Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P11021 (BiP)
 2,049 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

SEC63 encodes a protein required for secretory protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (J. A. Rothblatt, R. J. Deshaies, S. L. Sanders, G. Daum, and R. Schekman, J. Cell Biol. 109:2641-2652, 1989). Antibody directed against a recombinant form of the protein detects a 73-kDa polypeptide which, by immunofluorescence microscopy, is localized to the nuclear envelope-ER network. Cell fractionation and protease protection experiments confirm the prediction that Sec63p is an integral membrane protein. A series of SEC63-SUC2 fusion genes was created to assess the topology of Sec63p within the ER membrane. The largest hybrid proteins are unglycosylated, suggesting that the carboxyl terminus of Sec63p faces the cytosol. Invertase fusion to a loop in Sec63p that is flanked by two putative transmembrane domains produces an extensively glycosylated hybrid protein. This loop, which is homologous to the amino terminus of the Escherichia coli heat shock protein, DnaJ, is likely to face the ER lumen. By analogy to the interaction of the DnaJ and Hsp70-like DnaK proteins in E. coli, the DnaJ loop of Sec63p may recruit luminal Hsp70 (BiP/GRP78/Kar2p) to the translocation apparatus. Mutations in two highly conserved positions of the DnaJ loop and short deletions of the carboxyl terminus inactivate Sec63p activity. Sec63p associates with several other proteins, including Sec61p, a 31.5-kDa glycoprotein, and a 23-kDa protein, and together with these proteins may constitute part of the polypeptide translocation apparatus. A nonfunctional DnaJ domain mutant allele does not interfere with the formation of the Sec63p/Sec61p/gp31.5/p23 complex.
 ...
PMID:Topology and functional domains of Sec63p, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein required for secretory protein translocation. 162 Jan 30

Eukaryotic cells contain multiple Hsp70 proteins and DnaJ homologues. The partnership between a given Hsp70 and its interacting DnaJ could, in principle, be determined by their cellular colocalization or by specific protein-protein interactions. The yeast SCJ1 gene encodes one of several homologues of the bacterial chaperone DnaJ. We show that Scj1p is located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it can function with Kar2p (the ER-lumenal BiP/Hsp70 of yeast). The region common to all DnaJ homologues (termed the J domain) from Scj1p can be swapped for a similar region in Sec63p, which is known to interact with Kar2p in the ER lumen, to form a functional transmembrane protein component of the secretory machinery. Thus, Kar2p can interact with two different DnaJ proteins. On the other hand, J domains from two other non-ER DnaJs, Sis1p and Mdj1p, do not function when swapped into Sec63p. However, only three amino acid changes in the Sis1p J domain render the Sec63 fusion protein fully functional in the ER lumen. These results indicate that the choice of an Hsp70 partner by a given DnaJ homologue is specified by the J domain.
 ...
PMID:A yeast DnaJ homologue, Scj1p, can function in the endoplasmic reticulum with BiP/Kar2p via a conserved domain that specifies interactions with Hsp70s. 774 69

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ydj1p, a DnaJ homolog, is localized to the cytosol with the Ssa and Ssb Hsp70 proteins. Ydj1p helps facilitate polypeptide translocation across mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum membranes (Caplan, A. J., Cyr, D. M., and Douglas, M. G. (1992) Cell 71, 1143-1155) and can directly interact with Ssa1p to regulate chaperone activity (Cyr, D. M., Lu, X., and Douglas, M. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20927-20931). In this study, the role of Ydj1p in modulating ATP-dependent reactions catalyzed by Ssa and Ssb Hsp70 proteins has been examined using purified components and compared with that of other Hsp70 homologs BiP and DnaK. Ssa1p, Ssa2p, and Ssb1/2p all formed stable complexes with the mitochondrial presequence peptide, F1 beta(1-51). ATP alone had only modest effects on polypeptide complex formation with Ssa1p and Ssa2p, but prevented the majority of polypeptide binding to BiP and DnaK. ATP by itself also reduced polypeptide binding to Ssb1/2p to a level that was intermediate between that observed for the Ssa Hsp70 proteins tested and BiP and DnaK. ATP hydrolysis by Ssa1p, Ssa2p, and Ssb1/2p occurred at similar rates. Ydj1p was a potent modulator of the both the ATPase and polypeptide binding activities of Ssa1p and Ssa2p. In contrast, Ydj1p had little effect on the ATPase and polypeptide binding activity of Ssb1/2p. Therefore the chaperone-related activities of Ssa and Ssb Hsp70 proteins exhibit significant differences in sensitivity to ATP and YDJ1p. These data indicate that regulation of Hsp70 activity by DnaJ homologs can be specific. The specificity of interactions between Ydj1p and the Ssa and Ssb Hsp70 proteins observed could contribute in determining the functional specificity of these chaperones in the cytosol. In related experiments, F1 beta(1-51) was found to reduce the extent to which Ydj1p stimulated Ssa1p ATPase activity. This effect correlated with the formation of F1 beta(1-51).Ssa1p complexes. We propose that intramolecular communication between the polypeptide binding, ATPase and DnaJ regulatory domains on Ssa1p plays a role in the regulation of chaperone activity.
 ...
PMID:Differential regulation of Hsp70 subfamilies by the eukaryotic DnaJ homologue YDJ1. 814 72

