Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:P01034 (cystatin C)
 3,397 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The protease inhibitor cystatin C is a non-glycosylated low molecular weight protein (Mr=13359) which is produced by all nucleated cells at a constant rate, freely filtered by the renal glomeruli, and catabolized in the tubuli. The aim of the study was to elucidate the applicability of serum cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with various kidney diseases with a wide range of renal function and in dialysis patients. Seventy-six patients with various kidney diseases (aged 20 to 79 years) and 61 dialysis patients (aged 21 to 82 years) were included. Serum cystatin C was measured by automated particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry, serum and urine creatinine by an enzymatic method, and GFR by 99mTc-DTPA-clearance using a single plasma sample method. Serum cystatin C in patients with various kidney diseases was 1.90+/-0.98 mg/L (mean+/-SD) and in dialysis patients 7.14+/-1.91 mg/L. In the non-dialysis patients a linear relationship was found between 99mTc-DTPA-clearance and 1/serum cystatin C (r=0.91, p-value<0.0001), 1/serum creatinine (r=0.89, p-value<0.0001), and creatinine-clearance (r=0.88, p-value<0.0001). Comparison of the non-parametric ROC plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC)=0.9665; SE=0.0169), serum creatinine (AUC=0.9554; SE=0.0205), and creatinine-clearance (AUC=0.9731; SE=0.0160) revealed no significant differences (p-values: 0.50, 0.78, and 0.49). In conclusion, cystatin C may be a likewise good marker of the GFR as serum creatinine and creatinine-clearance, cystatin C having the advantage being independent of gender and muscle mass.
 ...
PMID:Serum cystatin C as a marker of the renal function. 989 Mar 42

Serum cystatin C more accurately reflects glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in pediatric renal transplant recipients than serum creatinine. Nineteen pediatric renal transplant recipients, 15 male and 4 female, ranging in age from 8.35 yr to 19.06 yr (median 13.52 yr), were enrolled in the study over an 18-month period. Twenty-eight measurements of 99mTc-DTPA GFR were compared with simultaneous measurements of serum cystatin C and Cr. Linear regression analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients and analysis of variance (anova) were used to determine the relationship between creatinine, cystatin C and GFR. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the relationship of 1/Cr to DTPA-GFR and for 1/cystatin C to DTPA-GFR were 0.63 and 0.58, respectively. There was no significant difference between serum cystatin C and serum creatinine as markers of GFR. Serum cystatin C, which costs more to measure than serum creatinine, offers no advantage in monitoring the renal function of pediatric renal transplant recipients.
 ...
PMID:The relationship between serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and glomerular filtration rate in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a pilot study. 1239 Apr 19

It is common practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Schwartz formula (a height creatinine/ratio), although it has its limitations. Cystatin C was found to be a superior marker of GFR. No formula has been validated to estimate GFR from cystatin C in children. Children (aged 1.0-18 years, n=536) with various renal pathologies undergoing nuclear medicine GFR clearance studies ((99m)Tc-DTPA single-injection technique) were tested. Cystatin C was measured with a nephelometric assay. The Schwartz GFR was calculated using enzymatically determined serum creatinine in micromoles per liter using the constant 48 for adolescent males and 38 otherwise. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis on log/log-transformed data, we derived the following relationship between the cystatin C concentration and GFR:. Using the Bland and Altman analysis to test agreement between the Schwartz formula and gold standard GFR showed considerable bias, with a mean difference of +10.8% and a trend towards overestimation of the GFR by the Schwartz formula with lower GFRs. In contrast, the Bland and Altman analysis applied on the GFR estimate derived from cystatin C showed the mean difference to be negligible at +0.3% and no trend towards overestimation of the GFR with lower GFRs. In the regression analysis of the estimate and the GFR, the Schwartz estimate showed significant deviation from linearity, whereas the cystatin C estimate did not. In conclusion, the data suggest that this novel cystatin C-based GFR estimate shows significantly less bias and serves as a better estimate for GFR in children.
 ...
PMID:Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? 1292 Jun 38

