Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04141 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor)
 6,790 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The clinical symptoms of allergy are caused by cellular (IgE-triggered) responses to an allergen. Effector cells of allergy include eosinophil and basophil granulocytes, as well as tissue mast cells. Growth and accumulation, as well as IgE-dependent and independent functions of these cells are regulated by distinct proteohormones and peptides. The hemopoietic cytokines IL-3 (interleukin-3), IL-5 and GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) are involved in the regulation of basophils (and eosinophils), whereas the ligand for c-kit, SCF (stem cell factor) is a mast cell-specific agonist. Basophils and mast cells express high-affinity IgE-binding sites. Allergen binding to IgE on mast cells and basophils, and consecutive cross-linking of IgE receptors is followed by production and/or secretion of inflammatory mediator substances. Specific activation and deactivation of mast cells/basophils in vitro has been demonstrated by use of recombinant cytokines and allergens, and specific haptens or by use of novel drugs, and should lead to epitope-specific diagnosis and better management of allergic diseases in the future.
 ...
PMID:[Effector cells in allergy: biological principles and new pharmacologic concepts]. 750 62

Allergen inhalation challenge is associated with increases in eosinophil number and activation, and provides a useful model for investigating airway inflammation in asthma. Limited information, however, is available on the effect of allergen challenge on cytokines regulating eosinophil function. We investigated allergen-induced changes in eosinophil number and activation and in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a cytokine known to regulate eosinophil function in vitro. Seven subjects with mild atopic asthma and late asthmatic responses completed diluent- and allergen-inhalation challenges. Blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and biopsy samples were collected 24 h after challenge. Allergen inhalation caused a significant increase in eosinophils in BALF and biopsy samples. Eosinophil activation, as assessed by secretion of eosinophil cationic protein, and GM-CSF levels were significantly increased in BALF and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells. Allergen inhalation did not cause a significant change in eosinophil activation in biopsy tissue but did result in a significant decrease in GM-CSF in the tissue. Significant correlations were shown between the concentration of GM-CSF in BALF and the percentage of BAL eosinophils (Rs = 0.75, p = 0.05), severity of the late asthmatic response, and number of BAL eosinophils (Rs = 0.82, p = 0.02). A trend was seen between the late response and the concentration of GM-CSF in BALF. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that eosinophils, regulated by GM-CSF, contribute to allergen-induced decreases in airway function.
 ...
PMID:Effects of allergen challenge on eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in mild asthma. 776 40

Allergen-induced emigration and maturation of dendritic cells (DC) are pivotal steps in sparking off allergic contact dermatitis. In vitro models, reflecting these steps, may provide tools for assessment of sensitizing capacities of putative contact allergens. Here, we evaluated the applicability of such models for a panel of methacrylate congeners, the sensitizing properties of which were established previously in clinical and experimental animal studies. First, using interleukin-4 (IL-4)/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-induced, blood monocyte-derived DC, hapten-induced up-regulation of maturation/ activation markers, including CD80, CD83, CD86, chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5, as well as the drug resistance related molecules P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and lung resistance protein (LRP), were monitored by flow cytometry. Of note, whereas CD86 and CXCR4 were most sensitive in discriminating between the contact sensitizers and irritants included in the panel, i.e. sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and croton oil (CO), assessment of CD83 and LRP expression reflected the relatively lower sensitizing capacity of methyl methacrylate. Second, using ex vivo skin explant cultures, allergen-induced LC migration from epidermal to basal membranous and dermal skin structures was most reliably monitored by CDla, as compared with Pgp, LRP, HLA-DR or CD54 staining. The extent of CD1a+ LC migration was found to closely correlate with the sensitizing capacities of the panel of test compounds. These results support the view that both in vitro models can provide valuable data on contact sensitizing properties, and add chemokine receptors and drug resistance related molecules to the list of DC membrane markers revealing allergenic signaling.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of two in vitro dendritic cell maturation models for screening contact sensitizers using a panel of methacrylates. 1470 10