Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UNIPROT:P01275 (
glucagon
)
26,492
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-LysNH2, [His1,Lys6]
GHRP
, is a new synthetic hexapeptide which specifically elicits a dosage-related release of GH in vitro and in vivo without a concomitant release of LH, FSH, TSH, or PRL and, in limited in vivo studies, insulin or
glucagon
. Our results indicate that this small peptide has the attributes of a hypophysiotropic hormone. In vitro the minimum and maximum active dosages ranged from 1-10 ng/ml in the pituitary incubate assay. It was active in rats, monkeys, lambs, calves, and under special experimental conditions chicks, indicating its lack of species dependency. It was active when administered iv, sc, or ip to rats. After iv injection, GH levels rose within 2 min, peaked at +10-20 min, and by 2 h usually had returned to normal. It was not possible to directly compare the potencies of [His1,Lys6]
GHRP
, and the GH-releasing factors GHRF-44 and GHRF-40 after a single sc injection in rats because the time course of the GH response of these peptides was different. The GH response of [His1,Lys6]
GHRP
was longer in duration than either of these larger peptides. Both SRIF-14 and SRIF-28 inhibited the GH response of the hexapeptide; however, SRIF-28 was about four times more active than SRIF-14 in vitro and 7.5 times more active in vivo. When this small peptide was administered sc once or twice daily to immature rats for 9 or 25 days, the BW gain increased above the control. At the end of the weight gain studies the pituitary remained fully responsive to the peptide. Thus, [His1,Lys6]
GHRP
may be a valuable peptide for investigating the function of the pituitary somatotrophs and, in addition, it has the potential for increasing BW gain of a variety of normal animals by inducing GH release via a direct pituitary site of action.
...
PMID:On the in vitro and in vivo activity of a new synthetic hexapeptide that acts on the pituitary to specifically release growth hormone. 671 55
The family of clinically available peptide hormones (PHs) is expanding in an exponential way, and advancement of knowledge of the basic mechanisms of action of PHs has led to multiplication of the possible clinical indications of already known PHs, and appears even more promising for still unknown PHs. A common obstacle to a full routine use of PHs is represented by the fact that PHs cannot be administered by the oral route, since they undergo digestion and inactivation in the gastrointestinal tract and a significant first pass metabolism in the liver. One alternative is represented by intranasal administration of PHs. The intranasal route of administration of PHs is also very attractive because of its convenience, which should assure a good compliance by patients. Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone, the analogues, desmopressin, oxytocin and salmon calcitonin are already marketed for intranasal administration; for salmon calcitonin, studies about bioavailability have been scanty in the past, but should be re-considered in order to fully explore its clinical benefit.Intranasal peptide hormones not yet on the market are insulin,
glucagon
, growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and
GHRP
, GH and somatostatin, but the scenario is likely to change in a short period of time. Hexarelin seems very effective and is at a promising stage of development; also,
glucagon
appears mature enough to undergo extensive clinical evaluation and possibly marketing. The concern is why other peptides have not been further evaluated, as is the case for somatostatin and its analogues.
...
PMID:Peptide hormones: Review of current and emerging uses by nasal delivery. 1083 81
Ghrelin possesses endocrine and non-endocrine actions mediated by the GH Secretagogue (GHS)-Receptors (
GHS-R
). The regulation of ghrelin secretion is still largely unknown. Somatostatin (SRIF) modulates central and gastroenteropancreatic hormonal secretions and functions. SRIF actions are partially shared by cortistatin (CST), a natural SRIF analogue, that binds all SRIF receptors and also
GHS-R
. Herein, we studied the effects of SRIF-14 or CST-14 (2.0 micro g/kg/h i.v. over 120 min) and of placebo on ghrelin, GH, insulin,
glucagon
and glucose levels in 6 normal young men. Placebo unaffected GH, insulin,
glucagon
, glucose and ghrelin levels. SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous GH secretion of about 90%. After SRIF or CST withdrawal, GH levels recovered to baseline levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p<0.01) insulin secretion of about 45%. In both sessions, after SRIF or CST withdrawal, insulin overrode baseline levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.01)
glucagon
levels of about 40%. After SRIF or CST withdrawal,
glucagon
persisted lower (p < 0.05) than at baseline. Neither SRIF nor CST modified glucose levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.01) circulating ghrelin levels of about 55%. Ghrelin levels progressively decreased from time +15 min, reaching the nadir at 120 and 105 min for SRIF and CST, respectively. Even 30 min after SRIF or CST withdrawal, ghrelin levels persisted lower (p < 0.05) than those at baseline. In conclusion, this study first shows that SRIF and CST strongly inhibits ghrelin secretion that, differently from GH and insulin secretion, persists inhibited even after stopping the infusion of SRIF or CST.
