Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P20020 (adenosine triphosphatase)
 3,299 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

During allergic disease, leucocytes infiltrate the affected tissues and release their mediators and cytokines. In this way, the local inflammatory process is induced and maintained. Basophilic granulocytes have been demonstrated in lung and sputum of allergic asthmatics, in nasal mucosa and secretion of allergic rhinitis patients, and in skin lesions of atopic dermatitis patients. The number of basophils correlates with the severity of the disease. Analysis of mediator profiles and cellular contents of lavages of nose, skin and lung during allergic late-phase reactions (LPR) have demonstrated histamine, but not tryptase or prostaglandin D2. The histamine-containing cells have been characterized as basophilic granulocytes. This indicates that infiltrating basophils but not mast cells are activated and release their inflammatory contents in the LPR. We are interested in the cellular mechanisms that determine the degranulation of basophils during LPR. Basophil activators, such as allergens and activated complement, are not present at these sites. However, cytokines that prime basophils but do not induce degranulation, such as interleukin-5 (IL-5) and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), have been detected at sites of LPR. We have now observed that after emptying intracellular Ca2+ stores by means of the Ca2+ adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) inhibitor, thapsigargin, basophils become extremely sensitive to stimuli that do not affect the Ca2+ stores themselves but that induce degranulation, such as the phorbolester, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). The most interesting finding was that although both thapsigargin and IL-3, IL-5 or GM-CSF do not induce basophil degranulation by themselves, a 2 min preincubation of basophils with thapsigargin followed by addition of one of these cytokines resulted in extensive histamine release: IL-3 induced 71 +/- 7% histamine release (conc1/2max 6 pM), IL-5 induced 43 +/- 8% histamine release (conc1/2max 41 pM) and GM-CSF induced 57 +/- 10% histamine release (conc1/2max 140 pM). Interestingly, the effect of thapsigargin could be mimicked by platelet-activating factor (PAF) (range 10(-9) to 10(-6) M), although to a lesser extent. Our results indicate that basophil degranulation in tissues during late-phase reactions might be caused by a combination of mediators or cytokines depleting Ca2+ stores, as platelet-activating factor or thapsigargin do, concurrent with activation by interleukin-3, interleukin-5 or granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The response of the basophils towards these cytokines might also be influenced by cell adhesion events, such as binding of basophils via integrins. This is the subject of further study.
 ...
PMID:The role of basophils in allergic disease. 887 Oct 57

Contact tolerance describes an immunological state which is caused by ordinary contact allergens painted in doses too low to sensitize, either once or repeatedly, onto healthy intact skin. The tolerance state accomplished by this means in BALB/c and C57BI/6 mice was found to be mediated by hapten-specific T cells that adoptively transferred tolerance to naive recipients. Furthermore, these cells were shown to be sensitive to cyclophosphamide, to express the Lyt2+ (CD8) phenotype, and to produce, upon restimulation in vitro, predominantly anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10. These data indicate that contact tolerance of the low zone type is actively mediated by Th2-like CD8 T cells rather than arising as a consequence of clonal anergy. The induction of contact tolerance appeared to be strictly dose-dependent. As opposed to sensitizing doses of allergen, subsensitizing doses did not involve epidermal Langerhans cells discernibly. This was suggested by their normal ultrastructure, their unaffected adenosine triphosphatase system, the inefficacy of functional blocking and excision experiments. Both radiolabeled and fluorescent contact sensitizers were observed to readily enter the bloodstream, thereby being dispersed throughout the body. Presumably, contact tolerance is induced systemically rather than locally. The presence of hapten-specific tolerance can only be uncovered through a subsequent attempt to sensitize. If the attained sensitization turns out to be significantly lower than that of immunologically naive controls, and if sensitization to chemically unrelated sensitizers is not impaired, hapten-specific tolerance does exist. Thus, contact tolerance is a result obtained from experimental sensitization in animals. Nonetheless, it is assumed to occur also in humans, although it is not demonstrable unless different proofs of existence become available.
 ...
PMID:Contact tolerance. 1072 10