Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P20226 (
TATA-binding protein
)
1,297
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We demonstrate that human activating transcription factor 4 (hATF4), a member of the activating transcription factor/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (ATF/CREB) family of transcription factors, is a potent transcriptional activator in both mammalian cells and yeast. The N-terminal 113 amino acids of hATF4 activate transcription efficiently, and unexpectedly, the C-terminal bZip DNA binding domain of hATF4 also activates transcription, albeit weakly. Our results indicate that hATF4 interacts with several general transcription factors:
TATA-binding protein
, TFIIB, and the RAP30 subunit of TFIIF. In addition, hATF4 interacts with the coactivator
CREB-binding protein
(
CBP
) at four regions: 1) the KIX domain, 2) a region that contains the third zinc finger and the E1A-interacting domain, 3) a C-terminal region that contains the p160/SRC-1-interacting domain, and 4) the recently identified histone acetyltransferase domain. Interestingly, both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of hATF4 interact with the above general transcription factors and
CBP
, providing a mechanistic explanation for their ability to activate transcription. Consistent with its role as a coactivator,
CBP
potentiates the ability of hATF4 to activate transcription. The potential significance of the interaction between hATF4 and multiple factors is discussed.
...
PMID:Characterization of human activating transcription factor 4, a transcriptional activator that interacts with multiple domains of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein. 929 63
In this work, we determined how altered-function mutants affecting hydrophobic residues within the tau 1-core activation domain of the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) influence its physical interaction with different target proteins of the transcriptional machinery. Screening of putative target proteins showed that the tau 1-core can interact with the C-terminal part of the
CREB-binding protein
(
CBP
). In addition, the previously identified interactions of the tau 1-core with the
TATA-binding protein
(
TBP
) and the Ada2 adaptor protein were localized to the C- and N-terminal regions of these proteins, respectively. A panel of mutations within the tau 1-core that either decrease or increase activation potential was used to probe the interaction of the tau 1-core domain with
TBP
, Ada2, and
CBP
. We found that the pattern of effects caused by the mutations was similar for each of the interactions and that the effects on binding generally reflected effects on gene activation potential. Thus, the predominant effect of the mutations appears to influence a property of the tau 1-core that is common to all three interactions, rather than properties that are differentially required by each of the target factor interactions, individually. Such a property could be the ability of the domain to adopt a folded conformation that is generally necessary for interaction with target factors. We have also shown that
TBP
, Ada2, and
CBP
can interact with both the tau 1-core and the GR ligand-binding domain, offering a possible mechanism for synergistic interaction between the tau 1-core and other receptor activation domains. However, other target proteins (e.g., RIP140, and SRC-1), which interact with the GR C terminus, did not show significant interactions with the tau 1-core under our conditions.
...
PMID:Role of important hydrophobic amino acids in the interaction between the glucocorticoid receptor tau 1-core activation domain and target factors. 964 42
The state of chromatin (the packaging of DNA in eukaryotes) has long been recognized to have major effects on levels of gene expression, and numerous chromatin-altering strategies-including ATP-dependent remodeling and histone modification-are employed in the cell to bring about transcriptional regulation. Of these, histone acetylation is one of the best characterized, as recent years have seen the identification and further study of many histone acetyltransferase (HAT) proteins and their associated complexes. Interestingly, most of these proteins were previously shown to have coactivator or other transcription-related functions. Confirmed and putative HAT proteins have been identified from various organisms from yeast to humans, and they include Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) superfamily members Gcn5, PCAF, Elp3, Hpa2, and Hat1: MYST proteins Sas2, Sas3, Esa1, MOF, Tip60, MOZ, MORF, and HBO1; global coactivators p300 and
CREB-binding protein
; nuclear receptor coactivators SRC-1, ACTR, and TIF2;
TATA-binding protein
-associated factor TAF(II)250 and its homologs; and subunits of RNA polymerase III general factor TFIIIC. The acetylation and transcriptional functions of these HATs and the native complexes containing them (such as yeast SAGA, NuA4, and possibly analogous human complexes) are discussed. In addition, some of these HATs are also known to modify certain nonhistone transcription-related proteins, including high-mobility-group chromatin proteins, activators such as p53, coactivators, and general factors. Thus, we also detail these known factor acetyltransferase (FAT) substrates and the demonstrated or potential roles of their acetylation in transcriptional processes.
...
PMID:Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. 1083 22
Neuronal intranuclear inclusions have become the neuropathological signature of the CAG repeat diseases, although their cytotoxicity is a matter of controversy. It has been demonstrated that the inclusions in dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) and Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) were immunopositive for several transcription factors such as
TATA-binding protein
(
TBP
), TBP-associated factor (TAF(II)130), Sp1, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) and
CREB-binding protein
, suggesting that neuronal degeneration in polyglutamine diseases may result from nuclear depletion of transcription factors containing the glutamine-rich domain. It was also revealed that, in the DRPLA brain, expanded polyglutamine stretches were diffusely accumulated in neuronal nucleoplasm. This nuclear pathology involved many neurons in various nervous system regions, such as the cerebral cortex, thalamus, substantia nigra, pontine nuclei, reticular formation and inferior olive, in addition to the previously recognized affected regions. The diffuse nuclear labeling was also detected in MJD, Huntington's disease, and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, suggesting that this nuclear pathology may be a characteristic feature and may exert certain influence on certain nuclear functions of many neurons in the CAG repeat diseases.
