Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P02794 (ferritin)
 17,525 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Acquired hemosiderosis resulting from massive iron deposits in various organs, including heart, liver, and pancreas, may lead to architectural and functional disturbances of these organs. Even though iron overload can occur in nonuremic as well as in uremic individuals, the dialysis patient is at particular risk for developing hemosiderosis. Many dialysis patients receive exogenous iron from either oral iron therapy or blood transfusions. In addition, these patients seem to be at high risk for retaining iron. A diagnosis of excess iron deposition should be considered if the patient has unexplained cardiomyopathy, hepatic cirrhosis, proximal myopathy, diabetes mellitus, arthropathy, or immune dysfunction such as listeriosis. Several techniques are available for determining iron overload. Diagnostic tests include measuring serum ferritin levels, staining bone marrow preparations for excess iron, measuring tissue hemosiderin concentrations, magnetic resonance imaging, and the deferoxamine (DFO; Desferal) "challenge test." The simplest treatment for iron overload in nonuremic patients is removal of iron by venesection. However, in patients in whom venesection is not feasible, the chelating agent DFO can effectively remove excess iron. In the dialysis patient, DFO therapy can be combined with either dialysis or hemoperfusion to remove the iron-DFO complex that would otherwise be removed by the kidney. DFO therapy in the nondialyzed individual has proven to be successful, but before treatment, the benefits of the treatment must be weighed against possible adverse side effects such as cataracts, changes in color vision, and anaphylaxis. In the dialysis patient, indications for iron removal are less clearly defined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Management of iron overload in dialysis patients. 329 89

Iron supplementation has become an integral part of the management of patients receiving epoetin therapy, and clinicians have found it necessary to learn how and when to use it to the best advantage. Three routes of administration for iron are available: oral, intramuscular, and intravenous. Oral iron has the advantage of being simple and cheap, but it is limited by side-effects, poor compliance, poor absorption, and low efficacy. Intravenous iron is the best means of guaranteeing delivery of readily available iron to the bone marrow, but it requires greater clinical supervision. The i.v. iron preparations vary widely in their degradation kinetics, bioavailability, side-effect profiles, and maximum dose for single administration. Iron dextran is hampered by a small but significant risk of anaphylaxis, whereas all i.v. iron preparations can induce "free iron" reactions if the circulating plasma transferrin is overloaded. Intravenous iron may be given in advance of epoetin therapy, as concomitant treatment to prevent the development of iron deficiency, as treatment of absolute or functional iron deficiency, or as adjuvant therapy to enhance the response to epoetin in iron-replete patients. Markers of iron status that may indicate a need for i.v. iron include a serum ferritin of less than 100 microg/liter, a transferrin saturation of less than 20%, and a percentage of hypochromic red cells more than 10%. Various regimens are available for giving i.v. iron: low-dose administration of 20 to 60 mg every dialysis session in hemodialysis patients, medium-dose administration of 100 to 400 mg, and high-dose administration of 500 to 1000 mg. Iron sodium gluconate can only be given as a low-dose regimen because of toxicity, whereas the only preparation suitable for high-dose administration is iron dextran. Although concerns have been raised regarding iron overload and long-term toxicity with i.v. iron therapy in terms of increased risk of infections, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy, there is little evidence to substantiate this in patients receiving epoetin. Care should be taken, however, to prevent the serum ferritin rising above 800 to 1000 microg/liter and the transferrin saturation above 50%. Provided this is done, the benefits of i.v. iron almost certainly outweigh the risks in terms of optimizing the response to epoetin therapy.
 ...
PMID:Strategies for iron supplementation: oral versus intravenous. 1008 88

Absolute or functional iron deficiency is a common problem in chronic disease which may lead to iron-deficient erythropoesis. Moreover, lack of available iron is the most common reason for unresponsiveness to epoetin in patients on chronic dialysis. Measurements of serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and percentage of hypochromic red blood cells allow the assessment of iron status. Lack of iron resorption and dose-dependent side-effects limit oral supplementation in a number of patients. Several iron preparations are available for intravenous substitution, especially the newly registered iron-saccharose offers safe and reliable iron supplementation and reduces the risk of anaphylaxis and iron toxicity. This review discusses new guidelines concerning diagnosis of iron status, indication for therapy and application of intravenous iron preparation.
 ...
PMID:[Indications and practical management of parenteral iron therapy]. 1287 35

