Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P21554 (cannabinoid receptor)
3,582 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Spinal antinociception produced by delta 9-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and other cannabinoid agonists has been suggested to be mediated by the release of dynorphin acting at the kappa opioid receptor. Alternatively, as cannabinoid receptors are distributed appropriately in the pain transmission pathway, cannabinoid agonists might act directly at the spinal level to inhibit nociception, without requiring dynorphin release. Here, these possibilities were explored using mice with a deletion of the gene encoding prodynorphin. Antinociceptive dose-response curves were constructed for spinal Delta(9)-THC and WIN 55,212-2 in prodynorphin knock-out mice and in wild-type littermates. WIN 55,212-2 and Delta(9)-THC were equipotent in the wild-type and prodynorphin knock-out mice. Spinal pretreatment with a kappa opioid receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), did not alter the dose-response curves for either WIN 55,212-2 or Delta(9)-THC in prodynorphin knock-out and wild-type mice. However, the same dose of nor-BNI used blocked U50,488H-induced antinociception in both wild-type and prodynorphin knock-out mice, confirming kappa opioid receptor activity. Pretreatment with SR141716A, a cannabinoid receptor antagonist blocked the antinociceptive actions of both WIN 55,212-2 and Delta(9)-THC. These data support the conclusion that antinociception produced by spinal cannabinoids are likely to be mediated directly through activation of cannabinoid receptors without the requirement for dynorphin release or activation of kappa opioid receptors.
Pain 2002 Dec
PMID:Dynorphin-independent spinal cannabinoid antinociception. 1246 95

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone is decreased during swallowing, during transient LES relaxations (TLESRs), and before emesis, and this decrease is due primarily to increasing inhibitory vagal output to the LES. Reflex-evoked relaxation of the LES is mediated by long-loop vagovagal reflexes that are coordinated by the dorsal vagal complex in the hindbrain medulla. A sequence of events occurs. Central control of TLESRs has not been studied directly; the information on how drugs may work centrally to reduce TLESRs is extrapolated from knowledge of how the brain evokes LES relaxation. Reduction of the frequency of TLESRs by a GABAB agonist, baclofen, is due to inhibition of vagal afferents, information transfer between the nucleus tractus solitarius and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, and vagal efferent outflow. Preliminary data show that cannabinoid receptor activation reduces information transfer between the nucleus tractus solitarius and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. The potential therapeutic usefulness of these types of agents that reduce TLESRs by acting centrally is promising.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2002 Dec
PMID:Central mechanisms of lower esophageal sphincter control. 1248 67

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC), the primary psychoactive constituent of marijuana (Cannabis sativa), is known to bind to two cannabinoid receptors: CB(1) receptors, located primarily in the brain, and CB(2) receptors, located primarily in the periphery. Recent research has suggested that other cannabinoids, including anandamide and WIN 55212-2, may also act at novel non-CB(1), non-CB(2) cannabinoid receptor(s). Anandamide produces a number of in vivo pharmacological effects in CB(1) knockout mice that are not produced by delta(9)-THC and cannot be explained by anandamide's rapid metabolism. In addition, in vitro anandamide and WIN 55212-2 stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in both CB(1) knockout and wildtype mice while delta(9)-THC stimulates this binding only in wildtype mice. Although anandamide and vanilloid agonists share pharmacological effects, anandamide's actions in CB(1) knockout mice do not appear to be mediated by vanilloid VR(1) receptors. While not yet conclusive, these results suggest the possibility of additional cannabinoid receptors in the brain and periphery.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Cannabinoid pharmacology: implications for additional cannabinoid receptor subtypes. 1250 90

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is expressed in the brain at levels sufficient to serve as potential target for in vivo imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography methodology. To date, the most promising radioligands for the in vivo imaging of this receptor have structures based on that of the cannabinoid antagonist, SR141716A. Rodent data obtained using these in vivo radiotracers has demonstrated that both the behavioral and neurochemical effects of cannabinoids occur at very low levels of receptor occupancy. More recently, an agonist radiotracer based on the structure of aminoalkylindole cannabinoids has also been examined for in vivo labeling of CB1 receptors. Although rodent studies have indicated that in vivo imaging of CB1 receptors is feasible, at the present time this receptor has still to be successful imaged in a human PET study.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:In vivo imaging of the brain cannabinoid receptor. 1250 91

