Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cancer gene therapy based on tissue-restricted expression of cytotoxic gene should achieve superior therapeutic index over an unrestricted method. This study compared the therapeutic effects of a highly augmented, prostate-specific gene expression method to a strong constitutive promoter-driven approach. Molecular imaging was coupled to gene therapy to ascertain real-time therapeutic activity. The imaging reporter gene (luciferase) and the cytotoxic gene (herpes simplex thymidine kinase) were delivered by adenoviral vectors injected directly into human prostate tumors grafted in SCID mice. Serial bioluminescence imaging, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography revealed restriction of gene expression to the tumors when prostate-specific vector was employed. In contrast, administration of constitutive active vector resulted in strong signals in the liver. Liver serology, tissue histology, and frail condition of animals confirmed liver toxicity suffered by the constitutive active cohorts, whereas the prostate-targeted group was unaffected. The extent of tumor killing was analyzed by apoptotic staining and human prostate marker (prostate-specific antigen). Overall, the augmented prostate-specific expression system was superior to the constitutive approach in safeguarding against systemic toxicity, while achieving effective tumor killing. Integrating noninvasive imaging into cytotoxic gene therapy will provide a useful strategy to monitor gene expression and therapeutic efficacy in future clinical protocols.
Mol Imaging
PMID:Micro-PET/CT monitoring of herpes thymidine kinase suicide gene therapy in a prostate cancer xenograft: the advantage of a cell-specific transcriptional targeting approach. 1628 8

This study examined the mechanisms by which the prostate cancer chemopreventive agent genistein modulates gene expression in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. Expression of androgen- and estrogen-regulated genes was measured in LNCaP cells cultured in the presence or absence of hormonal stimulation and the presence or absence of genistein. Genistein strongly suppressed basal expression of androgen-responsive gene (ARG) mRNAs, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Ste20-related proline-alanine-rich kinase (SPAK). However, genistein had little or no effect on basal expression of two other ARGs, beta2-microglobulin (B2M) or selenoprotein P (SEPP1). Culturing LNCaP cells in the presence of the synthetic androgen R1881-induced increases in PSA, SPAK, B2M, and SEPP1 mRNA levels. The R1881-induced expression of these genes was uniformly blocked by genistein. For PSA and SPAK, genistein also blocked or downregulated 17beta-estradiol-induced increases in mRNA expression. These results indicate that genistein selectively alters expression of ARG mRNAs in LNCaP cells through modulation of both androgen- and estrogen-induced signaling pathways.
Mol Carcinog 2006 Jan
PMID:Genistein affects androgen-responsive genes through both androgen- and estrogen-induced signaling pathways. 1629 12

We have investigated the role of corepressors SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) and N-CoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) in transcriptional regulation by androgen receptor (AR) in the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line. Using specific small interference RNAs to knock down SMRT and/or N-CoR in LNCaP cells, we found that SMRT and N-CoR not only mediate antagonist-dependent inhibition of AR activation but also have a widespread role in suppressing agonist-dependent activation of several AR target genes we have tested, including PSA (prostate-specific antigen), TSC22 (TSC22 domain family member 1), NKX3-1 (NK3 transcription factor locus 1), and B2M(beta-2-microglobulin). By sequencing analysis followed by analysis of physical association by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we mapped the putative androgen response elements in the NKX3-1 and B2M. Consistent with a role in both antagonist- and agonist-regulated transcription by AR, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that both SMRT and N-CoR were recruited by AR to these genes in the presence of either flutamide or R1881. Knocking down SMRT and N-CoR enhanced the recruitment of the coactivators steroid receptor coactivator 1 and p300 by agonist-bound AR and led to increased hyperacetylation of histone H3 and H4, suggesting that the corepressors actively compete with coactivators for binding to agonist-bound AR. Taken together, our data indicate that SMRT and N-CoR corepressors are involved in transcriptional regulation by both agonist- and antagonist-bound AR and regulate the magnitude of hormone response, at least in part, by competing with coactivators.
Mol Endocrinol 2006 May
PMID:The corepressors silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor and nuclear receptor corepressor are involved in agonist- and antagonist-regulated transcription by androgen receptor. 1637 95

The N-terminal domain of AR is known to engage a hormone-dependent interaction with its C-terminal ligand-binding domain, and this N/C interaction is known to modulate AR transcriptional activity. Using Xenopus oocytes as a model system to study transcriptional regulation in chromatin, we found that two previously reported N/C interaction-defective AR mutants, one with deletion of 23FQNLF27(ARDeltaF) and one with a Gly 21 to Glu mutation (ARG21E), were surprisingly inactive in activating transcription from various reporters assembled into chromatin. Further study using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that these mutants failed to bind both mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat and prostate-specific antigen enhancer assembled into chromatin. This defect is specific to chromatin because both mutants could bind to a consensus AR response element in vitro and activate transcription driven by mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat in transient transfection as effective as the wild-type AR. To further substantiate this novel finding, we established 293 cell lines that stably expressed either AR or ARDeltaF mutant in an inducible manner. Using these cell lines, we confirmed by using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay that AR but not ARDeltaF could bind to the endogenous prostate-specific antigen enhancer. Furthermore, we found that the ARDeltaF mutant interacts poorly with Brg1, the ATPase subunit of the chromatin-remodeling factor SWI/SNF. Taken together, our study reveals a novel role of AR N/C interaction in control of AR chromatin binding and suggests a working model that the proper N/C interaction is required for AR to recruit SWI/SNF complex, which in turn remodels chromatin to allow AR to bind to AR response elements in chromatin.
Mol Endocrinol 2006 Apr
PMID:A role of the amino-terminal (N) and carboxyl-terminal (C) interaction in binding of androgen receptor to chromatin. 1637 97

