Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P04626 (
erbB-2
)
5,251
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The c-
erbB-2
oncogene product in serum (serum c-
erbB-2
) was measured by an enzyme-immunoassay kit. The 12 U/ml cut-off level was estimated as the mean plus two standard deviations for 250 healthy women. With this cut-off level increased serum c-
erbB-2
was found in 12.0% of primary breast cancer cases (n = 25), in 4.9% of non-recurrent breast cancer patients (n = 82), and in 31.4% of patients with recurrent breast cancer (n = 35). In patients with primary and recurrent breast cancer, whose sera were assayed concurrently for serum c-
erbB-2
, CEA and
CA15
-3, the positive rates of these markers were fairly similar. However, their combined use significantly increased the sensitivity as compared to the use of any one marker alone.
...
PMID:Serum c-erbB-2 in breast cancer patients. 781 22
Many antigenic and genetic markers have been proposed for breast cancer, with potential utility in identification, screening, prognosis, detection, or monitoring. Of the available markers, those with the greatest promise in 1993 include the yet-to-be-cloned BrCa1, the p53 tumor suppressor gene, tissue-associated prognostic factors such as
HER-2/neu
, cathepsin-D, and indicators of angiogenesis, and circulating tumor markers that provide an indication of clinical course, such as
CA15
-3 and CEA. However, the precise clinical utilities of all of these markers have yet to be determined. It is especially important that the relative independence of the markers in relation to other available markers to determined so as to avoid the unnecessary cost and expense of redundancy. Moreover, it is important that the clinician be aware of the limitations in both sensitivity and specificity of each marker so as not to sensitivity and specificity of each marker so as not to over- or under-interpret the predictive value of any test. With these caveats in mind, judicial application of germ-line, tissue, and soluble tumor markers can improve clinical care of patients at risk for and with breast cancer.
...
PMID:Tumor markers for breast cancer. 811 99
Currently, many tumor markers are routinely measured in patient serum, but none appears to adequately detect cancer-specific substances for breast cancer. Four tumor markers (CEA,
CA15
-3, BCA225, c-
erbB-2
) were compared for sensitivity and specificity to breast cancer in 393 patients with breast disease (fibrocystic disease; 40, benign tumor; 21, primary cancer; 22, recurrent or advanced cancer; 22, non-recurrent; 288), and the following results were obtained: In cases of primary breast cancer excluding stage IV cases, the positive rates of CEA,
CA15
-3 and BCA225 were 4.5%, 13.6% and 13.6%, respectively. These rates were not higher than the positive rates found in fibrocystic disease or benign tumor. In cases of recurrent or advanced breast cancer, the positive rates of CEA,
CA15
-3, BCA225 and c-
erbB-2
were 31.8%, 50.0%, 40.9% and 27.3%, respectively. In the recurrent cases, the combination assay using
CA15
-3, BCA225 and c-
erbB-2
, showed more useful diagnostic value (72.7%) than other combination assays with three tumor markers. High levels of
CA15
-3 in eight cases, BCA225 in five and CEA in one were found during the follow up of 15 patients with initial recurrence. Serum c-
erbB-2
exceeded the normal range in 6 of 7 cases with advanced breast cancer. Serum c-
erbB-2
should be considered a marker of progressive breast cancer. These results suggested that
CA15
-3, BCA225, c-
erbB-2
and combination assays are useful tumor markers for not only detecting the recurrence of breast cancer, but also diagnosing the progression of primary breast cancer.
...
PMID:[Clinical usefulness of tumor markers in breast cancer]. 825 56
Tumor-associated markers have potential utility in identification, screening, prognosis, detection, or monitoring breast cancer. Of the available markers, those with the greatest promise in 1994 include the yet-to-be-cloned BrCa1, the p53 tumor suppressor gene, tissue-associated prognostic factors such as
HER-2/neu
, cathepsin-D, and indicators of angiogenesis, and circulating tumor markers that provide an indication of clinical course, such as
CA15
-3 and CEA. Unfortunately, the precise clinical utilities of all of these markers remain imprecise. It is especially important that the relative independence of the markers in relation to other available markers be determined so as to avoid the unnecessary cost and expense of redundancy. Moreover, it is important that the clinician be aware of the limitations in both sensitivity and specificity of each marker so as not to over- or underinterpret the predictive value of any test. With these caveats in mind, judicial application of germline, tissue, and soluble tumor markers can improve clinical care of patients at risk for and with breast cancer.
