Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (
Mol
)
630,302
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
KRAS
is an oncogene that can be activated by mutations. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have
KRAS
mutations do not respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors; therefore, accurate detection of
KRAS
mutations is important for deciding therapeutic strategies. Although sequencing-related techniques have been frequently used, they are usually too complex, have low sensitivity, and are time-consuming for routine screening in clinical situations. We evaluated peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamp smart amplification process version 2 (SmartAmp2) as a detection method for
KRAS
codon 12 mutations in patient specimens compared with traditional sequencing and polymerase chain reaction-related methods. Among 172 lung adenocarcinoma samples, direct sequencing, enzyme-enriched sequencing, and PNA-enriched sequencing showed that 16 (9.3%), 26 (15.7%), and 28 (16.3%) tumors, respectively, contained
KRAS
mutations in codon 12. Using PNA-clamp SmartAmp2, we could identify 31 (18.0%) tumors that had
KRAS
mutations in codon 12 within 60 minutes, three of which were undetected by polymerase chain reaction-related methods. On the other hand, we examined 30 nonmalignant peripheral lung tissue specimens and found no mutations in any of the samples using PNA-clamp SmartAmp2. In this study, we confirmed that PNA-clamp SmartAmp2 has high sensitivity and accuracy and is suitable for the clinical diagnosis of
KRAS
codon 12 mutations.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Jan
PMID:Usefulness of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamp smart amplification process version 2 (SmartAmp2) for clinical diagnosis of KRAS codon 12 mutations in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison of PNA-clamp SmartAmp2 and PCR-related methods. 2000 40
KRAS
mutation testing before anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer has become mandatory in Europe. However, considerable uncertainty exists as to which methods for detection can be applied in a reproducible and economically sound manner in the routine diagnostic setting. To answer this question, we examined 263 consecutive routine paraffin slide specimens. Genomic DNA was extracted from microdissected tumor tissue. The DNA was analyzed prospectively by Sanger sequencing and array analysis as well as retrospectively by melting curve analysis and pyrosequencing; the results were correlated to tissue characteristics. The methods were then compared regarding the reported results, costs, and working times. Approximately 40% of specimens contained
KRAS
mutations, and the different methods reported concordant results (kappa values >0.9). Specimens harboring fewer than 10% tumor cells showed lower mutation rates regardless of the method used, and histoanatomical variables had no influence on the frequency of the mutations. Costs per assay were higher for array analysis and melting curve analysis when compared with the direct sequencing methods. However, for sequencing methods equipment costs were much higher. In conclusion, Sanger sequencing, array analysis, melting curve analysis, and pyrosequencing were equally effective for routine diagnostic
KRAS
mutation analysis; however, interpretation of mutation results in conjunction with histomorphologic tissue review and on slide tumor tissue dissection is required for accurate diagnosis.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Jan
PMID:KRAS genotyping of paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue in routine diagnostics: comparison of methods and impact of histology. 2000 41
Treatment of colon carcinoma with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody Cetuximab is reported to be ineffective in
KRAS
-mutant tumors. Mutation testing techniques have therefore become an urgent concern. We have compared three methods for detecting
KRAS
mutations in 59 cases of colon carcinoma: 1) high resolution melting, 2) the amplification refractory mutation system using a bifunctional self-probing primer (ARMS/Scorpion, ARMS/S), and 3) direct sequencing. We also evaluated the effects of the methods of sectioning and coring of paraffin blocks to obtain tumor DNA on assay sensitivity and specificity. The most sensitive and specific combination of block sampling and mutational analysis was ARMS/S performed on DNA derived from 1-mm paraffin cores. This combination of tissue sampling and testing method detected
KRAS
mutations in 46% of colon tumors. Four samples were positive by ARMS/S, but initially negative by direct sequencing. Cloned DNA samples were retested by direct sequencing, and in all four cases
KRAS
mutations were identified in the DNA. In six cases, high resolution melting abnormalities could not be confirmed as specific mutations either by ARMS/S or direct sequencing. We conclude that coring of the paraffin blocks and testing by ARMS/S is a sensitive, specific, and efficient method for
KRAS
testing.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Jan
PMID:KRAS mutation: comparison of testing methods and tissue sampling techniques in colon cancer. 2000 45
Targeted mAbs to VEGFR and EGFR are well-established therapies for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The costs and toxicities associated with these novel treatments are not insignificant, and therefore molecular markers that predict treatment efficacy are needed to individualize the therapy administered to each patient. Recent data in this research field support
KRAS
mutation testing to guide the selection of EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer. This review discusses the evidence that
KRAS
mutation analysis can indicate a beneficial response to EGFR inhibitors, and the potential and limitations of other mutations in the VEGF and EGF signaling pathways as predictive molecular markers in this setting.
