Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Three polypeptides are produced from the major immediate-early (IE) region of human cytomegalovirus by alternative splicing. The IE gene products regulate subsequent viral and cellular gene expression. We previously reported that cotransfection of a genomic clone of the major IE region stimulated transient expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase driven by the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) promoter and that an intact E2F site was required for the trans activation (M. Wade, T. F. Kowalik, M. Mudryj, E.-S. Huang, and J. C. Azizkhan, Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4364-4374, 1992). With the availability of cDNA clones for the individual major IE proteins, we sought to determine which of these proteins exerted this effect and whether the IE protein(s) interacted with E2F. In this study, we use cotransfection to demonstrate that the 55- and 86-kDa major IE proteins from the IE2 region can each moderately trans activate the DHFR promoter and that the 72-kDa IE1 protein stimulates DHFR transcription to a much higher level. Furthermore, trans activation through the 72-kDa IE1 protein is in part E2F dependent, while activation by the 55- and 86-kDa IE proteins is E2F independent. We also demonstrate by in vitro pull-down assays that the 72-kDa IE1 protein can specifically interact with the DNA binding domain of E2F1 (amino acids 88 to 191) in the presence of nuclear extract. Moreover, antibodies to either E2F1 or IE72 will immunoprecipitate both E2F and IE72 from cells that stably express IE72, and antibody to E2F1 will immunoprecipitate IE72 from normal human fibroblast cells infected with human cytomegalovirus.
...
PMID:Interaction of the 72-kilodalton human cytomegalovirus IE1 gene product with E2F1 coincides with E2F-dependent activation of dihydrofolate reductase transcription. 749 86

C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice are approximately 50-fold more susceptible to liver-tumor induction than C57BL/6J (B6) mice. This difference is susceptibility is a consequence of allelic differences in hepatocarcinogen sensitivity (Hcs) genes that control the growth of preneoplastic lesions in the liver. We have shown previously that these two strains differ in their responses to partial hepatectomy, which acts as a promoter of hepatocarcinogenesis in B6 mice but not in C3H mice. To determine whether there are also strain-specific differences in normal regulation of hepatic growth, we compared liver regeneration in C3H and B6 mice at the levels of DNA synthesis and gene expression. Partial hepatectomy induced a cascade of controlled events resulting in the regeneration of the liver to its original mass 11 d after surgery. We observed a two-fold greater level of DNA synthesis in C3H mice relative to B6 mice during the first peak of DNA synthesis, which occurred 35 h after hepatectomy in both strains. While the c-fos transcript was readily induced in both strains, there was a reduction in the expression of the late response genes E2F1 and dihydrofolate reductase in the livers of B6 mice when compared with the expression of these transcripts in the livers of C3H mice. The differential regulation of E2F1 between B6 and C3H mice may indicate that the Hcs genes and E2F1 function in the same signal transduction pathway of normal growth control.
Mol Carcinog 1995 Sep
PMID:Strain-dependent differences in DNA synthesis and gene expression in the regenerating livers of CB57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice. 754 24

Although a number of transfection experiments have suggested potential targets for the action of the E2F1 transcription factor, as is the case for many transcriptional regulatory proteins, the actual targets in their normal chromosomal environment have not been demonstrated. We have made use of a recombinant adenovirus containing the E2F1 cDNA to infect quiescent cells and then measure the activation of endogenous cellular genes as a consequence of E2F1 production. We find that many of the genes encoding S-phase-acting proteins previously suspected to be E2F targets, including DNA polymerase alpha, thymidylate synthase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and ribonucleotide reductase, are indeed induced by E2F1. Several other candidates, including the dihydrofolate reductase and thymidine kinase genes, were only minimally induced by E2F1. In addition to the S-phase genes, we also find that several genes believed to play regulatory roles in cell cycle progression, such as the cdc2, cyclin A, and B-myb genes, are also induced by E2F1. Moreover, the cyclin E gene is strongly induced by E2F1, thus defining an autoregulatory circuit since cyclin E-dependent kinase activity can stimulate E2F1 transcription, likely through the phosphorylation and inactivation of Rb and Rb family members. Finally, we also demonstrate that a G1 arrest brought about by gamma irradiation is overcome by the overexpression of E2F1 and that this coincides with the enhanced activation of key target genes, including the cyclin A and cyclin E genes.
Mol Cell Biol 1995 Aug
PMID:Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes. 762 16

