Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04637 (p53)
 77,613 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cisplatin is among the most widely used broadly active cytotoxic anticancer drugs; however, its clinical efficacy is often limited by primary or the development of secondary resistance. Several mechanisms have been implicated in cisplatin resistance, including reduced drug uptake, increased cellular thiol/folate levels and increased DNA repair. More recently, additional pathways have been characterized indicating that altered expression of oncogenes that subsequently limit the formation of cisplatin-DNA adducts and activate anti-apoptotic pathways may also contribute to the resistance phenotype. Several lines of evidence suggest that expression of ras oncogenes can confer resistance to cisplatin by reducing drug uptake and increasing DNA repair; however, this is not a uniform finding. Tumor cells, in contrast to normal cells, respond to cisplatin exposure with transient gene expression to protect or repair their chromosomes. The c-fos/AP-1 complex, a master switch for turning on other genes in response to DNA-damaging agents, has been shown to play a major role in cisplatin resistance. In addition, AP-2 transcription factors, modulated by protein kinase A, are also implicated in cisplatin resistance by regulating genes encoding for DNA polymerase beta and metallothionines. Furthermore, considerable evidence indicates that mutated p53 plays a significant role in the development of cisplatin resistance since several genes implicated in drug resistance and apoptosis (e.g. mismatch repair, bcl-2, high mobility group proteins, DNA polymerases alpha and beta, PCNA, and insulin-like growth factor) are known to be regulated by the p53 oncoprotein. Improved understanding of molecular factors for the development of cisplatin resistance may allow the prediction of clinical response to cisplatin-based treatment. Furthermore, the identification of oncogenes involved in cisplatin resistance has already led to in vitro approaches which successfully inactivated these genes using ribozymes or antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, thus restoring cisplatin sensitivity. It is conceivable that these strategies, once transferred to a clinical setting, may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of cisplatin against a great variety of malignancies and thus more fully exploit the antineoplastic and curative potential of this drug.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatin resistance and oncogenes--a review. 1089 36

Peripheral neuropathy following cisplatin treatment is a major limiting factor in cisplatin chemotherapy of cancer patients. We investigated the pathomechanism underlying cisplatin neuropathy using a mouse dorsal root ganglion neuron-neuroblastoma hybrid cell line (N18D3) developed in our laboratory. DNA fragmentation, a characteristic feature of apoptosis, was induced in hybrid neurons following treatment with cisplatin. Accumulation of p53, Fas, and Fas ligand (Fas-L) was also demonstrated in these neurons. Preincubation with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a precursor of glutathione, blocked cisplatin-induced apoptosis completely, whereas Trolox, a vitamin E analogue, blocked it partially. Cisplatin-induced p53 accumulation was suppressed by NAC treatment, whereas p53 accumulation was retarded by Trolox treatment. In contrast, neither NAC nor Trolox showed any inhibitory effect on cisplatin-induced Fas/Fas-L accumulation. These results suggest that the neuroprotective effects of antioxidants against cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity in hybrid neurons are mediated mainly through the inhibition of p53 accumulation but not of Fas/Fas-L accumulation by these antioxidants.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatin-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse hybrid neurons is blocked by antioxidants through suppression of cisplatin-mediated accumulation of p53 but not of Fas/Fas ligand. 1093 75

cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) or cisplatin is a DNA-damaging agent that is widely used in cancer chemotherapy. Cisplatin cross-links to DNA, forming intra- and interstrand adducts, which bend and unwind the duplex and attract high-mobility-group domain and other proteins. Presumably due to a shielding effect caused by these proteins, the cisplatin-modified DNA is poorly repaired. The resulting DNA damage triggers cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Although it is still debatable whether the clinical success of cisplatin relies primarily on its ability to trigger apoptosis, at least two distinct pathways have been proposed to contribute to cisplatin-induced apoptosis in vitro. One involves the tumour-suppressor protein p53, the other is mediated by the p53-related protein p73. Coupling cisplatin damage to apoptosis requires mismatch repair activity, and recent observations further suggest involvement of the homologous recombinatorial repair system. At present it is generally accepted that abortive attempts to repair the DNA lesions play a key role in the cytotoxicity of the drug, and loss of the mismatch repair activity is known to cause cisplatin resistance, a major problem in antineoplastic therapy. Clearly, a better understanding of the signalling networks involved in cisplatin toxicity should provide a rational basis for the development of new therapeutic strategies.
 ...
PMID:Molecular mechanisms involved in cisplatin cytotoxicity. 1102 15

