Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P06889 (Mol)
 630,302 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We investigated binding characteristics of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on membranes prepared from 4 human breast cancer cell lines and 38 primary BC biopsies. Competitive binding experiments were performed and analyzed using the "Ligand" program. Furthermore bFGF mitogenic activity was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA from breast cancer cell lines. The presence of high-affinity binding sites was demonstrated in each cell type (MCF-7: Kd = 0.60 nM; T-47D: Kd = 0.55 nM; BT-20: Kd = 0.77 nM; MDA-MB-231: Kd = 0.34 nM). The presence of these high-affinity binding sites was confirmed with saturation experiments. A second class of low-affinity binding sites was detected in the 2 hormone-independent cells (BT-20: Kd = 2.9 nM; MDA-MB-231: Kd = 2.7 nM). bFGF stimulated the proliferation of MCF-7, T-47D, BT-20 but not MDA-MB-231 cell lines. With competition experiments, binding sites were detectable in 36/38 breast cancers; high-affinity binding sites (Kd less than 1 nM) were present in 19/36 cases and low-affinity binding sites (Kd greater than 2 nM) were present in 29/36 cases (the two classes of binding sites were present in 12 breast cancers). No relation between bFGF binding sites and node involvement, histologic type or grading of the tumor was evidenced. There were negative correlations (Spearman test) between total bFGF binding sites and estradiol receptor (P = 0.05) or progesterone receptor (P = 0.009). The demonstration of (1) bFGF specific binding sites in breast cancer membranes, and (2) bFGF growth stimulation of some breast cancer cell lines indicates that this factor may be involved directly in the growth of some breast cancers.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Sep
PMID:Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF): mitogenic activity and binding sites in human breast cancer. 152 70

When isolated from chick oviduct cytosol by antibody adsorption, the inactive progesterone receptor is associated with the two heat shock proteins, hsp90 and hsp70, plus three additional proteins termed p54, p50, and p23 according to their molecular weights. While their functions remain unknown, all of these receptor associated proteins are dissociated upon receptor activation in intact cells. To better understand the assembly and activation mechanisms of progesterone receptor complexes, we have developed a cell-free system for studying receptor interactions with hsp90 and hsp70 and have used this system to examine requirements for hsp90 binding to the receptor. Purified receptor, free of hsp90 and immobilized on an antibody affinity resin, will rebind hsp90 in rabbit reticulocyte lysate when several conditions are met. These include: (1) absence of progesterone, (2) elevated temperature (30 degrees C), (3) presence of ATP, and (4) presence of Mg2+. We have obtained maximal hsp90 binding to receptor when lysate is supplemented with 3 mM MgCl2 and an ATP regenerating system. ATP depletion of lysate by dialysis or ATPase addition blocks hsp90 binding to the receptor. When progesterone is added to pre-formed receptor complexes in reticulocyte lysate it promotes activation and the dissociation of hsp90. This process is also dependent upon ATP. Thus, both the assembly, and activation of the progesterone receptor can be accomplished in the reticulocyte lysate system.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:Composition, assembly and activation of the avian progesterone receptor. 156 3

Deletion mutants of the rabbit progesterone receptor were used to identify two major mechanisms of its nuclear localization. A putative signal sequence, homologous to that of the SV40 large T antigen, was localized around amino acids 638-642 and was shown to be constitutively active. When amino acids 638-642 were deleted, the receptor became cytoplasmic but could be shifted into the nucleus by the addition of hormone (or anti-hormone), it was almost fully active. A second putative nuclear localization signal is located in the DNA binding domain activated either through ligand binding or through production of constitutive receptor. By deleting epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies, it was possible to follow different receptor mutants inside the same cells. In the absence of ligand the receptor was transferred into the nucleus as a monomer. After administration of hormone (or anti-hormone) a "cytoplasmic" monomer was transferred into the nucleus through interaction with a "nuclear" monomer. These interactions occurred through the steroid binding domains of both monomers.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:Mechanisms of nuclear localization of the progesterone receptor. 156 4

The mechanisms of action of two types of anti-hormones is discussed. Type I anti-hormones comprise the antiestrogen hydroxy-tamoxifen and the antiprogestin RU486, both of which promote DNA binding of the cognate receptors and, due to the activity of one of the two transcription activation functions of the estrogen and progesterone receptors, act as mixed agonist/antagonists. Evidence supporting that ICI 164,384 is also a member of the same group is presented. Type II antagonists impair DNA binding of the corresponding receptor in vitro and, in some cases, also in vivo. Ligand-mapping, an approach to identify the site of interaction of a steroid substitution within the hormone-binding domain of the receptor has been used to identify the 11 beta-pocket of the progesterone receptor and revealed that a single amino acid is responsible for the differential antagonistic effect of RU486 in man, chicken and hamster.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:Mechanisms of antihormone action. 156 5

