Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P20366 (substance P)
 21,176 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The development of newer, more potent, nonsedating H1-receptor antagonists has led to a reappraisal of the potential of this class of drugs in the treatment of asthma. Studies conducted in Japan have examined the pharmacologic profile and clinical efficacy of one of these newer agents, terfenadine. In vitro, terfenadine inhibited the release of histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells and guinea pig lung tissue and conjunctiva in response to such stimuli as compound 48/80, concanavalin A, substance P, A-23187, and the partial peptide of eosinophil major basic protein. Ketotifen had similar, though less potent, antiallergic activity in these models. Mechanisms that appear to be involved in the mediation of this inhibitory effect include the prevention of intracellular calcium ion release and calcium uptake, the inhibition of protein kinase C translocation, and the activation of adenylate cyclase and the resulting accumulation of cyclic AMP (cAMP). A multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy of ketotifen, 2 mg bid, with that of terfenadine, given at doses of 120 or 240 mg bid (two or four times the US recommended dose, respectively) in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic and mixed-type asthma in adults. Physician assessment of overall improvement and patient evaluation of response were somewhat better with terfenadine, particularly the 120-mg bid dose. As in other comparative studies of these two drugs, terfenadine produced less drowsiness than ketotifen.
 ...
PMID:The Japanese perspective: effects of terfenadine in bronchial asthma: in vitro and in vivo research. 769 May 27

We have measured the concentrations of substance P, somatostatin, homovanillic acid (HVA), vanillyl mandelic acid (VMA) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of six patients suffering from narcolepsy and 12 age- and gender-matched controls using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Substance P and somatostatin were significantly decreased in our patients compared to controls (36.9 +/- 9.1 fmol/ml versus 52.5 +/- 9.9 fmol/ml, P < 0.05 and 30.3 +/- 7.8 fmol/ml versus 43.9 +/- 9.8 fmol/ml, P < 0.05, respectively). 5-HIAA (P < 0.05) and VMA (P < 0.05) were also significantly decreased. HVA was significantly increased (P < 0.01). The CSF concentrations of substance P and somatostatin correlated with the clinical parameters duration of disease (r = -0.68, P < 0.05 and r = -0.72, P < 0.05, respectively) and severity of cataplectic symptoms (r = -0.71, P < 0.05 and r = -0.78, P < 0.01). In addition, substance P correlated with the intensity of sleepiness and the frequency of day-sleep attacks (r = -0.69, P < 0.05 and r = -0.68, P < 0.05, respectively). Substance P affects the amount of dopamine release in the nigra-striatal region, and decreased amounts could contribute to the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. Reduced levels of substance P, which affects serotonin release, may be responsible for diminished release of serotonin which in turn could affect sleep cycles. Because somatostatin affects motor behavior through dopaminergic mechanisms and since the levels of somatostatin correlate with the intensity of cataplectic symptoms, we speculate that an interaction between somatostatin and dopaminergic neurons plays a role in the pathogenesis of narcolepsy.
 ...
PMID:CSF substance P somatostatin and monoaminergic transmitter metabolites in patients with narcolepsy. 894 37

Opiates are the primary treatment for pain management in cancer patients reporting moderate to severe pain, and are being increasingly used for non-cancer chronic pain. However, prolonged administration of opiates is associated with significant problems including the development of antinociceptive tolerance, wherein higher doses of the drug are required over time to elicit the same amount of analgesia. High doses of opiates result in serious side effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, somnolence, and impairment of mental alertness. In addition, sustained exposure to morphine has been shown to result in paradoxical pain in regions unaffected by the initial pain complaint, and which may also result in dose escalation, i.e. 'analgesic tolerance'. A concept that has been gaining considerable experimental validation is that prolonged use of opioids elicits paradoxical, abnormal pain. This enhanced pain state requires additional opioids to maintain a constant level of antinociception, and consequently may be interpreted as antinociceptive tolerance. Many substances have been shown to block or reverse antinociceptive tolerance. A non-inclusive list of examples of substances reported to block or reverse opioid antinociceptive tolerance include: substance P receptor (NK-1) antagonists, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, protein kinase C inhibitors, competitive and non-competitive antagonists of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor, AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4 isoxazolepropionic acid) antagonists, anti-dynorphin antiserum, and cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor antagonists. Without exception, these substances are also antagonists of pain-enhancing agents. Prolonged opiate administration indeed induces upregulation of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) within sensory fibers in vivo, and this is accompanied by an enhanced release of excitatory neurotransmitters and neuropeptides from primary afferent fibers upon stimulation. The enhanced evoked release of neuropeptides is correlated with the onset of abnormal pain states and opioid antinociceptive tolerance. Importantly, the descending pain modulatory pathway from the brainstem rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) via the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) is critical for maintaining the changes observed in the spinal cord, abnormal pain states and antinociceptive tolerance, because animals with lesion of the DLF did not show enhanced evoked neuropeptide release, or develop abnormal pain or antinociceptive tolerance upon sustained exposure to opiates. Microinjection of either lidocaine or a CCK antagonist into the RVM blocked both thermal and touch hypersensitivity as well as antinociceptive tolerance. Thus, prolonged opioid exposure enhances a descending pain facilitatory pathway from the RVM that is mediated at least in part by CCK activity and is essential for the maintenance of antinociceptive tolerance.
 ...
PMID:Is paradoxical pain induced by sustained opioid exposure an underlying mechanism of opioid antinociceptive tolerance? 1621 2

A widely prescribed and potent short-acting hypnotic, zolpidem has become the mainstay for the treatment of middle-of-the-night sleeplessness. It is expected to be antagonized by caffeine. Paradoxically, in some cases caffeine appears to slightly enhance zolpidem sedation. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic nature of this odd effect remains unexplored. The purpose of this study is to reproduce a hypothetical molecular network recruited by caffeine when co-administered with zolpidem using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Thus generated, network drew attention to several possible contributors to caffeine sedation, such as tachykinin precursor 1, cannabinoid, and GABA receptors. The present overview is centered on the possibility that caffeine potentiation of zolpidem sedation does not involve a centralized interaction of specific neurotransmitters, but rather is contributed by its antioxidant capacity. It is proposed that by modifying the cellular redox state, caffeine ultimately reduces the pool of reactive oxygen species, thereby increasing the bioavailability of endogenous melatonin for interaction with zolpidem. This side effect of caffeine encourages further studies of multiple antioxidants as an attractive way to potentially increasing somnolence.
 ...
PMID:The paradox of caffeine-zolpidem interaction: a network analysis. 1986 Jun 44