Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P10636 (tau protein)
 5,110 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA.There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p=0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high-grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high-grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS.In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high-grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate-grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high-grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression.
 ...
PMID:Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study. 2154 76

This study investigates the relationship of promoter methylation in tumor suppressor genes with copy-number aberrations (CNA) and with tumor markers in breast cancer (BCs). The study includes 98 formalin fixed paraffin-embedded BCs in which promoter methylation of 24 tumour suppressor genes were assessed by Methylation-Specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA), CNA of 20 BC related genes by MLPA and ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, CK18, EGFR, Cadherin-E, P53, Ki-67 and PARP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cluster analysis classed BCs in two groups according to promoter methylation percentage: the highly-methylated group (16 BCs), containing mostly hyper-methylated genes, and the sparsely-methylated group (82 BCs) with hypo-methylated genes. ATM, CDKN2A, VHL, CHFR and CDKN2B showed the greatest differences in the mean methylation percentage between these groups. We found no relationship of the IHC parameters or pathological features with methylation status, except for Catherin-E (p = 0.008). However the highly methylated BCs showed higher CNA proportion than the sparsely methylated BCs (p < 0.001, OR = 1.62; IC 95% [1.26, 2.07]). CDC6, MAPT, MED1, PRMD14 and AURKA showed the major differences in the CNA percentage between the two groups, exceeding the 22%. Methylation in RASSF1, CASP8, DAPK1 and GSTP1 conferred the highest probability of harboring CNA. Our results show a new link between promoter methylation and CNA giving support to the importance of methylation events to establish new BCs subtypes. Our findings may be also of relevance in personalized therapy assessment, which could benefit the hyper methylated BC patients group.
...
PMID:Methylation of tumor suppressor genes is related with copy number aberrations in breast cancer. 2562 46

Gene amplification is a common event in breast cancer, and identifies actual and potential targets of molecular therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the amplification status of 22 genes that are reportedly frequently amplified in breast cancers. An archive of 322 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancer tissues were screened by multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and a total of 906 gene loci judged as 'gain' or 'amplified' was further confirmed to have been amplified based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The results showed that 109 of 322 tumors (34%) displayed gene amplification of at least one of the 22 genes. The frequencies of the amplification of four regions containing known driver oncogenes were as follows: 8p11 (ZNF703, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB), 8q24 (MYC), 11q13 (CCND1, C11ORF30), and 17q11-21 (CPD, MED1, ERBB2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT) exhibited amplification in 9.6%, 9.6%, 12.4%, and 12.1% of the tumors, respectively. In addition to homogeneously staining region- or double-minute chromosome-type amplifications, a centromere-associated-type amplification was found in nine tumors. Co-localization of the amplicon on 8p11 and the amplicon on 11q13 in single cells was found in 10 tumors, and in six of those tumors the two amplicons constituted single amplification units. Similarly, an amplicon consisting of ERBB2 and its flanking genes on 17q12-21 co-localized with an amplicon on 8p11 in 10 tumors and with the amplicon on 11q13 in five tumors. Thus, precise and feasible analysis of gene amplification status can be obtained using a combination of MLPA and FISH.
 ...
PMID:Amplicons in breast cancers analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization. 3038 70