Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:O76050 (neu)
 3,969 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We report the clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and ploidy findings of seven cases of serous borderline tumor of the paratestis. Mean patient age was 56 years (range, 14-77 years), and the clinical presentation was that of a testicular mass. Tumors ranged in size from 1 to 6 cm (mean, 3.5 cm). Six tumors arose from the tunica albuginea, and two of these tumors were intratesticular. One tumor arose from the tunica vaginalis. Serous borderline tumor of the paratestis is histologically identical to its ovarian counterpart. The tumors were cystic with numerous intracystic blunt papillae lined by stratified epithelial cells with minimal to mild cytologic atypia. Psammoma bodies were present in two cases. In all cases, the neoplastic cells stained strongly and diffusely for cytokeratin 7, estrogen receptor, and CD15, and six of seven cases were positive for progesterone receptor and MOC-31. The cells did not stain for cytokeratin 20, carcinoembryonic antigen, calretinin, and HER2/neu. Proliferative activity, as assessed by MIB-1 staining, ranged from 1.3% to 10% (mean, 5.5%). Five of six tumors were diploid, and one was tetraploid. Patients were treated by radical orchiectomy and followed up from 4 months to 18 years (mean, 48 months; median, 8.5 months). No recurrences or metastases occurred. Serous borderline tumor of the paratestis is morphologically and immunophenotypically identical to ovarian serous borderline tumor. To date, no serous borderline tumor of the paratestis reported in the literature or in our series has recurred or metastasized after resection.
 ...
PMID:Serous borderline tumor of the paratestis: a report of seven cases. 1122 8

Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the eyelid is a rare neoplasm with less than ten cases described. This report details another case, which shows further parallels to lobular carcinoma of the breast, and reviews the literature on this subject. A 73-year-old white female presented with diffuse induration of her left eyelids. Histopathology revealed a delicate infiltrate of epithelial cells scattered throughout the lid stroma in a non-destructive pattern. The cells were relatively monomorphous and showed only mild atypia and rare mitotic figures. Many had slightly granular amphophilic cytoplasms, others showed distinct signet ring cell morphology, and all were strongly positive for epithelial mucin. Immunomicroscopy showed strong reactivity for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), and was negative for Her-2/neu (erb-2) and cytokeratin 20. An extensive workup for other primary sites was negative. Orbital exenteration showed extensive involvement of both lids and soft tissue, including diffuse muscle and lacrimal gland infiltration. In the breast, signet ring cell carcinoma is considered a variant of lobular carcinoma. The delicate infiltrating pattern in our case and the ER+, PR+, GCDFP-15+, Her-2/neu-phenotype further strengthen this analogy. Together, these data also support apocrine differentiation of primary eyelid signet ring cell carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the eyelid: report of a case demonstrating further analogy to lobular carcinoma of the breast with a literature review. 1180 78

Mammary small cell carcinoma (SmCC) is a very rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis compared with other invasive carcinomas. We studied the histological and immunohistochemical profiles of two cases of mammary SmCC, and compared them with those of five cases of carcinoma with endocrine features (CEF) and five cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), to elucidate the correct diagnosis of mammary SmCC. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with antibodies against cytokeratins (CKAE1/AE3, CK34betaE12, CKCAM5.2, CK7, CK8, CK19, CK20), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), vimentin, CD10, neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM; CD56), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A, S-100 protein, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), E-cadherin, N-cadherin, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), p53, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), HER2/neu, bcl-2, synaptophysin, calcitonin and Leu7. SmCCs were diffusely and strongly positive for NCAM in comparison with CEFs and IDCs. SmCCs were negative for vimentin, whereas CEFs and IDCs were positive. Neuro-endocrine carcinomas, including SmCCs and CEFs, were diffusely and strongly positive for NSE, compared with IDCs. Moreover, neuroendocrine carcinomas were negative for CK34betaE12, CK20 and CD10, whereas IDCs were positive. Our study suggests that NCAM and vimentin are useful markers for the diagnosis of mammary SmCC. CK34betaE12, NSE, CD10, CK20 and chromogranin A appear to be useful for differentiating neuroendocrine carcinoma from IDCs.
 ...
PMID:Comparative study of primary mammary small cell carcinoma, carcinoma with endocrine features and invasive ductal carcinoma. 1501 Aug 80

The recent observation that studies of BRCA1-associated tumors contain a high proportion of medullary carcinomas and ductal carcinomas with medullary features has re-introduced pathologists to an old diagnostic problem. The term "medullary carcinoma" dates to the 19th century, but the modern entity was introduced in 1949 by Moore and Foote, who described a carcinoma with a lymphoid infiltrate, a favorable prognosis, and low frequency of metastasis. Almost three decades later, Ridolfi et al proposed specific criteria for diagnosis, resulting in an entity with an even more favorable prognosis and a lower incidence. The reproducibility and clinical relevance of the diagnosis have been questioned recently, and new criteria have been proposed and compared. The tumors typically express cytokeratin 7, often vimentin and S100-protein, but not cytokeratin 20. The usual ones are positive for p53 and negative for estrogen receptor, Her2/neu, and bcl-2. Medullary carcinomas express e-cadherin and beta-catenin more often than ordinary high-grade ductal carcinomas, and the former have genetic differences from the latter. The lymphoid infiltrate of medullary carcinomas is related to beta-actin fragments exposed by apoptotic cells. The present review discusses historical and recent developments and emphasizes diagnostic criteria.
 ...
PMID:Medullary carcinoma, provocative now as then. 1507 61

