Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:A7KAX9 (grit)
 1,275 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The development of one-bottle dentin adhesive systems resulted in much optimism about providing simplified predictable esthetic dentistry. However, laboratory testing of these systems continues to provide significant variations between facilities. A potential effect of the number of applications was noted in this author's laboratory. This study evaluated the effect of doubling the manufacturer's recommended number of applications on shear bond strength to dentin. Ninety human molars were divided into groups of 15. The occlusal surfaces were finished to 600 grit SiC to provide a flat dentin bonding surface. Prime & Bond NT-Dyract, Optibond Solo-Elan and One Step-Dyract were evaluated. Each material was tested using: (1) the recommended number of adhesive applications and (2) twice the number of applications recommended. All adhesive applications were accomplished before light curing the adhesive. The specimens were thermocycled after one week of storage and tested in shear after two weeks. Specimens were also fabricated after adding Rhodamine D to the adhesive to allow for visualization using confocal microscopy. These teeth were sectioned and viewed 24 hours after fabrication. A t-test was used to compare differences within product groups. The results showed a significant effect (p < 0.001) when a double application of Prime & Bond NT was used. No difference was seen with Optibond Solo or One Step. All specimens appeared to have a uniform, glossy appearance of adhesive during fabrication. Therefore, the appearance of the adhesive after application may not be a reliable predictor of acceptable bonding. Confocal microscopy showed that single application Prime & Bond NT specimens did not exhibit a uniform thickness of adhesive across the entire interface. Tubule penetration and hybridization was apparent for all specimens.
 ...
PMID:The effect of double adhesive application on the shear bond strength to dentin of compomers using three one-bottle adhesive systems. 1135 76

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of repairs made with a composite (Herculite/Kerr) when two different surface treatment methods and two new generation bond materials were used. The bonding surfaces were prepared by sanding with 500-grit aluminum oxide sandpaper or air abrading with 25-micron aluminum oxide. Treated resin surfaces were acid etched, washed for one minute and air dried. Before adding the composite Herculite, either Optibond Solo (Kerr), Solobond M (Voco) bonding agent or no bonding agent (control group) was applied. The specimens were evaluated for shear bond strength after thermocycling. Fracture surfaces of some samples were also evaluated with SEM. Light microscope and SEM examination of fractured repair surfaces indicated mostly cohesive failure within the air-abraded group. The results showed that surface treatment with air abrasion plus Optibond Solo application had the highest shear bond strength.
 ...
PMID:The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. 1267 70

This study compared the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel of five self-etching primer/adhesive systems and one total-etch, one-bottle adhesive system. Sixty freshly extracted bovine incisors were mounted, polished to 600-grit and randomly assigned to six groups (n=10): Adper Prompt Self-Etch (AD), OptiBond Solo Plus Self-Etch (OP), AdheSE (AS), Tyrian (TY) and Clearfil SE Bond (SE) as self-etching systems; and Single Bond (SB) as a total-etch system (control). The respective hybrid composite was applied in a #5 gelatin capsule and light-cured. After 500 thermal cycles (5 degrees C-55 degrees C), the specimens were loaded in shear using an Instron at 5 mm/minute. Mean bond strengths were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by a Duncan's post-hoc test (p 0.05). SBS (mean +/- SD) were: AD=13.0(+/- 2.5); OP=5.6(+/-2.3);AS=12.6(+/-3.7); TY=7.6(+/-2.6); SE=17.6(+/-4.5) and SB=17.9(+/-4.4). ANOVA showed a significant difference at p<0.0001. Duncan's post-hoc test ranked this difference in three homogeneous subsets. Only SE showed similar enamel SBS compared to the total-etch system tested (SB). AD and AS were ranked in the intermediary Duncan's subset, while TY and OP resulted in the lowest SBS. SBS to enamel with self-etching primers may depend on its specific composition.
 ...
PMID:Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers. 1527 82

This study compared the shear bond strengths (SBS) to dentin achieved with six self-etching systems and one total-etch one-bottle adhesive system. Seventy freshly extracted bovine incisors were mounted in acrylic molds and the facial surfaces ground to expose middle dentin, which was polished by 600-grit sand paper. The incisors were randomly assigned to groups (n=10): Adper Prompt Self-Etch Adhesive, 3M-ESPE (ADP) and One-Up Bond F, Tokuyama (OU) as self-etching adhesives; AdheSE, Ivoclar-Vivadent (ADH), Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray (SE), Optibond Solo Plus-Self-Etch, Kerr (OP) as self-etching primers, Tyrian SPE, BISCO (TY) as a self-priming etchant and Single Bond, 3M-ESPE (SB), a total-etch one-bottle adhesive served as a control. All adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions with the respective hybrid composites. The specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles (5 degrees C to 55 degrees C), then loaded to failure in an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Mean bond strengths were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by a Duncan's post hoc test. SBS (mean +/- SD) were: ADH = 13.2 (+/- 5.3)b;ADP = 6.8 (+/- 4.4)c; OP = 18.2 (+/- 3.8)a; OU = 3.5 (+/- 1.5)c; SB = 12.2 (+/- 4.2)b; SE = 12.4 ( +/- 4.0)b; TY = 5.5 (+/- 1.4)c. Superscript letters indicate Duncan's homogeneous subsets. The self-etching adhesives OU and ADP and the self-priming etchant TY resulted in lower dentin SBS. OP resulted in the highest mean dentin SBS, while the other materials tested in this study (SE and ADH) presented similar dentin SBS to a total-etch one-bottle bonding system (SB).
 ...
PMID:Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. 1576 59

The microtensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to human enamel was evaluated utilizing four light-cure bonding agents. Human third molars were embedded in auto-cure acrylic and the buccal surfaces were sequentially abraded to 400 grit. Resin composite cylinders were then bonded using the four bonding systems according to the manufacturer's specifications. Each bonded tooth produced three to four longitudinal sections which were then laterally notched to give a square bond area (approximately 2.25 mm2). Specimens (n=10) were assigned to two groups: Group I was stored in distilled water at 37 degrees +/- 2 degrees C for seven days. Group II was stored in distilled water at 37 degrees +/- 2 degrees C for seven days, during which time it was thermocycled in hot and cold water baths for 1,000 cycles. In addition, a water sorption test was performed on three of the four adhesive systems. The microtensile bond strength of the conventional adhesive Optibond Solo Plus was significantly greater than that of the self-etching adhesives Tyrian SPE and Prompt L-Pop. Adhesive systems that were more hydrophilic tended to show lower bond strengths, especially after thermocycling.
 ...
PMID:Microtensile bond strengths of one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. 1585 5

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the dentine shear bond strength of five self-etching bonding agents with that of a total-etch dentine bonding agent (used as control). Sixty recently extracted third molar teeth were mounted in acrylic resin and the occlusal surfaces ground to expose superficial dentine. A standardised smear layer was created by polishing with wet 600-grit SiC paper. Products evaluated were Xeno III (XIII), Clearfil SE Bond (SE), ABF (ABF), Optibond Solo Self-etch (OS), Adper Prompt-L-Pop (PLP) and the control, Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP). Resin stubs were bonded to the dentine using the bonding agents according to manufacturer's instructions. Composite stubs were manufactured using an Ultradent jig and two increments of Z100, A1 shade composite. The bonds were subsequently stressed to failure with an Instron testing machine, operating at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data was statistically analysed using ANOVA (alpha < or = 0.05). The mean SBS (MPa) were: SBMP (Control) = 24.1 +/- 7.6; XIII = 17.3 +/- 4.1; SE = 26.2 +/- 7.8; ABF = 25.9 +/- 4.3; OS = 21.9 +/- 3.9 and PLP = 15.4 +/- 3.1. The shear bond strengths of both XIII and PLP to dentine were significantly lower than the control SBMP (p < 0.05). The remaining three products (SE, ABF and OS) displayed bond strengths comparable to the control (p > 0.05). Further research into cut (ground) and un-cut (un-ground) enamel shear bond strength and micro-leakage using these bonding agents are needed.
 ...
PMID:Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro shear bond strength evaluation. 1656 13

The aim of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of four acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems to enamel and dentin, and compare to that of an ethanol-based system used as control. Fifty human molars were bisected mesiodistally and the buccal and lingual surfaces were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC cylinders. The buccal surfaces were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces, while the lingual surfaces were ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces. All specimens were polished up to 600-grit sandpapers and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=20; 10 dentin specimens and 10 enamel specimens), according to the adhesive system used: One-Step (Bisco); Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer); Solobond M (Voco); TenureQuik w/F (Den-Mat) and OptiBond Solo Plus (Kerr) (control). Each adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The respective proprietary hybrid composite was applied in a gelatin capsule (d=4.3 mm) and light-cured for 40 s. The specimens were tested in shear strength with an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Bond strengths means were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc (p< or =0.05). Shear bond strength means (MPa) (+/-SD) to enamel and dentin were: Enamel: One-Step=11.3(+/-4.9); Gluma One Bond=16.3(+/-10.1); Solobond M=18.9(+/-4.5); TenureQuik w/F=18.7(+/-4.5) and OptiBond Solo Plus=16.4(+/-3.9); Dentin: One-Step=6.4(+/-2.8); Gluma One Bond=3.0(+/-3.4); Solobond M=10.6(+/-4.9); TenureQuik w/F=7.8(+/-3.9) and OptiBond Solo Plus=15.1(+/-8.9). In enamel, the adhesive systems had statistically similar bond strengths to each other (p>0.05). However, the ethanol-based system (OptiBond Solo Plus) showed significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the acetone-based systems (p< or =0.0001). In conclusion, the solvent type (acetone or ethanol) had no influence on enamel bond strength, but had great influence on dentin bonding, which should be taken into account when choosing the adhesive system.
 ...
PMID:Shear bond strength of acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems. 1672 63