Curr Opin
Mol
Ther 2009 Dec
PMID:Predictive biomarkers of clinical response to targeted antibodies in colorectal cancer. 2007 38
Recent evidence indicates that the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or
KRAS
mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can predict the response of the tumor to gefinitib. However, it is difficult to detect these mutations using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues because the fixation process and aging can damage the DNA. In this study, we describe our work in adapting the Smart Amplification Process version 2 (SmartAmp2) to detect EGFR or
KRAS
mutations in DNA extracted from FFPE tissues. We were able to detect these mutations in 37 (97%) of 38 FFPE lung cancer tissue samples within 60 minutes with the SmartAmp2 assay and to confirm the correlation between EGFR mutations in FFPE tissues and gefitinib responsiveness. All mutations had previously been confirmed in the 38 samples using DNA extracted from frozen tissues. Electrophoresis results indicated that PCR analysis was not reliable for DNA extracted from FFPE tissue when primers with a long amplicon (>300 bp) were used. This study confirms that the SmartAmp2 assay is suitable for use with DNA extracted from FFPE as well as frozen tissues.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Mar
PMID:Mutation detection of epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS genes using the smart amplification process version 2 from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung cancer tissue. 2009 89
E1B-55kD-deleted adenoviruses have been used as conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds) for therapeutic purposes in tumors with loss-of-function p53 mutation. To target cancer cells that harbor activating mutant
KRAS
(
KRAS
(aMut)) but spare p53(wild) normal cells, we constructed and examined by reporter assays a
KRAS
(aMut) but not p53-responsive promoter, the Deltap53REP2 promoter. The Deltap53REP2 promoter, derived from human double minute 2 (hdm2) P2 promoter with its p53 response elements being deleted, was used to regulate the expression of the hdm2 transgene in a novel E1B-55kD-deleted CRAd, the Ad-KRhdm2. The Ad-KRhdm2 selectively replicated in and exerted cytopathic effects on
KRAS
(aMut) colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116, LoVo, LS174T, LS123, and SW620), regardless of their p53 gene statuses, by forming plaques and exhibiting cytopathic effect in cultured cells. Ad-KRhdm2, like other E1B-55kD-deleted adenoviruses, also exerted selective cytopathic effects on tumor cells with loss-of-function p53 mutant. The multiplicities of infection of Ad-KRhdm2 required to decrease 50% viability of
KRAS
(aMut) tumor cells cultured for 7 days were 440 to 3,400 times less than those of MRC5 normal fibroblasts and
KRAS
(wild)/p53(wild) RKO tumor cells. Intratumoral injection of Ad-KRhdm2 vectors exhibited specific lytic activities in nude mouse xenografts of
KRAS
(aMut) cell lines (LoVo, SW620, and LS174T) but not in xenografts of RKO cells. Transduction of
KRAS
(aMut)/p53(wild) HCT116, LoVo, and LS174T cells by Ad-KRhdm2 significantly increased Hdm2 expression, decreased p53 level, and abolished the p53-transactivating p21(Cip1) promoter activity. Ad-KRhdm2 has shown its therapeutic potential in
KRAS
(aMut) cancer cells and warrants further clinical trials.
Mol
Cancer Ther 2010 Feb
PMID:A novel E1B-55kD-deleted oncolytic adenovirus carrying mutant KRAS-regulated hdm2 transgene exerts specific antitumor efficacy on colorectal cancer cells. 2012 54
KRAS
mutation testing has become a standard procedure in the management of patients with carcinomas. The most frequently used method for
KRAS
testing is direct sequencing of PCR products. The development of commercial real-time quantitative PCR kits offers a useful alternative since they are in theory much more sensitive than direct sequencing and they avoid post- PCR handling. We present our experience as a reference center for the study of
KRAS
mutations, comparing direct sequencing and the use of a commercial real-time quantitative PCR kit, as well as determining the sensitivity of both procedures in clinical practice. The TheraScreen K-RAS Mutation Kit identified mutations in 75 (44%) of the 170 tumors. Three cases were tested positive using TheraScreen K-RAS Mutation Kit and negative by direct sequencing. We then compared the sensitivity of the kit and that of direct sequencing using 74 mutant tumors. The kit was able to detect the presence of a mutation in a 1% dilution of the total DNA in 13.5% of the tumors and, in 84%,
KRAS
mutation was identified at a dilution of 5%. Sequencing was able to detect
KRAS
mutations when the mutant DNA represented 10% of the total DNA in 20/74 (27%) of the tumors. When the mutant DNA represented 30% of the total DNA, sequencing could detect mutations in 56/74 (76%).