Reintroduction of RB into SAOS2 (RB-/-) cells causes a G1 arrest and characteristic cellular swelling. Coexpression of the cellular transcription factor E2F-1 could overcome these effects. The ability of E2F-1 to bind to RB was neither necessary nor sufficient for this effect, and S-phase entry was not accompanied by RB hyperphosphorylation under these conditions. Furthermore, E2F-1 could overcome the actions of a nonphosphorylatable but otherwise intact RB mutant. These data, together with the fact that RB binds to E2F-1 in vivo, suggest that E2F-1 is a downstream target of RB action. Mutational analysis showed that the ability of E2F-1 to bind to DNA was necessary and sufficient to block the formation of large cells by RB, whereas the ability to induce S-phase entry required a functional transactivation domain as well. Thus, the induction of a G1 arrest and the formation of large cells by RB in these cells can be genetically dissociated. Furthermore, the ability of the E2F-1 DNA-binding domain alone to block one manifestation of RB action is consistent with the notion that RB-E2F complexes actively repress transcription upon binding to certain E2F-responsive promoters. In keeping with this view, we show here that coproduction of an E2F1 mutant capable of binding to DNA, yet unable to transactivate, is sufficient to block RB-mediated transcriptional repression.
Mol Cell Biol 1995 Feb
PMID:The transcription factor E2F-1 is a downstream target of RB action. 782 42

To gain an understanding of the role the E2F1 transcription factor plays in cell physiology, the full length protein (E2F1) and an amino terminal deletion of 87 amino acids (E2F1d87) were constitutively expressed in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Multiple cell lines were generated for each construct. These cells do not proliferate in media containing low serum and do not proliferate in soft agar, indicating that they are likely not transformed. However, both sets of cell lines show increased DNA synthesis and increased numbers of cells in S phase when cultured in media containing low serum, compared to the control cell lines. Cells expressing E2F1d87 (but not E2F1) have an extremely rounded morphology when cultured in 10% serum-containing media. These rounded cells lack detectable microfilaments, microtubules, and focal contacts. However, when these cells are cultured in low serum-containing media (0.5%), they attain the flattened morphology and cytoskeletal structure of normal NIH3T3 cells.
Mol Biol Cell 1994 Jun
PMID:Altered shape and cell cycle characteristics of fibroblasts expressing the E2F1 transcription factor. 794 23

A variety of studies have now implicated the cellular transcription factor E2F as a key participant in transcription control during the cell growth cycle. Although the recent isolation of molecular clones encoding proteins that are components of the E2F activity (E2F1 and DP-1) provides an approach to defining the specific involvement of E2F in these events, definitive experiments remain difficult in the absence of appropriate genetic systems. We have now identified a Drosophila equivalent of E2F1 that we hope will allow an eventual genetic approach to the role of E2F in cellular regulatory events. A cDNA clone was isolated from a Drosophila cDNA library by using a probe containing sequence from the E2F1 DNA binding domain. The sequence of the clone, which we term drosE2F1, demonstrates considerable homology to the human E2F1 sequence, with over 65% identity in the DNA binding region and 50% identity in the region of E2F1 known to interact with the retinoblastoma gene product. A glutathione S-transferase-drosE2F1 fusion protein was capable of binding specifically to an E2F recognition site, and transfection assays demonstrated that the drosE2F1 product was capable of transcription activation, dependent on functional E2F sites as well as sequences within the C terminus of the protein. Finally, we have also identified E2F recognition sequences within the promoter of the Drosophila DNA polymerase alpha gene, and we demonstrate that the drosE2F1 product activates transcription of a test gene under the control of this promoter. We conclude that the drosE2F1 cDNA encodes an activity with extensive structural and functional similarity to the human E2F1 protein.
Mol Cell Biol 1994 Mar
PMID:Functional properties of a Drosophila homolog of the E2F1 gene. 811 98

E2F has been implicated in growth control because of its association with the retinoblastoma protein and the presence of E2F binding sites in the promoters of several growth-regulated genes. Proteins that bind to an E2F site have been cloned from human and mouse cells. However, these two proteins (human E2F1 and mouse DP-1) are quite different in sequence. We have now cloned a mouse cDNA encoding a protein 86% identical to the human E2F1 protein. The mouse E2F1 cDNA encodes a 430-amino-acid protein with a predicted molecular weight of 46,322 and detects mRNAs of 2.7 and 2.2 kb. Using primers complementary to sequences in the mouse E2F1 3' untranslated region, we mapped the mouse E2F1 gene to chromosome 2, near the Agouti and c-src loci. To understand the role of the different E2F family members in the growth of mouse NIH 3T3 cells, we examined the levels of E2F1 and DP-1 mRNAs in different stages of the cell cycle. Since the levels of E2F1 but not DP-1 mRNA correlated with changes in transcription from the dhfr promoter, we examined whether E2F1 could activate various growth-regulated promoters. We found that E2F1 could activate some (dhfr, thymidine kinase, and DNA polymerase alpha) but not all (thymidylate synthase, cad, and c-myc) of these promoters. On the basis of changes in levels of E2F1 and its ability to transactivate growth-regulated promoters, we propose that E2F1 may mediate growth factor-initiated signal transduction.
Mol Cell Biol 1994 Mar
PMID:Cloning, chromosomal location, and characterization of mouse E2F1. 811 19

