Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04141 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor)
 6,790 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Human recombinant colony-stimulating factors may be used to treat or prevent neutropenia caused by marrow toxic chemotherapeutic agents administered to patients with cancer. Despite their common clinical use, little is known about the potential adverse effects that these cytokines may have on the growth of malignant cells. Indeed, several in vitro reports have indicated that colony-stimulating factors may act as stimulating growth factors in some human malignancies. To evaluate these effects in ovarian cancer, we investigated the possible growth effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF/Filgrastim) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors (GM-CSF/Sargramostim) on four established ovarian cancer cell lines, as well as five primary ovarian cancer cultures over a wide range of pharmacologic doses. Cell viability was measured by an ATP bioluminescence assay and expressed as a percentage of untreated control cultures. G-CSF showed no growth-stimulating effects in any of the four established cell lines tested. In the OVCAR-3 cell line, a decrease in growth (> 10%) was seen at 10, 100, and 1000 ng/ml after 5 days of continuous treatment. In the same cell line, GM-CSF caused an increase (> 10%) in growth at the same doses. However, these changes did not demonstrate statistical significance in a dose-dependent fashion. In the five primary cultures treated with G-CSF, only one demonstrated statistically significant increases in growth in a dose-dependent manner. GM-CSF treatment had no significant growth alterations in these same five primary cultures. These results would suggest that colony-stimulating factors may act as growth factors in some but not all ovarian cancer cells. Further investigations into the receptor status of ovarian cancer cells for these cytokines are underway to clarify this issue.
 ...
PMID:In vitro growth effects of colony-stimulating factors in ovarian cancer. 751 21

Thirteen patients with recurrent medulloblastoma were treated with cyclophosphamide in association with Sargramostim. Cyclophosphamide was given at doses ranging between 1.0-2.5 g/m2 daily for two doses. Sargramostim was given at a fixed dose of 250 micrograms/m2 subcutaneously twice a day beginning 24 hours after the second cyclophosphamide dose and continuing through the leukocyte nadir until the ANC was more than 1,000 cells/microliters for two consecutive days. A total of 33 courses were given with toxicity consisting of grade 4 neutropenia in all courses and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 10 of 13 patients. There were no deaths related to infection or bleeding. Four patients were taken off study because of prolonged myelosuppression. Three of these patients were at the 2.5 g/m2 level, and of these three, two developed lung toxicity (grades 2 and 4, respectively). One patient developed an allergic reaction following the first injection of Sargramostim and was also taken off study. Of 10 evaluable patients, there were 9 PR and 1 SD. We conclude that cyclophosphamide at a dose of 2.0 g/m2/day x 2 days q 4 weeks in association with Sargramostim demonstrates marked activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma.
 ...
PMID:Cyclophosphamide in combination with sargramostim for treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma. 762 28

The clinical use of the biologic response modifiers filgrastim, sargramostim, and regramostim is reviewed. All circulating blood cells are derived from totipotent hematopoietic stem cells. Various biologic response modifiers, including lymphokines and colony-stimulating factors, regulate and activate the lymphoid and myeloid cells of the blood. One of the more important types of blood cell for fighting infection is the neutrophil. Patients with low neutrophil concentrations are at high risk of developing neutropenic fevers and infections. The colony-stimulating factors filgrastim, sargramostim, and regramostim increase the production of circulating neutrophils, and this action is clinically useful in patients undergoing myelosuppressive antineoplastic therapy or bone marrow transplantation and in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clinical studies of these agents in comparison with antimicrobial prophylaxis or placebo have shown a decreased rate of neutropenic-associated hospitalizations and infections. These agents are also under study for dose intensification of antineoplastics in patients with various solid tumors and for augmenting patient responses to antimicrobial therapy in situations where there is high risk of morbidity and mortality. Sargramostim and regramostim are both granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors that differ in their degree of glycosylation and source of production, and at high doses they can cause life-threatening adverse effects because they stimulate the production of a broad range of leukocytes. Filgrastim, which stimulates only the production of neutrophils, has been better tolerated, especially at higher doses. Biologic response modifiers hold much promise for improving therapy of certain clinical conditions by decreasing myelosuppressive complications and enhancing responses to other drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Clinical effects of biologic response modifiers. 768 88

Costs of biologic response modifiers, specifically myeloid growth factors, are discussed relative to cost offsets they may produce in the total amount spent on health care in patients with certain disease states. Even though the biologic response modifiers granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (sargramostim or molgramostim) are similar in name, they are chemically and biologically different. These differences result in different clinical applications. Administered after myelosuppressive antineoplastic therapy, filgrastim decreases the risk of infection. The growth factors may also be useful in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, in nonneutropenic patients with bacterial infections, and in patients with other disease states. Although the myeloid growth factors are somewhat expensive in terms of acquisition cost, their use is usually associated with a decrease in the risk of medical complications requiring health care expenditures, often for hospitalizations or antimicrobials. The precise cost of acquiring and administering myeloid growth factors depends on three interdependent variables: the factor used, the dosage of the drug, and the duration of therapy. Cost offsets may be more difficult to define, but they would include direct cost offsets, such as reduced episodes of febrile neutropenia and fewer, less-intense days of hospitalization or treatment. Sargramostim and molgramostim have demonstrated efficacy when given after bone marrow transplantation; filgrastim has been shown to lower infection rates by at least 50% after myelosuppressive antineoplastic therapy and in patients with severe chronic neutropenia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Cost considerations in therapy with myeloid growth factors. 768 89

