Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Poly(A) polymerase is responsible for the addition of the adenylate tail to the 3' ends of mRNA. Using the two-hybrid system we have identified two proteins which interact specifically with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase, Pap1. Uba2 is a homolog of ubiquitin-activating (E1) enzymes and Ufd1 is a protein whose function is probably also linked to the ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway. These two proteins interact with Pap1 and with each other, but not with eight other target proteins which were tested in the two-hybrid system. The last 115 amino acids of Uba2, which contains an 82-amino acid region not present in previously characterized E1 enzymes, is sufficient for the interaction with Pap1. Both Uba2 and Ufd1 can be co-immunoprecipitated from extracts with Pap1, confirming in vitro the interaction identified by two-hybrid analysis. Depletion of Uba2 from cells produces extracts which polyadenylate precursor RNA with increased efficiency compared to extracts from nondepleted cells, while depletion of Ufd1 yields extracts which are defective in processing. These two proteins are not components of polyadenylation factors, and instead may have a role in regulating poly(A) polymerase activity.
Mol Gen Genet 1997 Jun
PMID:The Uba2 and Ufd1 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae interact with poly(A) polymerase and affect the polyadenylation activity of cell extracts. 923 79

During oocyte maturation and early development, mRNAs receive poly(A) in the cytoplasm at distinct times relative to one another and to the cell cycle. These cytoplasmic polyadenylation reactions do not occur during oogenesis, but begin during oocyte maturation and continue throughout early development. In this report, we focus on the link between cytoplasmic polyadenylation and control of the cell cycle during meiotic maturation. Activation of maturation promoting factor, a complex of CDK1 and cyclin, is required for maturation and dependent on c-mos protein kinase. We demonstrate here that two classes of polyadenylation exist during oocyte maturation, defined by their dependence of c-mos and CDK1 protein kinases. Polyadenylation of the first class of mRNAs (class I) is independent of c-mos and CDK1 kinase activities, whereas polyadenylation of the second class (class II) requires both of these activities. Class I polyadenylation, through its effects on c-mos mRNA, is required for class II polyadenylation. cis-acting elements responsible for this distinction reside in the 3'-untranslated region, upstream of the polyadenylation signal AAUAAA. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements (CPEs) are sufficient to specify class I polyadenylation, and subtle changes in the CPE can substantially, though not entirely, shift an RNA from class I to class II. Activation of class I polyadenylation events is independent of hyperphosphorylation of CPE-binding protein or poly(A) polymerase, and requires cellular protein synthesis. The two classes of polyadenylation and of mRNA define a dependent pathway, in which polyadenylation of certain mRNAs requires the prior polyadenylation of another. We propose that this provides one method of regulating the temporal order of polyadenylation events, and links polyadenylation to the control of the meiotic cell cycle.
Mol Biol Cell 1997 Aug
PMID:A dependent pathway of cytoplasmic polyadenylation reactions linked to cell cycle control by c-mos and CDK1 activation. 928 30

The hok/sok system of plasmid R1, which mediates plasmid stabilization by the killing of plasmid-free cells, codes for two RNA species, Sok antisense RNA and hok mRNA. Sok RNA, which is unstable, inhibits translation of the stable hok mRNA. The 64nt Sok RNA folds into a single stem-loop domain with an 11 nt unstructured 5' domain. The initial recognition reaction between Sok RNA and hok mRNA takes place between the 5' domain and the complementary region in hok mRNA. In this communication we examine the metabolism of Sok antisense RNA. We find that RNase E cleaves the RNA 6nt from its 5' end and that this cleavage initiates Sok RNA decay. The RNase E cleavage occurs in the part of Sok RNA that is responsible for the initial recognition of the target loop in hok mRNA and thus leads to functional inactivation of the antisense. The major RNase E cleavage product (denoted pSok-6) is rapidly degraded by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). Thus, the RNase E cleavage tags pSok-6 for further rapid degradation by PNPase from its 3' end. We also show that Sok RNA is polyadenylated by poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), and that the poly(A)-tailing is prerequisite for the rapid 3'-exonucleolytic degradation by PNPase.
Mol Microbiol 1997 Oct
PMID:Sok antisense RNA from plasmid R1 is functionally inactivated by RNase E and polyadenylated by poly(A) polymerase I. 938 56