...
PMID:Ghrelin secretion is inhibited by either somatostatin or cortistatin in humans. 1236 82
Ghrelin is produced mainly by endocrine cells in the stomach and is an endogenous ligand for the
growth hormone secretagogue receptor
(
GHS-R
). It also influences feeding behavior, metabolic regulation, and energy balance. It affects islet hormone secretion, and expression of ghrelin and
GHS-R
in the pancreas has been reported. In human islets, ghrelin expression is highest pre- and neonatally. We examined ghrelin and
GHS-R
in rat islets during development with immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. We also studied the effect of ghrelin on insulin secretion from INS-1 (832/13) cells and the expression of
GHS-R
in these cells. We found ghrelin expression in rat islet endocrine cells from mid-gestation to 1 month postnatally. Islet expression of
GHS-R
mRNA was detected from late fetal stages to adult. The onset of islet ghrelin expression preceded that of gastric ghrelin. Islet ghrelin cells constitute a separate and novel islet cell population throughout development. However, during a short perinatal period a minor subpopulation of the ghrelin cells co-expressed
glucagon
or pancreatic polypeptide. Markers for cell lineage, proliferation, and duct cells revealed that the ghrelin cells proliferate, originate from duct cells, and share lineage with
glucagon
cells. Ghrelin dose-dependently inhibited glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from INS-1 (832/13) cells, and
GHS-R
was detected in the cells. We conclude that ghrelin is expressed in a novel developmentally regulated endocrine islet cell type in the rat pancreas and that ghrelin inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion via a direct effect on the beta-cell.
...
PMID:Ghrelin is expressed in a novel endocrine cell type in developing rat islets and inhibits insulin secretion from INS-1 (832/13) cells. 1496 97
Ghrelin, an endogenous ligand for the
growth hormone secretagogue receptor
, was originally purified from the rat stomach. Although ghrelin has been recognized as an important regulator of energy metabolism, the regulation of the ghrelin secretion is largely unknown. Here, we examined the direct effects of insulin, leptin, and
glucagon
on the release of ghrelin from the isolated rat stomach. The isolated pancreas-spleen-duodenum deprived preparation of rat stomach was used. After a baseline control infusion into the left gastric artery, insulin, leptin, or
glucagon
were infused for 15 min at concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 nM. The levels of immunoreactive ghrelin in the venous effluents were measured with a radioimmunoassay. Insulin and leptin inhibited ghrelin secretion dose-dependently (total amount of ghrelin release: insulin at 1 nM, 73.5+/-7.3% of the control infusion; leptin at 1 nM, 81.8+/-2.5% of the control infusion; n=5, P<0.05), while
glucagon
increased it dose-dependently (total amount of ghrelin released at 10 nM was 143.9+/-19.3% of the control infusion; n=5, P<0.01). These results indicate that the ghrelin responses observed in vivo could be due to direct effects of multiple hormonal signals on the stomach.
...
