Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04637 (p53)
 77,613 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The p53 tumor suppressor is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that activates transcription in response to DNA damage to promote cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. The p53 protein functions in a tetrameric form in vivo and contains four domains including an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain, a C-terminal regulatory domain, a tetramerization domain, and a central core DNA-binding domain that is the site of the majority of tumor-derived mutations. Here we report the 2.7-A crystal structure of the mouse p53 core domain. Like the human p53 core domain in complex with DNA, the mouse p53 core domain adopts an immunoglobulin-like beta sandwich architecture with a series of loops and short helices at opposite ends of the beta sandwich. Comparison of the DNA-bound and DNA-free p53 core domains reveals that while the central beta sandwich architecture remains largely unchanged, a loop region important for DNA binding undergoes significant rearrangement. Although this loop region mediates major groove DNA contacts in the DNA-bound structure, it adopts a conformation that is incompatible with DNA binding in the DNA-free structure. Interestingly, crystals of the DNA-free core domain contain a noncrystallographic trimer with three nearly identical subunit-subunit (dimer) contacts. These dimer contacts align the p53 core domains in a way that is incompatible with simultaneous DNA binding by both protomers of the dimer. Surprisingly, similar dimer contacts are observed in crystals of the human p53 core domain with DNA in which only one of the three p53 protomers in the asymmetric unit cell is specifically bound to DNA. We propose that the p53 core domain dimer that is seen in the crystals described here represents a physiologically relevant inactive form of p53 that must undergo structural rearrangement for sequence-specific DNA binding.
 ...
PMID:Crystal structure of the mouse p53 core DNA-binding domain at 2.7 A resolution. 1115 81

p73 has been shown to transcriptionally activate genes positively responsive to wild-type p53. In order to undertake a comparative study of functions of p53 and p73 we have cloned the cDNA of p73 from MCF-7 cells. Adenovirus onco-protein E1A inhibits the transactivation by p73; a deletion mutant of E1A incapable of interacting with p300 and CREB-binding protein (CBP) fails to disrupt the transactivation. Furthermore, CBP increases the transactivation mediated by p73 suggesting that CBP may function as a co-activator and E1A inhibits p73-mediated transactivation by sequestering p300 or CBP. We show that p73 can transcriptionally inhibit a number of cellular and viral promoters. However, wild-type p53, p73 alpha and p73 beta differ in their ability to inhibit transcriptional activity of different promoters. While wild-type p53 inhibits the promoters of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early gene, the long terminal repeat of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV LTR), human cyclin A (cyc A) gene, and insulin-like growth factor receptor I (IGF-I-R), p73 alpha only inhibits the HIV LTR and cyc A promoters significantly; and p73 beta inhibits the CMV, HIV LTR and cyc A promoters. A mutant of p73 alpha having amino acid substitutions at positions 268 and 300 on the presumptive DNA-binding domain fails to transactivate the p21 promoter but represses the CMV and the HIV LTR promoter quite efficiently showing that the mechanisms of transactivation and repression by p73 are different. Interestingly, p73 alpha transactivates the IGF-I-R promoter, which is inhibited by wild-type p53; p73 beta has no significant effect on this promoter. This is a unique situation where p73 alpha differs from p73 beta as well as p53.
 ...
PMID:Differential modulation of cellular and viral promoters by p73 and p53. 1117 10

The majority of p53 mutations are located in the DNA-binding domain of the protein. However, recently a family suffering from Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) has been discovered, some of whom harbor a p53 mutation in exon 4, outside of the core domain. How this mutation affects p53 function and subsequently leads to malignant transformation is not yet clear. Interestingly, the p53 mutation found in this LFS family is localized to the p53 region that we have recently identified as necessary for Mdm2-mediated p53 degradation. We therefore endeavored to study further the LFS-associated p53 mutation at the molecular level by creating an equivalent lesion in a p53 expression construct and functionally characterizing it. Here we demonstrate that a mutation in this region is associated not only with resistance of the mutant p53 to Mdm2-mediated degradation, but also with an impaired response of mutant protein to DNA damage. In addition, the p53(LFS) mutant was found to be defective in its transactivation function, which correlated with its inability to suppress cell growth and to induce apoptosis. The molecular basis for p53(LFS) functional impairment appears to be its predominantly cytoplasmic localization caused by faulty nuclear import mechanism, which, at least in part, resulted from the mutant's decreased affinity to importin.
 ...
PMID:Mechanism of functional inactivation of a Li-Fraumeni syndrome p53 that has a mutation outside of the DNA-binding domain. 1124 91

