UNIPROT:P04637 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UNIPROT:P04637 (p53)
77,613 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The process of angiogenic switching is one of the most important factors in the growth and development of breast tumors. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF) is considered to be the most important directly acting angiogenic protein that has been shown to be up-regulated in breast cancer cells. Hypoxia seems to be an important stimulus for inducing VPF/VEGF mRNA expression in human mammary tumors. Here, we have studied the roles of the tumor suppressor gene p53 and the proto-oncogene c-Src in regulating the transcription of VPF/VEGF in breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB 435 under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. p53 significantly inhibited the transcription of VPF/VEGF involving the transcription factor Sp1. Increased binding of Sp1 to the VPF/VEGF promoter has been observed when the cells were exposed to hypoxia. It has been shown that p53 makes a complex with Sp1 and inhibits its binding to the VPF/VEGF promoter to prevent the transcriptional activation. Furthermore, c-Src kinase activity was found to be increased in the hypoxic condition, and in the presence of antisense of Src, there was down-regulation of the total mRNA level and also the promoter activity of VPF/VEGF. The present study indicates that p53 can also inhibit the hypoxic induction of Src kinase activity and thereby may prevent VPF/VEGF transcription. Taken together, our data suggest a central role of p53, through which it can inhibit VPF/VEGF expression by regulating the transcriptional activity of Sp1 and also by down-regulating the Src kinase activity, under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions.
...
PMID:Central role of p53 on regulation of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF) expression in mammary carcinoma. 1155 75

The X-gene product of hepatitis B virus (HBx) has been implicated in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma through its ability to induce liver cancer in some transgenic mice and to transactivate a variety of viral and cellular promoters. In this study, we demonstrated that the level of p21(waf1) RNA was decreased in the HBx-expressing cells and this effect was due to the transcriptional repression of the p21(waf1) gene by HBx via a p53-independent pathway. As the Sp1 binding sites of the p21(waf1) promoter were sufficient to confer HBx responsiveness to a previously non-responsive promoter, we suggested that HBx represses the transcription of p21(waf1) by downregulating the activity of Sp1. Because the tumor repressor p21(waf1) protein is a universal inhibitor of cyclin-CDK complexes and DNA replication that induces cell cycle arrest at the G1-S checkpoint, the repression of p21(waf1) by HBx might play an important role in a HBV-mediated pathogenesis.
...
PMID:Transcriptional repression of p21(waf1) promoter by hepatitis B virus X protein via a p53-independent pathway. 1157 65

The death receptor 5 (DR5) is a receptor for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and is able to induce apoptosis in various tumor cells. The expression of DR5 is up-regulated at the transcriptional level by p53, genotoxic stress and so on. To investigate the structure of the DR5 gene promoter, we screened and sequenced a genomic clone containing the 5'-flanking region of the DR5 gene. RNase protection assays showed two major transcription start sites around -122 and -137 upstream of the translation initiation codon ATG. Transient transfections with serial 5'-deletion mutants identified the minimal promoter element spanning -198 to -116. Site-directed mutagenesis demonstrated that the DR5 gene promoter has no typical TATA-box, but has two Sp1 sites responsible for the basal transcription activity of the DR5 gene promoter.
...
PMID:Promoter structure and transcription initiation sites of the human death receptor 5/TRAIL-R2 gene. 1169 76

IEX-1, a recently discovered early response gene, regulates cell growth and apoptosis. IEX-1 gene expression is regulated by a variety of factors such as x-irradiation, ultraviolet radiation, steroids, growth factors, and inflammatory stimuli. By systematic examination of the IEX-1 promoter, we show that IEX-1 gene expression is controlled by multiple conserved gene regulatory elements and that IEX-1 is a downstream target of the p53 tumor suppressor and Sp1. In addition, p300, Sox, nuclear factor-kappaB, and AP4 appear to be modulators of IEX-1 gene expression to a lesser degree. We found that there is at least one Sp1 element that functions as an activator and contributes to high basal transcriptional levels of the IEX-1 gene. We demonstrate the presence of a p53 response element that represses IEX-1 promoter activity in HaCaT keratinocytes, indicating that Sp1 and p53 have opposite effects on IEX-1 gene expression. We conclude that IEX-1 expression in cells is regulated by the p53 tumor suppressor and Sp1, thus providing a direct mechanism for control of cell proliferation.
...
PMID:Divergent regulation of the growth-promoting gene IEX-1 by the p53 tumor suppressor and Sp1. 1184 88