PMID:Effects of insulin, leptin, and glucagon on ghrelin secretion from isolated perfused rat stomach. 1509
Many peptides are synthesised and released from the gastrointestinal tract. Whilst their roles in regulation of gastrointestinal function have been known for some time, it is now evident that they also influence eating behaviour and thus potential anti obesity targets. Peptide YY (PYY) is released post prandially from the gastrointestinal L-cells with
glucagon-like peptide 1
(
GLP-1
) and
oxyntomodulin
. Following peripheral administration of PYY 3-36, the circulating form of PYY, to mouse, rat or human there is marked inhibition of food intake. PYY 3-36 is thought to mediate its actions through the NPY Y2 GPCR. Obese subjects have lower basal fasting PYY levels and have a smaller post prandial rise. However, obesity does not appear to be associated with resistance to PYY (as it is with leptin) and exogenous infusion of PYY 3-36 results in a reduction in food intake by 30% in an obese group and 31% in a lean group.
GLP-1
or
oxyntomodulin
, products of the prepreglucagon gene, decrease food intake when administered either peripherally or directly into the CNS. In addition, both have been shown to decrease food intake in humans. These effects are thought to be mediated by the GLP-1 receptor. Ghrelin, a huger hormone produced by the stomach, increases in the circulation following a period of fasting. Administration of ghrelin either peripherally or directly into the CNS increases food intake and chronic administration leads to obesity. Further infusion into normal healthy volunteers increases both food intake and appetite. Ghrelin is thought to act through the
growth hormone secretagogue receptor
(
GHS-R
). Obesity is the current major cause of premature death in the UK, killing almost 1000 people a week. Worldwide its prevalence is accelerating. The administration of the naturally occurring gut hormone may offer a long-term therapeutic approach to weight control. Here we consider the therapeutic potential of some gut hormones, and the GPCR's through which they act, in the treatment of obesity.
...
PMID:Gut hormones as peripheral anti obesity targets. 1554 46
Ghrelin, a novel peptide isolated from stomach tissue of rats and humans, has been identified as the endogenous ligand for the
growth hormone secretagogue receptor
(
GHS-R
). In addition to its secretion from the stomach, ghrelin is also expressed in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, intestine, kidney, placenta, and pancreas.
GHS-R
mRNA, on the other hand, is expressed in the hypothalamus, pituitary, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, stomach, intestine, and adipose tissue. Ghrelin is considered to have important roles in feeding regulation and energy metabolism as well as in the release of growth hormone (GH). Recent physiological experiments on the pancreas have shown that ghrelin regulates insulin secretion. However, sites of action of ghrelin in the pancreas are yet to be identified. In this study, to gain insight into the role of ghrelin in rat pancreatic islets, we used immunohistochemistry to determine the localization of ghrelin and
GHS-R
in islet cells. Double fluorescence immunohistochemistry revealed that weak
GHS-R
-like immunoreactivity was found in B cells containing insulin.
GHS-R
immunoreactivity overlapped that of
glucagon
-like immunoreactive cells. Moreover, both ghrelin and
GHS-R
-like immunoreactivities were detected mostly in the same cells in the periphery of the islets of Langerhans. These observations suggest that ghrelin is synthesized and secreted from A cells, and acts back on A cells in an autocrine and/or paracrine manner. In addition, ghrelin may act on B cells via
GHS-R
to regulate insulin secretion.
...
PMID:Morphological analysis of ghrelin and its receptor distribution in the rat pancreas. 1562 Apr 16
Current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) state that the diagnosis must be proven biochemically by provocative testing that is done within the appropriate clinical context. The need for reliance on provocative testing is based on evidence that the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h and the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels do not distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Regarding IGF-I, it has been demonstrated that very low levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e., patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD, or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) may be considered definitive evidence for severe GHD obviating the need for provocative tests. However, normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD and therefore adults suspected for GHD and with normal IGF-I levels must undergo a provocative test of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the test of choice, with severe GHD being defined by a GH peak less than 3 microg/l, the cut-off that distinguishes normal from GHD adults. The ITT is contraindicated in the presence of ischemic heart disease, seizure disorders, and in the elderly. Other tests are as reliable as the ITT, provided they are used with appropriate cut-off limits.