The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of 3 simplified adhesive systems applied on shallow vs deep dentin. For superficial dentin, 30 human molars were sectioned with a diamond saw to expose dentin immediately below the dentoenamel junction. For deep dentin, 30 molars were sectioned 3 mm below the dentoenamel junction. The teeth were mounted, polished to 600-grit, and randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=10): Single Bonda and OptiBond Solo, total-etch adhesives, and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, a self-etching primer adhesive. Adhesives were applied, the restorative material Filtek Z250 inserted in a No. 5 gelatin capsule, and light-cured. After 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, shear bond strength was measured with an Instron at 5 mm/min. The data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc test. The results showed the following shear bond strengths (mean +/- SD in MPa): Single Bond/superficial dentin = 22.1 +/- 2.8; Single Bond/deep dentin = 14.2 +/- 7.0; OptiBond Solo/superficial dentin = 18.9 +/- 4.1; OptiBond Solo/deep dentin = 18.4 +/- 4.8; Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/superficial dentin = 21.0 +/- 7.4; Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/deep dentin = 17.6 +/- 5.9. There were no significant differences between mean shear bond strength for the factor "adhesive system" (P>.822). The Duncan's test showed that Single Bond resulted in higher shear bond strength on superficial dentin than on deep dentin. The mean shear bond strength for Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and OptiBond Solo were not influenced by dentin depth. When data were pooled for dentin depth, deep dentin resulted in statistically lower bond strengths than superficial dentin (P<.01). The influence of dentin depth on shear bond strength depends on the specific composition of the dentin adhesive.
 ...
PMID:Dentin bond strengths of simplified adhesives: effect of dentin depth. 1679 42

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to human, buccal dentine, using four one-bottle dentine bonding systems. Eighty recently extracted human molar teeth were embedded in metal rings by means of self-curing acrylic resin. The projecting buccal surfaces were ground wet on 600 grit silicone carbide paper in order to expose superficial dentine. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (N=20): 1=Prime&tBond 2.1 (PB, Dentsply); 2=Scotchbond 1 (SB, 3M); 3=Optibond Solo (OS, Kerr) and 4=Syntac Single Component (SY, Vivadent). The dentine surfaces were etched, treated with one of the four dentine bonding systems, and cylinders of matching composites were then bonded to the surfaces by means of a silicone rubber split mould. All specimens were stored for 24 hours under water at 37 degrees C. The bonds were then stressed to failure with an Instron testing machine, operating at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were statistically analysed (Kruskall-Wallis). The mean SBS (MPa) were: PB = 12.5 +/- 2.0; SB = 16.2 +/- 1.9; OS = 17.4 +/- 3.1 and SY= 8.1 +/- 1.9. There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001) between the mean of SY and the other 3 groups, and also between PB and the other groups. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.244) between the SBS of OS and SB. SY demonstrated the lowest SBS.
 ...
PMID:Shear bond strength of one-bottle dentine bonding systems. 1689 11

This study examined the effect of different enamel and dentin conditioning times on the shear bond strength of a resin composite using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems. Shear bond strengths were determined following treatment of flat ground human enamel and dentin surfaces (4000 grit) with 11 adhesive systems: 1) AdheSE One Viva Pen-(ASE), 2) Adper Prompt L-Pop-(PLP), 3) Adper Single Bond Plus-(SBP), 4) Clearfil SE Bond-(CSE), 5) Clearfil S3 Bond-(CS3), 6) OptiBond All-In-One-(OBA), 7) OptiBond Solo Plus-(OBS), 8) Peak SE-(PSE), 9) Xeno IV-(X4), 10) Xeno V-(X5) and 11) XP Bond-(XPB) using recommended treatment times and an extended treatment time of 60 seconds (n = 10/group). Composite (Z100) to enamel and dentin bond strengths (24 hours) were determined using Ultradent fixtures and debonded with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed with a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's LSD post hoc test. The highest shear bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were achieved by the three etch-and-rinse systems at both the recommended treatment time (SBP-40.5 +/- 6.1; XPB-38.7 +/- 3.7; OBS- 35.2 +/- 6.2) and the extended treatment time (SBP-44.5 +/- 8.1; XPB-40.9 +/- 5.7; OBS-35.0 +/- 4.5). Extending the enamel treatment time did not produce a significant change (p > 0.05) in bond strength for the 11 adhesive systems tested. OBS generated the highest (46.2 +/- 7.9) bond strengths to dentin at the recommended treatment time. At the extended treatment time X4 (42.2 +/- 11.7), PSE (42.1 +/- 9.7) and OBS (41.4 +/- 8.0) produced the highest bond strengths to dentin. The bond strength change between recommend and extended treatment times was significant (p < 0.05) for PSE, but the other 10 systems did not exhibit any significant change.
 ...
PMID:Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times. 2016 18


1