Not uncommonly, bile duct adenomas (BDAs) and hamartomas (BDHs) of the liver may be difficult to distinguish from metastatic well-differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. However, this distinction is critical for proper staging and patient management. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if a panel of immunohistochemical stains can help distinguish BDA or BDH from metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the liver. Routinely processed tissue sections from 25 BDA, 10 BDH, 25 metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas to the liver and 6 cases each of metastatic colorectal, breast, and lung adenocarcinomas were immunohistochemically stained for CK7, CK8/CK18, CK19, CK20, p53, p63, TAG-72, monoclonal CEA (mCEA), polyclonal CEA (pCEA), HER-2/neu, AMACR (alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase), Dpc4 (Smad4), and mesothelin. The slides were evaluated in a blinded fashion, and the results were compared between the benign and malignant lesions. Significantly more (P < 0.05) metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas were positive for CK20 (76%), p53 (60%), TAG-72 (88%), mCEA (92%), HER2/neu (40%), and mesothelin (64%) and showed loss of Dpc4 (44%), in comparison to BDA (CK20, 40%; p53, 0%; TAG-72, 0%; mCEA, 0%; HER2/neu, 12%; mesothelin, 0%; loss of Dpc4, 0%) or BDH (CK20, 10%; p53, 0%; TAG-72, 0%; mCEA, 10%; HER2/neu, 0%; mesothelin, 0%; loss of Dpc4, 0%). Of these antibodies, p53, TAG-72, mCEA, loss of Dpc4, and mesothelin had the highest specificity for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with mCEA having the highest sensitivity (92%). No significant differences were observed in the degree of CK7, CK8/CK18, CK19, or pCEA expression between the three types of lesions. Although none of the BDA or BDH was positive for either p63 or AMACR, two of the metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas (8%) were positive for each of these peptides (P > 0.05). For nonpancreatic adenocarcinomas, mCEA showed a reasonably high sensitivity and 100% specificity in the differential diagnosis versus BDA. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, TAG-72, mCEA, mesothelin, and loss of Dpc4 can help distinguish metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the liver from BDA or BDH. Although p63 and AMACR are also specific for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, their low sensitivity limits their use in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Immunohistochemistry can help distinguish metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas from bile duct adenomas and hamartomas of the liver. 1572 8

Distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma to the ovary is often difficult by histologic examination alone. Recently an immunohistochemical marker CDX-2 was found to be of considerable diagnostic value in establishing the gastrointestinal origin of metastatic tumors. The aim of this study was to determine whether CDX-2 can distinguish between these malignancies. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 57 primary ovarian tumors and 40 metastatic tumors to the ovary were immunostained for CDX-2, and results were compared to the ancillary immunohistochemical results for CK7/CK20, CEA, CA125, and her-2/neu. CDX-2 immunoreactivity was observed in most of metastatic carcinomas with colorectal (91%) and appendiceal (100%) origin, however CDX-2 was negative in all primary ovarian carcinomas, except for the mucinous subtype. Almost all primary ovarian carcinomas including the mucinous subtype showed diffuse and strong immunoexpression for CK7. CEA and CA125 were mainly found in metastatic and primary ovarian carcinoma, respectively. Her-2/neu overexpression was only noted in a small proportion of primary and metastatic ovarian carcinomas. These results suggest that CDX-2 is very useful immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the ovary from primary ovarian carcinoma, including the mucinous subtype. Furthermore, combination with CDX-2 and CK7 strengthen the differential diagnosis between these tumors.
 ...
PMID:The usefulness of CDX-2 for differentiating primary and metastatic ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study using a tissue microarray. 1610 Apr 58

Some examples of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) may be composed in part of signet ring cells. Such proliferations have been considered examples of pleomorphic LCIS based on pathological features of the more conventional component. However, the occurrence of LCIS composed entirely of signet ring cells is extraordinarily rare. This report describes an example of an in situ proliferation that was composed almost entirely (>95%) of signet ring cells, which was unassociated with an invasive carcinoma and which showed comedo-type necrosis. There was only focal lobulocentric distention by lesional cells, as is typical of classic LCIS. However, discrete, ductal-type cross-sectional profiles showed a purely intraepithelial proliferation of remarkably discohesive signet ring cells. The signet ring cells had intermediate-grade nuclear atypia, no significant mitotic activity and were positive for mucicarmine and PAS stains (the latter with and without diastase predigestion). The cells displayed marked immunoreactivity for high-molecular-weight keratin (stained by 34beta E12 antibody), MUC1, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, cytokeratin 7 and were negative for cytokeratin 20, E-cadherin, progesterone receptor and HER2/neu. It is concluded that this is an example of a purely signet ring variant of pleomorphic LCIS.
 ...
PMID:Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast composed almost entirely of signet ring cells. 1704 Feb 92

Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is considered to be an intraepithelial adenocarcinoma. Typically involved anatomical sites are the vulvar, perianal, perineal, scrotal and penile regions. Clinically, the lesions present as well-defined, moist, erythematous plaques usually accompanied by pruritus. An unusual feature of EMPD is its association with cutaneous, adnexal-structure adenocarcinomas and its association with internal malignancies. Histopathological examination shows epidermal acanthosis and elongated rete ridges. Paget's cells are large intraepidermal cells with a large nucleous and abundant pale cytoplasm. Recent studies of perianal and vulvar EMPD have described distinct immunohistochemical subtypes termed cutaneous and endodermal. Cutaneous EMPD is characteristically positive for cytokeratin (CK)7, negative for CK20, and positive for gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP)15+, whereas endodermal EMPD shows a CK7+ CK20+ GCDFP15- phenotype. Surgery remains the treatment of choice, with either wide surgical excision or Mohs' micrographic surgery. We present a case of EMPD with an underlying carcinoma, which combined immunohistochemical findings suggestive of the cutaneous subtype (positive for CK7, GCDFP15, mucin (MUC)1, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2/neu positive) and the endodermal subtype, frequently associated with internal malignancy (CK20, MUC2, CDX-2 positve); however, our patient had no associated internal malignancy.
 ...
PMID:Extramammary Paget's disease of the groin with underlying carcinoma and fatal outcome. 1848 20

The author reports herein two cases of ductal adenoma of the breast with an emphasis on immunohistochemistry. Both cases (patient 1, 58-year-old woman; patient 2, 78-year-old woman) were clinically suspected as carcinoma, and core biopsies were 'indeterminate' or 'suspicious for malignancy'. Excisional biopsy and wide excision were performed. Histologically, both cases were ductal adenomas composed of ductal epithelial cells and myoepithelial cells. Patient 1 had extensive apocrine metaplasia. Immunohistochemically, myoepithelial cells were noted in both cases; cytokeratin (CK) 14 and p63 were the most reliable myoepithelial markers, followed by CD10, alpha-smooth muscle actin and S100 protein. CK profile was as follows: positive expression of CK5/6, CK18, CK19, and high-molecular-weight CK, and negative expression of CK20. This CK profile was the same as that of non-tumorous ducts, suggesting that the CK profile does not alter in tumorigenesis. The tumor cells expressed p53 protein (case 1, positive cell percentage 5%; case 2, 7%), c-erbB2 (HER2/neu, 76%, 64%), CEA (5%, 0%), estrogen receptor (33%, 84%), but were negative for progesterone receptor. Ki-67 labeling was 5% and 3%, respectively. MUC apomucin expression was as follows: MUC1, 92%, 100%; MUC2, 0%, 0%; MUC5AC, 0%, 0%; and MUC6, 5%, 0%. Non-tumorous ducts expressed MUC1, but were negative for MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6.
 ...
PMID:Ductal adenoma of the breast: immunohistochemistry of two cases. 1906 57

The clinical presentation of skin adnexal tumors is nonspecific, and histologically; the differential diagnosis between primary cutaneous adnexal malignant carcinomas and metastatic tumors with a visceral origin can be challenging. We report a patient with history of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who presented with a 1-cm erythematous palpable lesion on her right calf. The biopsy showed an intradermal proliferation of malignant epithelioid cells with ductal differentiation, histologically compatible with metastatic breast carcinoma. However, the tumor cells labeled strongly and diffusely not only for pancytokeratin and cytokeratin (CK7) but also with p63 and CK5/6; carcinoembryonic antigen highlighted the ductal structures. No labeling was seen for mammoglobin, estrogen/progesterone, Her2-neu, S-100 protein, CK20, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and CDX-2. Based on the p63 and CK5/6 positivity, the differential diagnosis also included the possibility of a primary adnexal neoplasm and a complete excision was advised. The reexcision specimen revealed residual infiltrating dermal tumor and an overlying intraepithelial component with marked cytologic atypia and focal duct formation, diagnostic of a primary cutaneous adnexal tumor with ductal differentiation (porocarcinoma). Immunohistochemical studies (like p63 and CK5/6) can help to differentiate a primary cutaneous neoplasm from a metastatic lesion. This discrimination is of a paramount importance because a diagnostic error can result in profound implications for patient's assumed prognosis and subsequently applied therapy.
 ...
PMID:Cutaneous adnexal tumor with an unusual presentation--discussion of a potential diagnostic pitfall. 2043 90


1 2 3 Next >>