Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P01275 (glucagon)
 26,492 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The history, physical examination, and the results of the upper gastrointestinal series, esophageal manometry, 24-h pH recording, endoscopy, and biopsy are reviewed in 16 children (mean age of 10.6 years, range of 3 years 5 months to 15 years 3 months) who presented to the Alberta Children's Hospital with dysphagia ("food-sticking") without previously identified provocative disorders since January 1985. Of the 16 patients, 11 had had intermittent obstruction, and 7 had had intervention to relieve obstruction (2 Heimlich maneuvers, 1 intravenous glucagon, and 4 endoscopy after failure of intravenous glucagon). Although only five children had a recent history suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux, 12 had histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis (including 1 with a peptic stricture, 1 with "nutcracker" esophagus, and 1 with esophageal dysmotility characteristic of Down's syndrome) and all responded clinically to antireflux therapy. Of the remaining four patients, one had extrinsic esophageal compression from a vascular ring (right aortic arch with left ligamentum arteriosum), one had a single and another had recurrent episodes of food-sticking without any identified abnormality, and one declined investigation. In childhood, dysphagia may be the presenting symptom of reflux esophagitis in the absence of a history suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux and without evidence of a peptic stricture.
 ...
PMID:The role of gastroesophageal reflux in pediatric dysphagia. 205 Dec 65

Biphasic contrast studies are generally advocated as the best current barium examination for the upper GI tract. Two recent prospective blinded trials compared the diagnostic results of a biphasic contrast examination--employing a medium-density barium suspension and glucagon--and endoscopy. Both methods appear to have nearly equal merit for the detection of peptic ulcer and gastric carcinoma. One of the trials demonstrated a relative inability of the barium examination to depict reflux esophagitis other than the severe variety, an inability that had been previously recognized. Earlier Japanese studies showed excellent results from biphasic studies in the detection of early and advanced gastric carcinoma. Because gastric carcinoma may present as a wide variety of lesions, ranging from minute alterations in mucosal relief through ulcers to masses, the values from these Japanese studies also test the sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic examination in demonstrating non-neoplastic lesions of the stomach. Ample data have shown that a radiographic examination compares favorably with endoscopy in the detection of esophageal carcinoma. The usefulness of a radiographic examination as a primary examination if disturbances of esophageal motor function are suspected is generally recognized. A state-of-the-art radiographic examination (ie, a biphasic examination, preferably with drug-induced hypotony) therefore appears to represent an appropriate initial examination in evaluation of most disorders of the upper GI tract. If this examination prompts the slightest suspicion of a malignant tumor, endoscopy should follow for the purpose of obtaining biopsy specimens. Endoscopy is not necessary if duodenal ulcers have been diagnosed by means of radiography; in typically benign gastric ulcers, radiographic follow-up without endoscopy may safely be considered. If in elderly patients multiple small gastric polyps have been detected, endoscopy is not needed. If complaints persist after negative results at radiographic examination, however, endoscopic intervention must be considered. If the complaints suggest reflux esophagitis, the clinician can choose between treatment and endoscopy. In a patient with acute upper GI bleeding, primary endoscopy may be preferred. This diagnostic approach in which endoscopy is employed as complementary to the barium examination is in most parts of the world a cost-effective one. It is also the safest possible option; although endoscopic complications are rare, their absolute number cannot be ignored if every patient had to undergo endoscopy. A biphasic approach with a medium-density barium suspension can be attempted in nearly every patient; if the patient proves unable to cooperate for an optimal double-contrast examination, a single-contrast examination can be performed with the same barium swallowed.
 ...
PMID:Use of barium in evaluation of disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract: current status. 268 69

The possible effect of hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and glucagon on the quality of the double-contrast esophagram was studied in 177 patients. Overall, the quality of the double-contrast esophageal views were judged poor in 46 (26%) patients and good in 131 (74%). No significant improvement in quality was evident in patients receiving glucagon, or in those with hiatal hernia or documented reflux esophagitis. Although the presence of gastroesophageal reflux or the lowering of esophageal sphincter pressure by glucagon would be expected to promote gaseous reflux from the stomach, no improvement in the quality of the double-contrast views of the esophagus was evident in our study.
 ...
PMID:Effects of hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and glucagon on the quality of double-contrast esophagram. 270 46

The correlation between radiography, endoscopy, and histology in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis, as well as the effect of glucagon on double contrast radiography was studied. The material consisted of 220 out-patients sent to the Oulu University Central Hospital for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. 109 of these were shown to have reflux esophagitis at endoscopy, the other 111 formed a control group with normal esophageal mucosa. Radiologic examinations were performed after endoscopy on the same day by a radiologist, who knew neither the clinical history of the patients nor the findings at endoscopy. Using endoscopy as a reference, 56% (28/50) of the patients with grade E I reflux esophagitis (erythema, oedema) were diagnosed correctly by double contrast radiography. The corresponding figures concerning grade E II (erosions), grade E III (localized deformity, ulcer), and grade E IV (stricture) reflux esophagitis were 84% (41/49), 100% (4/4), and 100% (6/6). False positive findings were found in 4.5% (5/111). The sensitivity of double contrast radiography as compared to endoscopy in all grades was 73%, its specificity was 96%, and accuracy 84%. The corresponding figures, when only grades E II, E III, and E IV are considered, were 86%, 96%, and 92%. In double contrast radiography, signs sometimes visible in grade E I reflux esophagitis were thick mucosal folds and mucosal granularity. Reliable signs of grade E II reflux esophagitis were streaks and dots of barium against the mucosa either alone or together with thick mucosal folds and mucosal granularity. Specific signs of grade E III and E IV reflux esophagitis were--along with the above--localized deformities, ulcers, and strictures. A hiatus hernia or wide hiatus was detected radiologically in 2/3 of the reflux esophagitis patients, and in 1/3 of the controls. Histologic findings correlated poorly with both endoscopic and radiologic findings. Single contrast radiography was less sensitive than double contrast radiography in detection of superficial mucosal lesions. Glucagon had no advantagous effect on esophageal double contrast radiography. Its use, however, in connection with double contrast radiography of the stomach is unlikely to have any disadvantagous effect on the evaluation of the hiatus and gastroesophageal reflux.
 ...
PMID:Diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. With special reference to double contrast radiography. 403 76

A role of gastrointestinal hormones in the regulation of the lower esophageal sphincter was studied in 22 patients with cardiospasm and 21 with reflux esophagitis. The levels of gastrin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), glucagon, insulin, and c peptide were determined by radioactive assay before and after surgical treatment. In opposite abnormalities (cardiospasm and reflux esophagitis), there is a different degree of VIP secretion both at the beginning and after functional exercises. Before and after functional exercises, the level of VIP was higher than in those with cardiospasm. The value of VIP on fasting and after functional exercises may be an additional information to establish the diagnoses of cardiospasm and reflux esophagitis and to evaluate the efficiency of the treatment performed.
 ...
PMID:[Regulation of the functional status of the lower esophageal sphincter with gastrointestinal hormones in cardiospasm and reflux esophagitis]. 1218 36