The tumor suppressor p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) binds to the DNA-binding domain of p53 and enhances p53-mediated transcriptional activation. 53BP1 contains two breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 COOH terminus (BRCT) motifs, which are present in several proteins involved in DNA repair and/or DNA damage-signaling pathways. Thus, we investigated the potential role of 53BP1 in DNA damage-signaling pathways. Here, we report that 53BP1 becomes hyperphosphorylated and forms discrete nuclear foci in response to DNA damage. These foci colocalize at all time points with phosphorylated H2AX (gamma-H2AX), which has been previously demonstrated to localize at sites of DNA strand breaks. 53BP1 foci formation is not restricted to gamma-radiation but is also detected in response to UV radiation as well as hydroxyurea, camptothecin, etoposide, and methylmethanesulfonate treatment. Several observations suggest that 53BP1 is regulated by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) after DNA damage. First, ATM-deficient cells show no 53BP1 hyperphosphorylation and reduced 53BP1 foci formation in response to gamma-radiation compared with cells expressing wild-type ATM. Second, wortmannin treatment strongly inhibits gamma-radiation-induced hyperphosphorylation and foci formation of 53BP1. Third, 53BP1 is readily phosphorylated by ATM in vitro. Taken together, these results suggest that 53BP1 is an ATM substrate that is involved early in the DNA damage-signaling pathways in mammalian cells.
 ...
PMID:Tumor suppressor p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is involved in DNA damage-signaling pathways. 1133 10

The DNA polymerase delta catalytic subunit gene (POLD1) was studied as a transcriptional target of p53. Northern blotting showed that a significantly decreased steady-state level of POLD1 mRNA was associated with increased wild-type p53 expression in cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate. When ectopic wild-type p53 expression was induced to a physiologically relevant level in "tet-off" cultured cells in which p53 expression was tightly regulated by tetracycline, it was found that POLD1 steady-state mRNA was repressed by about 65%. Transient cotransfection experiments using a POLD1 promoter luciferase reporter construct showed that: (i) POLD1 promoter activity was inhibited by transfected wild-type p53 plasmid to a maximum of about 86%; (ii) p53 mediated a large part of the transcriptional repression through a sequence-specific interaction with a site identified as the P4 site of the POLD1 promoter; (iii) tumor-derived p53 mutations in the p53 DNA-binding domain completely abolished the p53 transrepression activity. Moreover, transfection assays demonstrated that p53 was able to repress Sp1-stimulated POLD1 promoter activity and that this repression was largely due to the loss of the sequence-specific interaction between Sp1 protein and the P4 Sp1-binding site, which overlaps the P4 p53-binding site. Finally, gel shift assays suggested that p53 competes with Sp1 protein for binding to the P4 sequence of the POLD1 promoter.
 ...
PMID:Transcriptional regulation of the human DNA polymerase delta catalytic subunit gene POLD1 by p53 tumor suppressor and Sp1. 1137 83

We used molecular modeling to study the optimal conformation of the complex between two p53 DNA-binding domain monomers and a 12 base-pair target DNA sequence. The complex was constructed using experimental data on the monomer binding conformation and a new approach to deform the target DNA sequence. Combined with an internal/helicoidal coordinate model of DNA, this approach enables us to bend the target sequence in a controlled way while respecting the contacts formed with each p53 monomer. The results show that the dimeric complex favors DNA bending towards the major groove at the dimer junction by a value close to experimental findings. In contrast to inferences from earlier models, the calculation of key contributions to the free energy of the complexes indicates a determinant role for DNA in the formation of the complex with the dimer of the p53 DNA-binding domains.
 ...
PMID:Modeling multi-component protein-DNA complexes: the role of bending and dimerization in the complex of p53 dimers with DNA. 1139 Oct 15