A new approach for the treatment of breast cancer could be the use of progesterone antagonists. These compounds were originally developed for the inhibition of progesterone-dependent processes and have been shown to be effective in inhibition of nidation and interruption of pregnancy. Although the roles of progesterone and the progesterone receptor in control of cell growth remain unclear, it was found in progesterone receptor positive mammary carcinoma cell lines that the antiprogestin, Mifepristone, had an inhibitory effect on cell growth and a growth-inhibiting action on the DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma of the rat. We have shown that the progesterone antagonists, Onapristone and ZK 112993, which possess a reduced antiglucocorticoid activity compared to Mifepristone, exert a strong tumor-inhibiting effect in a panel of hormone-dependent mammary tumor models. The effects of these compounds were in some systems superior to those of tamoxifen or high dose progestins and comparable to ovariectomy. Although prerequisites for their antiproliferative potency are an affinity to the progesterone receptor as well as a sufficient number of available receptors in the tumors, the strong tumor inhibiting potential of the antiprogestins cannot be explained by a classical anti-hormonal mechanism. Surprisingly, the antitumor activity is evident in spite of elevated serum levels of ovarian and pituitary hormones. It was established by morphometric procedures that treatment with Onapristone triggers differentiation of the mitotically active polygonal tumor epithelial cell towards secretory active glandular structures and acini. All our quantitative light and electron microscopic data indicate that the antitumor action of antiprogestins is accompanied by the initiation of terminal differentiation leading to (apoptotic) cell death. Finally, our flow cytometry studies revealed an accumulation of the tumor cells in the G0G1 phase of the cell cycle, which may result from induction of differentiation since a differentiation-specific G1 arrest has already been proposed for other stem cell systems. It can be concluded from these data that the progesterone receptor antagonists differ in their mode of action from compounds used in established endocrine treatment strategies for mammary carcinoma. The ability of progesterone antagonists like Onapristone to reduce the number of cells in S-phase may offer a significant clinical advantage, since it is established that the S-phase fraction is a highly significant predictor of disease-free survival among axillary node-negative patients with diploid mammary tumors.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:Progesterone antagonists: tumor-inhibiting potential and mechanism of action. 156 10

The mechanisms underlying loss of oestrogen responsiveness in breast cancer are not well-defined. Potential mechanisms include loss of receptor expression, alterations in the oestrogen receptor (ER) gene producing proteins with abnormal function, or changes to receptor-dependent or -independent pathways controlling cell proliferation. Examination by Southern analysis of the ER gene in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast tumour biopsies failed to provide evidence of gross rearrangements and in only one of thirty seven tumour DNA samples was significant gene amplification observed. No restriction fragment length polymorphisms were detected for the restriction enzymes EcoR I, Pst I or Hind III. Methylation of the ER gene as assessed by Hpa II and Msp I restriction enzyme digests varied between tumours but the degree of methylation was not correlated with levels of expression of the receptor protein. Similar findings applied in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast cancer cell lines and clonal lines of MCF-7 cells, which were developed as an in vitro model for the acquisition of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance. In this model there was no evidence that changes to ER receptor function and/or structure at the level of the ER gene, mRNA, ligand binding, and ability to induce progesterone receptor might account for the development of hormone resistance. However, the ability of ER to interact with a DNA sequence containing the vitellogenin promoter oestrogen response element, as assessed by gel retardation assay, was impaired in the clone showing the greatest degree of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Mar
PMID:Oestrogen receptor gene structure and function in breast cancer. 156 23

We have examined the effects of the antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) and the estrogen 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on several estrogen-regulated responses in GH4C1 pituitary tumor cells. After 5 days of treatment with either TAM (1.0 microM) or E2 (1.0 nM), the level of PRL mRNA was markedly increased when measured by the cytosolic dot blot procedure. In contrast, only E2 was able to increase the levels of beta-actin mRNA and cytosolic protein, suggesting that this estrogen may stimulate cell proliferation over the course of treatment. This apparent difference in the abilities of TAM and E2 to stimulate GH4C1 cell proliferation was examined directly. TAM had no effect on cell proliferation as evidenced by its inability to increase cellular DNA or deoxythymidine triphosphate incorporation by nuclei isolated from treated cells. In contrast, E2 stimulated cell proliferation as evidenced by increases in cellular DNA and deoxythymidine triphosphate incorporation by isolated nuclei. The abilities of TAM and E2 to induce progesterone receptor (PR) and PR mRNA were also examined. TAM was unable to increase the levels of PR or PR mRNA, whereas E2 was effective in both of these regards. When added in combination with E2, TAM acted as a classical antiestrogen, partially blocking the induction of PR by E2. To determine whether the inabilities of TAM to stimulate cell proliferation and induce PR were a function of TAM concentration, dose-response experiments were performed. TAM at concentrations ranging from 10(-8)-10(-6) M was effective in inducing PRL mRNA, but at none of the tested concentrations was TAM effective in stimulating cell proliferation or inducing PR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Mol Endocrinol 1992 Apr
PMID:The estrogenic and antiestrogenic properties of tamoxifen in GH4C1 pituitary tumor cells are gene specific. 158 21