Siah-1, the human homologue of Drosophila seven in absentia, is related to apoptosis and tumor suppression. Although it was reported that the expression of Siah-1 is induced by p53 and p21/WAF1, little is known about the transcriptional regulation of the Siah-1 gene. To investigate the transcriptional regulation, we isolated and sequenced the genomic fragment of the Siah-1 promoter region. The Siah-1 promoter has no typical TATA box or CCAAT box. Transient transfection assays using reporter plasmids in which the promoter region of the Siah-1 gene was deleted or mutated showed that one Sp1 site was responsible for the basal promoter activity. In Northern blotting analysis, the expression of the Siah-1 gene was upregulated by p53, but activation of the reporter plasmid by the p53 co-transfection assay was not shown, suggesting that a p53 responsive element does not exist in the promoter region we examined in this study but might be present in another region.
...
PMID:The characterization of the human Siah-1 promoter(1). 1185 84

Sodium butyrate (NaB), a dietary micronutrient, is a potent growth inhibitor that initiates cell differentiation in many cell types, including prostate cancer cells. The molecular mechanisms by which these effects occur remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of NaB on the expression of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3, a known growth regulator, in two human prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3 and LNCaP). Treatment with NaB (0-10 mM) caused a dose-dependent stimulation of IGFBP-3 mRNA expression and parallel increases in protein levels. A specific histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) similarly induced IGFBP-3 expression, indicating that histone hyperacetylation may be critical in the regulation of IGFBP-3 expression. To investigate the molecular mechanism of NaB-regulated IGFBP-3 expression, 1.87 kb of the human IGFBP-3 gene promoter was cloned into the pGL2-basic luciferase reporter vector. In both PC-3 and LNCaP cells, NaB (10 mM) significantly increased luciferase activity 20- to 30-fold, compared with the untreated control. However, using 5' sequential deletion constructs of the IGFBP-3 promoter, the NaB response sequences in the IGFBP-3 promoter were different in PC-3 and LNCaP cells. Our studies identified a region, -75 to +69 from the start of transcription (+1), that is fully inducible by NaB treatment in LNCaP cells, but not in PC-3 cells. Unlike other well characterized NaB-regulated genes, Sp1 DNA sequences are not involved in NaB up-regulation of IGFBP-3 gene in LNCaP cells. Further deletion studies identified two independent regions critical for NaB-induced transactivation in LNCaP cells. These regions contain consensus binding sites for p53 and GATA, respectively, but mutational analyses and gel shift assays suggested that, while the p53 response element is required for NaB responsiveness, neither p53 nor GATA are involved. In summary, we have demonstrated that 1) NaB significantly up-regulates IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein levels in PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells; and 2) novel butyrate- responsive elements lacking consensus Sp1 sites are used in LNCaP cells.
...
PMID:Differential activation of the IGF binding protein-3 promoter by butyrate in prostate cancer cells. 1195 60

MDM2 protein is thought to exhibit tumorigenic activity by binding to the p53 tumor-suppressor protein and inhibiting its function. Alternatively, MDM2 may have oncogenic roles other than those resulting from p53 interactions. Here we report that MDM2 can induce expression of the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB, which is an anti-apoptotic factor expressed in certain neoplastic cells in response to chemotherapy. Initially, we noted that the overexpression of MDM2 protein in leukemic bone marrow cells of patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), and an ALL cell line (EU-4) transfected with the MDM2 gene was associated with elevated expression of p65 and in vitro resistance to doxorubicin (Adriamycin). By cotransfection of the MDM2 gene and p65-promoter-reporter constructs into EU-4 cells, we found that transient and high-level MDM2 expression induced p65 promoter activity. In the presence of wild-type (wt) p53, MDM2 increased p65 promoter activity by reversing p53-mediated suppression of p65. In the absence of p53, MDM2 directly increased p65 promoter activity. Deletion and mutation analysis of the p65 promoter indicated that the region between nt -575 and -178, which contains the first and second Sp1-binding sites, was required for activation by MDM2. Further studies using chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that MDM2 was able to directly bind to the Sp1 site of the p65 promoter. Our findings suggest that by inducing p65 expression, MDM2 has a p53-independent role in tumorigenesis, which may further elucidate the association between MDM2 overexpression and resistant disease in childhood ALL.
...
PMID:MDM2 induces NF-kappaB/p65 expression transcriptionally through Sp1-binding sites: a novel, p53-independent role of MDM2 in doxorubicin resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 1196 5

The cdc25C phosphatase participates in regulating transition from the G2 phase of the cell cycle to mitosis by dephosphorylating cyclin-dependent kinase 1. The tumor suppressor p53 down-regulates expression of cdc25C as part of G2/M checkpoint control. Transcription of cdc25C oscillates during the cell cycle with no expression in resting cells and maximum transcription in G2. We had identified earlier a new mechanism of cell cycle-dependent transcription that is regulated by a cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) in conjunction with a cell cycle genes homology region (CHR). The human cdc25C gene was the first example. CDE/CHR tandem elements have since been found in promoters of many cell cycle genes. Here we show that the mouse cdc25C gene is regulated by a CHR but does not hold a CDE. Therefore, it is the first identified gene with CHR-dependent transcriptional regulation during the cell cycle not relying on a CDE located upstream of it. The CHR leads to repression of cdc25C transcription early in the cell cycle and directs a release of this repression in G2. Furthermore, we find that this CHR can cooperate in cell cycle-dependent transcription with elements placed directly upstream of it binding E2F, Sp1 or Sp3 transcription factors.
...
PMID:A single cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) controls cell cycle-dependent transcription of the cdc25C phosphatase gene and is able to cooperate with E2F or Sp1/3 sites. 1197 34

