCCs (83%) and 5 renal oncocytomas (71%) revealed membranous immunoreactivity for KIT while none of the RCCs of other types expressed KIT immunohistochemically. Sporadic cases of urothelial carcinoma and nephroblastoma were focally positive for KIT. All angiomyolipomas were negative. Genomic DNA extracted from the chromophobe RCCs and renal oncocytomas was submitted for polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing of the juxtamembrane (exons 9 and 11) and tyrosine kinase (exons 13 and 17) domains. No mutation was found. Our results demonstrate that KIT could be a useful immunophenotypic marker for chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma; therefore, it has value for the precise classification of renal cortical epithelial tumors. However, the therapeutic relevance of KIT overexpression in these tumors is uncertain owing to the lack of mutations that would lead to constitutive activation of the protein.
...
PMID:Overexpression of KIT (CD117) in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma. 1519 61

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are derived from the collecting duct epithelia, although their morphology, molecular biologic characteristics and clinical behaviors are quite different. Herein is presented a case of RCC possessing the chromophobe RCC and CDC elements occurring in a 64 year-old Japanese woman. The patient was referred to Yokohama City University Hospital with complaints of persistent back pain and fever. Radiologic examinations revealed a left renal tumor, and radical nephrectomy was performed. The patient died with multiple metastases, 8 months after the operation. The resected tumor showed an invasive growth, and its cut surface was heterogenous with hemorrhage and necrosis. Histologically, the tumor was composed of chromophobe elements with dedifferentiation, and CDC elements. The chromophobe and CDC elements had obvious histological transition. Lectin histochemistry and immunohistochemistry confirmed that this tumor was derived from the distal nephron. c-KIT, p53 and Ki67 antigen showed differential localization between the chromophobe and CDC elements, even in the transitional areas. Along with the previous reports, the present case seemed to be composite RCC derived from the collecting duct, which might present clues to elucidate carcinogenesis in the distal nephron.
...
PMID:Composite distal nephron-derived renal cell carcinoma with chromophobe and collecting duct carcinomatous elements. 1594 94

Renal chromophobe cell carcinomas (ChCC) and oncocytomas express KIT. This character seems to reflect their common histogenesis from distal nephrons. In the normal kidney, however, the expression and localization of KIT are unclear. KIT expression in angiomyolipoma and congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN), is still controversial. c-kit mutations are reportedly rare in ChCC, but there is little information in other renal neoplasms, and no reported data on mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). In order to address these issues the authors examined five ChCC, five oncocytomas, seven papillary cell carcinomas, two collecting duct carcinomas, 12 angiomyolipomas, and three CMN, as well as 10 normal renal tissues. In the normal kidney KIT was specifically expressed in the distal nephrons. Nine of 12 (75%) angiomyolipomas contained scattered KIT-positive cells, whereas all three CMN were completely negative for KIT. The presence of KIT-positive cells in angiomyolipomas was likely to correspond to that of melanocytic marker-positive cells, which mainly showed epithelioid morphology. Polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism showed no evidence of mutations of c-kit or PDGFR in any of the tumors examined.
...
PMID:KIT expression in normal and neoplastic renal tissues: immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis. 1599 75

Collecting duct carcinoma is a highly aggressive renal epithelial malignancy, although it accounts for less than 1% of the incidence of renal epithelial neoplasms. Differential diagnoses between collecting duct carcinoma, pelvic urothelial carcinoma with marked invasion to the renal parenchyma (invasive urothelial carcinoma), and papillary renal cell carcinoma is often challenging. In our current study, we examined the utility of using commercially available antibodies, in conjunction with lectin histochemistry, for such differential diagnoses. We examined 17 cases of collecting duct carcinoma, 10 cases of invasive urothelial carcinoma and 15 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (type 1, 6 cases; type 2, 9 cases) in these evaluations. Our results indicated that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1, E-cadherin, and c-KIT were frequently positive in collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma, in comparison with papillary renal cell carcinoma, which had negative results for CD10 and alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase. We found, however, that collecting duct carcinoma showed positivity for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin and low-molecular-weight cytokeratin at a low frequency compared with invasive urothelial carcinoma, and that these distinctions need further careful evaluation. In addition, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin positivity was not a reliable marker for collecting duct carcinoma. We conclude that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 reactivity and positivity for E-cadherin and c-KIT are effective in distinguishing collecting duct carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma, and that negative results for alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase and CD10 are potentially useful hallmarks of this distinction also. In contrast, a differential diagnosis for collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma will require careful examination of multiple routinely stained specimens, particularly in cases of in situ neoplastic lesions in the pelvic mucosa.
...
PMID:Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: an immunohistochemical evaluation of the use of antibodies for differential diagnosis. 1860 72