Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P20226 (TATA-binding protein)
1,297 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Poly(ADP-ribosyl) transferase (ADPRT) is a nuclear protein that modifies proteins by forming and attaching to them poly(ADP-ribose) chains. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation represents an event of major importance in perturbed cell nuclei and participates in the regulation of fundamental processes including DNA repair and transcription. Although ADPRT serves as a positive cofactor of transcription, initiation of its catalytic activity may cause repression of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. It is demonstrated here that ADPRT-dependent silencing of transcription involves ADP-ribosylation of the TATA-binding protein. This modification occurs only if poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is initiated before TATA-binding protein has bound to DNA and thereby prevents formation of active transcription complexes. Specific DNA binding of other transcription factors including Yin Yang 1, p53, NFkappaB, Sp1, and CREB but not c-Jun or AP-2 is similarly affected. After assembly of transcription complexes initiation of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation does not influence DNA binding of transcription factors. Accordingly, if bound to DNA, transcription factors are inaccessible to poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Thus, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation prevents binding of transcription factors to DNA, whereas binding to DNA prevents their modification. Considering its ability to detect DNA strand breaks and stimulate DNA repair, it is proposed that ADPRT serves as a molecular switch between transcription and repair of DNA to avoid expression of damaged genes.
...
PMID:Regulation of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of transcription factors. 982 23

Oncogenes enhance the expression of cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2, but interactions between tumor suppressor genes and Cox-2 have not been studied. In the present work, we have compared the levels of Cox-2 and the production of prostaglandin E2 in mouse embryo fibroblasts that do not express any p53 ((10)1) versus the same cell line ((10. 1)Val5) engineered to overexpress wild-type (wt) p53 at 32 degrees C or mutant p53 at 39 degrees C. Cells expressing wt p53 showed about a 10-fold decrease in synthesis of prostaglandin E2 compared with those expressing mutant p53. Levels of Cox-2 protein and mRNA were markedly suppressed by wt p53 but not by mutant p53. Nuclear run-offs revealed decreased rates of Cox-2 transcription in cells expressing wt p53. The activity of the Cox-2 promoter was reduced by 85% in cells expressing wt p53 but was reduced only by 30% in cells expressing mutant p53 compared with cells null for p53. The effect of p53 on the suppression of Cox-2 promoter activity was localized to the first 40 base pairs 5' from the transcription start site. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay revealed that p53 competed with TATA-binding protein for binding to mouse Cox-2 or human Cox-2 promoter extending from -50 to +52 base pairs. The results of this study suggest that interactions between p53 and Cox-2 could be important for understanding why levels of Cox-2 are undetectable in normal cells and increased in many tumors.
...
PMID:Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression by p53. 1019 69

Adenovirus E1B 55,000-molecular-weight protein (55K) binds to host cell p53, stabilizing it, greatly increasing its affinity for its cognate DNA-binding site, and converting it from a regulated activator to a constitutive repressor. Here we analyzed the mechanism of repression by the p53-E1B 55K complex. E1B 55K repression requires that 55K be tethered to the promoter by binding directly to DNA-bound p53. Transcription from an assembled, p53-activated preinitiation complex was not repressed by the subsequent addition of E1B 55K, suggesting that either sites of 55K interaction with p53 or targets of 55K in the preinitiation complex are blocked. Specific E1B 55K repression was observed in reactions lacking TFIIA and with recombinant TATA-binding protein in place of TFIID, conditions under which p53 does not activate transcription. Thus, E1B 55K does not simply inhibit a p53-specific activation mechanism but rather blocks basal transcription. As a consequence, E1B 55K may repress transcription from any promoter with an associated p53-binding site, no matter what other activators associate with the promoter. E1B 55K did not repress basal transcription in reactions with recombinant and highly purified general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II but rather required a corepressor that copurifies with the polymerase.
...
PMID:Corepressor required for adenovirus E1B 55,000-molecular-weight protein repression of basal transcription. 1020 64

