Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Myogenin is a skeletal muscle-specific transcription factor that can activate myogenesis when introduced into a variety of nonmuscle cell types. Activation of the myogenic program by myogenin is dependent on its binding to a DNA sequence known as an E box, which is associated with numerous muscle-specific genes. Myogenin shares homology with MyoD and other myogenic regulatory factors within a basic region and a helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif that mediate DNA binding and dimerization, respectively. Here we show that the basic region-HLH motif of myogenin alone lacks transcriptional activity and is dependent on domains in the amino and carboxyl termini to activate transcription. Analysis of these N- and C-terminal domains through creation of chimeras with the DNA-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor GAL4 revealed that they act as strong transcriptional activators. These transcription activation domains are dependent for activity on a specific amino acid sequence within the basic region, referred to as the myogenic recognition motif (MRM), when an E box is the target for DNA binding. However, the activation domains function independent of the MRM when DNA binding is mediated through a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The activation domain of the acidic coactivator VP16 can substitute for the myogenin activation domains and restore strong myogenic activity to the basic region-HLH motif. Within a myogenin-VP16 chimera, however, the VP16 activation domain also relies on the MRM for activation of the myogenic program. These findings reveal that DNA binding and transcriptional activation are separable functions, encoded by different domains of myogenin, but that the activity of the transcriptional activation domains is influenced by the DNA-binding domain. Activation of muscle-specific transcription requires collaboration between the DNA-binding and activation domains of myogenin and is dependent on events in addition to DNA binding.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Jan
PMID:The basic region of myogenin cooperates with two transcription activation domains to induce muscle-specific transcription. 130 91

Proteins containing the basic-helix-loop-helix (B-HLH) domain have been shown to be important in regulating cellular differentiation. We have isolated a cDNA for a human B-HLH factor, denoted HEB, that shares nearly complete identity in the B-HLH domain with the immunoglobulin enhancer binding proteins encoded by the E2A and ITF2 genes (E proteins). Functional characterization of the protein expressed from this cDNA indicates that HEB is a third member of the E-protein class of B-HLH factors. HEB mRNA was found to be expressed in several tissues and cell types, including skeletal muscle, thymus, and a B-cell line. HEB, ITF2, and the E12 product of the E2A gene all bound to a similar spectrum of E-box sequences as homo-oligomers. All three factors also formed hetero-oligomers with myogenin, and the DNA-binding specificity and binding off-rates (dissociation rates) were modulated after hetero-oligomerization. Both homo- and hetero-oligomers of these proteins were able to distinguish between very closely related E-box sequences. In addition, HEB was shown to form hetero-oligomers with the E12 and ITF2 proteins. Finally, HEB was able to activate gene expression. These data demonstrate that HEB shares characteristics with other E proteins and show that HEB can interact with members of both the myogenic regulatory class and the E-protein class of B-HLH factors. HEB is therefore likely to play an important role in regulating lineage-specific gene expression.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:HEB, a helix-loop-helix protein related to E2A and ITF2 that can modulate the DNA-binding ability of myogenic regulatory factors. 131 19

Transcriptional cascades that specify cell fate have been well described in invertebrates. In mammalian development, however, gene hierarchies involved in determination of cell lineage are not understood. With the recent cloning of the MyoD family of myogenic regulatory factors, a model system has become available with which to study the dynamics of muscle determination in mammalian development. Myogenin, along with other members of the MyoD gene family, possesses the apparent ability to redirect nonmuscle cells into the myogenic lineage. This ability appears to be due to the direct activation of an array of subordinate or downstream genes which are responsible for formation and function of the muscle contractile apparatus. Myogenin-directed transcription has been shown to occur through interaction with a DNA consensus sequence known as an E box (CANNTG) present in the control regions of numerous downstream genes. In addition to activating the transcription of subordinate genes, members of the MyoD family positively regulate their own expression and cross-activate one another's expression. These autoregulatory interactions have been suggested as a mechanism for induction and maintenance of the myogenic phenotype, but the molecular details of the autoregulatory circuits are undefined. Here we show that the myogenin promoter contains a binding site for the myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor, MEF-2, which can function as an intermediary of myogenin autoactivation. Since MEF-2 can be induced by myogenin, these results suggest that myogenin and MEF-2 participate in a transcriptional cascade in which MEF-2, once induced by myogenin, acts to amplify and maintain the myogenic phenotype by acting as a positive regulator of myogenin expression.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Sep
PMID:Analysis of the myogenin promoter reveals an indirect pathway for positive autoregulation mediated by the muscle-specific enhancer factor MEF-2. 132 3

MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Oct
PMID:The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression. 132 51

Differentiation of skeletal muscle cells is inhibited by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signal transduction pathway. Here we report that the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) can substitute for cAMP and suppress muscle-specific transcription by silencing the activity of the MyoD family of regulatory factors, which includes MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4. Repression by the PKA catalytic (C) subunit is directed at the consensus sequence CANNTG, the target for DNA binding and transcriptional activation by these myogenic regulators. Phosphopeptide mapping of myogenin in vitro and in vivo revealed two PKA phosphorylation sites, both within the basic region. However, repression of myogenin function by PKA does not require direct phosphorylation of these sites but instead involves an indirect mechanism with one or more intermediate steps. Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the MyoD family by modulation of the cAMP signaling pathway may account for the inhibitory effects of certain peptide growth factors on muscle-specific gene expression and may also determine the responsiveness of different cell types to myogenic conversion by these myogenic regulators.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Oct
PMID:Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits the activity of myogenic helix-loop-helix proteins. 132 56

Sodium butyrate reversibly inhibits muscle differentiation and blocks the expression of many muscle-specific genes in both proliferating myoblasts and differentiated myotubes. We investigated the role of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) myogenic determinator proteins MyoD and myogenin in this inhibition. Our data suggest that both MyoD and myogenin are not able to function as transcriptional activators in the presence of butyrate, although both apparently retain the ability to bind DNA. Transcription of MyoD itself is extinguished in butyrate-treated myoblasts and myotubes, an effect that may be due to the inability of MyoD to autoactivate its own transcription. We present evidence that the HLH region of MyoD is essential for butyrate inhibition of MyoD. In contrast to MyoD and myogenin, butyrate does not inhibit the ubiquitous basic HLH protein E2-5 from functioning as a transcriptional activator.
Mol Cell Biol 1992 Nov
PMID:Sodium butyrate inhibits myogenesis by interfering with the transcriptional activation function of MyoD and myogenin. 132 72

1. The skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptor comprises several subunits whose coordinated expression during myogenesis is probably controlled by cis elements in the individual subunit genes. We have previously analyzed promoter regions of the alpha and delta genes (Wang et al., 1988, 1990); to gain further insight into receptor regulation, we have now studied the promoter of the chick muscle gamma-subunit gene. 2. This analysis was faciliated by the close upstream proximity of the coding region of the delta-subunit gene and the consequent brevity (740 bp) of the untranslated linker connecting the two genes (Nef et al., 1984). Nuclease protection and primer extension analysis revealed that transcription of the gamma-subunit gene starts at position 56 upstream of the translational initiation site. 3. Nested deletions of the promoter region were employed to identify functionally important elements. A 360-bp sequence (-324 to +36) was found to activate transcription, in a position- and orientation-independent manner, during myotube formation. This sequence comprises 5 M-CAT (Nikovits et al., 1986) similarities and contains, at positions -52/-47 and -33/-28, two CANNTG (Lassar et al., 1989) motifs. 4. Binding experiments were performed by means of gel retardation, gel shift competition, and footprint analysis. The CANNTG motifs were found to bind MyoD and myogenin fusion proteins and to interact with proteins in nuclear extracts from cultured myotubes. 5. Point mutations in the CANNTG motifs revealed that these elements are crucial for full promoter activity in myotubes and essential in fibroblasts cotransfected with a myogenin expression vector. 6. We conclude that the activity of the gamma-subunit gene is determined largely by E boxes, which in vivo are likely to be activated by MyoD family proteins; in addition, other transactivators such as the M-CAT binding protein presumably play a role. Both CANNTG elements and M-CAT motifs are also present in the alpha- and delta-subunit enhancer and may therefore account for the coordinate expression of the three subunits during muscle differentiation.
Cell Mol Neurobiol 1992 Jun
PMID:Analysis of binding and activating functions of the chick muscle acetylcholine receptor gamma-subunit upstream sequence. 133 Mar 9

