Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Two distinct isoforms of the human progesterone receptor (hPR-A and hPR-B) have been identified previously. They differ only in that hPR-B contains an additional 164 amino acids at the amino terminus. Among various species these two forms arise as a result of either alternate initiation of translation from the same mRNA or by transcription from alternate promoters within the same gene. In order to understand the reason for their existence, we studied the transcriptional capacity of these individual receptors and observed that their activity was influenced strongly by cell and promoter context. More surprising was the observation that in promoter and cell contexts where hPR-A was inactive, it acted as a potent trans-dominant repressor of hPR-B-mediated transcription. This event occurred at substoichiometric concentrations of hPR-A and was hormone dependent. Human PR-A was not a general repressor of ligand-mediated transcription, as it had no effect on vitamin D receptor function. Interestingly, hPR-A but not hPR-B was capable of a similar inhibition of glucocorticoid, androgen, and mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated gene transcription. This suggests a specific role for the hPR-A isoform in this regulatory process. The trans-dominant effects of hPR-A were induced also by the antiprogestins ZK112993 and ZK98299 and a DNA binding defective hPR-A mutant, suggesting that the inhibitory function of hPR-A does not require DNA binding. The dual role of hPR-A as an activator or repressor of transcription defines a potential mechanism by which cells can generate dissimilar responses to a single hormone and provides a molecular explanation for the existence of two distinct forms of the hPR.
Mol Endocrinol 1993 Oct
PMID:Human progesterone receptor A form is a cell- and promoter-specific repressor of human progesterone receptor B function. 826 57

A regulatory mechanism for the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in rat osteosarcoma cells (ROS 17/2.8) is stabilization of the receptor through binding of its ligand, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3]. Increased transcription of the gene encoding VDR does not occur upon treatment of these osteoblast-like cells with 1,25-(OH)2D3. When 10 nM 1,25-(OH)2D3 was administered to confluent cultures of ROS 17/2.8 cells, no change in receptor mRNA was detected, as measured by a ribonuclease protection assay. VDR abundance was measured using an immunoradiometric assay at varying time points within a 24-h period after 1,25-(OH)2D3 treatment. Receptor protein levels increased rapidly and continued to rise over 24 h. By 2 h, the level of receptor increased 2.5-fold, achieving a maximum level of 8-fold above the baseline at 18 h. The half-life of the receptor protein is 2 h in the absence of hormone, as determined by blockage of translation in cycloheximide-treated cells. In the presence of hormone, however, receptor levels were unchanged for at least 6 h. The administration of 1,25-(OH)2D3 stabilizes the receptor, thereby resulting in its accumulation in ROS 17/2.8 cells.
Mol Endocrinol 1993 Oct
PMID:Stabilization of the vitamin D receptor in rat osteosarcoma cells through the action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. 826 62

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) binds the vitamin D-responsive element (VDRE) as a heterodimer with an unidentified receptor auxiliary factor (RAF) present in mammalian cell nuclear extracts. VDR also interacts with the retinoid X receptors (RXRs), implying that RAF may be related to the RXRs. Here we demonstrate that highly purified HeLa cell RAF contained RXR beta immunoreactivity and that both activities copurified and precisely coeluted in high-resolution hydroxylapatite chromatography. Furthermore, an RXR beta-specific antibody disrupted VDR-RAF-VDRE complexes in mobility shift assays. These data strongly indicate that HeLa RAF is highly related to or is identical to RXR beta. Consequently, the effect of the 9-cis retinoic acid ligand for RXRs was examined in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3]-activated gene expression systems. Increasing concentrations of 9-cis retinoic acid (1 nM to 1 microM) markedly reduced 1,25(OH)2D3-dependent accumulation of osteocalcin mRNA in osteoblast-like ROS 17/2.8 cells. All-trans retinoic acid also interfered with vitamin D responsiveness, but it was consistently less potent than the 9-cis isomer. Transient transfection studies revealed that attenuation by 9-cis retinoic acid was at the transcriptional level and was mediated through interactions at the osteocalcin VDRE. Furthermore, overexpression of both RXR beta and RXR alpha augmented 1,25(OH)2D3 responsiveness in transient expression studies. Direct analysis of VDRE binding in mobility shift assays demonstrated that heteromeric interactions between VDR and RXR were enhanced by 1,25(OH)2D3 and were not affected appreciably by 9-cis retinoic acid, except that inhibition was observed at high retinoid concentrations. These data suggest a regulatory mechanism for osteocalcin gene expression that involves 1,25(OH)2D3-induced heterodimerization of VDR and unliganded RXR. 9-cis retinoic acid may attenuate 1,25(OH)2D3 responsiveness by diverting RXRs away from VDR-mediated transcription and towards other RXR-dependent transcriptional pathways.
Mol Cell Biol 1993 Sep
PMID:Retinoid X receptors stimulate and 9-cis retinoic acid inhibits 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-activated expression of the rat osteocalcin gene. 839 17