One of the well-known effects of cannabinoids is the impairment of cognitive processes, including short-term memory formation, by altering hippocampal and neocortical functions reflected in network activity. Acting on presynaptically located G protein-coupled receptors in the hippocampus, cannabinoids modulate the release of neurotransmitter molecules. CB1 cannabinoid receptors, so far the only cloned cannabinoid receptor type in the CNS, are selectively expressed on the axon terminals of a subset of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons containing the neuropeptide cholecystokinin. Activation of CB1 receptors reduces GABA release from presynaptic terminals, thereby increasing the excitability of principal cells. Novel, non-CB1 cannabinoid sensitive receptors are present on the hippocampal excitatory axon terminals, which suppress glutamate release. These cannabinoid receptors have distinct pharmacological features compared to CB1, i.e. WIN 55212-2 is an order of magnitude less potent in reducing glutamatergic transmission than in inhibiting GABAergic postsynaptic currents, and the novel receptor binds vanilloid receptor ligands. Thus, at least two different cannabinoid sensitive presynaptic receptors regulate network activity in the hippocampus, CB1 via the GABAergic interneurons, and a new receptor via a direct action on pyramidal cell axon terminals.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Distinct cannabinoid sensitive receptors regulate hippocampal excitation and inhibition. 1250 92

Effects of cannabinoid compounds on neurons are predominantly mediated by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor. Onset of signaling cascades in response to cannabimimetic drugs is triggered by the interaction of the cannabinoid receptor with G(i/o) proteins. Much work has been done to delineate the cannabinoid agonist-induced downstream signaling events; however, it remains to define the molecular basis of cannabinoid receptor-G protein interactions that stimulate these signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss several signal transduction pathways, focusing on studies that demonstrate the efficacy of CB(1) receptor agonists through G protein mediated pathways.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:CB(1) cannabinoid receptor-G protein association: a possible mechanism for differential signaling. 1250 94

The major endocannabinoids, anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamide, 20:4n-6 N-acylethanolamine) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) are structurally and functionally similar, but they are produced by different metabolic pathways and their levels must therefore be regulated by different mechanisms. Both endocannabinoids are accompanied by cannabinoid receptor-inactive, saturated and mono- or di-unsaturated congeners which can influence their metabolism and function. Here we review published data on the presence and production of anandamide and 2-AG and their congeners in mammalian cells and discuss this information in terms of their proposed signaling functions.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Cell signaling by endocannabinoids and their congeners: questions of selectivity and other challenges. 1250 95

A large body of literature indicates that cannabinoids suppress behavioral responses to acute and persistent noxious stimulation. This review examines behavioral, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical evidence supporting a role for cannabinoids in suppressing nociceptive transmission at spinal and peripheral levels. The development of subtype-selective competitive antagonists and high-affinity agonists provides the pharmacological tools required to study cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms. These studies provide insight into the functional roles of cannabinoid receptor subtypes, CB1 and CB2, in cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms as revealed in animal models of acute and persistent (somatic inflammatory, visceral inflammatory, neuropathic) pain. Localization studies employing receptor binding and quantitative autoradiography, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization are reviewed to examine the distribution of cannabinoid receptors at these levels and provide a neuroanatomical framework with which to understand the roles of endogenous cannabinoids in sensory processing.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Spinal and peripheral mechanisms of cannabinoid antinociception: behavioral, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical perspectives. 1250 99

Cannabinoid receptor agonists diminish responses to painful stimuli. Extensive evidence demonstrates that CB(1) cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits pain responses. Recently, the synthesis of CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective agonists has allowed testing whether CB(2) receptor activation inhibits pain. CB(2) receptor activation is sufficient to inhibit acute nociception, inflammatory hyperalgesia, and the allodynia and hyperalgesia produced in a neuropathic pain model. Studies using site-specific administration of agonist and antagonist have suggested that CB(2) receptor agonists inhibit pain responses by acting at peripheral sites. CB(2) receptor activation also inhibits edema and plasma extravasation produced by inflammation. CB(2) receptor-selective agonists do not produce central nervous system (CNS) effects typical of cannabinoids retaining agonist activity at the CB(1) receptor. Peripheral antinociception without CNS effects is consistent with the peripheral distribution of CB(2) receptors. CB(2) receptor agonists may have promise for the treatment of pain and inflammation without CNS side effects.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Inhibition of pain responses by activation of CB(2) cannabinoid receptors. 1250

This review examines evidence that delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can regulate and suppress human immune responses. Leukocytes express both cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2), and levels of mRNA encoding for them are increased in peripheral blood leukocytes obtained from marijuana smokers, suggesting cannabinoid receptor activation in vivo. Exposure of human T-cells to THC suppresses their proliferation, inhibits the release of interferon-gamma, and skews the balance of T-helper cytokines towards a type 2 response. The majority of these effects are CB2 receptor-dependent. Consistent with an impact of THC on cell-mediated immunity, alveolar macrophages (AMs) recovered from the lungs of marijuana smokers are suppressed in their ability to release pro-inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide (NO), and kill bacteria. Macrophage function is restored by treatment with interferon-gamma, a type 1 cytokine. Habitual exposure to THC appears capable of impacting on human cell-mediated immunity and host defense.
Chem Phys Lipids 2002 Dec 31
PMID:Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on human immune function and host defense. 1250 3


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>