Cisplatin-centered chemotherapy is a key treatment for ovarian cancer, but resistance to chemotherapeutic agents remains a major cause of treatment failure. Multiple factors are known to contribute to the development of this chemoresistance. Although it has been demonstrated that X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (Xiap) prevents apoptosis by inhibiting effector caspases, if and how it is important in chemoresistance in ovarian cancer has not been studied. The effects of Xiap down-regulation and/or restoration of wild type p53 by recombinant adenovirus infection were examined on four ovarian epithelial cancer cell lines [C13*, A2780-s (wild type p53), A2780-cp (mutant p53), and SKOV3 (null p53)]. Apoptosis and protein expression (e.g., Xiap, caspase-3, p53, MDM2, and p21waf1) were assessed by Hoechst 33258 stain and Western blot, respectively. We demonstrated that Xiap down-regulation following adenoviral antisense expression induces apoptosis in the wild-type p53 cells, but not in the mutated or null cells. Xiap down-regulation resulted in caspase-3 activation, caspase-mediated MDM2 processing, and p53 accumulation. Restoration of wild type p53 in the p53-mutated or -null cells significantly enhanced the proapoptotic effect of Xiap antisense expression. Down-regulation of Xiap induced apoptosis in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells, a process dependent on p53 status.
 ...
PMID:Down-regulation of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein induces apoptosis in chemoresistant human ovarian cancer cells. 1105 57

A nonhistone chromosomal protein, high mobility group (HMG) 1, is ubiquitous in higher eukaryotic cells and binds preferentially to cisplatin-modified DNA. HMG1 also functions as a coactivator of p53, a tumor suppressor protein. We investigated physical interactions between HMG1 and p53 and the influence of p53 on the ability of HMG1 to recognize damaged DNA. Using immunochemical coprecipitation, we observed binding of HMG1 and p53. Interaction between HMG1 and p53 required the HMG A box of HMG1 and amino acids 363-376 of p53. Cisplatin-modified DNA binding by HMG1 was significantly enhanced by p53. An HMG1-specific antibody that recognized the A box of this protein also stimulated cisplatin-modified DNA binding. These data suggest that an interaction with either p53 or antibody may induce conformational change in the HMG1 A box that optimizes DNA binding by HMG1. Interaction of p53 with HMG1 after DNA damage may promote activation of specific HMG1 binding to damaged DNA in vivo and provide a molecular link between DNA damage and p53-mediated DNA repair.
 ...
PMID:Interaction with p53 enhances binding of cisplatin-modified DNA by high mobility group 1 protein. 1110 54

The levels of the human checkpoint gene hCHK1 were measured in human cancer cells growing in vitro after treatment with the DNA damaging agent cis-dichlorodiammine platinum(II) (DDP). Treatment of human cancer cell lines with DDP induced a decrease in the hCHK1 protein levels starting 6 h after treatment, with a further decline at 24 and 48 h. A similar decrease in the levels of hCHK1 was found at the mRNA level by using Northern blot analysis. By using isogenic cell systems in which p53 was disrupted either by transfection with HPV-E6 or by targeted homologous recombination, we found that the DNA damage-induced down-regulation of hCHK1 was only observable in wild type p53-expressing cells, with only a minor decline in the hCHK1 levels observable 48 h after treatment in cells with disrupted p53. Similarly, treatment of mutant p53-expressing human cancer cell lines with DDP did not result in changes in the levels of hCHK1. The p53-dependent down-regulation of hCHK1 is likely to be at transcriptional levels, as suggested by the lack of down-regulation of the hCHK1 when transfected under the control of a heterologous viral promoter. In addition, p53 is able to down-regulate the luciferase activity under the control of the 5' flanking region of the hCHK1 gene. The data suggest a strict link between p53 and hCHK1 governing the activation and repression of the G(2) checkpoint in which both proteins participate.
 ...
PMID:DNA Damage Induces p53-dependent Down-regulation of hCHK1. 1115 53

This study examined how the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system and p53 interact to maintain genomic integrity in the presence of the mutagenic stress induced by cisplatin (DDP). Sensitivity to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effect of DDP was assessed using a panel of sublines of the MMR-deficient HCT116 colon carcinoma cells in which MMR function had been restored by transfer of a copy of MLH1 on chromosome 3 or in which p53 function had been disabled by expression of HPV-16 E6. Loss of p53 function by expression of E6 in MMR-proficient HCT116+ ch3 cells conferred only 1.1-2.0-fold resistance to a panel of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, whereas disruption of p53 in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells resulted in substantial levels of resistance to some agents (paclitaxel, 1.9-fold; gemcitabine, 2.7-fold; 6-thioguanine, 3.3-fold; and etoposide, 4.4-fold) but sensitization to other agents (topotecan, 2.5-fold; and DDP, 3.3-fold). Loss of MMR or p53 alone had only a minor effect on sensitivity to the mutagenic effect of DDP as measured by the appearance of variants resistant to 6-thioguanine, etoposide, topotecan, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in the population 10 days later (1.0-2.4-fold), whereas loss of both p53 and MMR had a more profound effect (1.7-6.5-fold). Loss of both p53 and MMR increased the basal frequency insertion/deletion mutations detected by a shuttle vector-based assay to a greater extent than loss of either alone. In association with DDP-induced injury, loss of p53 or MMR alone resulted in 1.2- and 1.7-fold more mutations, whereas loss of both resulted in a 5.1-fold increase in mutant frequency. Examination of the impact of loss of p53 and/or MMR on the DDP-induced cell cycle checkpoint activation, p53 induction, ability of the cell to tolerate adducts in its DNA, and the rate of disappearance of platinum from genomic DNA indicated the effects of the loss of p53 and/or MMR on all of these parameters, suggesting a multifactorial etiology for the changes in sensitivity to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of DDP. These results indicate that p53 and MMR can cooperate to control sensitivity to the cytotoxic effect of DDP and to limit its mutagenic potential in the colon cancer cells.
 ...
PMID:P53 modulates the effect of loss of DNA mismatch repair on the sensitivity of human colon cancer cells to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of cisplatin. 1124 58

