Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.
Cell Mol Biol 1992 Aug
PMID:The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAS differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials. 146 9

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1992 Dec
PMID:The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAs differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials. 147 7

Expression of MRF4, a myogenic regulatory factor of the basic helix-loop-helix type, produced multiple changes in the myogenic program of the BC3H-1 cell line. BC3H-1 cells that stably expressed exogenous MRF4 were prepared and termed BR cell lines. Upon differentiation, the BR cells were found to have three muscle-specific properties (endogenous MyoD expression, myoblast fusion, and fast myosin light-chain 1 expression) that the parent BC3H-1 cells did not have. Of the four known myogenic regulatory factors (MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4), only MRF4 was capable of activating expression of the endogenous BC3H-1 myoD gene. In addition, the pattern of Myf-5 expression in BR cells was the opposite of that in BC3H-1 cells. Myf-5 expression was low in BR myoblasts and showed a small increase upon myotube formation, whereas Myf-5 expression was high in BC3H-1 myoblasts and decreased upon differentiation. Though the MRF4-transfected BR cells fused to form large myotubes and expressed fast myosin light-chain 1, the pattern of myosin heavy-chain isoform expression was the same in the BR and the nonfusing parent BC3H-1 cells, suggesting that factors in addition to the MyoD family members regulate myosin heavy-chain isoform expression patterns in BC3H-1 cells. In contrast to the changes produced by MRF4 expression, overexpression of Myf-5 did not alter BC3H-1 myogenesis. The results suggest that differential expression of the myogenic regulatory factors of the MyoD family may be one mechanism for generating cells with diverse myogenic phenotypes.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Jun
PMID:Expression of MRF4, a myogenic helix-loop-helix protein, produces multiple changes in the myogenic program of BC3H-1 cells. 158 52

Quail myogenic cells infected with temperature sensitive (ts) mutants of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) exhibit a temperature-dependent transformation and block of differentiation. When the cells are allowed to differentiate at the restrictive temperature (41 degrees C) and then shifted back to the permissive temperature (35 degrees C), a sharp reduction in the accumulation of muscle-specific mRNAs is observed, following reactivation of the transforming protein pp60v-src. A kinetic analysis of this down-regulation reveals that the reduction in the accumulation of muscle-specific transcripts occurs fairly rapidly within 6 to 20 h after the shift back, depending on the mRNA analyzed. Studies on transcription of endogenous muscle-specific genes and a transfected chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene under the control of muscle-specific promoters, at the different temperatures, suggest that the oncogene exerts its control mainly at the transcriptional level. On the contrary, transcription of the CMD1 gene, the avian homolog of the mouse muscle regulatory MyoD gene, is not significantly affected by the oncogene both in proliferating myoblasts and in myotubes shifted back to 35 degrees C. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that v-src blocks myogenesis by controlling transcription of muscle-specific genes independently of cell proliferation. Furthermore, they suggest the existence of an alternative pathway, not requiring the silencing of CMD1 transcription, through which the oncogene exerts its effect.
Mol Cell Biol 1991 Jun
PMID:Transcription of muscle-specific genes is repressed by reactivation of pp60v-src in postmitotic quail myotubes. 164 48

Stimulation of myogenic differentiation by the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) has been established for many years, but our attempts to elucidate the mechanism of that stimulation have been successful only in eliminating some likely possibilities. The recent discovery of a family of muscle determination genes has opened a new approach to this question, allowing specific focus on those genes that might play central roles in controlling myogenesis. We now report that IGF-I stimulates terminal myogenic differentiation in L6A1 cells by inducing a large increase in expression of the myogenin gene. This conclusion is supported by the following observations. 1) Myogenin mRNA is elevated by IGF-I, with a concentration dependency that parallels the stimulation of differentiation, including a decrease in stimulation at higher concentrations. 2) The time course of elevation of myogenin mRNA is consistent with its acting as an intermediate in the signalling pathway between occupancy of the IGF-I receptor and induction of expression of muscle-specific genes. 3) Inhibitors of myogenesis also inhibit elevation of myogenin mRNA in response to IGF-I. 4) An antisense oligonucleotide to the N-terminus of myogenin prevents the stimulation of differentiation by IGF-I and IGF-II, but has no effect on other actions of IGF-I on myoblasts. MyoD has been reported not to be expressed in L6 cells, and the expression of myf-5 and herculin/myf-6/MRF4 is reportedly low or undetectable. Thus, the stimulation of differentiation by IGF-I can be attributed largely, if not entirely, to increased expression of the myogenin gene. However, the relatively long time period between addition of the IGFs and elevation of myogenin mRNA as well as the inhibition of this process by several inhibitors indicate that increased myogenin mRNA levels are not a simple direct result of occupation of the IGF-I receptor.
Mol Endocrinol 1991 May
PMID:Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates terminal myogenic differentiation by induction of myogenin gene expression. 164 94