Processing of the 3' end of mRNA precursors depends on several proteins. The multisubunit cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) is required for cleavage of the mRNA precursor as well as polyadenylation. CPSF interacts with the cleavage stimulatory factor complex (CstF), and this interaction increases the specificity of binding. Following cleavage downstream of the AAUAAA site, CPSF and poly(A) polymerase (PAP) are required for efficient polyadenylation. Recently, it has been shown that 160-kDa subunit of CPSF interacts directly with the 77-kDa subunit of CstF, which is homologous to the product encoded by the Drosophila gene su(f), and with PAP. Here we report the cloning and characterization of a Drosophila homologue of CPSF-160. The 1329-amino acid dCPSF protein exhibits about 45% and 20% sequence identity, respectively, to its mammalian and yeast counterparts over its entire length. We show that the CPSF homologue is expressed throughout development and that CPSF is essential for viability. Mutations in the cpsf gene did not alter the phenotype of homozygous su(f) mutations, suggesting that, for most genes, processing of 3' termini is not sensitive to small changes in cpsf and su(f) dosage.
Mol Gen Genet 1998 Apr
PMID:Characterization of a Drosophila homologue of the 160-kDa subunit of the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor CPSF. 960 91

Previous work has implicated poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), encoded by the pcnB gene, in the decay of a number of RNAs from Escherichia coli. We show here that PAP I does not promote the initiation of decay of the rpsT mRNA encoding ribosomal protein S20 in vivo; however, it does facilitate the degradation of highly folded degradative intermediates by polynucleotide phosphorylase. As expected, purified degradosomes, a multi-protein complex containing, among others, RNase E, PNPase, and RhlB, generate an authentic 147-residue RNase E cleavage product from the rpsT mRNA in vitro. However, degradosomes are unable to degrade the 147-residue fragment in the presence of ATP even when it is oligoadenylated. Rather, both continuous cycles of polyadenylation and PNPase activity are necessary and sufficient for the complete decay of the 147-residue fragment in a process which can be antagonized by the action of RNase II. Moreover, both ATP and a non-hydrolyzable analog, ATPgammaS, support the PAP I and PNPase-dependent degradation of the 147-residue intermediate implying that ATPase activity, such as that which may reside in RhlB, a putative RNA helicase, is not necessarily required. Alternatively, the rpsT mRNA can be degraded in vitro by a second 3'-decay pathway which is dependent on PAP I, PNPase and ATP alone. Our results demonstrate that a hierarchy of RNA secondary structures controls access to exonucleolytic attack on 3' termini. Moreover, decay of a model mRNA can be reconstituted in vitro by a small number of purified components in a process which is more dynamic and ATP-dependent than previously imagined.
J Mol Biol 1998 Jun 26
PMID:Reconstitution of the degradation of the mRNA for ribosomal protein S20 with purified enzymes. 964 84

It has previously been shown in vivo that bovine papillomavirus represses its late gene expression via a 5' splice site sequence located upstream of the late polyadenylation signal. Here, the mechanism of repression is determined by in vitro analysis. U1 snRNP binding to the 5' splice site results in inhibition of polyadenylation via a direct interaction with poly(A) polymerase (PAP). Although the inhibitory mechanism is similar to that used in U1A autoregulation, U1A within the U1 snRNP does not contribute to PAP inhibition. Instead the U1 70K protein, when bound to U1 snRNA, both interacts with and inhibits PAP. Conservation of the U1 70K inhibitory domains suggests that polyadenylation regulation via PAP inhibition may be more widespread than previously thought.
Mol Cell 1998 Jan
PMID:U1 snRNP inhibits pre-mRNA polyadenylation through a direct interaction between U1 70K and poly(A) polymerase. 965 22

We have isolated cDNA clones encoding a novel factor (PAP-I) that is a component of a multi-subunit poly(A) polymerase from pea seedlings. The encoded protein, when isolated from appropriately engineered Escherichia coli, was active as a poly(A) polymerase, either with an associated RNA binding cofactor (PAP-III) or with free poly(A) as an RNA substrate. The latter observation indicates that PAP-I is in fact a poly(A) polymerase. PAP-I bore a striking resemblance to an as yet uncharacterized cyanobacterial protein. This observation suggested a possible chloroplast localization for PAP-I. This hypothesis was tested and found to be substantiated; immunoblot analysis identified PAP-I in chloroplast but not nuclear extracts. Our results suggest that PAP-I is a component of the machinery that adds poly(A) to chloroplast RNAs.
Plant Mol Biol 1998 Jul
PMID:Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel plant poly(A) polymerase. 968 75