...
PMID:Tumor markers for breast cancer. Current utilities and future prospects. 870 69
Many circulating markers have been proposed for breast cancer, with potential utility for identification, screening, prognosis, detection, or monitoring. Of the available markers, those with the greatest promise include circulating tumor markers that provide an indication of clinical course, such as
CA15
-3 and CEA, and novel markers such as BrCa1, antibodies to p53, antibodies to
HER-2/neu
, indicators of angiogenesis, and the extracellular domain of
HER-2/neu
. However, the precise clinical utilities of all of these markers have yet to be determined. It is especially important that the relative independence of the markers in relation to other available markers be determined so as to avoid the unnecessary cost and expense of redundancy. Moreover, it is important that the clinician be aware of the limitations in both sensitivity and specificity of each marker so as not to over- or under-interpret the predictive value of any test.
...
PMID:Serum (circulating) tumor markers for breast cancer. 878 54
A panel of markers used to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer was examined in the saliva of a cohort of healthy women, women with benign lesions of the breast, and women with diagnosed breast cancer. We found recognized tumor markers c-
erbB-2
(erb), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and tumor suppressor oncogene protein 53 (p53) in the saliva of all three groups of women. The levels of erb and
CA15
-3 in the cancer patients evaluated, however, were significantly higher than the salivary levels of healthy control subjects and benign tumor patients. Conversely, pantropic p53 levels were higher in control subjects compared with those women with breast cancer and those with benign tumors. Although cathepsin-D and epidermal growth factor receptor were detected, they did not demonstrate any clear correlation with disease status. The results of the pilot suggest that these markers have potential use in initial detection and/or follow-up screening for the detection of breast cancer in women.
...
PMID:A preliminary study of CA15-3, c-erbB-2, epidermal growth factor receptor, cathepsin-D, and p53 in saliva among women with breast carcinoma. 1070 71
c-
erbB-2
protein levels in tissue extracts and sera were determined in a retrospective analysis of 158 patients who underwent surgical resection of breast carcinoma by means of a sandwich enzyme immunometric assay (EIA) using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to the extracellular domain of the c-
erbB-2
oncogene protein (ErbB-2). In the analysis of tissue extracts, 48 samples (30.3%) showed ErbB-2 levels exceeding 18.0 ng/mg protein (group A), while in 110 samples these levels were below 18.0 ng/mg protein (group B). Immunohistochemical examination of resected tissues using anti-c-
erbB-2
antibody revealed positive staining in 93.8% (45/48) in group A and 13.6% (15/110) in group B (p < 0.00001). The proportion of patients who preoperatively showed a serum ErbB-2 value above 5.4 ng/ml was 52.1% (25/48) in group A and 10.0% (11/110) in group B (p < 0.00001). Thus, the level of ErbB-2 in tissue extracts was significantly associated with immunohistochemistry and ErbB-2 levels in preoperative sera. During follow-up, 48 patients (30.3%) developed recurrent disease: 17 in group A (35.4%) and 31 in group B (28.2%). From an ROC analysis based on the postoperative serum ErbB-2 levels in patients either with or without relapse, the cutoff value of serum ErbB-2 for tumor relapse was determined to be 6.5 ng/ml. The sensitivity of serum ErbB-2 in patients with relapsed breast cancer was 58.3% (21/36) overall, 84.6% (11/13) in group A and 43.5% (10/23) in group B. In the analysis of serum samples taken before relapse, 90.9% (10/11) of the subjects in group A and 26.7% (4/15) of those in group B were shown to be positive for serum ErbB-2. Serum ErbB-2 in group A was a more sensitive marker than other tumor markers such as CEA,
CA15
-3, and NCC-ST-439. Thus, the determination of ErbB-2 in tissue extracts of breast carcinoma may be useful for assessing c-
erbB-2
protein expression in the primary tissue and indicates that serum ErbB-2 may be a sensitive marker for monitoring tumor relapse.