Proliferin (PLF), a protein which has homology to PRL and GH, has been implicated in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation. PLF1 was detected and found to be differentially regulated during myogenesis in the rodent myogenic cell line C2C12. Transient and stable constitutive high level expression of PLF1 repressed expression of the transfected cardiac and skeletal alpha-actin myogenic-specific promoters, but did not affect expression of the cytoskeletal beta-actin and several viral promoters linked to CAT. Stable cotransfection analyses of 5' unidirectionally deleted actin promoters and a PLF expression vector indicated that PLF exerted its effect on transcription down-stream of nucleotide positions -177 and -154 with respect to the start of transcription at 1 in the cardiac and skeletal alpha-actin promoters. Analyses of cells stably transfected with PLF showed reduced levels of MyoD mRNA, a recently identified gene that is sufficient to convert pluripotential 10T1/2 cells into myoblasts. However, transient constitutive expression of MyoD by the Moloney sarcoma virus long terminal repeat did not override the effect of PLF. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of nuclear extracts from C2C12 cells stably transfected with a PLF expression vector displayed drastically reduced levels or activity of the CArG-binding factor (CBF) relative to the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor Oct-1. High affinity interaction between CBF and alpha-actin promoter sequences in vitro directly correlates with functional in vivo expression. CBF is a transcription factor that is sufficient and necessary for myogenic-specific transcription, interacts with the promoter sequences targeted by PLF, and is immunologically related to the serum response factor. In conclusion, PLF selectively represses myogenic-specific transcription within the actin multigene family by suppressing the level and/or activity of a trans-acting factor (CBF) that modulates multiple muscle-specific genes. The data provide a molecular explanation for the inhibition of differentiation by an endogenously produced growth factor/hormone that is differentially expressed during myogenesis and a physiologically important antagonistic regulator of muscle-specific transcription.
Mol Endocrinol 1991 Jun
PMID:Proliferin, a prolactin/growth hormone-like peptide represses myogenic-specific transcription by the suppression of an essential serum response factor-like DNA-binding activity. 165 42

Myogenin and MRF4 belong to the MyoD family of muscle-specific transcription factors, which can activate myogenesis when introduced into nonmyogenic cells. These proteins share homology within a basic-helix-loop-helix motif that mediates DNA binding and dimerization, but they are divergent in their amino and carboxyl termini. Although myogenin and MRF4 bind the same sequence within the muscle creatine kinase enhancer, only myogenin efficiently transactivates this enhancer. By creating chimeras of myogenin and MRF4, we show that the specificities of these factors for transactivation of the muscle creatine kinase enhancer can be interchanged by swapping their amino and carboxyl termini. Within these chimeras, strong cooperation between the amino and carboxyl termini was observed. These findings suggest that myogenin and MRF4 discriminate between muscle-specific enhancers and that target gene specificity is determined by domains surrounding the basic-helix-loop-helix region.
Mol Cell Biol 1991 Dec
PMID:Domains outside of the DNA-binding domain impart target gene specificity to myogenin and MRF4. 165 26