The thyroid hormone, retinoic acid (RA), and vitamin D regulate gene expression by binding to similar receptors which act as ligand-inducible transcription factors. Incubation of pituitary GH4C1 cells with nanomolar concentrations of vitamin D markedly reduces the response of the rat growth hormone mRNA to thyroid hormone triiodothyronine (T3) and RA. The stimulation of growth hormone gene expression by both ligands is mediated by a common hormone response element (TREGH) present in the 5'-flanking region of the gene, and the inhibition caused by vitamin D is due to transcriptional interference of the vitamin D receptor on this DNA element. No inhibition of the basal promoter activity by the vitamin was observed. The response to T3 and RA of a heterologous promoter containing this element, the palindromic T3- and RA-responsive sequence TREPAL, or a direct repeat of the same motif is also inhibited by vitamin D. In contrast, vitamin D strongly induces the activity of constructs containing a vitamin D response element, and neither T3 nor RA reduces vitamin D-mediated transactivation. Transfection with an expression vector for the retinoid X receptor alpha (RXR alpha) increases transactivation by T3 and RA but does not abolish the inhibition caused by the vitamin. Gel retardation experiments show that the vitamin D receptor (VDR) as a heterodimer with RXR weakly binds to the T3- and RA-responsive elements. Additionally, VDR displaces binding of T3 and RA receptors in a dose-dependent manner. Our data suggest the formation of TR-VDR and RAR-VDR heterodimers with RXR. The fact that the same response element mediates opposite effects of at least four different nuclear receptors provides a greater complexity and flexibility of the transcriptional responses to their ligands.
Mol Cell Biol 1996 Jan
PMID:Vitamin D interferes with transactivation of the growth hormone gene by thyroid hormone and retinoic acid. 852 11

Although numerous studies have shown potent antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3) and its analogs on cells not directly related to bone metabolism, only few reports focussed on the effects of these analogs on bone. We compared the action of several recently developed analogs with that of 1,25-(OH)2D3 on human (MG-63) and rat (ROS 17/2.8) osteoblast-like cells and on in vitro bone resorption. In MG-63 cells the analogs EB1089 and KH1060 were about 166,000 and 14,000 times more potent than 1,25-(OH)2D3 in stimulating type I procollagen and 100 and 6,000 times more potent in stimulating osteocalcin production, respectively. Also in ROS 17/2.8 cells EB1089 and KH1060 were most potent in inducing osteocalcin synthesis. In vitro bone resorption was 2.3 and 17.5 times more potently stimulated by EB1089 and KH1060, respectively. In MG-63 cells, 1,25-(OH)2D3 and the analogs inhibited cell proliferation, whereas both 1,25-(OH)2D3 and the analogs stimulated the growth of ROS 17/2.8 cells. Differences in potency could neither be explained by affinity for the vitamin D receptor nor by a differential involvement of protein kinase C in the action of the analogs. Together, these data show that also in bone the analogs EB1089 and KH1060 are more potent than 1,25-(OH)2D3 but that the potency of the analogs compared to 1,25-(OH)2D3 is dependent on the biological response. On the basis of these observations it can be concluded that the reported reduced calcemic effect in vivo is not the result of a decreased responsiveness of bone to these analogs. Lastly, in view of eventual clinical application of 1,25-(OH)2D3-analogs, the observed stimulation of in vitro bone resorption and growth of an osteosarcoma cell line warrant in vivo studies to further examine these effects.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1995 Dec
PMID:Differential effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-analogs on osteoblast-like cells and on in vitro bone resorption. 854 Dec 30

