Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P01350 (gastrin)
 9,683 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A technique has been developed to obtain viable, isolated and enriched populations of gastrin cells (G-cells) from the rat stomach. Restricted tissue samples from a small area of the pyloric antrum known to be particularly rich in G-cells, were sequentially digested with pronase followed by mechanical agitation, to remove the epithelial cells. This technique resulted in a significant enrichment of G-cells (3-4 fold) since the surface epithelial cells and upper portions of the glands were discarded before the initial G-cell fraction was collected. These cells in suspension were then isolated from each other by gentle pipetting in a DNase containing solution and designated the crude preparation (CP). The G-cells were then purified further by separating the cells according to size by velocity sedimentation. The greatest concentration of G-cells (15-25%) was found in the fraction containing cells with diameters of 10 to 12 micrometer. The effectiveness of the technique was evaluated by counting G-cells as identified by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence and assessing gastrin activity by radioimmunoassay. All three methods indicated that cell separation by gravity velocity sedimentation enriched the G-cell population 15-20 fold over their concentration in the CP. The combined techniques of selective pronase digestion followed by gravity velocity sedimentation resulted in an isolated cell preparation containing a 50-100 fold increase of G-cells over their normal distribution in the intact gastric mucosa. Since these isolated G-cells retain features indicating viability, their usefulness for in vitro studies is suggested.
 ...
PMID:Studies of isolated and enriched rat antral mucosa gastrin cells. 48 90

The gastrin gene is expressed in fetal pancreatic islet cells, but after birth expression is selectively repressed as the islets terminally differentiate. DNA transfection studies identified a cis regulatory domain between -108 and -76 in the gastrin promoter which controls gastrin transcription in islet cells. This cis regulatory domain comprises adjacent positive and negative elements. The negative element (-108 to -82) contains the sequence ATTCCTCT, which is also found in the negative element of the beta-interferon promoter. Gel retardation assays and DNase footprinting studies demonstrated that specific islet nuclear protein(s) bind to the gastrin negative element. In vivo competition studies demonstrated that the trans-acting factors which bind to this element specifically repress gastrin promoter activity in islet cells. Immediately downstream of the negative element lies a positive element (-82 CATATGG -76), which activates gastrin transcription in islet cells. The sequence of the positive element resembles the islet-specific enhancer elements of the insulin gene (CATCTGG/C). Gel mobility shift assays and in vivo competition studies indicate that this positive element activates the gastrin promoter by binding to the same islet cell transcription factor which binds enhancer elements in the rat insulin gene. The tandem organization of the negative and positive elements suggests that this regulatory domain may act as a switch controlling the transient transcription of the gastrin gene during fetal islet development.
 ...
PMID:Islet cell-specific regulatory domain in the gastrin promoter contains adjacent positive and negative DNA elements. 218 75

Prolactinoma is the most common type of primary pituitary tumors. It occurs more frequently in women than in men. Dopaminergic agonists are effective in the shrinkage of prolactin-secreting pituitary tumor and are preferred in some patients. However, pituitary radiotherapy may enable the long-term removal of prolactin-secreting tumor cells. Recent evidence suggests that prolactinoma is a heterogeneous disorder with complicated and multifactorial etiology and pathogenesis. Apparently, a thorough understanding of prolactinoma tumorigenesis would be important. To facilitate investigations on tumorigenesis of prolactinoma, animal models for prolactinomas have been developed. These models have expedited our progress in the recent years. Many researchers consider the F(344) rat to be the most sensitive strain of rats to estrogen (E(2))-induced prolactinoma formation. Nonetheless, E(2) treatment for 60 days also induces the formation of pituitary prolactin-secreting adenoma in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Evidently, the SD rat is also a good animal for prolactinoma investigations. Following E(2) implantation, prolactinomas developed in the eutopic adenohypophysis in situ and/or ectopic pituitary grafted under the renal capsule in SD rats. These observations favor the hypothesis that prolactinoma growth is the result of pathological changes in the adenohypophysis and/or hypothalamus. In the latter case, abnormal release of hypothalamic dopamine, GABA, or brain-gut peptides (such as cholecystokinin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, galanin, angiotensin, opioid peptide, gastrin, gastrin-releasing peptide, pancreatic polypeptide, and adrenocorticotropic hormone) results in some of the pathological changes that may lead to hyperprolactinemia and/or prolactinoma development. Dysregulation of prolactin synthesis and secretion may be the result of prolactin gene modulation. In E(2)-induced rat prolactinomas, prolactin mRNA contents and the expression of some proto-oncogenes, e.g. c-myc and c-ras, TGFalpha and TGFbeta1 mRNA were significantly changed. The above findings are consistent with results in human prolactinoma development. In addition, in rats abnormal expression of the prolactin gene was correlated with hypomethylated status of CpG sites in exons 1, 2 and 4 of the prolactin gene, as well as the increase in hypersensitive sites to DNase 1 in the encoding region of the prolactin gene. In E(2)-treated rats, a point mutation with a base substitution from cytidine (C) to adenine (A) was found at the -36-bp site of the proximal promoter of the prolactin gene in eutopic pituitary prolactinomas, but no change was observed in the same sequence of the prolactin gene in ectopic prolactinoma. The association of a base substitution with the hyperexpression of the prolactin gene in eutopic prolactinomas suggests that different mechanisms may mediate the formation of eutopic and ectopic prolactin-secreting tumors. Melatonin decreases the expression of the prolactin gene in vitro suggesting that this pineal hormone may be a potential anticarcinogen in vivo. It has also been shown that MT(2) (Mel(1b)) melatonin receptors are expressed in anterior pituitary cells. The use of melatonin as a preventive or therapeutic drug for prolactinomas should be further investigated. In summary, improved knowledge on tumorigenesis of prolactinomas, especially in the rat model, was noted. These E(2)-induced rat prolactinoma models would facilitate future investigations, and expected results shall be fruitful and exciting for the development of future drug designs for the prevention and/or treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors.
 ...
PMID:Pituitary prolactin-secreting tumor formation: recent developments. 1068 32

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX) 2 promotes intestinal wound healing but elicits also proinflammatory effects and has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis. Thus, a balanced expression of COX-2 is essential for intestinal homeostasis. This study was designed to evaluate the regulation of COX-2 by probiotic organisms and to characterize ligands and receptors involved. Colo320 and SW480 intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) were stimulated with gastrin or TNF-alpha and pre- or coincubated with commensales, bacterial supernatants, or distinct toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands. COX-2 promoter activity was determined by luciferase assays, protein expression by Western blotting, and secretion of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) by ELISA. Commensales differentially regulated COX-2 expression in IEC. E. coli Nissle 1917, the probiotic mixture VSL#3, and media conditioned by these organisms ameliorated induced COX-2 expression and PGE(2) secretion. Heat inactivation and DNase treatment significantly decreased these regulatory capacities. Lactobacillus acidophilus, however, significantly increased COX-2 expression and PGE(2) secretion. TLR agonists differentially ameliorated basal or induced COX-2 expression. Distinct probiotics specifically and significantly decrease induced COX-2 expression in IEC, most likely mediated by released factors and in part by bacterial DNA. A significant involvement of TLRs in these regulatory processes remains to be established.
 ...
PMID:Probiotics regulate the expression of COX-2 in intestinal epithelial cells. 1911 80