...
PMID:Combined measurement of the c-erbB-2 protein in breast carcinoma tissues and sera is useful as a sensitive tumor marker for monitoring tumor relapse. 1095 6
Many serological markers have been utilized to indicate the status, risk, or presence of breast cancer. In May 1996, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a Tumor Marker Panel and determined clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. Eight markers containing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and
CA15
-3 were evaluated and assigned by expert reviewers to be valuable markers of breast cancer.
CA15
-3 recognizes a mucin-like glycoprotein, MUC-1, which is frequently expressed in breast cancer tissues. BCA225, which may recognize antigens similar to MUC-1 glycoprotein, are sensitive and specific markers for breast cancer. However, it is not recommended to measure the 2 markers in combination. The measurement of carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (I CTP) is worthwhile as a serological diagnostic method of bone metastasis from breast cancer. Other markers such as
erbB-2
, CYFRA 21-1 and PTHrP are candidates for clinical utilization as tumor markers in breast cancer.
...
PMID:[Tumor markers in breast cancer]. 1147 35
The role of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and c-
erbB-2
in breast and ovarian cancer was investigated. Eighty patients of breast and ovarian cancer and benign lesions, as well as twenty normal controls were evaluated for the expression of c-
erbB-2
by Western blotting and uPAR levels by ELISA. The c-
erbB-2
and uPAR showed a significant increase in both types of cancer investigated compared to normal control and benign lesions. The frequency of c-
erbB-2
was significantly higher in breast cancer lesions (p < 0.01). Levels of
CA15
.3 in breast cancer and CA125 in ovarian cancer were significantly higher in cases expressing c-
erbB-2
(p < 0.01) than in negative c-
erbB-2
cases. The uPAR showed a significant positive correlation with advanced stages of breast cancer (r = 0.7971) and ovarian cancer (r = 0.83662), while significant correlations were found for
CA15
.3 in breast cancer (r = 0.64967) and CA125 in ovarian cancer (r = 0.83996). Taken together, our data suggest that the c-
erbB-2
and uPAR in the sera of ovarian and breast cancer act as valuable markers for the evaluation of the patients preoperatively.
...
PMID:Detection of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and c-erbB-2 in sera of patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma. 1456 47
Here, the structure, function, biological and pathological significance and clinical utility of the principal biomolecular markers of breast cancer is reviewed. Each marker was scored for clinical utility using a recently developed tumor marker utility grading system (TMUGS). Among the tissue markers, ERs and PRs are important prognostic/predictive factors and the only tissue markers routinely determined. ER cross-talks with other growth factors while co-regulatory factors enhance (co-activators) or decrease (co-repressors) its transcriptional activity.
C-erbB-2
and Ki67/MIB-1 select for adjuvant chemotherapy a subgroup of lymph-node negative patients at a high risk of relapse. Monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab, gefitinib, erlotinib and bevacizumab) targeting tissue markers and involved in tumor growth and metastasization (EGFR,
C-erbB-2
, VEGF) have been developed; they showed therapeutical single agent activity as well as potent synergy with chemotherapy agents in metastatic cancer. Among circulating markers, some are potentially useful in the early detection and monitoring of metastatic disease; nevertheless, none is routinely recommended. To suspect distant metastases, CEA-TPA-
CA15
.3 panel attained accuracy of about 90%. ECD HER2-neu, p53 and nucleophosmin antibodies seem suitable candidates for different associations. Preliminary observations suggest that an early detection with tumor markers and successive treatment of relapses significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survival in selected patients. In conclusion, biomolecular markers are improving understanding of biology and management of breast cancer.
...
PMID:Biomolecular markers of breast cancer. 1636 59
1
2
Next >>