The hormonal form of vitamin D, 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25- (OH)2D3], transiently stimulates the transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene in osteoblastic cells. We have identified and characterized a vitamin D response element (VDRE) in the promoter of c-fos. The 1,25-(OH)2D3-responsive region was delineated between residues -178 and -144 upstream of the c-fos transcription start site. A mutation that inhibited binding to the sequence concomitantly abolished 1,25-(OH)2D3-induced transcriptional responsiveness; similarly, cloning to the site upstream of a heterologous promoter conferred copy-number-dependent vitamin D responsiveness to a reporter gene, demonstrating that we have identified a functional response element. The structure of the c-fos VDRE was found to be unusual. Mutational analysis revealed that the c-fos VDRE does not conform to the direct repeat configuration in which hexameric core-binding sites are spaced by a few nucleotide residues. In contrast, the entire 36-bp sequence was essential for binding. We identified the vitamin D receptor and the retinoid X receptor alpha as components of the complex that bound the c-fos VDRE. However, our results also show that a putative CCAAT-binding transcription factor/nuclear factor 1 (CTF/NF-1) family member bound the response element in conjunction with the nuclear hormone receptors. The expression of this CTF/NF-1 family member appeared restricted to bone cells. These data hint at new molecular mechanisms of action for vitamin D.
Mol Cell Biol 1996 Feb
PMID:A composite element binding the vitamin D receptor, retinoid X receptor alpha, and a member of the CTF/NF-1 family of transcription factors mediates the vitamin D responsiveness of the c-fos promoter. 855 86

COUP-TFs are orphan members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. COUP-TF homologues have been cloned in several species, from Drosophila to man. The vertebrate COUP-TFs can be classified into four subgroups according to sequence homology in their ligand-binding domain. COUP-TFs bind to AGGTCA direct repeats or palindromes with various spacings. These include the response elements of several other members of the superfamily, the vitamin D receptor, the thyroid hormone receptor, the retinoic acid receptor, the retinoid X receptor, the peroxisome proliferation activated regulator, and the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4. COUP-TF response elements have been identified in the promoters of many genes and COUP-TFs have been shown to act as negative regulators both in vitro and in vivo. They can compete with the above mentioned receptors for binding to the common response elements. The ratio of COUP-TF and the other positive regulator determines the transcriptional state of the particular gene in any given moment. COUP-TFs are expressed in the developing central nervous system of mouse and zebra-fish. In addition, they are also expressed in many organs during mouse organogenesis. The expression pattern and profile of COUP-TFs favor the hypothesis that they are involved in development and differentiation. The expression of COUP-TFs are also highly regulated. P19 embryonal carcinoma cells have been used as a model system to study COUP-TF regulation. COUP-TFs are up-regulated in retinoic acid (RA) treated P19 cells. Transient transfection assay showed that mouse COUP-TFII promoter directly responded to RA treatment, suggesting that COUP-TF expression is directly regulated by RA signaling pathway.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1996 Jan
PMID:Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors and their regulation. 860 50