...
PMID:Pathology of CAG repeat diseases. 1121 Oct 58
The adenovirus (Ad) E1A 243R oncoprotein encodes an N-terminal transcription repression domain that is essential for early viral functions, cell immortalization, and cell transformation. The transcription repression function requires sequences within amino acids 1 to 30 and 48 to 60. To elucidate the roles of the
TATA-binding protein
(
TBP
), p300, and the
CREB-binding protein
(
CBP
) in the mechanism(s) of E1A repression, we have constructed 29 amino acid substitution mutants and 5 deletion mutants spanning the first 30 amino acids within the E1A 1-80 polypeptide backbone. These mutant E1A polypeptides were characterized with regard to six parameters: the ability to repress transcription in vitro and in vivo, to disrupt
TBP
-TATA box interaction, and to bind
TBP
, p300, and
CBP
. Two regions within E1A residues 1 to 30, amino acids 2 to 6 and amino acid 20, are critical for E1A transcription repression in vitro and in vivo and for the ability to interfere with
TBP
-TATA interaction. Replacement of 6Cys with Ala in the first region yields the most defective mutant. Replacement of 20Leu with Ala, but not substitutions in flanking residues, yields a substantially defective phenotype. Protein binding assays demonstrate that replacement of 6Cys with Ala yields a mutant completely defective in interaction with
TBP
, p300, and
CBP
. Our findings are consistent with a model in which the E1A repression function involves interaction of E1A with p300/
CBP
and interference with the formation of a
TBP
-TATA box complex.
...
PMID:Adenovirus E1A N-terminal amino acid sequence requirements for repression of transcription in vitro and in vivo correlate with those required for E1A interference with TBP-TATA complex formation. 1177 19
Initiation of transcription of protein-encoding genes by RNA polymerase II was thought to require transcription factor TFIID, a complex comprising the
TATA-binding protein
(
TBP
) and
TBP
-associated factors (TAFs). In the presence of
TBP
-free TAF complex (TFTC), initiation of polymerase II transcription can occur in the absence of TFIID. TFTC contains several subunits that have been shown to play the role of transcriptional coactivators, including the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase (HAT), which acetylates histone H3 in a nucleosomal context. Here we analyze the coactivator function of TFTC. We show direct physical interactions between TFTC and the two distinct activation regions (H1 and H2) of the VP16 activation domain, whereas the HAT-containing coactivators, p300/CBP (
CREB-binding protein
), interact only with the H2 subdomain of VP16. Accordingly, cell transfection experiments demonstrate the requirement of both p300 and TFTC for maximal transcriptional activation by GAL-VP16. In agreement with this finding, we show that in vitro on a chromatinized template human TFTC mediates the transcriptional activity of the VP16 activation domain in concert with p300 and in an acetyl-CoA-dependent manner. Thus, our results suggest that these two HAT-containing co-activators, p300 and TFTC, have complementary rather than redundant roles during the transcriptional activation process.
...
PMID:TATA-binding protein-free TAF-containing complex (TFTC) and p300 are both required for efficient transcriptional activation. 1210 88
The myeloid cell-specific expression and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) induction of Fc gamma receptor I (FcgammaRI) requires cooperation between PU.1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1) by means of mechanisms that are unknown. We found that PU.1 and Stat1 mediated distinct functions in the activation of FcgammaRI promoter. The basal activity of the natural FcgammaRI promoter was strictly dependent on PU.1, and IFN-gamma induction required both PU.1 and Stat1. Recruitment of
TATA-binding protein
(
TBP
) to the FcgammaRI promoter did not replace PU.1 in promoter activation, suggesting that
TBP
is not sufficient for FcgammaRI activation and that PU.1 mediates additional contacts with basal transcription machinery. In contrast, Stat1 did not interact with basal transcription machinery, but the Stat1-mediated activation of FcgammaRI promoter critically required
CREB-binding protein
(
CBP
)/p300. These results define functional cooperativity between PU.1 and Stat1 in FcgammaRI promoter activation, in which PU.1 appears to serve as a bridging factor with the basal transcription machinery and IFN-gamma-mediated induction of transcription occurs through recruitment of
CBP
/p300 by Stat1.
...
PMID:Distinct functions for signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of Fc gamma receptor I promoter. 1213 May 29
Specialized transcription complexes that coordinate the differentiation programme of spermatogenesis have been found in germ cells, which display specific differences in the components of the general transcription machinery. The
TATA-binding protein
family and its associated cofactors, for example, show upregulated expression in testis. In this physiological context, transcriptional control mediated by the activator cAMP response element modulator (CREM) represents an established paradigm. Somatic cell activation by CREM requires its phosphorylation at a unique regulatory site (Ser117) and subsequent interaction with the ubiquitous coactivator
CREB-binding protein
. In testis, CREM transcriptional activity is controlled through interaction with a tissue-specific partner, activator of CREM in the testis (ACT), which confers a powerful, phosphorylation-independent activation capacity. The function of ACT was found to be regulated by the testis-specific kinesin KIF17b. Here we discuss some aspects of the testis-specific transcription machinery, whose function is essential for the process of spermatogenesis.
...
PMID:Specialized rules of gene transcription in male germ cells: the CREM paradigm. 1559 50