The progression of prostate cancer from androgen dependence to androgen independence is often accompanied by enhanced androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity. We observed a marked increase in the expression of Vav3, a Rho GTPase guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), during the progression of human prostate cancer LNCaP cells to the androgen-independent derivative, LNCaP-R1. GEFs activate Rho family GTPases by promoting the exchange of GDP for GTP. Reporter gene assays showed that Vav3 potentiated AR transcriptional activity, and knock down of Vav3 resulted in decreased AR transactivation. Vav3 also increased androgen-induced levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA. Furthermore, Vav3 enhanced AR activity at subnanomolar concentrations of androgen. This finding is particularly relevant because low androgen levels may be present in prostate tissue of patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Enhancement of AR activity by Vav3 required amino terminal activation function 1 (AF1) of AR; however, Vav3 did not interact with AR or increase AR levels. Neither GEF function nor the C-terminal domains of Vav3 were required for Vav3-mediated enhancement of AR activity; however, the pleckstrin homology domain was obligatory. These data show that Vav3 levels rise during progression to androgen independence and support continued AR signaling (even under conditions of low androgen) by a novel GEF-independent cross-talk mechanism.
Mol Endocrinol 2006 May
PMID:Vav3, a Rho GTPase guanine nucleotide exchange factor, increases during progression to androgen independence in prostate cancer cells and potentiates androgen receptor transcriptional activity. 1638 56

In light of the potential use of the thiazolidinedione family of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists in prostate cancer treatment, this study assessed the mechanism by which these agents suppress prostate-specific antigen (PSA) secretion in prostate cancer cells. Two lines of evidence indicate that the effect of thiazolidinediones on PSA down-regulation is independent of PPARgamma activation. First, this thiazolidinedione-mediated PSA down-regulation is structure-specific irrespective of the relative PPARgamma agonist potency. Second, the PPARgamma-inactive analogs of troglitazone and ciglitazone [Delta2TG (5-[4-(6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-chroman-2-yl-methoxy)-benzylidene]-thiazolidine-2,4-dione) and Delta2CG (5-[4-(1-methyl-cyclohexylmethoxy)-benzylidene]-thiazolidine-2,4-dione), respectively] exhibit higher potency than the parent compound in inhibiting dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-stimulated PSA secretion. Although 10 microM troglitazone and Delta2TG significantly inhibit PSA secretion, they do not alter the expression level of androgen receptor (AR) or interfere with DHT-activated nuclear translocation of AR. However, reporter gene and chromatin immunoprecipitation studies indicate that troglitazone and Delta2TG block AR recruitment to the androgen response elements within the PSA promoter. Thus, this study raises the question of whether the ability of oral troglitazone to reduce PSA levels in prostate cancer patients is therapeutically relevant. A major concern is that the concentration for troglitazone to mediate antitumor effects is severalfold higher than that of PSA down-regulation, which is difficult to attain at therapeutic doses. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that troglitazone and Delta2TG at high doses were able to inhibit AR expression. From a translational perspective, separation of PPARgamma agonist activity from AR down-regulation provides a molecular basis to use troglitazone as a platform to design AR-ablative agents.
Mol Pharmacol 2006 May
PMID:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-independent repression of prostate-specific antigen expression by thiazolidinediones in prostate cancer cells. 1645

The basic leucine zipper transcription factor, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), negatively regulates cell proliferation and induces terminal differentiation of various cell types. C/EBPalpha is expressed in the prostate, but its potential role in the tissue is unknown. Herein, we show that C/EBPalpha is highly expressed at the stage of growth arrest during prostate development. Furthermore, overexpression of C/EBPalpha decreases the rate of DNA synthesis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Investigation of the potential cross-talk between C/EBPalpha and androgen receptor (AR) that is responsible for androgen-dependent prostate proliferation demonstrates that androgen-dependent transactivation of AR is strongly repressed by C/EBPalpha. C/EBPalpha directly binds AR in vitro and forms a complex with AR in vivo. C/EBPalpha neither prevents the nuclear translocation of AR nor disrupts the N/C-terminal interaction of AR, which are both necessary for its proper transactivation activity upon ligand binding. To modulate AR transactivation, however, C/EBPalpha does compete with AR coactivators for AR binding. Additionally, C/EBPalpha is recruited onto AR-target promoters with AR and is further able to inhibit the expression of endogenous prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer cells. Our results suggest C/EBPalpha as a potent AR corepressor and provide insight into the role of C/EBPalpha in prostate development and cancer.
Mol Endocrinol 2006 May
PMID:The CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-alpha negatively regulates the transactivation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. 1645 20

