Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P08908 (5-HT1A)
 5,574 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Buspirone (Buspar) is a azaspirodecanedione anxiolytic agent. Its mechanism of action is extremely complex, but current investigations indicate that its main neuropharmacologic effects are mediated by the 5-HT1A receptors. Other neuroreceptor systems could be involved, as buspirone displays some affinity for DA2 autoreceptors and 5-HT2 receptors. It has been proposed that inhibition of synthesis and release of serotonin result through the combined interactions of neuroreceptors and secondary messenger systems. This action leads to inhibition of the firing rate of 5-HT-containing neurons in the dorsal raphe. From this novel profile, that differs from that of the benzodiazepines, buspirone lacks anticonvulsant and muscle-relaxant properties, and causes only minimal sedation. The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a mean bioavailability of 3.9%. After a single oral dose, the mean elimination half-life is 2.1 hours. Buspirone is mainly bound to albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. It is metabolized to an active metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl) piperazine (1-PP). The mean elimination half-life of 1-PP is 6.1 hours. Buspirone is indicated in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders. Its efficacy is comparable to the benzodiazepines. Its use in depression and panic disorders requires further investigation. When combined with alcohol or given alone, psychomotor impairment was not detected. Abuse, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms have not been reported. The frequency of adverse effects is low, and the most common effects are headaches, dizziness, nervousness, and lightheadness. Buspirone should be added to drug formularies and could represent a significant addition in psychopharmacology.
 ...
PMID:Buspirone: an update on a unique anxiolytic agent. 304 84

Buspirone (Buspar; Bristol) marks a departure from established concepts of anxiolysis. Differing substantially both in its mode of action and in the clinical expression of its action from agents such as barbiturates and benzodiazepines, it would seem to operate chiefly via the 5-HT1A subtype of serotonin receptor. Such receptor selectivity is likely to be responsible for the novel action of this anxiolytic in that sedation and psychomotor and cognitive dysfunction are minimal, and because dependence is unlikely. The slower onset of full therapeutic benefit further delineates the differences between buspirone and other anxiolytics. However, it is apparent that the benzodiazepines will not readily be displaced from all of their varied applications by buspirone. This review examines buspirone and provides some guidelines for its use.
 ...
PMID:Buspirone--frontrunner of a new genre of anxiolytics. 305 61

Groups of rats were treated with buspirone (1 mg/kg/day) for 21 days using osmotic minipumps implanted subcutaneously. After buspirone treatment, the 5-HT1A receptor mRNA levels were significantly decreased in the CA1 and CA2 of the hippocampus, but were markedly increased in the dentate gyrus (DG), CA3 and CA4. The level of the 5-HT1A receptor binding sites was not significantly changed in these subhippocampal areas. Buspirone treatment markedly increased 5-HT2A receptor mRNA levels in the DG, CA2, CA3 and CA4. This was accompanied by a significant increase in the level of 5-HT2A receptor binding sites in all subhippocampal regions. These results demonstrate that chronic buspirone treatment differentially regulates 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNA as well as their expressed binding sites in various regions of the hippocampus.
 ...
PMID:Chronic buspirone treatment differentially regulates 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNA and binding sites in various regions of the rat hippocampus. 750 Aug 48

Buspirone, an agonist of the 5-HT1A subtype of serotonin receptors, has shown antiemetic activity in animal models. However, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin, ondansetron, given either i.v. (one 8-mg dose 30 min after cisplatin) or orally (one 16-mg dose at the end of cisplatin infusion) was superior (P < 0.001) to buspirone (60 mg p.o. at the end of cisplatin and 60 mg p.o., 30 min later), in all parameters of antiemetic efficacy. These results are in favour of 5-HT3 receptors, but against the participation of 5-HT1A receptors in acute emesis associated with cisplatin chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy of a single oral dose of ondansetron and of buspirone against cisplatin-induced emesis in cancer patients. 754 13

