Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P04141 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor)
 6,790 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To determine whether recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) can offset the myelosuppressive effects of intensive chemotherapy, we carried out a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which 40 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were randomized into two groups of 20 each. One group received rhGM-CSF (5.5 micrograms/kg SC) coadministered with chemotherapy and the other, placebo coadministered with chemotherapy from day 5 to day 11 and from day 19 to day 25 of the 28-day intensification phase of our institutional high-risk protocol for childhood ALL. The results indicate that, at the dose and schedule used, rhGM-CSF did not prevent neutropenia or shorten the number of days required to complete this phase of therapy. In addition, the treated and placebo groups showed no significant difference in absolute neutrophil counts, number of days with neutropenia, number of days with fever, number of days spent in hospital, or number of days on antibiotics during the 28-day study period. There was also no difference between the two groups in the number, type, or severity of infectious episodes. Two of 20 patients in the treatment group have relapsed, whereas none of the patients in the placebo group has yet relapsed (follow-up: 3-37 months), but these events were not statistically significant. We conclude that treatment with rhGM-CSF at the dose and schedule employed is not clinically beneficial.
 ...
PMID:Concurrent RhGM-CSF does not offset myelosuppression from intensive chemotherapy: randomized placebo-controlled study in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 804 12

Colony stimulating factors reduce the duration of neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy in a variety of settings, but the advantages in the management of leukemia are inconclusive. The variations in clinical results and the high costs of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have led to confusion over appropriate use for leukemia patients. In this paper, we reviewed published information on costs and cost-effectiveness of growth factors for childhood and adult leukemia patients. Medline and Healthstar databases were searched for original research articles that contain cost or cost-effectiveness analyses of G-CSF (filgrastim) and GM-SCF (sargramostim) in oncology cooperative group trials. Published manuscripts and abstracts presented at national or international oncology conferences were included. The cost of adjunct treatment was evaluated in two studies of pediatric ALL, one study of adult AML, and two studies of AML in older adults (>55 years). The use of G-CSF for children with ALL was associated with reductions in days to ANC recovery, fewer documented infections, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and small (but not significant) additional costs. In adult AML patients, benefits included a shortening of the duration of neutropenia and hospital stays, a lower incidence of infection and febrile episodes, less use of antibiotics, and cost savings of $2,230 and $2,310 in two studies and an increase if $120 in the third study. This summary suggests that economic analyses can provide useful information to assist clinical decision-making. For pediatric ALL patients, this information indicates that G-CSF use is unlikely to have significant cost implications, and its use should be based on clinical considerations. In studies of adult and older adult AML patients, both GM-CSF and G-CSF have clinical benefits and can be expected to lead to a decrease in overall costs.
 ...
PMID:Cost analyses of adjunct colony stimulating factors for acute leukemia: can they improve clinical decision making. 1072 70