The chicken progesterone receptor (PR) is a transcriptional regulatory protein that localizes predominantly within the nucleus of hormone-treated and untreated cells. Transient heterokaryons were generated between PR-expressing Cos-1 cells and PR-negative NIH3T3 cells to examine whether PRs are confined to the nucleus or are capable of bidirectionally traversing the nuclear envelope. Migration of PR from Cos-1 to NIH3T3 nuclei was observed in both the presence and absence of hormone. Since de novo PR synthesis was inhibited in heterokaryons with cycloheximide treatment, PRs that localize within NIH3T3 nuclei of heterokaryons must derive from preexisting receptors that were exported from Cos-1 nuclei. Thus, PR, like some nucleolar and heat shock proteins, appears to be capable of shuttling between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Not all proteins that enter the nucleus exhibit this trait, since simian virus-40 large tumor antigen, endogenously expressed in Cos-1 cells, does not efficiently translocate to NIH3T3 nuclei of heterokaryons, which support internuclear migration of PR. Thus, proteins that may use analogous or identical mechanisms for nuclear import may differentially interact with the nuclear export machinery. Furthermore, the fact that PR and simian virus-40 large tumor antigen localization within nuclei is not identical, as revealed by laser scanning confocal microscopy, supports the notion that nuclear export may be influenced by subnuclear compartmentalization.
Mol Endocrinol 1992 May
PMID:Internuclear migration of chicken progesterone receptor, but not simian virus-40 large tumor antigen, in transient heterokaryons. 160 89

The effect was studied of four different synthetic progestins (Org 30659, gestodene, 3-ketodesogestrel and levonorgestrel) on the proliferation of the 17 beta estradiol (E2)-dependent human breast cancer cell line MCF7. All progestins were found to stimulate proliferation, but only at high pharmacological dosages. Moreover, like estrogens the progestins at high concentrations synergistically stimulated MCF7 cell proliferation together with low concentrations of insulin. This stimulatory effect could be blocked by antiestrogens, but not by antiglucocorticoids and antiprogestins. This suggests that growth stimulation by these progestins (or their metabolites) occurs through crossreaction with the E2 receptor (ER). This is confirmed by the observation that the strong synthetic progestin Org 2058 does not stimulate proliferation. The absence of a progesterone receptor (PR)-mediated growth response seems not to be due to aberrant PR expression in these cells; 27,000 receptors (Kd 1.7 x 10(-10)M) per cell were present under growth-assay conditions. Growth stimulation by E2 in the absence or presence of insulin, is slightly inhibited or unaffected by the progestins, respectively. Our data do not support a role for the recently identified gestodene binding sites [Colletta et al., J. Steroid Biochem. 33 (1989) 1055-1061] in mediating gestodene effects on breast cancer cells: gestodene and 3-ketodesogestrel, a compound that does not bind to these gestodene binding sites, showed a similar biological activity. The effects of the progestins on the MCF7 breast cancer cell line, indicate that the use of these compounds at very high concentrations may be unfavourable, but do not support a role for them in directly stimulating breast tumor proliferation at the low progestin concentration which are reached in the serum in oral contraceptive users.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Jun
PMID:Effects of progestins on the proliferation of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cells under growth factor-defined conditions. 161 75

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether progesterone exerted progesterone receptor mediated direct effects on the anterior pituitary in the secretion of FSH and whether such effects were mediated through the 5 alpha-reduction of progesterone. Treatment of anterior pituitary dispersed cells for 48 h with 0.5 nM estradiol reduced the ED50 for gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated FSH release from 0.58 to 0.36 ng/ml and the ED50 for GnRH-induced LH release from 0.54 to 0.19 ng/ml. When dispersed pituitary cells were treated with 0.5 nM estradiol and exposed to various doses of progesterone for 1 to 6 h, the most consistent rise in basal and GnRH-stimulated FSH release was observed with the 50 nM dose of progesterone with a 3-h exposure period. All three doses of progesterone elevated basal LH and GnRH-stimulated LH was increased by the 50 and 100 nM doses of progesterone during the 3-h period of treatment. Using the 50 nM dose of progesterone, basal and GnRH-stimulated LH was increased after 2, 3 and 6 h of progesterone treatment. When the period of exposure of progesterone was extended to 12, 36 or 48 h, there was a significant inhibition of GnRH-stimulated FSH release. GnRH-stimulated LH release was inhibited at 36 and 48 but not 12 h after progesterone treatment. These studies showed that the effect of progesterone administered for periods of 1 to 6 h enhanced the secretion of LH and FSH whereas progesterone administered for periods beyond 12 h inhibited FSH and LH release by dispersed pituitary cells in culture. These results are similar to those observed in vivo after progesterone treatment. Furthermore estrogen priming of the dispersed pituitary cells was necessary to observe the effects of progesterone. The progesterone antagonist RU486 prevented the progesterone-induced rise in GnRH-stimulated FSH release. Furthermore the 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor N,N-diethyl-4-methyl-3-oxo-4-aza-5 alpha-androstane- 17 beta-carboxamide also prevented the progesterone-induced rise in GnRH-stimulated FSH release in estrogen-treated dispersed pituitary cells. These results indicate that the anterior pituitary is a major site of action of progesterone in the release of FSH and that 5 alpha-reduction of progesterone plays an important role in FSH release.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992 Jun
PMID:Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of progesterone on FSH secretion by the anterior pituitary. 161 77


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>