Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04626 (erbB-2)
 5,251 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In the medical literature there are frequently conflicting reports on the utility of biological tumour markers available in the clinical management of breast cancer. In this review we analyse current information on the relationships between the most widely investigated breast cancer biological markers including oestrogen and progesterone receptors, p53, Bcl-2, c-erbB-2, cyclin expression, proliferative activity, DNA ploidy and the urokinase plasminogen activation system, as well as their relevance to prognosis and response to clinical treatment. By biological prognostic indicator, we mean a marker that correlates with survival and disease-free survival; the term predictor marker indicates a marker that is capable of predicting tumour sensitivity or resistance to various therapies. Similarly to other authors' experiences, our analysis suggests that oestrogen receptors are weak prognostic indicators and good predictors of response to endocrine therapy. Furthermore, there are consistent data suggesting that proliferation indices are good indicators of prognosis, and that they are directly related to response to chemotherapy and closely related to response to hormonotherapy. On the contrary, there is no evidence or conflicting data for all of the other biological markers. These should be considered in the context of randomized trials in order to precisely define their prognostic and predictive roles. p53 and c-erbB-2 seem to be the most promising factors, but their use in routine practice still needs validation.
 ...
PMID:Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers. 985 25

The mammary gland seems to be the only organ that is not fully developed at birth. Estrogens stimulate breast tissue via estrogen receptors (ERs). In the mammary gland, ER-mediated mechanisms have been shown to regulate: various growth factors, such as TGF-alpha and TGF-beta; enzymes, such as cathepsin D and plasminogen-activator; proto-oncogenes, such as c-fos, c-myc and HER-2/neu; cyclines and other regulatory substances that provide signaling systems for cell division and differentiation; other steroid receptors and epidermal growth factor receptors. Estrogen target genes contain estrogen-responsive elements. In these genes, transcription will be activated through interaction with the estrogen/ER protein complex. Subsequent activation of proto-oncogenes provides an explanation for the stimulating effect of estrogens on the glandular breast. Progesterone may be the key in influencing the risk of breast cancer with the peak of mitotic activity in the breast during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. On the other hand, in human breast cancer cell lines, both proliferation and inhibition have been observed with various progestational agents. Relevant biological and clinical issues are pregnancy and exposure to exogenous hormones. The intense hormonal stimulation of pregnancy (both estrogen and progesterone) has no adverse impact on the course of breast cancer. Pregnancy, with its mammogenetic differentiation, results in the protection of this organ from carcinogenesis. Characterization of specific lobular morphology serves as an indicator of the level of differentiation achieved by the organ, and thus provides means to assess the risk of the gland undergoing neoplastic transformation when exposed to given agents. Sufficient evidence exists to indicate the possibility of a slightly increased risk of breast cancer after approximately one decade of postmenopausal estrogen use. A review of the epidemiologic studies of postmenopausal hormone replacement and the risk of breast cancer fails to provide definitive evidence. Recent information derives from observations of cellular proliferation, plasma and tissue estradiol and progesterone receptor levels, and the percentage of apoptotic epithelial cells in human breast tissue. Several studies suggest that short-term, continuous combined HRT does not increase breast cancer recurrence or mortality. The participation of sexual hormones in the mammogenetic process during pregnancy might serve as an intermediate end point in assessing the effectiveness of hormones as chemopreventive agents. Investigations based on history, and breast morphology, should enable us to select estrogens and progestogens for HRT, and adopt optimal therapeutic regimens.
 ...
PMID:Potential benefits of estrogens and progestogens on breast cancer. 992 May 36

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and inhibitor, plasminogen activator-type 1 (PAI-1) are proposed to be of prognostic significance in some cancers. To determine the prognostic value of the urokinase plasminogen activation system in ovarian cancer, levels of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 were measured in extracts of ovarian cancer tissue using ELISA tests. uPA and PAI-1 were determined in 70 tumor extracts and uPAR in 43 extracts. Levels were correlated with age, tumor histology, stage, grade, lymph node and metastatic status, residual disease, risk of recurrence, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, cathepsin D (Cath-D), and c-erbB-2 levels. uPA and uPAR did not exhibit correlation with any of these parameters. However, patients with high grade tumor, recurrence, and lower EGFR and Cath-D had significantly higher PAI-1 levels compared to those of others (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier plots of survival were compared. uPA and uPAR were not related to disease-free or overall survival. Although low PAI-1 appeared to predict a longer overall survival, the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that PAI-1 was a predictor for overall survival although it was not as strong as stage. These results suggest that elevated PAI-1 seems to be correlated with an unfavorable prognosis in ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:Clinical relevance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator, its receptor and inhibitor type 1 in ovarian cancer. 1124 Jul 1

In a retrospective study of 488 women with primary breast cancer, after a median follow-up of 10 years, we sought interactions between disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and tumor antigen levels of two components of the plasminogen system, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1, and the transmembrane growth factor receptor c-erbB-2. We used ELISAs (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, CT, USA) to quantify uPA and PAI-1 antigen levels in cytosols, and a double monoclonal antibody-based assay (EIA) (Ciba Corning Diagnostics, Alameda, CA, USA) to quantify c-erbB-2 in membrane extracts of the same tissues. Weak positive correlations were found between uPA and c-erbB-2 (r(s) = 0.146; p = 0.001) and between PAI-1 and c-erbB-2 (r(s) = 0.154; p < 0.001). In the overall population, using univariate analyses, c-erbB-2 overexpression and high uPA and PAI-1 antigen levels (> 300 IU/mg, > 1.40 ng/mg and > 5.53 ng/mg, respectively) were significantly associated with shorter DFS (p = 0.003, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 in all cases). Using multivariate analyses, PAI-1, node status and tumor size were independent predictors of DFS and c-erbB-2 was retained in the model only for OS. In the node-negative subgroup, PAI-1 was the strongest significant survival predictor both for OS (p = 0.003; HR 2.52) and DFS (p < 0.001; HR 2.39). This study shows that in primary breast cancer c-erbB-2 offers no additional prognostic information when uPA and/or PAI-1 are candidates in the multivariate analyses.
 ...
PMID:Limited prognostic value of c-erbB-2 compared to uPA and PAI-1 in primary breast carcinoma. 1453 92