Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04637 (p53)
 77,613 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Esophageal cancer is an important problem in the United States. It results in more deaths (over 10,000 annually) than rectal cancer. Furthermore, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing at a rate faster than that of nearly any other cancer and the reasons for the increase are not well understood. A variety of tumor-suppressor genes (including p53, APC, DCC and Rb) and proto-oncogenes (including prad1, EGFR, c-erb-2 and TGF alpha) may be involved in the development and progression of esophageal cancer. Clinical prognostic factors include stage, Karnofsky performance status, sex, age, anatomic location of the tumor, and degree of weight loss. A new staging system based on depth of wall penetration and lymph node involvement correlates well with prognosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy. Newer staging procedures including endoscopic ultrasound as well as the use of minimally invasive surgery, such as thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, may allow accurate staging without esophagectomy. Surgical resection provides excellent palliation; however, the chance for cure with esophagectomy alone is only 10% to 20%. Adjuvant treatment with pre- or postesophagectomy radiation may improve local-regional control but does not improve survival. Nor has preoperative chemotherapy been shown to improve survival; however, it remains an active area of investigation. Multimodality therapy, namely, chemotherapy and radiation (chemoradiation), given concurrently prior to surgical resection shows promise, with one study indicating a 5-year survival of 34%. A complete pathologic response to chemoradiation correlates with improved survival. Chemoradiation has been shown to be superior to radiation as primary management of esophageal cancer. There has been no successfully completed randomized trial of surgery versus definitive radiation or chemoradiation. However, chemoradiation represents a reasonable alternative to esophagectomy in the primary management of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and chemoradiation also appears to be effective in the treatment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, offering significant palliation and a chance for long-term survival as well. Randomized studies of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery or versus chemoradiation alone are needed. The treatment of advanced esophageal cancer must be directed toward palliation of symptoms. Newer endoscopic techniques, including the use of expansile metal stents, laser ablation, intraluminal high-dose rate brachytherapy, BICAP tumor probe, or photodynamic therapy, offer selected patients short-term palliation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Esophageal cancer. 753 69

The p53 family regulates cell-cycle arrest, triggers apoptosis or is involved in repair of DNA damage. In the present study, we analysed the expression of some p53 family proteins and their responses to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in cases of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We immunohistochemically investigated the relationship between p53, p53R2, and p21 expression in biopsy specimens of untreated primary tumours and their clinical and histological responses to CRT in 62 patients with ESCC. Chemoradiation therapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin and 40 Gy of radiation. The rates of clinical and histological responses (complete or partial) to CRT were 71.0% (clinical) and 52.8% (histological). The rate of positive expression was 43.5% for p53, 37.1% for p53R2, and 54.8% for p21 expression. Statistically significant correlations were found between p53 or p53R2 expression and favourable response to CRT (P=0.0001 or 0.041 clinical, P=0.016 or 0.0018 histological, respectively). Furthermore, in p53-negative tumours, CRT was more effective in tumours with p53R2 negative expression than those with p53R2 positive expression (P=0.0014). We demonstrated that the negative expression of p53 and p53R2 expression was closely related to the effect of CRT and should predict the CRT outcome in patients with ESCC.
 ...
PMID:The predictive value of p53, p53R2, and p21 for the effect of chemoradiation therapy on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 1565 47

Chemoradiation therapy (CRT), a combination of X-ray irradiation and anticancer agents as a radiosensitizer, has been found to be an effective treatment for esophageal cancer and has been linked to p53 genetics. The p53 gene family regulates cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis and DNA damage repair. A recently identified ribonucleotide reductase, p53R2, is directly regulated by p53 in the supply of nucleotides for repairing damaged DNA. In the present study, we investigated the improvement in radiosensitivity of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cell lines using p53R2 small interfering RNA (siRNA). p53R2 expression in ESCC cells (TE-8) with or without transfection of p53R2 siRNA was examined by Western blot analysis and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The radiosensitivity of TE-8 cells was also measured by cell survival assay. In addition, we investigated the relationship between the expression of p53R2 mRNA in the biopsy specimens of untreated primary tumors and the efficacy of CRT, using RT-PCR. The expression of p53R2 was amplified after X-ray irradiation (14 Gy) and diminished after X-ray irradiation following the transfection of p53R2 siRNA in TE-8 cells. The radiosensitivity of the TE-8 cells significantly improved following the transfection of p53R2 siRNA. In the clinical study, a significantly lower p53R2 mRNA expression was detected in the effective response cases. We demonstrated that p53R2 is associated with the radiosensitivity of ESCC cell lines, and that p53R2 expression is reduced after X-ray irradiation following the transfection of p53R2 siRNA. This protocol could potentially improve the efficacy of radiation therapy.
 ...
PMID:Improvement in radiosensitivity using small interfering RNA targeting p53R2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 1767 2

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a very rare but aggressive tumor. Angiosarcoma of the scalp is very rare, and a review of the world literature revealed less than 60 cases. Here, the author reports a case of poorly differentiated angiosarcoma of the scalp. The pathological diagnosis was very difficult. A 70-year-old Japanase man was admitted to our hospital complaining of red mass of the scalp. An excisional biopsy was done. The biopsy showed proliferation of malignant spindle cells in the dermis. Apparent differentiation was not recognized. Invasion into the lateral dermis and subcutis was recognized. There were many mitotic figures and a few foci of necrosis. The size was 2 x 2 x 3 cm. Intracytoplasmic vacuoles were recognized in the malignant tumor cells in some places. A few vague vasoformative features were recognized in one very small area. Immunohistochemically, the malignant spindle cells were positive for factor VIII-related antigen (F-VIII-RA), Ulex lectin, CD31, CD34, vimentin, p53 protein. The Ki-67 labeling was 76%. In contrast, the tumor cells were negative for cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen, desmin, S100 protein, alpha-smooth muscle antigen, bcl-2, melanosome, and myoglobin. The intracytoplasmic vacuoles were strongly positive for F-VIII-RA, Ulex lectin, CD31, and CD34, The abortive vasoformative channels were moderately positive for these endothelial markers. A pathologic diagnosis of angiosarcoma of the scalp was made. Chemoradiation and immunotherapy were performed. However, the tumor recurred several times, and ultimately metastasized to the systemic bones and lungs. The patient died of systemic carcinomatosis 33 months after the first manifestation.
 ...
PMID:Fatal poorly differentiated angiosarcoma of the scalp. 2060 36

Adenocarcinoma accounts for 10-25% of all cervical cancers, and its relative and absolute rate has raised over the past decades. Most, but not all the authors, reported that adenocarcinoma has a greater propensity to lymph node, ovarian and distant metastases and a worse prognosis compared with squamous cell carcinoma. However, whether histologic type is an independent prognostic factor is still a debated issue. Moreover, adenocarcinoma is a very heterogenous disease, including different histological subtypes. Whereas radical hysterectomy and definitive radiotherapy achieve the same clinical outcome in early stage squamous cell carcinoma, surgery seems to obtain better survival compared with definitive radiotherapy in early stage adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer regardless of histologic type, although several retrospective studies showed that patients with adenocarcinoma were more likely to die than those with squamous cell carcinoma both before and after concurrent chemoradiation era. The prognostic relevance of biological variables, such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p53, cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2], cell surface tyrosine-kinases and programmed death-ligand [PD-L1], is still under investigation. Palliative chemotherapy is the only treatment option for persistent or recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma not amenable with surgery and radiotherapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as a therapeutic strategy targeting cell surface tyrosine kinases should be adequately explored in this clinical setting.
 ...
PMID:Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Pathologic features, treatment options, clinical outcome and prognostic variables. 3081 39