The ability to assess renal function in diabetes patients rapidly and early is of major importance. This study was designed to determine whether cystatin C can replace serum creatinine as the screening marker for reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetes patients. The study was performed on 51 type 2 diabetic patients. GFR was estimated by the plasma clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA. The correlation between (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance and levels of serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance was determined. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of renal impairment (defined as GFR<68 ml/min) were calculated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance. The correlation coefficients with (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance were -0.744 for serum cystatin C, -0.658 for serum creatinine, and +0.625 for creatinine clearance (P<0.001). With a cutoff value of 68 mL/min, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.891 for cystatin C, 0.77 for creatinine, and 0.753 for creatinine clearance. The AUC was statistically different between serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance (P<0.05). The ROC plot indicates that cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine and creatinine clearance for detecting impaired GFR. Serum cystatin C appropriately reflects GFR in diabetes, and is more efficacious than serum creatinine and creatinine clearance in detecting reduced GFR in type 2 diabetes patients.
 ...
PMID:Serum cystatin C assay for the detection of early renal impairment in diabetic patients. 1473 May 55

Accurate measurement of GFR is critical for the evaluation of new therapies and the care of renal transplant recipients. Although not accurate in renal transplantation, GFR is often estimated using creatinine-based equations. Cystatin C is a marker of GFR that seems to be more accurate than creatinine. Equations to predict GFR based on the serum cystatin C concentration have been developed, but their accuracy in transplantation is unknown. GFR was estimated using four equations (Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, and Hoek) that are based on serum cystatin C and seven equations that are based on serum creatinine in 117 adult renal transplant recipients. GFR was measured using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), and the bias, precision, and accuracy of each equation were determined. The mean (99m)Tc-DTPA GFR was 58 +/- 23 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The cystatin C-based equations of Filler and Le Bricon had the lowest bias (-1.7 and -3.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), greatest precision (11.4 and 11.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and highest accuracy (87 and 89% within 30% of measured GFR, respectively). The cystatin C equations remained accurate even when the measured GFR was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The creatinine-based equations were not as accurate, with only 53 to 80% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR. Cystatin C-based equations are more accurate at predicting GFR in renal transplant recipients than traditional creatinine-based equations. Further prospective studies with repetitive measurement of cystatin C are needed to determine whether cystatin C-based estimates of GFR will be sufficiently accurate to monitor long-term allograft function.
 ...
PMID:Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. 1623 5

Early detection of renal dysfunction in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation is important. Creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were found to be less accurate in liver transplant recipients than in their original populations. Since cystatin C (CysC) is independent from muscle mass and hepatic biosynthesis, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 3 CysC-based equations (Larson, Hoek, and Filler formulae) that are based on the same CysC method as that of our center in comparison to the abbreviated creatinine-based modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula in 59 liver transplant recipients. "True GFR" was measured by 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) clearance. Neither correlation with the GFR (correlation coefficients: 0.594-0.640) nor precision (root mean square error: 15.7-18.17 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) differed significantly between the tested formulae. The biases of the Hoek and Larsson formulae were significantly smaller than those of the MDRD and Filler equations (-0.1 and -2.3 vs. 10.1 and 7.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; P </= 0.0023). Mean estimates of MDRD (61.9 +/- 21.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and Filler (61.2 +/- 22.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) differed significantly from the measured GFR (52.3 +/- 17.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < 0.005), whereas Larsson and Hoek did not (49.5 +/- 20.2 and 51.4 +/- 17.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively). Accuracy within 30% and 50% of the true GFR was best for the Hoek (76.3% and 93.2%) formula, albeit not significantly different from MDRD (64.4% and 83.1%). Taken together, these data show the best overall performance for GFR estimates derived from the Hoek equation with respect to bias, precision, and accuracy.
 ...
PMID:Estimation of glomerular filtration rates after orthotopic liver transplantation: Evaluation of cystatin C-based equations. 1703 31

