Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P02749 (beta2-glycoprotein I)
 836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are defined by anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) ELISA and prolongation of phospholipid dependent coagulation assays (lupus anticoagulant; LAC). For the binding of aCL to cardiolipin a cofactor, beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI), is necessary. We have investigated whether the same cofactor is essential for LAC activity. Plasma from 6 LAC positive patients and 3 controls was depleted from beta 2-GPI by means of affinity chromatography. From the 6 LAC positive plasmas, 4 became LAC negative (tested with dRVVT) when beta 2-GPI was depleted and became positive again when purified beta 2-GPI (200 micrograms/ml) was added. A dose response curve showed that addition of 50 micrograms/ml beta 2-GPI to beta 2-GPI deficient patient plasma, led to a positive dRVVT. Depletion of, and addition of beta 2-GPI to plasma from controls had no effect on the dRVVT. Measurement of beta 2-GPI plasma levels in 19 LAC positive patients, 40 LAC negative patients and 15 controls showed no difference in beta 2-GPI levels. These results show that a combination of aPL and beta 2-GPI is essential not only for binding to cardiolipin, but also for LAC activity and imply that low beta 2-GPI levels (less than 50 micrograms/ml) can lead to false negative LAC tests. These observations may lead to new insights in the pathophysiological complications associated with aPL.
 ...
PMID:Lupus anticoagulant activity is frequently dependent on the presence of beta 2-glycoprotein I. 151 7

Autoimmune aPL are associated with a well-defined clinical syndrome of vascular thromboses, recurrent fetal loss, thrombocytopenia, livedo reticularis, and valvular and neurologic abnormalities. A clinical diagnosis of SLE need not be present, and aPL syndrome in the absence of other well-defined autoimmune disease is termed PAPS. A positive test for aPL is defined by enzyme-linked immunoassay (aCL) or by functional coagulation assay (LAC). Anticardiolipin antibody and LAC are similar but probably not identical antibodies. The false-positive test for syphilis is less closely associated with clinical complications than are aCL and LAC. The mechanism of action of aPL is not yet known, although many theories have been advanced. Recent identification of beta 2-glycoprotein I, a serum glycoprotein, as an aPL cofactor suggests that inhibition of this protein's anticoagulant activity may be important. Autoimmune aPL differ from infection-induced aPL in important antibody characteristics, including IgG subclass, light chain preference, antibody avidity, and cofactor requirement. Both recognize negatively charged phospholipids, but various physical characteristics of the phospholipids alter the recognition patterns. Treatment of the aPL syndrome is not well defined. Anticoagulation with heparin, coumadin, or aspirin are currently widely used. Although corticosteroid, immunosuppressive therapy, and plasmapheresis may be used for severe, fulminant thrombosis, the efficacy of this treatment has yet to be proved.
 ...
PMID:Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. 156 40

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) characterize patients at risk for both arterial and venous thrombotic complications. Recently it has been recognized that the presence of plasma proteins such as beta 2-glycoprotein I(beta 2 GPI) and prothrombin are essential for the binding of aPL to phospholipids and that these proteins are probably the real target of aPL. The discovery of these new antigens for aPL introduces the possibility of new assays to detect the presence of aPL. However, it is not known whether these assays improve the identification of patients at risk for thrombosis. In this retrospective study we compared the value of the classic assays LAC (lupus anticoagulant) and ACA (anticardiolipin antibodies) to detect aPL associated with thrombotic complications, with new assays which are based on the binding of aPL to the plasma proteins prothrombin and beta 2GPI. To do so, we have used these assays in a group of 175 SLE patients and correlated the positivity of the different assays with the presence of a history of venous and arterial thrombosis. Control groups were patients without SLE but with LAC and/or ACA and thrombosis (n = 23), patients with thrombosis without LAC and ACA (n = 40) and 42 healthy controls. In the univariate analysis, in which no distinction has been made between high and low antibody levels, we confirmed LAC and ACA to be related to both arterial and venous thrombosis. Anti-beta 2GPI- and anti-prothrombin-antibodies, both IgG and IgM correlate with venous thrombosis and anti-beta 2GPI-IgM with arterial thrombosis. Multivariate analysis showed that LAC is the strongest risk factor (OR 9.77; 95% CI 1.74-31.15) for arterial thrombosis. None of the other factors is a significant additional risk factor. For venous thrombosis LAC is the strongest risk factor (OR 6.55; 95% CI 2.36-18.17), but ACA-IgM above 20 MPL units also appeared to be a significant (p = 0.0159) risk factor (OR 3.90; 95% CI 1.29-11.80). Furthermore, the presence of anti-beta 2GPI- and/or anti-prothrombin-antibodies in LAC positive patients (n = 60) does not increase the risk for thrombosis. The results showed that (i) the LAC assay correlates best with a history of both arterial and venous thrombosis and (ii) neither the anti-beta 2GPI ELISA nor the anti-prothrombin ELISA gives additional information for a thrombotic risk in SLE patients.
 ...
PMID:Lupus anticoagulant is the strongest risk factor for both venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Comparison between different assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies. 926 10

The concurrence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and thrombosis or pregnancy loss defines the 'antiphospholipid syndrome' (APS). The Sydney update of the classification criteria for definite APS diagnosis introduced numerous ameliorations to the previous preliminary consensus statement. Clinical criteria are now better defined as vascular thrombosis must be diagnosed on the basis of objective criteria. Moreover,additional risk factors for thrombosis or pregnancy loss must be taken into account before the diagnosis is made and should be described in detail in scientific reports. As far as laboratory criteria are concerned,the lack of standardization and the misinterpretation of results remain major problems often leading to overdiagnosis. A single positive test result out of the possible assays determining aPL antibodies (Lupus Anticoagulant, LAC, anticardiolipin, aCL and anti. beta2-Glycoprotein I, beta2-GPI, antibodies) is still sufficient,according to the Sydney criteria, to justify a diagnosis of APS. Nevertheless single test positivity may result in overdiagnosis or identification of low risk patients and use of all three tests seems more reasonable. Multiple positivity or (better) triple positivity in our experience allows for the identification of high risk patients for possible recurrence. In the near future, coagulation tests discriminating between a beta2-GPI and anti-prothrombin LAC may be useful in identifying high risk patients.
 ...
PMID:The diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome. 1685 67

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a non-inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the plasma of patients with vascular thrombosis, recurrent complications of pregnancy, or both (1, 2). The presence of aPL in plasma of patients can be detected with either a prolongation of phospholipid dependent coagulation tests (lupus anticoagulant, LAC), or with solid phase immune assays against the protein beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI) or the phospholipid cardiolipin (anti-beta2-GPI antibody ELISA and anti-cardiolipin antibody ELISA, respectively) (3). For a long time there was a lot of confusion on who had the syndrome and who not. To solve this dispute, an international consensus meeting was organized in Sapporo in 1999 to formulate classification criteria for patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (4). These criteria have been updated in 2004 at another international consensus meeting in Sydney (5). The classification criteria were defined for scientific purposes and were aimed to be used as inclusion criteria in patient related studies. They were specifically not defined for diagnostic purposes. However, current practice is that these criteria are used as a diagnostic tool. This is very unfortunate because the specificity of the different aPL assays to detect the clinical manifestations that characterize APS are disputable. One of the aims of defining the criteria was to initiate studies to determine the value of the different anti-phospholipid antibody assays to serve as biomarker for the risk of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. The recent progress made on this important topic will be discussed.
 ...
PMID:Antiphospholipid syndrome. Current insights into laboratory diagnosis and pathophysiology. 2068 Feb 33