Glucagon
stimulation, a classical test, and especially new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GHS (i.e.,
GHRP
-6) have well-defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, are independent of age and gender, and are able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The confounding effect of overweight or obesity on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests needs to be considered as the somatotropic response to all stimuli is negatively correlated with body mass index. Appropriate cut-offs for lean, overweight, and obese subjects must be used in order to avoid false-positive diagnoses of severe GHD in obese adults.
...
PMID:Growth hormone levels in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adulthood. 1742 91
The current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult GHD are mainly based on the statements from the GH Research Society Consensus from Port Stevens in 1997. It is stated that diagnosis of adult GHD must be shown biochemically by provocative tests within the appropriate clinical context. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was indicated as that of choice and severe GHD defined by a GH peak lower than 3 microg/L. The need to rely on provocative tests is based on evidence that that the measurement of IGF-I as well as of IGFBP-3 levels does not distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Hypoglycemia may be contraindicated; thus, alternative provocative tests were considered, provided they are used with appropriate cut-off limits. Among classical provocative tests, arginine and
glucagon
alone were indicated as alternative tests, although less discriminatory than ITT. Testing with the combined administration of GHRH plus arginine was recommended as an alternative to ITT, mostly taking into account its marked specificity. Based on data in the literature in the last decade, the GRS Consensus Statements should be appropriately amended. Regarding the appropriate clinical context for the suspicion of adult GHD, one should evaluate patients with hypothalamic or pituitary disease or a history of cranial irradiation, as well as those with childhood-onset GHD are at obvious risk as adults for severe GHD. Brain injuries (trauma, subarachnoid hemorrage, tumours of the central nervous system) very often cause acquired hypopituitarism, including severe GHD. Given the epidemiology of brain injuries, the important role of the endocrinologist in providing major clinical benefit to brain injured patients who are still undiagnosed should be underscored. From the biochemical point of view, although normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD, very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e. patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) can be considered as definitive evidence for severe GHD; thus, these patients would skip provocative tests. Patients suspected for adult GHD with normal IGF-I levels must be investigated by provocative tests. ITT remains a test of reference but it should be recognized that other tests are as reliable as ITT.
Glucagon
as classical test and, particularly, new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GH secretagogues (GHS) (i.e.
GHRP
-6) have well defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Overweight and obesity have confounding effect on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests. In adults cut-off levels of GH response below which severe GHD is demonstrated must be appropriate to lean, overweight and obese subjects to avoid false positive diagnosis in obese adults and false negative diagnosis in lean GHD patients. Finally, normative values of GH response to provocative tests may depend on age, particularly in the transitional age; the normative cut-off levels of GH response to ITT in this phase of life are now available.
...
PMID:Diagnosis of adult GH deficiency. 1776 55
Based on previous consensus statements, it has been widely accepted that the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) must be shown biochemically by provocative tests of GH secretion; in fact, the measurement of IGF-I as well as of other markers was considered unable to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT) was indicated as that of choice and severe GHD defined by a GH peak lower than 3 microg/l. It is now recognized that, although normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD, very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e. patients with childhood-onset severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) can be considered as definite evidence for severe GHD. However, patients suspected for adult GHD with normal IGF-I levels must be investigated by provocative tests. ITT remains a test of reference but it should be recognized that other tests are as reliable as ITT.
Glucagon
as classical test and, particularly, new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GH secretagogues (GHS) (i.e.
GHRP
-6) have well defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Overweight and obesity have confounding effect on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests. In adults cut-off levels of GH response below which severe GHD is demonstrated must be appropriate to lean, overweight and obese subjects to avoid false positive diagnosis in obese adults and false negative diagnosis in lean GHD patients.
...
PMID:Diagnosis of adult GH deficiency. 1840 87
1
2
3
Next >>