DNA elements with the CC(A/T)6GG, or CArG, motif occur in promoters that are under different regulatory controls. CArG elements from the skeletal actin, c-fos, and myogenin genes were tested for their abilities to confer tissue-specific expression on reporter genes when the individual elements were situated immediately upstream from a TATA element. The c-fos CArG element, also referred to as the serum response element (SRE), conferred basal, constitutive expression on the test promoter. The CArG motif from the myogenin gene was inactive. The skeletal actin CArG motif functioned as a muscle regulatory element (MRE) in that basal expression was detected only in muscle cultures. Muscle-specific expression from the 28-bp MRE and the 2.3-kb skeletal actin promoter was trans repressed by the Fos and Jun proteins. The expression and factor-binding properties of a series of synthetic CArG elements were analyzed. Muscle-specific expression was conferred by perfect 28-bp palindromes on the left and right halves of the skeletal actin MRE. Chimeric elements of the skeletal actin MRE and the c-fos SRE differed in their expression properties. Muscle-specific expression was observed when the left half of the MRE was fused to the right half of the SRE. Constitutive expression was conferred by a chimera with the right half of the MRE fused to the left half of the SRE and by chimeras which exchanged the central CC(A/T)6GG sequences. At least three distinct proteins specifically bound to these CArG elements. The natural and synthetic CArG elements differed in their affinities for these proteins; however, muscle-specific expression could not be attributed to differences in the binding of a single protein. Furthermore, the MRE did not bind MyoD or the myogenin-E12 heterodimer, indicating that muscle-specific expression from this element does not involve a direct interaction with these helix-loop-helix proteins. These data demonstrate that the conserved CArG motifs form the core of a family of functionally different DNA regulatory elements that may contribute to the tissue-specific expression properties of their cognate promoters.
Mol Cell Biol 1991 Dec
PMID:Natural and synthetic DNA elements with the CArG motif differ in expression and protein-binding properties. 165 30

The quail fast skeletal troponin I (TnI) gene is a member of the contractile protein gene set and is expressed exclusively in differentiated skeletal muscle cells. TnI gene transcription is controlled by an internal regulatory element (IRE), located within the first intron, that functions as a muscle-specific enhancer. Recent studies have shown that the TnI IRE may interact directly with the muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5 to produce a muscle-specific expression pattern, since these factors trans-activate cotransfected TnI gene constructs in C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts. In this study, we have examined the protein-IRE interactions that are responsible for transcriptionally activating the TnI gene during skeletal muscle development. We demonstrate that the helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4, when complexed with the immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein E12, interact with identical nucleotides within a muscle regulatory factor-binding site (MRF site) located in the TnI IRE. The nuclear proteins that bind to the MRF site are restricted to skeletal muscle cells, since protein extracts from HeLa, L, and C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts do not contain similar binding activities. Importantly, the TnI MRF site alone is not sufficient to elicit the full enhancer activity associated with the IRE. Instead, two additional regions (site I and site II) are required. The proteins that interact with site I and site II are expressed in both muscle and nonmuscle cell types and by themselves are ineffective in activating TnI gene expression. However, when the MRF site is positioned upstream or downstream of site I and site II, full enhancer activity is restored. We conclude that helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors must interact with ubiquitously expressed proteins to generate the active TnI transcription complex that is present in differentiated muscle fibers.
Mol Cell Biol 1991 Jan
PMID:Muscle-specific expression of the troponin I gene requires interactions between helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors and ubiquitous transcription factors. 184 22

The ski oncogene induces muscle differentiation in otherwise nonmyogenic quail embryo cells (C. Colmenares and E. Stavnezer, Cell 59:293-303, 1989). Here we report that v-ski induces both MyoD and myogenin expression, suggesting that activation of these muscle regulatory genes may be a critical step in ski-induced myogenesis. We also describe a transformation-defective mutant of v-ski (tdM5i) that fails to induce myotube formation, although it induces the expression of many muscle-specific genes, including the MyoD and myogenin genes. Therefore, if activation of MyoD and myogenin expression is a necessary component of the myogenic program triggered by ski, it is clearly insufficient to account for complete muscle differentiation.
Mol Cell Biol 1991 Feb
PMID:Transformation-defective v-ski induces MyoD and myogenin expression but not myotube formation. 184 65


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>