Vertebrate poly(A) polymerase (PAP) contains a catalytic domain and a C-terminal Ser-Thr-rich regulatory region. Consensus and nonconsensus cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) sites are conserved in the Ser-Thr-rich region in vertebrate PAPs. PAP is phosphorylated by cdc2-cyclin B on these sites in vitro and in vivo and is inactivated by hyperphosphorylation in M-phase cells, when cdc2-cyclin B is active. In the experiments described here, we undertook a genetic approach in chicken DT40 cells to study the function of PAP phosphorylation. We found that PAP is highly conserved in chicken and is essential in DT40 cells. While cells could tolerate reduced levels of PAP, even modest overexpression of either wild-type PAP or a mutant PAP with two consensus cdk sites mutated (cdk- PAP) was highly deleterious and at a minimum resulted in reduced growth rates. Importantly, cells that expressed cdk- PAP had a significantly lower growth rate than did cells that expressed similar levels of wild-type PAP, which was reflected in increased accumulation of cells in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle. We propose that the lower growth rate is due to the failure of hyperphosphorylation and thus M-phase inactivation of cdk- PAP.
Mol Cell Biol 1998 Sep
PMID:Deregulation of poly(A) polymerase interferes with cell growth. 971 May 85

The interaction of the Fip1 subunit of polyadenylation factor I with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase (PAP) was assayed in vivo by two-hybrid analysis and was found to involve two separate regions on PAP, located at opposite ends of the protein sequence. In vitro, Fip1 blocks access of the RNA primer to an RNA binding site (RBS) that overlaps the Fip1 carboxy-terminal interaction region and, in doing so, shifts PAP to a distributive mode of action. Partial truncation of this RBS has the same effect, indicating that this site is required for processivity. A comparison of the utilization of ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides as substrates indicates the existence on PAP of a second RBS which recognizes the last three nucleotides at the 3' end of the primer. This site discriminates against deoxyribonucleotides at the 3' end, and interactions at this site are not affected by Fip1. Further analysis revealed that the specificity of PAP for adenosine is not simply a function of the ATP binding site but also reflects interactions with bases at the 3' end of the primer and at another contact site 14 nucleotides upstream of the 3' end. These results suggest that the unique specificity of PAP for ribose and base, and thus the extent and type of activity with different substrates, depends on interactions at multiple nucleotide binding sites.
Mol Cell Biol 1998 Oct
PMID:Processivity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase requires interactions at the carboxyl-terminal RNA binding domain. 974 11

In this study we demonstrate, at an ultrastructural level, the in situ distribution of heterogeneous nuclear RNA transcription sites after microinjection of 5-bromo-UTP (BrUTP) into the cytoplasm of living cells and subsequent postembedding immunoelectron microscopic visualization after different labeling periods. Moreover, immunocytochemical localization of several pre-mRNA transcription and processing factors has been carried out in the same cells. This high-resolution approach allowed us to reveal perichromatin regions as the most important sites of nucleoplasmic RNA transcription and the perichromatin fibrils (PFs) as in situ forms of nascent transcripts. Furthermore, we show that transcription takes place in a rather diffuse pattern, without notable local accumulation of transcription sites. RNA polymerase II, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) core proteins, general transcription factor TFIIH, poly(A) polymerase, splicing factor SC-35, and Sm complex of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) are associated with PFs. This strongly supports the idea that PFs are also sites of major pre-mRNA processing events. The absence of nascent transcripts, RNA polymerase II, poly(A) polymerase, and hnRNPs within the clusters of interchromatin granules rules out the possibility that this domain plays a role in pre-mRNA transcription and polyadenylation; however, interchromatin granule-associated zones contain RNA polymerase II, TFIIH, and Sm complex of snRNPs and, after longer periods of BrUTP incubation, also Br-labeled RNA. Their role in nuclear functions still remains enigmatic. In the nucleolus, transcription sites occur in the dense fibrillar component. Our fine structural results show that PFs represent the major nucleoplasmic structural domain involved in active pre-mRNA transcriptional and processing events.
Mol Biol Cell 1999 Jan
PMID:Ultrastructural analysis of transcription and splicing in the cell nucleus after bromo-UTP microinjection. 988 Mar 37


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>