The state of chromatin (the packaging of DNA in eukaryotes) has long been recognized to have major effects on levels of gene expression, and numerous chromatin-altering strategies-including ATP-dependent remodeling and histone modification-are employed in the cell to bring about transcriptional regulation. Of these, histone acetylation is one of the best characterized, as recent years have seen the identification and further study of many histone acetyltransferase (HAT) proteins and their associated complexes. Interestingly, most of these proteins were previously shown to have coactivator or other transcription-related functions. Confirmed and putative HAT proteins have been identified from various organisms from yeast to humans, and they include Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) superfamily members Gcn5, PCAF, Elp3, Hpa2, and Hat1: MYST proteins Sas2, Sas3, Esa1, MOF, Tip60, MOZ, MORF, and HBO1; global coactivators p300 and CREB-binding protein; nuclear receptor coactivators SRC-1, ACTR, and TIF2; TATA-binding protein-associated factor TAF(II)250 and its homologs; and subunits of RNA polymerase III general factor TFIIIC. The acetylation and transcriptional functions of these HATs and the native complexes containing them (such as yeast SAGA, NuA4, and possibly analogous human complexes) are discussed. In addition, some of these HATs are also known to modify certain nonhistone transcription-related proteins, including high-mobility-group chromatin proteins, activators such as p53, coactivators, and general factors. Thus, we also detail these known factor acetyltransferase (FAT) substrates and the demonstrated or potential roles of their acetylation in transcriptional processes.
...
PMID:Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. 1083 22

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is frequently inactivated in tumors. It functions as a transcriptional activator as well as a repressor for a number of viral and cellular promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and by RNA Pol III. Moreover, it appears that p53 also suppresses RNA Pol I transcription. In this study, we examined the molecular mechanism of Pol I transcriptional inhibition by p53. We show that wild-type, but not mutant, p53 can repress Pol I transcription from a human rRNA gene promoter in cotransfection assays. Furthermore, we show that recombinant p53 inhibits rRNA transcription in a cell-free transcription system. In agreement with these results, p53-null epithelial cells display an increased Pol I transcriptional activity compared to that of epithelial cells that express p53. However, both cell lines display comparable Pol I factor protein levels. Our biochemical analysis shows that p53 prevents the interaction between SL1 and UBF. Protein-protein interaction assays indicate that p53 binds to SL1, and this interaction is mostly mediated by direct contacts with TATA-binding protein and TAF(I)110. Moreover, template commitment assays show that while the formation of a UBF-SL1 complex can partially relieve the inhibition of transcription, only the assembly of a UBF-SL1-Pol I initiation complex on the rDNA promoter confers substantial protection against p53 inhibition. In summary, our results suggest that p53 represses RNA Pol I transcription by directly interfering with the assembly of a productive transcriptional machinery on the rRNA promoter.
...
PMID:Repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by the tumor suppressor p53. 1091 76

RNA polymerase III (Pol III) synthesizes various small RNA species, including the tRNAs and the 5 S ribosomal RNA, which are involved in protein synthesis. Here, we describe the regulation of human Pol III transcription in response to sustained cell cycle arrest. The experimental system used is a cell line in which cell cycle arrest is induced by the regulated expression of the tumor suppressor protein p53. We show that the capacity of cells to carry out Pol III transcription from various promoter types, when tested in vitro, is severely reduced in response to sustained p53-mediated cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, this effect does not appear to be due to direct inhibition by p53. By using complementation assays, we demonstrate that a subcomponent of the Pol III transcription factor IIIB, which contains the proteins TATA-binding protein and TAF3B2, is the target of repression. Moreover, we reveal that TAF3B2 levels are markedly reduced in extracts from cell cycle-arrested cells because of a decrease in TAF3B2 protein stability. These findings provide a novel mechanism of Pol III regulation and yield insights into how cellular biosynthetic capacity and growth status can be coordinated.
...
PMID:A role for TAF3B2 in the repression of human RNA polymerase III transcription in nonproliferating cells. 1128 26

The tumor suppressor, p53, has been shown to transcriptionally activate or silence a number of target genes. As an activator, p53 relies on its specific consensus sequence within the promoter. It is not clear whether p53 requires a specific DNA binding site in its action as a gene repressor. This report demonstrates that the human BKB1R gene is a p53 target. Expression of p53 in transiently transfected SV40-transformed IMR90 cells strongly suppressed luciferase reporter activity driven by a 1.8 kb BKB1R promoter as well as its minigene. These down-regulations were p53 dose-dependent. p53 reduced both basal and induced promoter activities of the minigene. Expression of p53 abolished the inducibility of the minigene. Induction of endogenous p53 expression by etoposide also inhibited promoter activity and minigene inducibility. Replacing the region containing both the putative p53 binding site and the TATA-box with a basal adenovirus promoter in the 1.8 kb promoter construct did not prevent p53 from inhibiting BKB1R promoter activity. Thus suppression by p53 is not mediated by competition with the TATA-binding protein and is not through interaction with the putative p53-binding site. p53 also does not appear to suppress BKB1R gene expression through interaction with c-Jun which functions in the inducibility of this gene [Yang et al., 2001].
...
PMID:p53 down-regulates human bradykinin B1 receptor gene expression. 1140 Jan 61