We conducted a dose escalation trial of cyclophosphamide plus Sargramostim in the therapy of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent central nervous system tumors. Cyclophosphamide was administered at doses ranging between 1.0 and 2.5 g/m2 daily for two doses. Sargramostim was administered at a fixed dose of 250 micrograms/m2 subcutaneously twice a day beginning 24 hours after the second cyclophosphamide dose and continuing through the leukocyte nadir until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > 1,000 cells/microliters for two consecutive days. The MTD for patients who had not received any prior chemotherapy and who had received either no radiotherapy or radiotherapy confined to the cranium was 2.0 g/m2 daily for two doses. The MTD for patients previously treated with chemotherapy or neuraxis radiotherapy was also 2.0 g/m2 daily for two doses. Responses were seen in patients with medulloblastoma (8/9), glioblastoma multiforme (2/13), germinoma (1/1), and pineoblastoma (1/2).
 ...
PMID:Dose escalation trial of cyclophosphamide with Sargramostim in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. 770 Jan 69

Following local treatment and doxorubicin-containing standard chemotherapy, 42 patients with surgical Stage II or IIIA breast cancer containing ten or more involved axillary nodes and 13 patients with Stage IIIB disease were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (TMJ) consisting of thiotepa (750 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (40 mg/m2), and carboplatin (1000 mg/m2), with autologous bone marrow (ABM) and peripheral stem cell (PSC) transplant, followed by irradiation and/or hormone therapy. Sargramostim (GM-CSF) support was given to most patients. The median time to transfusion independence was two weeks. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon, with no intensive care admission or treatment-related death. At a median follow-up of 17 months, eight patients have relapsed and five have died of tumor progression. No statement can yet be made regarding adjuvant efficacy, but this high-dose regimen is very well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:TMJ: a well-tolerated high-dose regimen for the adjuvant chemotherapy of high risk breast cancer. 799 67

This article familiarizes the practitioner with the clinical nursing implications of the colony stimulating factors that have been approved for use. The process of hematopoiesis is reviewed with a focus on the mechanisms of action for Sargramostim, Filgrastim, and Epoetin Alfa. Each agent is discussed individually and information is presented regarding indications, pharmacologic properties, routes of administration, and potential adverse reactions. Nursing interventions for care of the patient receiving colony stimulating factors are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Clinical implications for the administration of colony stimulating factors. 816 90

Sargramostim is a myeloid growth factor that is widely used as adjunctive support in patients with neutropenia. Sargramostim enhances neutrophil recovery and myeloid engraftment, reduces infectious complications, and shortens the duration of hospitalization in selected patients. The high cost of sargramostim and other myeloid growth factors and their ability to reduce infections and days of hospitalization have generated interest in their pharmacoeconomic impact. Cost minimization studies in patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia and in recipients of autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) show estimated cost savings with sargramostim of 1996 US$12,513 and 1994 US$14,500, respectively. These data are consistent with cost savings of 1989 US$16,000 using molgramostim in autologous BMT recipients. Although no pharmacoeconomic data have been published in patients with other conditions, clinical outcomes research demonstrates a clear benefit for sargramostim administration in recipients of peripheral blood progenitor cell and allogeneic BMT and in patients who experience graft delay or failure. Because of reductions in the duration of hospitalization and infectious complications, economic outcomes of these conditions would probably also support sargramostim use. More data regarding the use of sargramostim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia are required to properly assess the pharmacoeconomic impact in these patients.
 ...
PMID:Neutropenia and neoplasia: an overview of the pharmacoeconomics of sargramostim in cancer therapy. 937 27

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study in 181 afebrile cancer patients with ANC levels < 500/microL receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy was undertaken to compare sargramostim (yeast-derived recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, RhuGM-CSF) and filgrastim (bacteria-derived recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, RhuG-CSF) in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Patients received daily subcutaneous (SC) injections of either agent until ANC levels reached at least 1500/microL. There was no statistical difference between treatment groups in the mean number of days to reach an ANC of 500/microL, but the mean number of days to reach ANC levels of 1000/microL and 1500/microL was approximately one day less in patients receiving filgrastim. Fewer patients in the sargramostim arm were hospitalized, and they had a shorter mean length of hospitalization, mean duration of fever, and mean duration of i.v. antibiotic therapy compared with patients who received filgrastim. Both growth factors were well tolerated. No patient was readmitted to the hospital after growth factor was discontinued. Sargramostim and filgrastim have comparable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of standard-dose chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in community practice.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of efficacy of sargramostim (yeast-derived RhuGM-CSF) and filgrastim (bacteria-derived RhuG-CSF) in the therapeutic setting of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. 1051 2

The recent increased usage of high-cost biotechnology agents has placed a tremendous impact on the hospital pharmacy budget. One approach in improving cost containment is to minimize waste during the preparation of these agents. This is particularly practical and possible in the process of low-dose syringe repackaging of Sargramostim (GM-CSF) used for the treatment of neutropenia. In search of ways to reduce waste, this study looked into the dos and don'ts of repackaging this agent in syringes. Decreased waste is very significant if GM-CSF is properly reconstituted with bacteriostatic water for injection and if a syringe equipped with a permanently attached needle is used. Another 10% of the solution from each vial could be saved if the solution is withdrawn with a technique involving the vial in a right-side-up position.
 ...
PMID:Getting the most out of low-dose syringe prefilling of a high-cost biotechnology agent. 1013 64


1 2 3 Next >>