The gold standard to assess renal function is the measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). For practical reasons, renal function is often evaluated from serum creatinine (S Cr) or cystatin C (S Cys), and GFR is predicted from SCr. Ultrasound scanning of the kidneys is used only to evaluate renal morphology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sonographic renal dimensions and GFR in renal transplant recipients and in kidney donors. GFR (urinary clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA), S Cr, and S Cys were measured in 33 donors (28 females [F], 5 males [M]; SCr, 0.81-1.90 mg/dL) and 30 recipients (8 F, 22 M; SCr, 0.96-2.42 mg/dL). GFR was also predicted using the Cockcroft and Gault (CG) formula and with the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Length, width, and depth of kidneys and renal sinus were measured using renal sonography. Among sonographic measurements, kidney length showed the best correlation with GFR. A closer correlation with GFR was found in donors (r = 0.639; P < .00007) than in recipients (r = 0.511; P < .005). In either case, the correlation of kidney length with GFR was greater than that of S Cr or S Cys, and similar to that of CG or MDRD GFR. Accuracy of kidney length as an indicator of GFR impairment was not statistically different from laboratory tests. Only in donors did CG show better accuracy. In conclusion, renal dimensions at sonography closely correlated with GFR. Thus, renal sonography can give information also on the function of the renal graft and of the remaining kidney of living donors.
 ...
PMID:Kidney dimensions at sonography are correlated with glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients and in kidney donors. 1769 10

Plasma creatinine may not reflect glomerular filtration rate (GFR) especially in the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Plasma cystatin C (cysC), however, has the potential to more accurately determine early GFR reduction. We sought to improve the creatinine-based GFR estimation by including cysC measurements. We derived a reference GFR from standard dual plasma sampling (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance in a training cohort of 376 randomly selected adult Chinese patients with CKD. We compared reference values to estimated GFR and applied multiple regression models to one equation based solely on cysC, and to another combining plasma creatinine (Pcr) and cysC measurements of the training cohort. The results were validated by testing an additional 191 patients. The difference, precision, and accuracy of the two estimates were compared with the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation for Chinese patients, and another estimate combining cysC and modified MDRD calculations. The estimated GFR combining Pcr and cysC measurements more accurately matched the reference GFR at all stages of CKD than the other equations, particularly in patients with near-normal kidney function.
 ...
PMID:Improved GFR estimation by combined creatinine and cystatin C measurements. 1789 98

We report on the relationships between serum cystatin C level, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from a cystatin C-based prediction equation (that of Filler and Lepage), GFR calculated by the Schwartz formula and technetium 99m-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid ((99)Tc-DTPA)-determined GFR in 28 children with spina bifida. All children underwent measurement of height, weight, serum cystatin C level, and serum creatinine level at the time of their renal scan. The relationship between variables was assessed by Pearson correlation. Pearson correlation for the relationship between (99)Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the cystatin C-based equation was significant and higher than that of the relationship between (99)Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the Schwartz equation, which was not statistically significant. The correlation for Filler GFR was 0.42 (P = 0.03) and for Schwartz GFR was 0.21 (P = 0.28). Although we use renal scan determination of GFR as the best measure, and a creatinine-based formula as the most practical measure, perhaps a formula such as that published by Filler and Lepage, which is not dependent on anthropometric data, might be a more useful (and accurate) tool for establishing GFR in children with spina bifida.
 ...
PMID:Correlation between cystatin C- and renal scan-determined glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida. 1792 94

The aim is to review the tools for early detection of renal dysfunction after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Currently, the most widely used marker for detection of renal dysfunction involves measurement of GFR. Inulin clearance forms the "gold standard" method for measuring GFR; however, nuclear medicine methods ((51)Cr EDTA and (99)Tc DTPA isotope clearance studies) have replaced inulin clearance. The measurement of serum creatinine has a low sensitivity for the early detection of renal damage. The Schwartz formula using patient height and serum creatinine requires center-specific constants and has limitations associated with creatinine determination. These limitations may be overcome using a cystatin C-based GFR estimation. In diabetic nephropathy, and more recently in hemolytic uremic syndrome, microalbuminuria has been established as a useful screening tool for renal damage, while its predictive value in the transplantation setting needs to be established. All transplant recipients should be screened for hypertension. Early referral for ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring and involvement of pediatric nephrologists should be considered. All pediatric solid organ transplant recipients receiving CNI should be screened regularly for high blood pressure and early evidence of renal damage using either GFR scans or cystatin C-based GFR estimations.
 ...
PMID:How to monitor renal function in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. 1817 36


1 2 Next >>