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 May
PMID:A commercial real-time PCR kit provides greater sensitivity than direct sequencing to detect KRAS mutations: a morphology-based approach in colorectal carcinoma. 2020 3
KRAS
is frequently mutated in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in the activation of the MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)/ERK pathway. High-throughput mutation profile has shown that lung cancer frequently harbors comutation of cancer-related genes. Therefore, given that cancer cells have multiple genetic alterations, combinatorial therapeutic strategy is demanded for effective cancer therapy. To address this, we first characterized MEK dependence in four NSCLC cells. Two cells (H358, A549) carried
KRAS
mutation only, and the other two (H23, H157) harbored comutation of
KRAS
/PTEN. H358 cells with
KRAS
mutation only were sensitive to MEK inhibition. However, the other
KRAS
mutant A549 cells were resistant to MEK inhibition. Previously, we have shown that dual inhibition of EGFR and MEK signaling shows a synergistic effect on
KRAS
mutant gastric cancer cells by suppressing compensatory activation of AKT. Here we also observed that this combination was effective in
KRAS
mutant A549 cells. However, the combination was ineffective in H23 and 157 cells with comutation of
KRAS
/PTEN. Compared to
KRAS
mutant/PTEN wild-type cells, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was significantly activated following MEK inhibition in
KRAS
/PTEN comutant cells. Combined STAT3 inhibition by a JAK2 inhibitor or gene knockdown with MEK inhibition blocked STAT3 activation, synergistically suppressed cell growth, and induced apoptosis in comutant cells. Taken together, our study provides molecular insights that help explain the heterogeneous response to MEK inhibition in
KRAS
mutant lung cancers, and presents a rationale for the clinical investigation of combination of MEK and EGFR inhibitor or MEK and JAK2 inhibitor depending on PTEN status.
Mol
Carcinog 2010 Apr
PMID:KRAS mutant lung cancer cells are differentially responsive to MEK inhibitor due to AKT or STAT3 activation: implication for combinatorial approach. 2035 31
Detection of somatic mutations in clinical cancer specimens is often hampered by excess wild-type DNA. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and economical protocol without using fluorescent probes to detect low-level mutations. In this study, we combined peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamping PCR with asymmetric primers and a melting curve analysis using an unlabeled detection probe. PNA-clamping PCR, which suppressed amplification of the wild-type allele, was more sensitive for
KRAS
codon 12 mutation detection than nonclamping PCR in 5 different mutant cell lines. Three detection probes were tested (a perfectly matched antisense, a mismatched antisense, and a mismatched sense), and the mismatched sense detection probe showed the highest sensitivity (0.1% mutant detection) under clamping conditions. With this probe, we were able to detect not only the perfectly matched
KRAS
mutation, but also 4 other mismatched mutations of
KRAS
. We then applied this protocol to 10 human colon cancer tissues with
KRAS
codon 12 mutations, successfully detecting the mutations in all of them. Our data indicate that the combination of perfectly matched antisense PNA and a mismatched sense detection probe can detect
KRAS
mutations with a high sensitivity in both cell lines and human tissues. Moreover, this study might prove an easily applicable protocol for the detection of low-level mutations in other cancer genes.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Jul
PMID:Detection of low-level KRAS mutations using PNA-mediated asymmetric PCR clamping and melting curve analysis with unlabeled probes. 2041 78
Mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the
KRAS
oncogene are relatively common in colorectal and lung adenocarcinomas. Recent data indicate that these mutations result in resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Therefore, we assessed Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of
KRAS
codon 12/13 mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, including 58 primary and 42 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas, 63 primary and 17 metastatic lung adenocarcinomas, and 20 normal colon samples. Of 180 tumor samples, 62.2% were
KRAS
mutant positive, and 37.8% were negative. Melting curve analysis yielded no false positive or false negative results, but had 10% equivocal calls. Melting curve analysis also resulted in 4 cases with melting curves inconsistent with either wild-type or codon 12/13 mutations. These patterns were generated from samples with double mutants in codons 12/13 and with mutations outside of codons 12/13. Pyrosequencing yielded no false positive or false negative results as well. However, two samples from one patient yielded a pyrogram that was flagged as abnormal, but the mutation subtype could not be determined. Finally, using an electronic cutoff of 10%, Sanger sequencing showed 11.1% false positives and 6.1% false negatives. In our hands, the limit of detection for Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis was approximately 15 to 20%, 5%, and 10% mutant alleles, respectively.
J
Mol
Diagn 2010 Jul
PMID:Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications. 2043 Oct 34
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>