KAR2 encodes the yeast homologue of mammalian BiP, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident member of the HSP70 family. Kar2p has been shown to be required for the translocation of proteins across the ER membrane as well as nuclear fusion. Sec63, an ER integral membrane protein that shares homology with the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein, is also required for translocation. In this paper we describe several specific genetic interactions between these two proteins, Kar2p and Sec63p. First, temperature-sensitive mutations in KAR2 and SEC63 form synthetic lethal combinations. Second, dominant mutations in KAR2 are allele-specific suppressors for the temperature-sensitive growth and translocation defect of sec63-1. Third, the sec63-1, unlike other translocation defective mutations, results in the induction of KAR2 mRNA levels. Taken together, these genetic interactions suggest that Kar2p and Sec63p interact in vivo in a manner similar to that of the E. coli HSP70, DnaK, and DnaJ. We propose that the interaction between these two proteins is critical to their function in protein translocation.
 ...
PMID:Genetic interactions between KAR2 and SEC63, encoding eukaryotic homologues of DnaK and DnaJ in the endoplasmic reticulum. 830 36

To clarify the roles of Kar2p (BiP) and Sec63p in translocation across the ER membrane in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have utilized mutant alleles of the essential genes that encode these proteins: kar2-203 and sec63-1. Sanders et al. (Sanders, S. L., K. M. Whitfield, J. P. Vogel, M. D. Rose, and R. W. Schekman. 1992. Cell. 69:353-365) showed that the translocation defect of the kar2-203 mutant lies in the inability of the precursor protein to complete its transit across the membrane, suggesting that the lumenal hsp70 homologue Kar2p (BiP) binds the transiting polypeptide in order to facilitate its passage through the pore. We now show that mutation of a conserved residue (A181-->T) (Nelson, M. K., T. Kurihara, and P. Silver. 1993. Genetics. 134:159-173) in the lumenal DnaJ box of Sec63p (sec63-1) results in an in vitro phenotype that mimics the precursor stalling defect of kar2-203. We demonstrate by several criteria that this phenotype results specifically from a defect in the lumenal interaction between Sec63p and BiP: Neither a sec62-1 mutant nor a mutation in the cytosolically exposed domain of Sec63p causes precursor stalling, and interaction of the sec63-1 mutant with the membranebound components of the translocation apparatus is unimpaired. Additionally, dominant KAR2 suppressors of sec63-1 partially relieve the stalling defect. Thus, proper interaction between BiP and Sec63p is necessary to allow the precursor polypeptide to complete its transit across the membrane.
 ...
PMID:Interaction between BiP and Sec63p is required for the completion of protein translocation into the ER of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 852 80

Constitutive 70-kDa heat shock protein (hsc70) is a mixture of monomers and oligomers in ADP, while in ATP it is monomeric unless certain DnaJ homologs are present which induce hsc70 to form large polymers in an ATP-dependent reaction. A key question regarding polymerized hsc70 is whether it is able to bind protein substrates. Polymerized BiP, the hsc70 present in the endoplasmic reticulum, has been found to bind substrates in vitro although substrates appear to bind only to monomeric BiP in vivo. In this study, we investigated whether substrate binds to polymerized cytoplasmic hsc70 in vitro. Although both stoichiometric ATP and high concentrations of cytochrome c peptide monomerized hsc70, direct binding studies provided no evidence that cytochrome c peptide binds to polymerized hsc70. Furthermore, the time course of cytochrome c peptide and clathrin binding to hsc70 suggested that rather than binding to polymerized hsc70, they monomerized it by reducing free monomer, thereby shifting the monomer-polymer equilibrium toward monomer. We conclude that peptide and protein substrates bind at least an order of magnitude more weakly to polymerized hsc70 than to monomer, suggesting that polymerization of hsc70 in vivo, perhaps by DnaJ homologs, may store it in an inactive form.
 ...
PMID:Effect of constitutive 70-kDa heat shock protein polymerization on its interaction with protein substrate. 866 41