1. We devised a new light/dark transition apparatus, recorded transitions, % time animals spent outside the dark chambers (% time) and locomotor activity, and evaluated this apparatus by testing anxiolytics, non-anxiolytic drugs and putative anxiogenic drugs in mice. 2. Diazepam and alprazolam significantly increased transitions, % time and locomotor activity. The effects of 1 mg/kg (i.p.) diazepam on these parameters in this modified test were blocked by flumazenil, a selective benzodiazepine antagonist. 3. Anxiogenic drugs such as beta-carboline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (beta-CCE) and picrotoxin significantly decreased all three parameters. Another anxiogenic drug, yohimbine, also significantly decreased transitions and locomotor activity, but it significantly increased % time at 5 mg/kg (i.p.). 4. Imipramine (5-10 mg/kg, i.p.), an antidepressant, sulpiride (10-25 mg/kg, i.p.), an antipsychotic drug, and scopolamine (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.), an anticholinergic drug, had no effect. 5. Buspirone, a partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist, produced parameter changes similar to those induced by anxiolytic benzodiazepines. 8-OH-DPAT, a full 5-HT1A receptor agonist, significantly increased transitions and locomotor activity but not % time. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, ICS205-930 and MDL72222, did not have any effect on these parameters. 6. Methamphetamine (1-2 mg/kg, i.p.) increased all parameters, while caffeine increased only locomotor activity. 7. The present findings indicate that the modified light/dark transition test is very simple and easy to perform for testing the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of drugs.
 ...
PMID:The modified light/dark transition test in mice: evaluation of classic and putative anxiolytic and anxiogenic drugs. 771 61

Hippocampal rhythmical slow activity (RSA) can be elicited by stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation. Buspirone, chlordiazepoxide and imipramine are all anxiolytic and have all been shown to decrease the frequency of RSA. All these compounds have been suggested to affect, directly or indirectly, 5-HT metabolism and function. The present experiments tested the possibility that buspirone, chlordiazepoxide and imipramine reduce RSA frequency via 5-HT1A autoreceptors. Rats received buspirone (10 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) and imipramine (30 mg/kg) after 5-HT depletion with p-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA, 100 mg/kg/day for 3 days or 350 mg/kg/day for 2 days) or after pretreatment with 5-HTP (40 mg/kg, to replete 5-HT) as well as pCPA. The frequency-reducing effects produced by buspirone and chlordiazepoxide were unchanged by either dose of pCPA, whereas the frequency-reducing effect of imipramine was completely eliminated by the high dose of pCPA. Pindolol, but not beta-blockers (a combination of metoprolol and ICI118,551), was able to block the effect of imipramine on RSA frequency. Pindolol has been reported to block the effects of buspirone but not chlordiazepoxide. These data suggest that: (1) buspirone obtains its frequency-reducing effects via pre- or post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors rather than 5-HT1A autoreceptors; (2) chlordiazepoxide obtains its frequency-reducing effect via benzodiazepine receptors and GABA with no direct or indirect involvement of 5-HT systems; and (3) imipramine obtains its frequency-reducing effect by increasing the availability of 5-HT at 5-HT1A receptors which are not autoreceptors.
 ...
PMID:The interaction of serotonin depletion with anxiolytics and antidepressants on reticular-elicited hippocampal RSA. 776 Sep 82

Buspirone is renowned for its highly inconsistent effects in animal models of anxiety. In the present study, the effects of acute (0.63-5.0 mg/kg) and chronic (1.25-5.0 mg/kg, daily, 15 days) buspirone treatment on the behaviour of mice in the elevated plus-maze test were assessed using a recently developed ethological scoring method. On acute administration, a selective reduction in risk assessment behaviours was observed at 1.25 mg/kg; these mild anxiolytic-like effects were maintained at higher doses (2.5-5.0 mg/kg) which also reduced measures of general activity. Similar, though more potent, effects were observed with chronic administration; the lowest dose tested (1.25 mg/kg) reduced open arm entries and total stretch attend postures while higher doses profoundly reduced all major indices of anxiety (traditional and novel) and, concomitantly, suppressed total entries and rearing. Acute administration of haloperidol (0.0125-0.1 mg/kg) appeared to mimic the behavioural suppressant effects of buspirone without selectively affecting anxiety-related measures at any dose. It is suggested that the anti-anxiety and behavioural suppressant profile of buspirone may reflect combined action at 5-HT1A and D2 receptors, respectively. Results are discussed in relation to the utility of risk assessment as a sensitive index of anxiety in models based upon unconditioned behaviour.
 ...
PMID:Ethological evaluation of the effects of acute and chronic buspirone treatment in the murine elevated plus-maze test: comparison with haloperidol. 783 22