Suppression of tumor cell growth by p53 results from the activation of both apoptosis and cell cycle arrest functions that have been shown to be separable activities of p53. We report here that some mutants in the p53 hinge domain, a short linker between the DNA binding and tetramerization domains, differentially activated the promoters of p53 target genes and possessed an impaired apoptotic function. Our results indicate that the hinge domain may play an important role in differentially regulating p53 cell cycle arrest and apoptotic functions. However, the mechanisms by which p53 hinge domain mutants differentially activate its target genes, e.g. p21(WAF1/CIP1) and Bax, remain unknown. To investigate the possible mechanisms, recombinant p21(WAF1/CIP1) and Bax promoters were constructed, resulting in rearrangement of the existing p53 binding sites within a given promoter or actually swapping p53 binding sites between the two promoters. Our results suggest that multiple mechanisms of differential transactivation occur, depending on the molecular nature of the relevant hinge domain mutant, such as the possibility that dual separate DNA binding sites in the p21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter are responsible for the selective transactivation activity of p53 hinge domain mutant del300-327, which has a large deletion in the hinge domain. Lack of ideal p53 binding sites in the Bax promoter results in less potent activation than that seen with the p21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter when it is transactivated by hinge domain point mutant mutR306P or short deletion mutant del300-308 proteins. How the single mutation or the short deletion affect the conformation of p53 and consequently the transactivation of the Bax promoter will require further investigation of the relevant p53 protein: DNA-binding domain by NMR and x-ray crystallographic techniques.
 ...
PMID:Mechanisms of differential activation of target gene promoters by p53 hinge domain mutants with impaired apoptotic function. 1139 10

The tumour suppressor gene p53 is extensively studied for its importance in cancer. In its active conformation, p53 is tetrameric and one domain - the tetramerization domain - permits the oligomerization of this protein. Until recently, little attention was given to this domain because, in contrast to the DNA-binding domain, it is not often mutated in cancer. However, various experimental studies have shown evidence that the tetramerization domain is essential for DNA binding, protein-protein interactions, post-translational modifications, and p53 degradation. Moreover, single mutations in the tetramerization domain can inactivate the wild-type protein in a manner similar to that seen with mutations in the DNA-binding domain. Interestingly, the phenotype of several tetramerization domain mutants differs from that observed with DNA-binding domain mutants. In this review, current knowledge about the importance of the tetramerization domain to the function of p53 will be summarized.
 ...
PMID:The role of tetramerization in p53 function. 1142 Jun 72

The p53 protein is the major tumor suppressor in mammals. The discovery of the p53 homologs p63 and p73 defined a family of p53 members with distinct roles in tumor suppression, differentiation, and development. Here, we describe the biochemical characterization of the core DNA-binding domain of a human isoform of p63, p63-delta, and particularly novel features in comparison with p53. In contrast to p53, the free p63 core domain did not show specific binding to p53 DNA consensus sites. However, glutathione S-transferase-fused and thus dimerized p63 and p53 core domains had similar affinity and specificity for the p53 consensus sites p21, gadd45, cyclin G, and bax. Furthermore, the fold of p63 core was remarkably stable compared with p53 as judged by differential scanning calorimetry (T(m) = 61 degrees C versus 44 degrees C for p53) and equilibrium unfolding ([urea](50%) = 5.2 m versus 3.1 m for p53). A homology model of p63 core highlights differences at a segment near the H1 helix hypothetically involved in the formation of the dimerization interface in p53, which might reduce cooperativity of p63 core DNA binding compared with p53. The model also shows differences in the electrostatic and hydrophobic potentials of the domains relevant to folding stability.
 ...
PMID:High thermostability and lack of cooperative DNA binding distinguish the p63 core domain from the homologous tumor suppressor p53. 1147 76

The induction of anti-DNA autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is problematic because mammalian DNA is poorly immunogenic at best. Here we demonstrate a chain of connected antibodies in SLE patient sera that could account for the induction of anti-DNA antibody, and possibly for some of the pathogenic features of SLE. We now report that SLE patients, in addition to anti-DNA, produce antibodies to the carboxy-terminal domain of the tumour suppressor molecule p53; this p53 domain recognizes damaged DNA. Hence, these anti-p53 antibodies could mimic damaged DNA immunologically. Indeed, SLE sera do contain anti-idiotypic antibodies to a prototypic anti-p53 antibody. Moreover, SLE anti-DNA antibodies also recognize this type of anti-p53 antibody. Indeed, binding of affinity-purified anti-DNA both to DNA and to the anti-p53 antibody could be blocked by a p53 peptide derived from the DNA-binding domain. This mimicry of the p53 DNA-binding domain by the SLE anti-DNA antibodies is functional: activation of the p53 molecule could be inhibited by such anti-DNA antibodies. Thus, anti-DNA antibodies may arise in SLE patients by a chain of idiotypic autoimmunity centered around p53 autoimmunity. The SLE anti-DNA and anti-p53 antibodies can functionally block p53 activation, and so could affect apoptosis.
 ...
PMID:Autoimmunity to the p53 protein is a feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) related to anti-DNA antibodies. 1148 38


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>