Proteins enter the secretory pathway by two general routes. In one, the complete polypeptide is made in the cytoplasm and held in an incompletely folded state by chaperoning adenosine triphosphatases (ATPases) such as hsp70. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, fully synthesized secretory precursors engage the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane by interaction with a set of Sec proteins comprising the polypeptide translocation apparatus (Sec61p, Sec62p, Sec63p, Sec71p, Sec72p). Productive interaction requires displacement of hsp70 from the precursor, a reaction that is facilitated by Ydj1p, a homologue of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein. Both DnaJ and Ydj1p regulate chaperone activity by stimulating the ATPase activity of their respective hsp70 partners (E. coli DnaK and S. cerevisiae Ssa1p, respectively). In the ER lumen, another hsp70 chaperone, BiP, binds ATP and interacts with the ER membrane via its contact with a peptide loop of Sec63p. This loop represents yet another DnaJ homologue in that it contains a region of approximately 70 residue similarity to the 'J box', the most conserved region of the DnaJ family of proteins. In the presence of ATP, under conditions in which BiP can bind to Sec63p, the secretory precursor passes from the cytosol into the lumen through a membrane channel formed by Sec61p. A second route to the membrane pore that is used by many other secretory precursors, particularly in mammalian cells, requires that the polypeptide engage the ER membrane as the nascent chain emerges from the ribosome. Such cotranslational translocation bypasses the need for certain Sec proteins, instead utilizing an alternate set of cytosolic and membrane factors that allows the nascent chain to be inserted directly into the Sec61p channel.
 ...
PMID:Polypeptide translocation machinery of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. 898 44

We studied the molecular nature of the interaction between the integral membrane protein Sec63p and the lumenal Hsp70 BiP to elucidate their role in the process of precursor transit into the ER of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A lumenal stretch of Sec63p with homology to the Escherichia coli protein DnaJ is the likely region of interface between Sec63p and BiP. This domain, purified as a fusion protein (63Jp) with glutathione S-transferase (GST), mediated a stable ATP-dependent binding interaction between 63Jp and BiP and stimulated the ATPase activity of BiP. The interaction was highly selective because only BiP was retained on immobilized 63Jp when detergent-solubilized microsomes were mixed with ATP and the fusion protein. GST alone was inactive in these assays. Additionally, a GST fusion containing a point mutation in the lumenal domain of Sec63p did not interact with BiP. Finally, we found that the soluble Sec63p lumenal domain inhibited efficient precursor import into proteoliposomes reconstituted so as to incorporate both BiP and the fusion protein. We conclude that the lumenal domain of Sec63p is sufficient to mediate enzymatic interaction with BiP and that this interaction positioned at the translocation apparatus or translocon at the lumenal face of the ER is vital for protein translocation into the ER.
 ...
PMID:The lumenal domain of Sec63p stimulates the ATPase activity of BiP and mediates BiP recruitment to the translocon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 919 65

To determine whether mitochondrial hsp70 (mHsp70) could substitute for the endoplasmic retuculum (ER) Hsp70 (BiP) during protein translocation, we assembled ER-derived reconstituted proteoliposomes supplemented with either protein. We found that only BiP restored translocation in kar2 mutant vesicles and stimulated translocation approximately 3-fold in wild type proteoliposomes. mHsp70 associated poorly with both a BiP binding (DnaJ) domain of Sec63p and an ER precursor, and its ATPase activity was poorly enhanced upon incubation with the DnaJ domain. In contrast, BiP bound to the Sec63p-DnaJ domain in an ATP-dependent manner and its ATPase activity was stimulated significantly by this polypeptide. We conclude that mHsp70 is unable to support protein translocation into the ER because it fails to associate productively with Sec63p and a precursor.
 ...
PMID:Mitochondrial Hsp70 cannot replace BiP in driving protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. 976 4

The posttranslational translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane in yeast requires ATP hydrolysis and the action of hsc70s (DnaK homologues) and DnaJ homologues in both the cytosol and ER lumen. Although the cytosolic hsc70 (Ssa1p) and the ER lumenal hsc70 (BiP) are homologous, they cannot substitute for one another, possibly because they interact with specific DnaJ homologues on each side of the ER membrane. To investigate this possibility, we purified Ssa1p, BiP, Ydj1p (a cytosolic DnaJ homologue), and a GST-63Jp fusion protein containing the lumenal DnaJ region of Sec63p. We observed that BiP, but not Ssa1p, is able to associate with GST-63Jp and that Ydj1p stimulates the ATPase activity of Ssa1p up to 10-fold but increases the ATPase activity of BiP by <2-fold. In addition, Ydj1p and ATP trigger the release of an unfolded polypeptide from Ssa1p but not from BiP. To understand further how BiP drives protein translocation, we purified four dominant lethal mutants of BiP. We discovered that each mutant is defective for ATP hydrolysis, fails to undergo an ATP-dependent conformational change, and cannot interact with GST-63Jp. Measurements of protein translocation into reconstituted proteoliposomes indicate that the mutants inhibit translocation even in the presence of wild-type BiP. We conclude that a conformation- and ATP-dependent interaction of BiP with the J domain of Sec63p is essential for protein translocation and that the specificity of hsc70 action is dictated by their DnaJ partners.
 ...
PMID:Specific molecular chaperone interactions and an ATP-dependent conformational change are required during posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast ER. 984 86


1 2 3 Next >>