To develop a novel therapeutic strategy for ovarian cancer, we constructed a recombinant adenovirus which highly expresses pro-apoptotic Bax protein and examined its therapeutic effect on a series of ovarian cancer cell lines: A2780, A2780/cDDP, OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3. A recombinant adenovirus carrying the Bax-alpha gene (AxCALNKYbax) induced high expression of the Bax-alpha protein in all the cell lines. The cytotoxic effect of Bax was observed in three ovarian cancer cell lines: the per cent reduction in the number of cells was 40.0% for cisplatin-sensitive A2780, 50.0% for cisplatin-resistant A2780/cDDP, and 64.8% for marginally cisplatin-resistant OVCAR-3. In contrast, it was only 12.3% for cisplatin-resistant SK-OV-3. Cisplatin-resistant A2780/cDDP had a p53 mutation and exhibited attenuated Bax induction after cisplatin treatment, which may explain why supplementation of Bax was effective in this chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Combination with cisplatin or paclitaxel enhanced the cytotoxic effect of Bax induction in all but one cell line including cisplatin-resistant A2780/cDDP. It appears that adenovirus-mediated Bax induction, with or without combination with conventional chemotherapy, useful strategy for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:Combination effect of adenovirus-mediated pro-apoptotic bax gene transfer with cisplatin or paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer cell lines. 1126 64

Posttranslational modifications of p53 induced by two widely used anticancer agents, cisplatinum (DDP) and taxol were investigated in two human cancer cell lines. Although both drugs were able to induce phosphorylation at serine 20 (Ser20), only DDP treatment induced p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 (Ser15). Moreover, both drug treatments were able to increase p53 levels and consequently the transcription of waf1 and mdm-2 genes, although DDP treatment resulted in a stronger inducer of both genes. Using two ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) cell lines, the role of ATM in drug-induced p53 phosphorylations was investigated. No differences in drug-induced p53 phosphorylation could be observed, indicating that ATM is not the kinase involved in these phosphorylation events. In addition, inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase activity by wortmannin did not abolish p53 phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser20, again indicating that DNA-PK is unlikely to be the kinase involved. After both taxol and DDP treatments, an activation of hCHK2 was found and this is likely to be responsible for phosphorylation at Ser20. In contrast, only DDP was able to activate ATR, which is the candidate kinase for phosphorylation of Ser15 by this drug. This data clearly suggests that differential mechanisms are involved in phosphorylation and activation of p53 depending on the drug type.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatinum and taxol induce different patterns of p53 phosphorylation. 1132 11

The relationship between apoptosis and chemosensitivity remains complex. We tested the chemosensitivity of 45 patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) ex vivo against anthracyclines (A: doxorubicin, epirubicin), taxanes (T: paclitaxel, docetaxel), cisplatin (DDP) and CMF and any correlation with the expression of p53, Bcl-2 and apoptosis. Viable cells were processed for ex vivo ATP Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay (ATP-TCA). Immunohistochemistry was performed in corresponding tumor samples. Apoptosis prior to chemotherapy was assayed using a TUNEL Test. Of 45 BC tested, 18 (40%) were p53+ and 37 (82%) showed high Bcl-2 expression. Apoptosis was detected in 29 (64.4%) specimens. The Ex vivo Response Rate (EVRR) for T was 75.6% in all cases. This was the highest rate among the 4 drugs tested followed by CMF (66.7%). For A and DDP the positive rates were lower (27.6% and 10.6%, respectively). A significant correlation (r = 0.589, p < or = 0.01) was found between tumors which were sensitive to A and DDP. There was no association between chemosensitivity and apoptosis. Moreover tests for p53 and Bcl-2 did not show a correlation to ex vivo chemosensitivity. Pretreatment apoptotic parameters are unlikely to predict the individual response of breast cancer to antineoplastic agents.
 ...
PMID:Lack of correlation between P53 expression, BCL-2 expression, apoptosis and ex vivo chemosensitivity in advanced human breast cancer. 1132 70


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>