Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04141 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor)
 6,790 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Clonality in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been studied with various techniques including glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) isoenzyme and cytogenetic analyses, and with molecular techniques such as gene deletion studies and the analysis of restriction fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLP) of X-linked genes. In this study, we investigated the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a chromosome-specific probe to examine cytogenetic clonality in peripheral blood (PB) cells from three patients with MDS. In each case, trisomy 8 was shown by conventional cytogenetic analysis at the time of the initial diagnosis. By using FISH with a probe for the centromere of chromosome 8, we identified the trisomy in individual PB cells from Wright-stained smears. With this technique, we could determine the cell lineage involved by the trisomy, and through serial analyses we could assess the response of the clonal and nonclonal cells to growth-factor therapy, and the expansion of the trisomic clone over time. In each of the three cases, various proportions of granulocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils showed trisomy 8 by FISH analysis. In none of the cases did we detect trisomy 8 in lymphocytes. By analysis of PB cells before and during therapy with recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), we found that GM-CSF stimulated both trisomic and disomic cells. During a 1-year period of sequential study, we detected an abrupt increase in the percentage of trisomic cells in one patient, a stable percentage in another, and a slowly increasing percentage in the third. The abrupt increase in the first patient preceded a transformation to a more acute phase by 2 months. We conclude that FISH analysis of PB cells of patients with MDS offers an additional approach to the study of clonality in this disorder. In some cases this analysis may provide a useful and simple means of assessing response to therapy and progression of disease.
 ...
PMID:Cytogenetic clonality in myelodysplastic syndromes studied with fluorescence in situ hybridization: lineage, response to growth factor therapy, and clone expansion. 845 4

Chronic kidney disease is a common occurrence in patients with gynecological cancer. Systemic anticancer treatment in such patients is a challenge for clinicians because of altered drug pharmacokinetics. For those drugs that are excreted mainly by the kidneys, decreased renal function may lead to increased systemic exposure and increased toxicity. Dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic changes is required in this situation to avoid life-threatening toxicity. In this review, we summarize the nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetic data of agents commonly used in systemic anticancer treatment of gynecological cancers and dose adjustment guidelines in the presence of impaired renal function. We review 17 medications that need dose adjustment (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, topotecan, irinotecan, etoposide, capecitabine, bleomycin, methotrexate, actinomycin D, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, metoclopramide, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine) as well as 27 drugs that do not (paclitaxel, docetaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, vincristine, letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, leuprorelin, megestrol, gefitinib, erlotinib, trastuzumab, leucovorin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, erythropoietin, ondansetron, granisetron, palonosetron, tropisetron, dolasetron, aprepitant, dexamethasone, lorazepam, and diazepam). We also review the formulae commonly used to estimate creatinine clearance, including Cockcroft-Gault, Chatelut, Jelliffe, Wright, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study formulae.
 ...
PMID:Systemic anticancer therapy in gynecological cancer patients with renal dysfunction. 1799 97