The nonconserved, hydrophilic N-terminal domain of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I (topo I) is dispensable for catalytic activity in vitro but essential in vivo. There are at least five putative nuclear localization signals and a nucleolin-binding signal within the first 215 residues of the topo I N-terminal domain. We have investigated physiological functions of the topo I N-terminal domain by fusing it to an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The first 170 residues of the N-terminal domain allow efficient import of chimeric proteins into nuclei and nucleoli. The nucleolar localization of this protein does not depend on its interaction with nucleolin, whereas ongoing rDNA transcription clearly is crucial. Immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that the topo I N terminus (topoIN)-EGFP fusion protein associates with the TATA-binding protein in cells. Furthermore, DNA damage results in extensive nuclear redistribution of the topoIN-EGFP chimeric product. The redistribution is also p53-dependent and the N terminus of topo I appears to interact with p53 in vivo. These results show that the topo I localization to the nucleolus is related to the p53 and DNA damage, as well as changes in transcriptional status. Nucleolar release of topo I under conditions of cellular duress may represent an important, antecedent step in tumor cell killing by topoisomerase active agents.
...
PMID:Subnuclear distribution of topoisomerase I is linked to ongoing transcription and p53 status. 1180 86

Infection of HeLa cells with poliovirus leads to rapid shut-off of host cell transcription by RNA polymerase II. Previous results have suggested that both the basal transcription factor TBP (TATA-binding protein) and transcription activator proteins such as CREB (cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein) and Oct-1 (the octamer-binding factor) are cleaved by the viral-encoded protease, 3C(Pro). Here we demonstrate that the transcriptional activator (and tumor suppressor) p53 is degraded by the viral protease 3C both in vivo and in vitro. Unlike other transcription factors that are directly cleaved by 3C(pro), degradation of p53 requires a HeLa cell activity in addition to 3C(Pro). The degradation of p53 by 3C(Pro) does not appear to involve the ubiquitin pathway of protein degradation. Vaccinia virus infection of HeLa cells leads to inactivation of the cellular activity required for 3C(Pro)-mediated degradation of p53. The vaccinia-encoded protein (CrmA) is known to inhibit caspase I (ICE protease) that converts inactive IL-1beta to an active secreted form. Incubation of HeLa cells with caspase I inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk does not interfere with 3C(Pro)-mediated degradation of p53. The cellular activity present in extracts of HeLa cells can be fractionated through phosphocellulose. A partially purified fraction that elutes at 0.6 M KCl from phosphocellulose contains the activity that degrades p53 in a 3C(Pro)-dependent manner. These results suggest that both poliovirus-encoded protease 3C(Pro) and a cellular activity are required for the degradation of p53 observed in cells infected with poliovirus.
...
PMID:Poliovirus 3C protease-mediated degradation of transcriptional activator p53 requires a cellular activity. 1187 95

The protein encoded by C-terminal alternatively spliced p53 mRNA (p53as) has been shown previously to occur naturally in mouse cells and to bind sequence-specifically to DNA more efficiently than p53 (p53r, regular form). In the current study, p53as and p53r proteins ectopically expressed in p53-deficient cells each transactivated reporter plasmids containing p53 binding sites. However, p53as consistently was more efficient in transcriptional repression of promoters lacking p53 binding sites and in concentration-dependent repression of the p21(WAF1/Cip-l/Sdi) promoter sequence. The p53as protein, like p53r, associated with TATA-binding protein (TBP), indicating that this interaction does not require the last 26 amino acids of p53. Consistent with its stronger repression effects, p53as interfered with TBP binding to a TATA-containing DNA sequence more efficiently than p53r protein. Taken together, these in vitro and in vivo results demonstrate a novel role in transcriptional repression for a naturally occurring C-terminal variant form of mouse p53 protein associated with differences in DNA binding properties and interference with transcription factor binding.
...
PMID:Repression of transcription and interference with DNA binding of TATA-binding protein by C-terminal alternatively spliced p53. 1224 50


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>