Iron deficiency is a frequent complication in chronically ill patients and in pregnant women. Iron status can now be characterised precisely and relatively easily by determining serum ferritin, transferritin saturation and if necessary hypochromic erythrocytes and the haemoglobin content of erythrocytes (CHr). Oral iron replacement is usually restricted by limited absorption and low tolerability. Intravenous iron therapy is possible in such cases and can be combined with rHuEPO (e.g. EPREX/Epoetin alfa) in severe cases. Iron saccharate Switzerland and this permits high dose iron replacement without any danger of anaphylaxis or acute iron toxicity.
 ...
PMID:[The iron letter--an update on the treatment of iron deficiency anemia]. 1655 Jul 9

Iron deficiency is a frequent complication in chronically ill patients and in pregnant women. Iron status can now be characterised precisely and relatively easily by determining serum ferritin, transferritin saturation and if necessary hypochromic erythrocytes and the haemoglobin content of erythrocytes (CHr). Oral iron replacement is usually restricted by limited absorption and low tolerability. Intravenous iron therapy is possible in such cases and can be combined with rHuEPO (e.g. EPREX/ epoetin alfa) in severe cases. Iron saccharate (VENOFER) is commercially available in Switzerland and this permits high dose iron replacement without any danger of anaphylaxis or acute iron toxicity.
 ...
PMID:[Current recommendations for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia]. 1751 29

The feasibility of the large, single-dose intravenous iron repletion method, which is known today as total dose infusion (TDI), has been demonstrated over decades. However, this method of iron repletion was chiefly developed for patients with large iron deficits, such as those with pregnancy-induced anemia, chronic bleeding disorders, and absolute iron-deficiency anemia (serum ferritin < 30 ng/mL, transferrin saturation < 15%) who were unable to receive frequent small doses of intravenous iron. Today, 50 years after the advent of TDI, more is known about iron metabolism and storage, but the optimal dosing strategy for intravenous iron in patients with cancer is still not well defined. The proinflammatory state of cancer, or its treatment, may influence the response to intravenous iron therapy. Additionally, the long-term adverse effects of large single doses or smaller more frequent doses have yet to be studied in the oncology population. Historically, safety concerns surrounding the administration of intravenous iron have centered on anaphylaxis. Newer concerns are being raised, such as oxidative stress, iron overload, venous thromboembolism, infection risk, and tumor growth. Therefore, with the original premise of TDI assuming low levels of inflammation, coupled with the recent data surrounding the adverse effects of blood transfusions and erythropoietic-stimulating agents, this article reviews the risks and benefits of TDI administration specifically for patients with cancer.
 ...
PMID:Total dose iron dextran infusion in cancer patients: is it SaFe2+? 2257 Feb 95

: The presence of denatured proteins within a therapeutic drug product can create a series of serious adverse effects, such as mild irritation, immunogenicity, anaphylaxis, or instant death to a patient. The detection of protein degradation is complicated and expensive due to current methods associated with expensive instrumentation, reagents, and processing time. We have demonstrated here a platform for visual biosensing of denatured proteins that is fast, low cost, sensitive, and user friendly by exploiting the plasmonic properties of noble metal nanoparticles. In this study we have exposed artificially heat stressed ferritin and gold nanoparticles to 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane, which degrades the protein by showing a systematic blue shift in the absorbance spectra of the gold nanoparticle/ferritin and aminosilane solution. This blue shift in absorbance produces a detectable visual color transition from a blue color to a purple hue. By studying the Raman spectroscopy of the gold nanoparticle/ferritin and aminosilane solution, the extent of ferritin degradation was quantified. The degradation of ferritin was again confirmed using dynamic light scattering and was attributed to the aggregation of the ferritin due to accelerated heat stress. We have successfully demonstrated a proof of concept for visually detecting ferritin from horse spleen that has experienced various levels of degradation, including due to heat stress.
 ...
PMID:Optical Detection of Denatured Ferritin Protein via Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles Exposure through Aminosilane Solution. 3159 Feb 97