The cellular transcription factor E2F appears to be a target for the regulatory action of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product. The recent isolation of the E2F1 cDNA clone, which encodes a polypeptide with properties characteristic of E2F, has now allowed a more detailed analysis of the regulation of E2F function by Rb as well as the Rb-related p107 protein and the adenovirus 19-kDa E4 gene product. Previous experiments have shown that each of these regulatory proteins can modulate the activity of cellular E2F. We find that each of these regulatory events can be mediated through the E2F1 product. Moreover, an examination of various E2F1 mutations reveals distinct specificities for these regulatory proteins. For instance, the ability of E4 to alter E2F1 function is dependent upon sequences within a putative leucine repeat of E2F1 as well as within the C-terminal acidic domain. In contrast, the leucine repeat element was not important for Rb- or p107-mediated inhibition of E2F1 activity. Although the C-terminal acidic domain of E2F1, previously shown to be important for Rb binding, appears to be a site for regulation of E2F1 by Rb and p107, point mutations within this region distinguish recognition by Rb and p107. These results underscore the complexity of E2F regulatory interactions and also demonstrate a qualitative distinction in the interactions of Rb and p107 with E2F1, perhaps reflective of functional differences.
Mol Cell Biol 1993 Oct
PMID:A genetic analysis of the E2F1 gene distinguishes regulation by Rb, p107, and adenovirus E4. 841 30

Enhanced expression of genes involved in nucleotide biosynthesis, such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), is a hallmark of entrance into the DNA synthesis (S) phase of the mammalian cell cycle. To investigate the regulated expression of the DHFR gene, we stimulated serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells to synchronously reenter the cell cycle. Our previous results show that a cis-acting element at the site of DHFR transcription initiation is necessary for serum regulation. Recently, this element has been demonstrated to bind the cloned transcription factor E2F. In this study, we focused on the role of E2F in the growth regulation of DHFR. We demonstrated that a single E2F site, in the absence or presence of other promoter elements, was sufficient for growth-regulated promoter activity. Next, we showed that the increase in DHFR mRNA at the G1/S-phase boundary required protein synthesis, raising the possibility that a protein(s) lacking in serum-starved cells is required for DHFR transcription. We found that, similar to DHFR mRNA expression, levels of murine E2F1 mRNA were low in serum-starved cells and increased at the G1/S-phase boundary in a protein synthesis-dependent manner. Furthermore, in a cotransfection experiment, expression of human E2F1 stimulated the DHFR promoter 22-fold in serum-starved cells. We suggest that E2F1 may be the key protein required for DHFR transcription that is absent in serum-starved cells. Expression of E2F also abolished the serum-stimulated regulation of the DHFR promoter and resulted in transcription patterns similar to those seen with expression of the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. In summary, we provide evidence for the importance of E2F in the growth regulation of DHFR and suggest that alterations in the levels of E2F may have severe consequences in the control of cellular proliferation.
Mol Cell Biol 1993 Mar
PMID:A protein synthesis-dependent increase in E2F1 mRNA correlates with growth regulation of the dihydrofolate reductase promoter. 844 1

We have studied the abilities of different transactivation domains to stimulate the initiation and elongation (postinitiation) steps of RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nuclear run-on and RNase protection analyses revealed three classes of activation domains: Sp1 and CTF stimulated initiation (type I); human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat fused to a DNA binding domain stimulated predominantly elongation (type IIA); and VP16, p53, and E2F1 stimulated both initiation and elongation (type IIB). A quadruple point mutation of VP16 converted it from a type IIB to a type I activator. Type I and type IIA activators synergized with one another but not with type IIB activators. This observation implies that synergy can result from the concerted action of factors stimulating two different steps in transcription: initiation and elongation. The functional differences between activators may be explained by the different contacts they make with general transcription factors. In support of this idea, we found a correlation between the abilities of activators, including Tat, to stimulate elongation and their abilities to bind TFIIH.
Mol Cell Biol 1996 May
PMID:Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domain. 862 70


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>