The effects of the putative anxiolytic agent buspirone on food-handling behavior of laboratory rats were investigated. Rats trained to travel from a covered shelter to a food source were provided with food pellets of six sizes. Smaller pellets were eaten at the exposed food source, whereas larger pellets were carried back to the shelter for consumption. Subcutaneous administration of buspirone hydrochloride (0.2-2.0 mg/kg) reduced carrying of larger food pellets in a dose-dependent manner. Instead, these pellets were also eaten at the exposed food source. Carrying was maximally suppressed 1 h after drug administration. Handling of smaller pellets, travel times, and eating times were not affected by buspirone. Similar results have previously been obtained with diazepam. Buspirone appears to exert its effects through 5-HT1A and/or dopamine receptors, whereas diazepam interacts with benzodiazepine receptors. Thus, manipulations of distinct transmitter systems may have similar behavioral consequences on the food carrying responses of rats.
 ...
PMID:Food carrying in rats is blocked by the putative anxiolytic agent buspirone. 786 31

To investigate a dopaminergic component in the discriminative stimulus properties of buspirone, rats were trained to discriminate 2.5 mg/kg buspirone from saline, using a two lever, food-rewarded, fixed ratio 10 operant procedure. To test the dopamine-2 (D2) antagonist action of buspirone, a second group of rats was trained to discriminate 0.16 mg/kg apomorphine from saline. In addition to a complete generalization to 8-OH-DPAT, the D2 antagonists haloperidol, R 79598 and sulpiride showed a partial generalization to buspirone. The benzodiazepine ligands chlordiazepoxide and bretazenil did not generalize to the buspirone cue. Buspirone (2.0 mg/kg) completely blocked the apomorphine cue in the apomorphine trained rats. Haloperidol, R 79895 and sulpiride also blocked the apomorphine cue, although at doses much smaller than the doses needed to evoke buspirone responding in the buspirone trained group. 8-OH-DPAT did not antagonize apomorphine. It was concluded that the D2 action of buspirone partially contributes to its discriminative stimulus properties. Mediation of the buspirone cue by 5-HT1a receptor activation seemed predominant. Further, buspirone can act as a full D2 antagonist in drug discrimination. A model was proposed suggesting a compound discriminative stimulus complex of buspirone with a dominant 5-HT1a component that overshadows a less pronounced D2 component.
 ...
PMID:The discriminative stimulus properties of buspirone involve dopamine-2 receptor antagonist activity. 787 Sep 34

In the present experiments, the effects of the azapirone anxiolytics, buspirone and ipsapirone, on excessive drinking induced by a FT-60 schedule of food delivery (schedule induced polydipsia, SIP) were investigated. Because buspirone is known to block dopamine receptors and both buspirone and ipsapirone act as agonists at the 5-HT1A receptor, their effects on polydipsia were compared to raclopride, an antagonist at D2 receptors, and 8-OH-DPAT, an agonist at the 5-HT1A receptor, thus providing information about the relative importance of the serotonergic and/or dopaminergic systems for the maintenance of polydipsia. The effects of all four drugs were investigated both acutely, and following repeated treatment. The doses employed were as follows: buspirone, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg; raclopride, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.5 mg/kg; 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/kg and ipsapirone, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 mg/kg. Administered acutely, the lowest doses of buspirone and raclopride did not alter drinking, whilst the low dose of 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced polydipsia. These effects were reversed following repeated treatment over 16 successive days. Buspirone 1.0 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg raclopride reduced drinking, whilst tolerance developed to the effects of 0.1 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. Ipsapirone, at low doses, was without effect on drinking. At high doses, all four drugs reduced drinking both acutely and chronically. Repeated treatment with buspirone (3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) reduced licking and panel entries, but induced a selective decrease in licking at the low dose (1.0 mg/kg). Similar effects were seen following raclopride treatment, although the effects were less selective. 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, in contrast reduced licking only at the highest dose, and both drugs increased panel entries as testing continued. The effects of buspirone resembled those of raclopride whereas the effects of ipsapirone resembled those of 8-OH-DPAT. Buspirone appears to act as a dopamine antagonist in this test. The effects of the drugs suggest that SIP depends upon motivational and performance factors which may be more sensitive to drug manipulation than potential underlying psychological factors such as anxiety or stress.
 ...
PMID:Effects of buspirone and ipsapirone on schedule induced polydipsia: comparison with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and raclopride. 787 Oct 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>