1. We have prepared probes specific for the chicken myogenic determination genes MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and herculin and have investigated the expression of these genes in response to denervation and acute electrical stimulation in neonate chick muscle, using ribonuclease protection. 2. Upon denervation, herculin mRNA remains essentially unchanged, myf5 transcript levels approximately double, and MyoD message is up-regulated by two- to fivefold. In contrast, the message coding for myogenin, barely detectable in innervated muscle, rises dramatically (approximately 200-fold) on the second day after nerve section; in this respect it resembles acetylcholine receptor (AChR) alpha-, gamma- and delta-subunit mRNAs. Cohybridization experiments reveal that the increase in myogenin mRNA slightly precedes the rise in AChR alpha-subunit message. 3. Electrical stimulation of denervated muscle leads to an immediate decline in myogenin and AChR alpha-subunit mRNAs, with half-lives of less than an hour and approximately 4 hr, respectively; message stability measurements suggest that this is effected through a rapid shutdown of transcription. Messages coding for MyoD, myf5, and herculin decay much more slowly, as a result of slower turnover. 4. Previous experiments have indicated the involvement of a de novo induced (Tsay, H.-J., Neville, C. M., and Schmidt, J., FEBS Lett. 274:69-72, 1990) autocatalytic (Neville, C. M., Schmidt, M., and Schmidt, J., NeuroReport 2:655-657, 1991) transcription factor in the denervation-triggered up-regulation of AChR alpha-subunit expression; the denervation and electrical stimulation experiments reported here are compatible with the notion that myogenin is that factor.
Cell Mol Neurobiol 1992 Dec
PMID:Response of myogenic determination factors to cessation and resumption of electrical activity in skeletal muscle: a possible role for myogenin in denervation supersensitivity. 133 17

Having previously demonstrated that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) induce expression of the myogenin gene, we have now extended our investigation of the induction of myogenesis by the IGFs to a second member of the MyoD family, myf-5. This is the only myogenesis gene other than myogenin expressed early in the differentiation of L6 myoblasts, so its regulation was of particular interest because of our observations on myogenin. In contrast to myogenin, myf-5 mRNA was detectable in proliferating myoblasts, but the steady state levels of myf-5 mRNA fell strikingly for 48 h after the cells were switched to low serum medium containing IGF-II in both murine cell lines and myoblasts cultured from human muscle. In spite of this decrease, translation of myf-5 mRNA appeared essential during the early stages of stimulation of myogenesis by the IGFs; an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to the first five codons of myf-5 blocked the increase in myogenin mRNA and inhibited morphological (cell fusion) and biochemical (creatine kinase elevation) aspects of myogenesis. We conclude that expression of myf-5 is essential for the initial induction of myogenin by the IGFs, but that subsequent elevation of myogenin expression is independent of myf-5, possibly resulting from autoinduction of the myogenin gene. The functional significance of the dramatic decrease in myf-5 mRNA levels during differentiation is not obvious.
Mol Endocrinol 1992 Dec
PMID:Paradoxical decrease in myf-5 messenger RNA levels during induction of myogenic differentiation by insulin-like growth factors. 133 40

Thyroid hormones are among the positive regulators of muscle development in vivo, but little is known about the way they work. We demonstrate here that MyoD1, one of the master genes controlling myogenesis, is a target of T3. After proliferating C2 myoblasts have been treated with T3 for 15 h, we observed a rise in MyoD1 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. This is the first positive hormonal control of MyoD1 gene expression reported so far. We also provide data which suggest that T3 nuclear receptor(s) have a direct role on MyoD1 gene transcription: 1) C2 cells express the alpha 1 form of T3 nuclear receptors; 2) T3 up-regulates MyoD1 gene transcription and does not affect MyoD1 mRNA stability, as demonstrated by run-on and actinomycin D chase experiments, respectively; and 3) this transcriptional activation does not need the synthesis of intermediate protein(s) since it is not abolished by simultaneous treatment with cycloheximide. Moreover, in presence of T3, the increase of MyoD1 transcripts is associated with a faster terminal differentiation. Indeed we observed an earlier expression of various markers of myogenesis including myogenin (a regulatory gene of the MyoD1 family mainly involved in the triggering of terminal differentiation), myosin light chain 1A, and troponin T in T3-treated cells vs. untreated cells. We suggest that the regulation of a pivotal myogenic gene could be an important step in the control exerted by T3 on muscle development in vivo.
Mol Endocrinol 1992 Aug
PMID:3,5,3'-Triiodothyronine positively regulates both MyoD1 gene transcription and terminal differentiation in C2 myoblasts. 140 97


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>