A number of analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] have been synthesized that act as more potent inducers of cellular differentiation and inhibitors of cell growth than the natural ligand; at the same time, many of the analogs have reduced hypercalcemic properties. This combination makes these compounds attractive candidates for clinical use. The mechanism by which the analogs act, however, is unclear. Potentially, the analogs could be taken up more readily, be more slowly catabolized, or have higher binding affinities for the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Analogs of 1,25-(OH)2D3 could also differentially modulate one or more of the activities of VDR, namely dimerization, DNA binding, and/or transcriptional regulation. To directly examine this latter possibility, we used a sensitive assay for the kinetics of dimerization and DNA binding, surface plasmon resonance, and report here that three 1,25-(OH)2D3 analogs, 1,25-(OH)2-16-ene-23-yne-D3, 1,25-(OH)2-16-ene-23-yne-26,27-di home-D3, and 1,25-(OH)2-26,27-hexafluoro-16-ene-23-yne-D3, all confer distinct rate and equilibrium constants for VDR-retinoid X receptor heterodimerization and DNA binding to a specific vitamin D response element relative to the natural ligand. In response to the hexafluoro analog, the apparent Kd for DNA binding by VDR was significantly lower than that for 1,25-(OH)2D3, and correspondingly, in vivo transactivation from a responsive reporter was greater. Interestingly, solution heterodimerization was not affected by this analog. These results suggest that vitamin D analogs do indeed confer biological effects by acting directly and differentially at the level of VDR, and that specific vitamin D analogs can act on distinct receptor functions.
Mol Endocrinol 1995 Dec
PMID:Vitamin D3-retinoid X receptor dimerization, DNA binding, and transactivation are differentially affected by analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. 861 17

Following the cloning and deletion analysis of the vitamin D receptor, most recent advances have been in the isolation and characterization of the DNA response elements found in the promoter region of target genes of vitamin D. Vitamin D, like the thyroid and retinoid hormones, binds to repeat sequences, but the repeats are separated by three nonspecified bases. The action of the VDR requires the presence of the RXR proteins and evidently other proteins that are involved in regulating transcriptions. A possible role of phosphorylation of the ligand binding domain of the VDR in transcription has also appeared. Very likely, the molecular events involved in vitamin D stimulation or suppression of a target gene will include its interaction with a number of transcription factors, both in the regulation of transcription and in the actual machinery involved in the transcription process through polymerase II. Although likely, it is not entirely clear whether the genomic action of vitamin D can account for all of its biological activities. Nongenomic actions of the vitamin D hormone have been reported, but convincing evidence that this is of biological importance in vivo is lacking. Advances in our understanding of the vitamin D mechanism of action can clearly be expected from physical studies of cloned and expressed vitamin D receptor and its subdomains, elucidation of the transcription factors in vitamin D-modulated transcription of target genes, elucidation of the role of phosphorylation in the transcription process, and the identification of important genes that are regulated in the specific target tissues responsive to vitamin D. This will definitely remain as a very active field of investigation well into the future.
Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1996
PMID:Recent advances in the molecular biology of vitamin D action. 865 Mar 7

We identified and characterized a novel rat vitamin D receptor isoform (rVDR1), which retains intron 8 of the canonical VDR (rVDR0) during alternative splicing. In this isoform protein directed by the stop codon in this newly identified exon, a part of the ligand binding domain (86 amino acids) is truncated at the C-terminal end but contains 19 extra amino acids. The rVDR1 transcript was expressed at a level 1/15 to 1/20 of that of rVDR0 in the kidney and intestine in adult rats but not in embryos. The recombinant rVDR1 protein showed no ligand binding activity. Homo- and heterodimers of the recombinant rVDR0 and rVDR1 proteins bound to a consensus vitamin D response element (VDRE) but not to consensus response elements for thyroid hormone and retinoic acid. However, unlike rVDR0, rVDR1 did not form a heterodimeric complex with RXR on the VDRE. A transient expression assay showed that this isoform acted as a dominant negative receptor against rVDR0 transactivation. Interestingly, the dominant negative activities of rVDR1 differed among VDREs. Thus, the present study indicates that this new VDR isoform negatively modulates the vitamin D signaling pathway, through a particular set of target genes.
Mol Cell Biol 1996 Jul
PMID:Intron retention generates a novel isoform of the murine vitamin D receptor that acts in a dominant negative way on the vitamin D signaling pathway. 866 54


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>