The use of antibody microarrays continues to grow rapidly due to the recent advances in proteomics and automation and the opportunity this combination creates for high throughput multiplexed analysis of protein biomarkers. However, a primary limitation of this technology is the lack of PCR-like amplification methods for proteins. Therefore, to realize the full potential of array-based protein biomarker screening it is necessary to construct assays that can detect and quantify protein biomarkers with very high sensitivity, in the femtomolar range, and from limited sample quantities. We describe here the construction of ultramicroarrays, combining the advantages of microarraying including multiplexing capabilities, higher throughput, and cost savings with the ability to screen very small sample volumes. Antibody ultramicroarrays for the detection of interleukin-6 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a widely used biomarker for prostate cancer screening, were constructed. These ultramicroarrays were found to have a high specificity and sensitivity with detection levels using purified proteins in the attomole range. Using these ultramicroarrays, we were able to detect PSA secreted from 100 LNCaP cells in 3 h and from just four LNCaP cells in 24 h. Cellular PSA could also be detected from the lysate of an average of just six cells. This strategy should enable proteomic analysis of materials that are available in very limited quantities such as those collected by laser capture microdissection, neonatal biopsy microspecimens, and forensic samples.
Mol Cell Proteomics 2006 May
PMID:Detection and quantification of protein biomarkers from fewer than 10 cells. 1648 39

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that controls growth and survival of prostate cancer cells. In the present study, we investigated the regulation of AR activity by the receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP140). We first showed that RIP140 could be coimmunoprecipitated with the receptor when coexpressed in 293T cells. This interaction appeared physiologically relevant because chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that, under R1881 treatment, RIP140 could be recruited to the prostate-specific antigen encoding gene in LNCaP cells. In vitro glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays provided evidence that the carboxy-terminal domain of AR could interact with different regions of RIP140. By means of fluorescent proteins, we demonstrated that ligand-activated AR was not only able to translocate to the nucleus but also to relocate RIP140 from very structured nuclear foci to a diffuse pattern. Overexpression of RIP140 strongly repressed AR-dependent transactivation by preferentially targeting the ligand binding domain-dependent activity. Moreover, disruption of RIP140 expression induced AR overactivation, thus revealing RIP140 as a strong AR repressor. We analyzed its mechanism of transrepression and first demonstrated that different regions of RIP140 could mediate AR-dependent repression. We then showed that the carboxy-terminal end of RIP140 could reverse transcriptional intermediary factor 2-dependent overactivation of AR. The use of mutants of RIP140 allowed us to suggest that C-terminal binding protein played no role in RIP140-dependent inhibition of AR activity, whereas histone deacetylases partly regulated that transrepression. Finally, we provided evidence for a stimulation of RIP140 mRNA expression in LNCaP cells under androgen treatment, further emphasizing the role of RIP140 in androgen signaling.
Mol Endocrinol 2006 Jul
PMID:Receptor-interacting protein 140 is a repressor of the androgen receptor activity. 1652 72

Prevention trials showed that selenium reduced prostate cancer incidence by 50%, establishing selenium as a promising chemopreventive agent for prostate cancer. Selenium inhibited human prostate cancer cell growth, blocked cell cycle progression at multiple transition points, and induced apoptotic cell death. Previous studies showed a novel mechanism of selenium anticancer action in which selenium markedly reduces androgen signaling and androgen receptor (AR)-mediated gene expression, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA), in human prostate cancer cells. The molecular mechanisms of selenium-mediated down-regulation of AR signaling are not clear. In this study, a systemic approach was taken to examine the modification of androgen signaling by selenium in human prostate cancer cells. In addition to reduced AR mRNA expression, selenium was found to initially increase the stability of AR mRNA within 6 hours while decreasing the stability of AR mRNA after 8 hours. Selenium increased AR protein degradation and reduced AR nuclear localization. Scatchard analysis indicated that selenium did not affect ligand binding to AR in LNCaP cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses showed that DHT increased the recruitment of AR and coactivators, such as SRC-1 and TIF-2, to the promoter of the PSA gene, and that recruitment was greatly diminished in the presence of 5 micromol/L selenium. On the other hand, selenium enhanced the recruitment of corepressors, such as SMRT, to the promoter of the PSA gene. Taken together, these results suggest that selenium disrupts AR signaling at multiple stages, including AR mRNA expression, mRNA stability, protein degradation, nuclear translocation, and recruitment of coregulators.
Mol Cancer Ther 2006 Apr
PMID:Mechanisms of selenium down-regulation of androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer. 1664 61


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10