Granulocytes and monocytes develop from a common myeloid progenitor. Early granulopoiesis requires the C/EBPalpha, PU.1, RAR, CBF, and c-Myb transcription factors, and terminal neutrophil differentiation is dependent upon C/EBPepsilon, PU.1, Sp1, CDP, and HoxA10. Monopoiesis can be induced by Maf-B, c-Jun, or Egr-1 and is dependent upon PU.1, Sp1, and ICSBP. Signals eminating from cytokine receptors modulate factor activities but do not determine cell fates. Orchestration of the myeloid developmental program is achieved via cooperative gene regulation, via synergistic and inhibitory protein-protein interactions, via promoter auto-regulation and cross-regulation, via regulation of factor levels, and via induction of cell cycle arrest: For example, c-Myb and C/EBPalpha cooperate to activate the mim-1 and NE promoters, PU.1, C/EBPalpha, and CBF, regulate the NE, MPO, and M-CSF Receptor genes. PU.1:GATA-1 interaction and C/EBP suppression of FOG transcription inhibits erythroid and megakaryocyte gene expression. c-Jun:PU.1, ICSBP:PU.1, and perhaps Maf:Jun complexes induce monocytic genes. PU.1 and C/EBPalpha activate their own promoters, C/EBPalpha rapidly induces PU.1 and C/EBPepsilon RNA expression, and RARalpha activates the C/EBPepsilon promoter. Higher levels of PU.1 are required for monopoiesis than for B-lymphopoiesis, and higher C/EBP levels may favor granulopoiesis over monopoiesis. CBF and c-Myb stimulate proliferation whereas C/EBPalpha induces a G1/S arrest; cell cycle arrest is required for terminal myelopoiesis, perhaps due to expression of p53 or hypo-phosphorylated Rb.
...
PMID:Transcriptional regulation of granulocyte and monocyte development. 1203 76

During adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 productive infections, the p19 promoter of AAV is activated by the AAV Rep78 and Rep68 proteins. Rep-induced activation of p19 depends on the presence of one of several redundant Rep binding elements (RBEs) within the p5 promoter or within the terminal repeats (TR). In the absence of the TR, the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site at position -50 are essential for p19 transactivation. To determine how a Rep complex bound at p5 induces transcription at p19, we made a series of p19 promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs in which the p5 RBE was inserted at different locations upstream or downstream of the p19 mRNA start site. The RBE acted like a repressor element at most positions in the presence of both Rep and adenovirus (Ad), and the level of repression increased dramatically as the RBE was inserted closer to the p19 promoter. We concluded that the RBE by itself was not a conventional upstream activation signal and instead behaved like a repressor. To understand how the Rep-RBE complex within p5 activated p19, we considered the possibility that its role was to function as an architectural protein whose purpose was to bring other p5 transcriptional elements to the p19 promoter. In order to address this possibility, we replaced both the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site with GAL4 binding sites. The modified GAL4-containing constructs were cotransfected with plasmids that expressed GAL4 fusion proteins capable of interacting through p53 and T-antigen (T-ag) protein domains. In the presence of Ad and the GAL4 fusion proteins, the p19 promoter exhibited strong transcriptional activation that was dependent on both the GAL4 fusion proteins and Ad infection. This suggested that the primary role of the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 sites was to act as a scaffold for bringing transcription complexes in the p5 promoter into close proximity with the p19 promoter. Since Rep and Sp1 themselves were not essential for transactivation, we tested mutants within the other p5 transcriptional elements in the context of GAL4-induced looping to determine which of the other p5 elements was necessary for p19 induction. Mutation of the p5 major late-transcription factor site reduced p19 activity but did not eliminate induction in the presence of the GAL4 fusion proteins. However, mutation of the p5 YY1 site at position -60 (YY1-60) eliminated GAL4-induced transactivation. This implicated the YY1-60 protein complexes in p19 induction by Rep. In addition, both basal p19 activity and activity in the presence of Ad increased when the YY1-60 site was mutated even in the absence of Rep or GAL4 fusion proteins. Therefore, there are likely to be alternative p5-p19 interactions that are Rep independent in which the YY1-60 complex inhibits p19 transcription. We concluded that transcriptional control of the p19 promoter was dependent on the formation of complexes between the p5 and p19 promoters and that activation of the p19 promoter depends largely on the ability of Rep and Sp1 to form a scaffold that positions the p5 YY1 complex near the p19 promoter.
...
PMID:Studies of the mechanism of transactivation of the adeno-associated virus p19 promoter by Rep protein. 1213 28

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>